Lifetime Brands Net Income vs. Number Of Employees
| LCUT Stock | USD 3.42 0.05 1.48% |
Net Loss | First Reported 1989-03-31 | Previous Quarter -39.7 M | Current Value -1.2 M | Quarterly Volatility 7.4 M |
| Current Value | Last Year | Change From Last Year | 10 Year Trend | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Profit Margin | 0.45 | 0.44 |
|
|
For Lifetime Brands profitability analysis, we use financial ratios and fundamental drivers that measure the ability of Lifetime Brands to generate income relative to revenue, assets, operating costs, and current equity. These fundamental indicators attest to how well Lifetime Brands utilizes its assets to generate profit and value for its shareholders. The profitability module also shows relationships between Lifetime Brands's most relevant fundamental drivers. It provides multiple suggestions of what could affect the performance of Lifetime Brands over time as well as its relative position and ranking within its peers.
Check out Correlation Analysis. Is there potential for Housewares & Specialties market expansion? Will Lifetime introduce new products? Factors like these will boost the valuation of Lifetime Brands. Expected growth trajectory for Lifetime significantly influences the price investors are willing to assign. Understanding fair value requires weighing current performance against future potential. All the valuation information about Lifetime Brands listed above have to be considered, but the key to understanding future value is determining which factors weigh more heavily than others.
Quarterly Earnings Growth 2.432 | Dividend Share 0.17 | Earnings Share (1.67) | Revenue Per Share | Quarterly Revenue Growth (0.07) |
Lifetime Brands's market price often diverges from its book value, the accounting figure shown on Lifetime's balance sheet. Smart investors calculate Lifetime Brands' intrinsic value - its true economic worth - which may differ significantly from both market price and book value. Analysts utilize numerous techniques to assess fundamental value, seeking to purchase shares when trading prices fall beneath estimated intrinsic worth. Since Lifetime Brands' trading price responds to investor sentiment, macroeconomic conditions, and market psychology, it can swing far from fundamental value.
Understanding that Lifetime Brands' value differs from its trading price is crucial, as each reflects different aspects of the company. Evaluating whether Lifetime Brands represents a sound investment requires analyzing earnings trends, revenue growth, technical signals, industry dynamics, and expert forecasts. However, Lifetime Brands' price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.
Lifetime Brands Number Of Employees vs. Net Income Fundamental Analysis
Comparative valuation techniques use various fundamental indicators to help in determining Lifetime Brands's current stock value. Our valuation model uses many indicators to compare Lifetime Brands value to that of its competitors to determine the firm's financial worth. Lifetime Brands is rated second overall in net income category among its peers. It is rated below average in number of employees category among its peers . At this time, Lifetime Brands' Net Loss is comparatively stable compared to the past year. Comparative valuation analysis is a catch-all technique that is used if you cannot value Lifetime Brands by discounting back its dividends or cash flows. It compares the stock's price multiples to nearest competition to determine if the stock is relatively undervalued or overvalued.Lifetime Number Of Employees vs. Net Income
Net income is the profit of a company for the reporting period, which is derived after taking revenues and gains and subtracting all expenses and losses. Net income is one of the most-watched numbers by money managers as well as individual investors.
Lifetime Brands |
| = | (15.16 M) |
Because income is reported on the Income Statement of a company and is measured in dollars some investors prefer to use Profit Margin, which measures income as a percentage of sales.
Number of Employees shows the total number of permanent full time and part time employees working for a given company and processed through its payroll.
Lifetime Brands |
| = | 1.18 K |
Employee typically refers to an individual working under a contract of employment, whether oral or written, express or implied, and has recognized his or her rights and duties. Most officers of corporations are included as employees and contractors are generally excluded.
Lifetime Number Of Employees vs Competition
Lifetime Brands is rated below average in number of employees category among its peers. The total workforce of Consumer Discretionary industry is now estimated at about 32,027. Lifetime Brands holds roughly 1,180 in number of employees claiming about 4% of stocks in Consumer Discretionary industry.
