Rogers Communications Net Income vs. Price To Earning
| RCI Stock | USD 40.35 0.62 1.51% |
Net Income | First Reported 1994-03-31 | Previous Quarter 5.8 B | Current Value 743 M | Quarterly Volatility 544.8 M |
| Current Value | Last Year | Change From Last Year | 10 Year Trend | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Profit Margin | 0.22 | 0.2311 |
|
| |||||
| Operating Profit Margin | 0.18 | 0.2311 |
|
|
For Rogers Communications profitability analysis, we use financial ratios and fundamental drivers that measure the ability of Rogers Communications to generate income relative to revenue, assets, operating costs, and current equity. These fundamental indicators attest to how well Rogers Communications utilizes its assets to generate profit and value for its shareholders. The profitability module also shows relationships between Rogers Communications's most relevant fundamental drivers. It provides multiple suggestions of what could affect the performance of Rogers Communications over time as well as its relative position and ranking within its peers.
Check out Your Equity Center. Is there potential for Wireless Telecommunication Services market expansion? Will Rogers introduce new products? Factors like these will boost the valuation of Rogers Communications. Anticipated expansion of Rogers directly elevates investor willingness to pay premium valuations. Understanding fair value requires weighing current performance against future potential. All the valuation information about Rogers Communications listed above have to be considered, but the key to understanding future value is determining which factors weigh more heavily than others.
Quarterly Earnings Growth 0.37 | Dividend Share 2 | Earnings Share 9.32 | Revenue Per Share | Quarterly Revenue Growth 0.126 |
Understanding Rogers Communications requires distinguishing between market price and book value, where the latter reflects Rogers's accounting equity. The concept of intrinsic value - what Rogers Communications' is actually worth based on fundamentals - guides informed investors toward better entry and exit points. Analysts utilize numerous techniques to assess fundamental value, seeking to purchase shares when trading prices fall beneath estimated intrinsic worth. Market sentiment, economic cycles, and investor behavior can push Rogers Communications' price substantially above or below its fundamental value.
It's important to distinguish between Rogers Communications' intrinsic value and market price, which are calculated using different methodologies. Investment decisions regarding Rogers Communications should consider multiple factors including financial performance, growth metrics, competitive position, and professional analysis. In contrast, Rogers Communications' trading price reflects the actual exchange value where willing buyers and sellers reach mutual agreement.
Rogers Communications Price To Earning vs. Net Income Fundamental Analysis
Comparative valuation techniques use various fundamental indicators to help in determining Rogers Communications's current stock value. Our valuation model uses many indicators to compare Rogers Communications value to that of its competitors to determine the firm's financial worth. Rogers Communications is rated third in net income category among its peers. It is rated below average in price to earning category among its peers . The ratio of Net Income to Price To Earning for Rogers Communications is about 388,734,876 . As of now, Rogers Communications' Net Income is increasing as compared to previous years. The reason why the comparable model can be used in almost all circumstances is due to the vast number of multiples that can be utilized, such as the price-to-earnings (P/E), price-to-book (P/B), price-to-sales (P/S), price-to-cash flow (P/CF), and many others. The P/E ratio is the most commonly used of these ratios because it focuses on the Rogers Communications' earnings, one of the primary drivers of an investment's value.Rogers Price To Earning vs. Net Income
Net income is the profit of a company for the reporting period, which is derived after taking revenues and gains and subtracting all expenses and losses. Net income is one of the most-watched numbers by money managers as well as individual investors.
Rogers Communications |
| = | 6.89 B |
Because income is reported on the Income Statement of a company and is measured in dollars some investors prefer to use Profit Margin, which measures income as a percentage of sales.
Price to Earnings ratio is typically used for current valuation of a company and is one of the most popular ratios that investors monitor daily. Holding a low PE stock is less risky because when a company's profitability falls, it is likely that earnings will also go down as well. In other words, if you start from a lower position, your downside risk is limited. There are also some investors who believe that low Price to Earnings ratio reflects the low pricing because a given company is in trouble. On the other hand, a higher PE ratio means that investors are paying more for each unit of profit.
Rogers Communications |
| = | 17.72 X |
Generally speaking, the Price to Earnings ratio gives investors an idea of what the market is willing to pay for the company's current earnings.
Rogers Price To Earning Comparison
Rogers Communications is currently under evaluation in price to earning category among its peers.
