Quantitative U S Fund Manager Performance Evaluation
| GQLVX Fund | USD 14.25 0.02 0.14% |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Contained
Weak | Strong |
Quantitative U S currently ranks below 6% of comparable funds and fund portfolios when recent risk-adjusted returns are measured across a 90-day horizon. The main point is that return merits judgment together with the volatility required to produce it. Quantitative is delivering weak return efficiency relative to its risk profile. Current price dislocation suggests continued short-term downside pressure for investors. Learn More
Relative Risk vs. Return Landscape
If you had invested $ 1,372 in Quantitative U S on January 28, 2026 and sold it today you would have earned a total of $ 53.00 from holding Quantitative U S or generated 3.86% return on investment over 90 days. Quantitative U S is currently producing a 0.0634% return and carries 0.803% volatility of returns over 90 trading days. Stated differently, Quantitative is more volatile than roughly 93% of traded mutual funds, and GQLVX is outperformed by 99% of traded instruments in expected return over the next 90 trading days. Expected Return |
| Risk |
Target Price Odds to finish over Current Price
Price convergence toward a historical mean is a well-documented pattern for funds like Quantitative Mutual Fund. Although this tendency is a useful forecasting input, some instruments remain persistently mispriced before market correction.
| Current Price | Horizon | Target Price | Odds moving above the current price in 90 days |
| 14.25 | 90 days | 14.25 | about 8.18 |
Our distribution model estimates the likelihood of Quantitative moving above the current price in 90 days from now at about 8.18 . Past return patterns over this horizon reflect a distribution that has favored above-current-price scenarios. (This Quantitative U S distribution emphasizes the price range most consistent with recent behavior in Quantitative Mutual Fund over a 90-day period).
Quantitative Price Density |
| Price |
Predictive Modules for Quantitative
Investors apply quantitative and fundamental models to forecast Quantitative U S within the fund market. Combining results from different methods frames the confidence level warranted by Quantitative U S predictions.Statistical evidence for mean reversion in Quantitative's appears through its tendency to revert after extreme valuations. Under mean reversion theory, Quantitative's price extremes are viewed as temporary dislocations that may self-correct.
Primary Risk Indicators
Significant market corrections and rallies over the last two decades have made the mutual fund market challenging for Quantitative investors. Dramatic market moves have periodically reshaped the risk landscape for holders of Quantitative U S.α | Alpha over Dow Jones | 0.04 | |
β | Beta against Dow Jones | 0.73 | |
σ | Overall volatility | 0.28 | |
Ir | Information ratio | 0.06 |
Investor Alerts and Insights
Tracking Quantitative through automated alerts focuses attention on the most impactful fund developments. Reviewing Quantitative U S notifications is an efficient way to stay current on technical patterns and fundamental changes.| Latest headline from news.google.com: Wall Street regulators jointly propose to trim Biden-era private fund reporting rules - Reuters |
Quantitative Fundamentals Growth
Market participants price Quantitative Mutual Fund based on their assessment of Quantitative's financial trajectory. Revenue and earnings growth, profitability metrics, and debt levels form the core fundamentals driving Quantitative Mutual Fund.
| Total Asset | 2.58 M | |||
Performance Metrics & Calculation Methodology
Return quality for Quantitative measures how stable NAV growth has been across rolling measurement windows. High return quality implies that outcomes are not dominated by a small number of extreme observations.
Quantitative U S metrics are compiled from fund disclosures and market reference feeds and normalized before display. Return and risk statistics are calculated from historical price series.
Editorial review and methodology oversight provided by: Ellen Johnson, Member of Macroaxis Editorial Board