Lifetime Brands Profitability Projections
The most important aspect of a successful company is its ability to generate a profit. For investors in Lifetime Brands, profitability is also one of the essential criteria for including it into their portfolios because, without profit, Lifetime Brands will eventually generate negative long term returns. The profitability progress is the general direction of Lifetime Brands' change in net profit over the period of time. It can combine multiple indicators of Lifetime Brands, where stable trends show no significant progress. An accelerating trend is seen as positive, while a decreasing one is unfavorable. A rising trend means that profits are rising, and operational efficiency may be rising as well. A decreasing trend is a sign of poor performance and may indicate upcoming losses.
| Last Reported | Projected for Next Year | ||
| Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income | -16.5 M | -17.3 M | |
| Operating Income | 31.1 M | 17.3 M | |
| Income Before Tax | -10.7 M | -10.1 M | |
| Total Other Income Expense Net | -35 M | -33.3 M | |
| Net Loss | -13.6 M | -13 M | |
| Income Tax Expense | 3.8 M | 5.6 M | |
| Net Loss | -5.5 M | -5.3 M | |
| Net Loss | -13.6 M | -13 M | |
| Non Operating Income Net Other | -6.7 M | -6.4 M | |
| Interest Income | 23.4 M | 11.7 M | |
| Net Interest Income | -20 M | -21 M | |
| Change To Netincome | 15.3 M | 9.1 M | |
| Net Loss | (0.81) | (0.77) | |
| Income Quality | (1.41) | (1.34) | |
| Net Income Per E B T | 1.15 | 0.78 |
Lifetime Profitability Driver Comparison
Profitability drivers are factors that can directly affect your investment outlook on Lifetime Brands. Investors often realize that things won't turn out the way they predict. There are maybe way too many unforeseen events and contingencies during the holding period of Lifetime Brands position where the market behavior may be hard to predict, tax policy changes, gold or oil price hikes, calamities change, and many others. The question is, are you prepared for these unexpected events? Although some of these situations are obviously beyond your control, you can still follow the important profit indicators to know where you should focus on when things like this occur. Below are some of the Lifetime Brands' important profitability drivers and their relationship over time.
Lifetime Brands Earnings Estimation Breakdown
The calculation of Lifetime Brands' earning per share is based on the data from the past 12 consecutive months, used for reporting the company's financial figures. The next projected EPS of Lifetime Brands is estimated to be 0.108325 with the future projection ranging from a low of 0.065 to a high of 0.1475. Please be aware that this consensus of annual earnings estimates for Lifetime Brands is based on EPS before non-recurring items and includes expenses related to employee stock options.Last Reported EPS
0.07 Lowest | Expected EPS | 0.15 Highest |
Lifetime Brands Earnings Projection Consensus
Suppose the current estimates of Lifetime Brands' value are higher than the current market price of the Lifetime Brands stock. In this case, investors may conclude that Lifetime Brands is overpriced and will exhibit bullish sentiment. On the other hand, if the present value is lower than the stock price, analysts may conclude that the market undervalues the equity. These scenarios may suggest that the market is not as efficient as it should be at the estimation time, and Lifetime Brands' stock will quickly adjusts to the new information provided by the consensus estimate.
| Number of Analysts | Historical Accuracy | Last Reported EPS | Estimated EPS for 31st of December 2026 | Current EPS (TTM) | |
| 2 | 54.29% | 0.0 | 0.108325 | -1.67 |
Lifetime Brands Earnings History
Earnings estimate consensus by Lifetime Brands analysts from Wall Street is used by the market to judge Lifetime Brands' stock performance. Investors also use these earnings estimates to evaluate and project the stock performance into the future in order to make their investment decisions. However, we suggest analyzing not only Lifetime Brands' upcoming profit reports and earnings-per-share forecasts but also comparing them to our different valuation methods.Lifetime Brands Quarterly Gross Profit |
|
Sophisticated investors, who have witnessed many market ups and downs, anticipate that the market will even out over time. This tendency of Lifetime Brands' price to converge to an average value over time is called mean reversion. However, historically, high market prices usually discourage investors that believe in mean reversion to invest, while low prices are viewed as an opportunity to buy.
Lifetime Brands Earnings per Share Projection vs Actual
Actual Earning per Share of Lifetime Brands refers to what the company shows during its earnings calls or quarterly reports. The Expected EPS is what analysts covering Lifetime Brands predict the company's earnings will be in the future. The higher the earnings per share of Lifetime Brands, the better is its profitability. While calculating the Earning per Share, we use the weighted ratio, as the number of shares outstanding can change over time.Lifetime Brands Estimated Months Earnings per Share
For an investor who is primarily interested in generating an income out of investing in entities such as Lifetime Brands, the EPS ratio can tell if the company is intending to increase its current dividend. Although EPS is an essential tool for investors, it should not be used in isolation. EPS of Lifetime Brands should always be considered in relation to other companies to make a more educated investment decision.Lifetime Quarterly Analyst Estimates and Surprise Metrics
Earnings surprises can significantly impact Lifetime Brands' stock price both in the short term and over time. Negative earnings surprises usually result in a price decline. However, it has been seen that positive earnings surprises lead to an immediate rise in a stock's price and a gradual increase over time. This is why we often hear news about some companies beating earning projections. Financial analysts spend a large amount of time predicting earnings per share (EPS) along with other important future indicators. Many analysts use forecasting models, management guidance, and additional fundamental information to derive an EPS estimate.