Rogers Communications Profitability Projections
The most important aspect of a successful company is its ability to generate a profit. For investors in Rogers Communications, profitability is also one of the essential criteria for including it into their portfolios because, without profit, Rogers Communications will eventually generate negative long term returns. The profitability progress is the general direction of Rogers Communications' change in net profit over the period of time. It can combine multiple indicators of Rogers Communications, where stable trends show no significant progress. An accelerating trend is seen as positive, while a decreasing one is unfavorable. A rising trend means that profits are rising, and operational efficiency may be rising as well. A decreasing trend is a sign of poor performance and may indicate upcoming losses.
| Last Reported | Projected for Next Year | ||
| Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income | -2.3 B | -2.2 B | |
| Operating Income | 5 B | 5.3 B | |
| Income Before Tax | 7.6 B | 8 B | |
| Total Other Income Expense Net | 2.6 B | 2.7 B | |
| Net Income | 6.9 B | 7.2 B | |
| Income Tax Expense | 719.4 M | 755.4 M | |
| Net Income From Continuing Ops | 2 B | 2.1 B | |
| Net Income Applicable To Common Shares | 6.9 B | 7.2 B | |
| Interest Income | 2 B | 2.1 B | |
| Net Interest Income | -2.1 B | -1.9 B | |
| Change To Netincome | 377.2 M | 396.1 M | |
| Net Income Per Share | 12.81 | 13.45 | |
| Income Quality | 0.88 | 0.58 | |
| Net Income Per E B T | 0.90 | 0.88 |
Rogers Profitability Driver Comparison
Profitability drivers are factors that can directly affect your investment outlook on Rogers Communications. Investors often realize that things won't turn out the way they predict. There are maybe way too many unforeseen events and contingencies during the holding period of Rogers Communications position where the market behavior may be hard to predict, tax policy changes, gold or oil price hikes, calamities change, and many others. The question is, are you prepared for these unexpected events? Although some of these situations are obviously beyond your control, you can still follow the important profit indicators to know where you should focus on when things like this occur. Below are some of the Rogers Communications' important profitability drivers and their relationship over time.
Rogers Communications Earnings Estimation Breakdown
The calculation of Rogers Communications' earning per share is based on the data from the past 12 consecutive months, used for reporting the company's financial figures. The next projected EPS of Rogers Communications is estimated to be 1.05 with the future projection ranging from a low of 0.91 to a high of 1.1864. Please be aware that this consensus of annual earnings estimates for Rogers Communications is based on EPS before non-recurring items and includes expenses related to employee stock options.Last Reported EPS
0.91 Lowest | Expected EPS | 1.19 Highest |
Rogers Communications Earnings Projection Consensus
Suppose the current estimates of Rogers Communications' value are higher than the current market price of the Rogers Communications stock. In this case, investors may conclude that Rogers Communications is overpriced and will exhibit bullish sentiment. On the other hand, if the present value is lower than the stock price, analysts may conclude that the market undervalues the equity. These scenarios may suggest that the market is not as efficient as it should be at the estimation time, and Rogers Communications' stock will quickly adjusts to the new information provided by the consensus estimate.
| Number of Analysts | Historical Accuracy | Last Reported EPS | Estimated EPS for 31st of March 2026 | Current EPS (TTM) | |
| 17 | 93.62% | 1.51 | 1.05 | 9.32 |
Rogers Communications Earnings per Share Projection vs Actual
Actual Earning per Share of Rogers Communications refers to what the company shows during its earnings calls or quarterly reports. The Expected EPS is what analysts covering Rogers Communications predict the company's earnings will be in the future. The higher the earnings per share of Rogers Communications, the better is its profitability. While calculating the Earning per Share, we use the weighted ratio, as the number of shares outstanding can change over time.Rogers Communications Estimated Months Earnings per Share
For an investor who is primarily interested in generating an income out of investing in entities such as Rogers Communications, the EPS ratio can tell if the company is intending to increase its current dividend. Although EPS is an essential tool for investors, it should not be used in isolation. EPS of Rogers Communications should always be considered in relation to other companies to make a more educated investment decision.Rogers Quarterly Analyst Estimates and Surprise Metrics
Earnings surprises can significantly impact Rogers Communications' stock price both in the short term and over time. Negative earnings surprises usually result in a price decline. However, it has been seen that positive earnings surprises lead to an immediate rise in a stock's price and a gradual increase over time. This is why we often hear news about some companies beating earning projections. Financial analysts spend a large amount of time predicting earnings per share (EPS) along with other important future indicators. Many analysts use forecasting models, management guidance, and additional fundamental information to derive an EPS estimate.
| Reported | Fiscal Date | Estimated EPS | Reported EPS | Surprise | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2026-01-29 | 2025-12-31 | 1.4 | 1.51 | 0.11 | 7 | ||
2025-10-23 | 2025-09-30 | 1.24 | 1.37 | 0.13 | 10 | ||
2025-07-23 | 2025-06-30 | 1.1 | 1.14 | 0.04 | 3 | ||
2025-04-23 | 2025-03-31 | 1.01 | 0.99 | -0.02 | 1 | ||
2025-01-30 | 2024-12-31 | 1.32 | 1.46 | 0.14 | 10 | ||
2024-10-24 | 2024-09-30 | 1.34 | 1.42 | 0.08 | 5 | ||
2024-07-24 | 2024-06-30 | 1.14 | 1.16 | 0.02 | 1 | ||
2024-04-24 | 2024-03-31 | 0.98 | 0.99 | 0.01 | 1 | ||
2024-02-01 | 2023-12-31 | 1.11 | 1.19 | 0.08 | 7 | ||
2023-11-09 | 2023-09-30 | 1.13 | 1.27 | 0.14 | 12 | ||
2023-07-26 | 2023-06-30 | 1.13 | 1.02 | -0.11 | 9 | ||
2023-04-25 | 2023-03-31 | 0.96 | 1.09 | 0.13 | 13 | ||
2023-02-02 | 2022-12-31 | 0.99 | 1.09 | 0.1 | 10 | ||
2022-11-09 | 2022-09-30 | 0.86 | 0.84 | -0.02 | 2 | ||
2022-07-27 | 2022-06-30 | 0.85 | 0.86 | 0.01 | 1 | ||
2022-04-20 | 2022-03-31 | 0.83 | 0.91 | 0.08 | 9 | ||
2022-01-27 | 2021-12-31 | 0.95 | 0.96 | 0.01 | 1 | ||
2021-10-21 | 2021-09-30 | 1.03 | 1.03 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2021-07-21 | 2021-06-30 | 0.76 | 0.76 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2021-04-21 | 2021-03-31 | 0.66 | 0.77 | 0.11 | 16 | ||
2021-01-28 | 2020-12-31 | 0.97 | 0.99 | 0.02 | 2 | ||
2020-10-22 | 2020-09-30 | 0.78 | 1.08 | 0.3 | 38 | ||
2020-07-22 | 2020-06-30 | 0.73 | 0.6 | -0.13 | 17 | ||
2020-04-22 | 2020-03-31 | 0.75 | 0.71 | -0.04 | 5 | ||
2020-01-22 | 2019-12-31 | 1.02 | 1.0 | -0.02 | 1 | ||
2019-10-23 | 2019-09-30 | 1.31 | 1.19 | -0.12 | 9 | ||
2019-07-23 | 2019-06-30 | 1.17 | 1.16 | -0.01 | 0 | ||
2019-04-18 | 2019-03-31 | 0.93 | 0.78 | -0.15 | 16 | ||
2019-01-24 | 2018-12-31 | 1.08 | 1.13 | 0.05 | 4 | ||
2018-10-19 | 2018-09-30 | 1.17 | 1.21 | 0.04 | 3 | ||
2018-07-19 | 2018-06-30 | 1.05 | 1.07 | 0.02 | 1 | ||
2018-04-19 | 2018-03-31 | 0.74 | 0.9 | 0.16 | 21 | ||
2018-01-25 | 2017-12-31 | 0.86 | 0.88 | 0.02 | 2 | ||
2017-10-19 | 2017-09-30 | 1 | 1.01 | 0.01 | 1 | ||
2017-07-20 | 2017-06-30 | 0.93 | 1.0 | 0.07 | 7 | ||
2017-04-18 | 2017-03-31 | 0.57 | 0.64 | 0.07 | 12 | ||
2017-01-26 | 2016-12-31 | 0.71 | 0.74 | 0.03 | 4 | ||
2016-10-17 | 2016-09-30 | 0.87 | 0.83 | -0.04 | 4 | ||
2016-07-21 | 2016-06-30 | 0.81 | 0.83 | 0.02 | 2 | ||
2016-04-18 | 2016-03-31 | 0.53 | 0.51 | -0.02 | 3 | ||