| Reported | Fiscal Date | Estimated EPS | Reported EPS | Surprise | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
null | null | null | null | null | 0 | ||
null | null | null | null | null | 0 | ||
2025-11-06 | 2025-09-30 | 0.18 | 0.11 | -0.07 | 38 | ||
2025-08-07 | 2025-06-30 | -0.12 | -1.83 | -1.71 | 1425 | ||
2025-05-07 | 2025-03-31 | -0.095 | -0.25 | -0.155 | 163 | ||
2025-03-10 | 2024-12-31 | 0.43 | 0.55 | 0.12 | 27 | ||
2024-11-07 | 2024-09-30 | 0.39 | 0.21 | -0.18 | 46 | ||
2024-08-08 | 2024-06-30 | -0.03 | -0.03 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2024-05-09 | 2024-03-31 | -0.14 | -0.15 | -0.01 | 7 | ||
2024-03-12 | 2023-12-31 | 0.33 | 0.29 | -0.04 | 12 | ||
2023-11-09 | 2023-09-30 | 0.25 | 0.36 | 0.11 | 44 | ||
2023-08-03 | 2023-06-30 | -0.15 | -0.02 | 0.13 | 86 | ||
2023-05-10 | 2023-03-31 | -0.2 | -0.12 | 0.08 | 40 | ||
2023-03-09 | 2022-12-31 | 0.14 | 0.22 | 0.08 | 57 | ||
2022-11-03 | 2022-09-30 | 0.32 | 0.16 | -0.16 | 50 | ||
2022-08-04 | 2022-06-30 | 0.05 | -0.14 | -0.19 | 380 | ||
2022-05-05 | 2022-03-31 | 0.07 | 0.06 | -0.01 | 14 | ||
2022-03-09 | 2021-12-31 | 0.48 | 0.65 | 0.17 | 35 | ||
2021-11-04 | 2021-09-30 | 0.4 | 0.61 | 0.21 | 52 | ||
2021-08-05 | 2021-06-30 | -0.06 | 0.28 | 0.34 | 566 | ||
2021-05-06 | 2021-03-31 | -0.22 | 0.13 | 0.35 | 159 | ||
2021-03-10 | 2020-12-31 | 0.56 | 0.7 | 0.14 | 25 | ||
2020-11-05 | 2020-09-30 | 0.44 | 0.65 | 0.21 | 47 | ||
2020-08-06 | 2020-06-30 | -0.29 | -0.15 | 0.14 | 48 | ||
2020-05-21 | 2020-03-31 | -0.18 | -0.27 | -0.09 | 50 | ||
2020-03-11 | 2019-12-31 | 0.79 | 0.99 | 0.2 | 25 | ||
2019-11-07 | 2019-09-30 | 0.42 | -0.13 | -0.55 | 130 | ||
2019-08-08 | 2019-06-30 | -0.14 | -0.22 | -0.08 | 57 | ||
2019-05-09 | 2019-03-31 | -0.41 | -0.19 | 0.22 | 53 | ||
2019-03-14 | 2018-12-31 | 0.77 | 0.55 | -0.22 | 28 | ||
2018-11-08 | 2018-09-30 | 0.76 | 0.4 | -0.36 | 47 | ||
2018-08-06 | 2018-06-30 | -0.08 | -0.28 | -0.2 | 250 | ||
2018-05-08 | 2018-03-31 | -0.18 | -0.5 | -0.32 | 177 | ||
2018-03-15 | 2017-12-31 | 0.79 | 0.47 | -0.32 | 40 | ||
2017-11-09 | 2017-09-30 | 0.67 | 0.37 | -0.3 | 44 | ||
2017-08-08 | 2017-06-30 | 0.06 | -0.05 | -0.11 | 183 | ||
2017-05-09 | 2017-03-31 | -0.13 | -0.11 | 0.02 | 15 | ||
2017-03-13 | 2016-12-31 | 0.7 | 1.03 | 0.33 | 47 | ||
2016-11-08 | 2016-09-30 | 0.51 | 0.51 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2016-08-09 | 2016-06-30 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2016-05-10 | 2016-03-31 | -0.11 | -0.24 | -0.13 | 118 | ||
2016-03-11 | 2015-12-31 | 0.64 | 0.75 | 0.11 | 17 | ||
2015-11-05 | 2015-09-30 | 0.57 | 0.41 | -0.16 | 28 | ||
2015-08-06 | 2015-06-30 | -0.08 | -0.04 | 0.04 | 50 | ||
2015-05-07 | 2015-03-31 | -0.12 | -0.14 | -0.02 | 16 | ||
2015-03-12 | 2014-12-31 | 0.7 | 0.59 | -0.11 | 15 | ||
2014-11-06 | 2014-09-30 | 0.56 | 0.41 | -0.15 | 26 | ||
2014-08-05 | 2014-06-30 | -0.09 | -0.23 | -0.14 | 155 | ||
2014-05-01 | 2014-03-31 | -0.01 | -0.13 | -0.12 | 1200 | ||
2014-03-13 | 2013-12-31 | 0.75 | 0.76 | 0.01 | 1 | ||
2013-11-07 | 2013-09-30 | 0.51 | 0.47 | -0.04 | 7 | ||
2013-08-08 | 2013-06-30 | 0.08 | -0.08 | -0.16 | 200 | ||
2013-05-02 | 2013-03-31 | 0.12 | -0.05 | -0.17 | 141 | ||
2013-03-14 | 2012-12-31 | 0.55 | 0.67 | 0.12 | 21 | ||
2012-11-08 | 2012-09-30 | 0.64 | 0.4 | -0.24 | 37 | ||
2012-08-07 | 2012-06-30 | 0.2 | 0.08 | -0.12 | 60 | ||
2012-05-03 | 2012-03-31 | -0.04 | 0.15 | 0.19 | 475 | ||
2012-03-08 | 2011-12-31 | 0.75 | 0.57 | -0.18 | 24 | ||
2011-11-08 | 2011-09-30 | 0.58 | 0.67 | 0.09 | 15 | ||
2011-08-08 | 2011-06-30 | 0.05 | 0.17 | 0.12 | 240 | ||
2011-05-05 | 2011-03-31 | 0.1 | -0.08 | -0.18 | 180 | ||
2011-03-10 | 2010-12-31 | 0.52 | 0.63 | 0.11 | 21 | ||
2010-11-04 | 2010-09-30 | 0.43 | 0.52 | 0.09 | 20 | ||
2010-08-05 | 2010-06-30 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2010-05-06 | 2010-03-31 | -0.05 | 0.06 | 0.11 | 220 | ||
2010-03-11 | 2009-12-31 | 0.35 | 0.41 | 0.06 | 17 | ||
2009-11-05 | 2009-09-30 | 0.41 | 0.4 | -0.01 | 2 | ||
2009-08-06 | 2009-06-30 | -0.28 | -0.1 | 0.18 | 64 | ||
2009-05-07 | 2009-03-31 | -0.39 | -0.43 | -0.04 | 10 | ||
2009-03-17 | 2008-12-31 | 0.12 | -0.01 | -0.13 | 108 | ||
2008-11-06 | 2008-09-30 | 0.53 | 0.19 | -0.34 | 64 | ||
2008-08-07 | 2008-06-30 | -0.34 | -0.26 | 0.08 | 23 | ||
2008-05-08 | 2008-03-31 | -0.19 | -0.36 | -0.17 | 89 | ||
2008-03-10 | 2007-12-31 | 0.6 | 0.33 | -0.27 | 45 | ||
2007-11-06 | 2007-09-30 | 0.67 | 0.47 | -0.2 | 29 | ||
2007-08-02 | 2007-06-30 | -0.12 | -0.15 | -0.03 | 25 | ||
2007-05-08 | 2007-03-31 | -0.1 | -0.1 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2007-03-06 | 2006-12-31 | 0.61 | 0.62 | 0.01 | 1 | ||
2006-11-06 | 2006-09-30 | 0.5 | 0.45 | -0.05 | 10 | ||
2006-08-03 | 2006-06-30 | -0.11 | -0.11 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2006-05-04 | 2006-03-31 | 0.05 | 0.07 | 0.02 | 40 | ||
2006-03-02 | 2005-12-31 | 0.61 | 0.6 | -0.01 | 1 | ||
2005-11-03 | 2005-09-30 | 0.33 | 0.4 | 0.07 | 21 | ||
2005-08-03 | 2005-06-30 | 0.08 | 0.12 | 0.04 | 50 | ||
2005-05-05 | 2005-03-31 | 0.03 | 0.09 | 0.06 | 200 | ||
2005-03-01 | 2004-12-31 | 0.51 | 0.47 | -0.04 | 7 | ||
2004-11-03 | 2004-09-30 | 0.34 | 0.23 | -0.11 | 32 | ||
2004-07-28 | 2004-06-30 | 0.1 | 0.02 | -0.08 | 80 | ||
1998-10-22 | 1998-09-30 | 0.28 | 0.29 | 0.01 | 3 | ||
1997-07-23 | 1997-06-30 | 0.12 | 0.12 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
1997-05-30 | 1997-03-31 | 0.1 | 0.11 | 0.01 | 10 | ||
1996-02-22 | 1995-12-31 | 0.25 | 0.14 | -0.11 | 44 | ||
1995-10-25 | 1995-09-30 | 0.18 | 0.19 | 0.01 | 5 | ||
1995-07-26 | 1995-06-30 | 0.13 | 0.08 | -0.05 | 38 | ||
1995-04-25 | 1995-03-31 | 0.14 | 0.14 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
1995-03-01 | 1994-12-31 | 0.26 | 0.26 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
1994-10-26 | 1994-09-30 | 0.18 | 0.19 | 0.01 | 5 | ||
1994-07-25 | 1994-06-30 | 0.11 | 0.11 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
1994-04-28 | 1994-03-31 | 0.11 | 0.13 | 0.02 | 18 | ||
1994-02-18 | 1993-12-31 | 0.26 | 0.23 | -0.03 | 11 | ||
1993-10-25 | 1993-09-30 | 0.13 | 0.15 | 0.02 | 15 | ||
1993-07-26 | 1993-06-30 | 0.09 | 0.09 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
1993-04-27 | 1993-03-31 | 0.1 | 0.11 | 0.01 | 10 | ||
1993-01-29 | 1992-12-31 | 0.19 | 0.19 | 0.0 | 0 |
Use Lifetime Brands in pair-trading
One of the main advantages of trading using pair correlations is that every trade hedges away some risk. Because there are two separate transactions required, even if Lifetime Brands position performs unexpectedly, the other equity can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Lifetime Brands will appreciate offsetting losses from the drop in the long position's value.Lifetime Brands Pair Trading
Lifetime Brands Pair Trading Analysis
The ability to find closely correlated positions to Lifetime Brands could be a great tool in your tax-loss harvesting strategies, allowing investors a quick way to find a similar-enough asset to replace Lifetime Brands when you sell it. If you don't do this, your portfolio allocation will be skewed against your target asset allocation. So, investors can't just sell and buy back Lifetime Brands - that would be a violation of the tax code under the "wash sale" rule, and this is why you need to find a similar enough asset and use the proceeds from selling Lifetime Brands to buy it.
The correlation of Lifetime Brands is a statistical measure of how it moves in relation to other instruments. This measure is expressed in what is known as the correlation coefficient, which ranges between -1 and +1. A perfect positive correlation (i.e., a correlation coefficient of +1) implies that as Lifetime Brands moves, either up or down, the other security will move in the same direction. Alternatively, perfect negative correlation means that if Lifetime Brands moves in either direction, the perfectly negatively correlated security will move in the opposite direction. If the correlation is 0, the equities are not correlated; they are entirely random. A correlation greater than 0.8 is generally described as strong, whereas a correlation less than 0.5 is generally considered weak.
Correlation analysis and pair trading evaluation for Lifetime Brands can also be used as hedging techniques within a particular sector or industry or even over random equities to generate a better risk-adjusted return on your portfolios.Use Investing Themes to Complement your Lifetime Brands position
In addition to having Lifetime Brands in your portfolios, you can quickly add positions using our predefined set of ideas and optimize them against your very unique investing style. A single investing idea is a collection of funds, stocks, ETFs, or cryptocurrencies that are programmatically selected from a pull of investment themes. After you determine your investment opportunity, you can then find an optimal portfolio that will maximize potential returns on the chosen idea or minimize its exposure to market volatility.Did You Try This Idea?
Run Natural Foods Thematic Idea Now
Natural Foods
Companies producing natural foods including dairy products and different types of meets. The Natural Foods theme has 44 constituents at this time.
You can either use a buy-and-hold strategy to lock in the entire theme or actively trade it to take advantage of the short-term price volatility of individual constituents. Macroaxis can help you discover thousands of investment opportunities in different asset classes. In addition, you can partner with us for reliable portfolio optimization as you plan to utilize Natural Foods Theme or any other thematic opportunities.
| View All Next | Launch |
Additional Tools for Lifetime Stock Analysis
When running Lifetime Brands' price analysis, check to measure Lifetime Brands' market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Lifetime Brands is operating at the current time. Most of Lifetime Brands' value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Lifetime Brands' future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Lifetime Brands' price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Lifetime Brands to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.