2016-01-27 | 2015-12-31 | 0.7 | 0.64 | -0.06 | 8 | ||
2015-10-22 | 2015-09-30 | 0.81 | 0.91 | 0.1 | 12 | ||
2015-07-23 | 2015-06-30 | 0.78 | 0.8 | 0.02 | 2 | ||
2015-04-20 | 2015-03-31 | 0.61 | 0.53 | -0.08 | 13 | ||
2015-01-29 | 2014-12-31 | 0.63 | 0.69 | 0.06 | 9 | ||
2014-10-23 | 2014-09-30 | 0.88 | 0.78 | -0.1 | 11 | ||
2014-07-24 | 2014-06-30 | 0.84 | 0.84 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2014-04-21 | 2014-03-31 | 0.71 | 0.66 | -0.05 | 7 | ||
2014-02-12 | 2013-12-31 | 0.74 | 0.69 | -0.05 | 6 | ||
2013-10-24 | 2013-09-30 | 0.97 | 0.97 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2013-07-24 | 2013-06-30 | 0.97 | 0.96 | -0.01 | 1 | ||
2013-04-22 | 2013-03-31 | 0.77 | 0.8 | 0.03 | 3 | ||
2013-02-14 | 2012-12-31 | 0.72 | 0.88 | 0.16 | 22 | ||
2012-10-24 | 2012-09-30 | 0.88 | 0.96 | 0.08 | 9 | ||
2012-07-24 | 2012-06-30 | 0.86 | 0.77 | -0.09 | 10 | ||
2012-04-24 | 2012-03-31 | 0.75 | 0.67 | -0.08 | 10 | ||
2012-02-22 | 2011-12-31 | 0.66 | 0.7 | 0.04 | 6 | ||
2011-10-26 | 2011-09-30 | 0.82 | 0.89 | 0.07 | 8 | ||
2011-07-26 | 2011-06-30 | 0.81 | 0.85 | 0.04 | 4 | ||
2011-04-26 | 2011-03-31 | 0.71 | 0.76 | 0.05 | 7 | ||
2011-02-16 | 2010-12-31 | 0.61 | 0.64 | 0.03 | 4 | ||
2010-10-26 | 2010-09-30 | 0.79 | 0.83 | 0.04 | 5 | ||
2010-07-27 | 2010-06-30 | 0.68 | 0.8 | 0.12 | 17 | ||
2010-04-28 | 2010-03-31 | 0.55 | 0.69 | 0.14 | 25 | ||
2010-02-17 | 2009-12-31 | 0.56 | 0.61 | 0.05 | 8 | ||
2009-10-27 | 2009-09-30 | 0.53 | 0.82 | 0.29 | 54 | ||
2009-07-28 | 2009-06-30 | 0.55 | 0.65 | 0.1 | 18 | ||
2009-04-29 | 2009-03-31 | 0.45 | 0.4 | -0.05 | 11 | ||
2009-02-18 | 2008-12-31 | 0.34 | 0.21 | -0.13 | 38 | ||
2008-10-28 | 2008-09-30 | 0.5 | 0.73 | 0.23 | 46 | ||
2008-07-29 | 2008-06-30 | 0.53 | 0.57 | 0.04 | 7 | ||
2008-04-29 | 2008-03-31 | 0.43 | 0.42 | -0.01 | 2 | ||
2008-02-22 | 2007-12-31 | 0.39 | 0.41 | 0.02 | 5 | ||
2007-11-01 | 2007-09-30 | 0.41 | 0.41 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2007-07-31 | 2007-06-30 | 0.36 | 0.43 | 0.07 | 19 | ||
2007-05-01 | 2007-03-31 | 0.21 | 0.26 | 0.05 | 23 | ||
2007-02-15 | 2006-12-31 | 0.09 | 0.24 | 0.15 | 166 | ||
2006-10-31 | 2006-09-30 | 0.18 | 0.24 | 0.06 | 33 | ||
2006-08-01 | 2006-06-30 | 0.13 | 0.31 | 0.18 | 138 | ||
2006-04-25 | 2006-03-31 | 0.07 | 0.03 | -0.04 | 57 | ||
2006-02-09 | 2005-12-31 | 0.01 | -0.09 | -0.1 | 1000 | ||
2005-10-25 | 2005-09-30 | 0.04 | 0.08 | 0.04 | 100 | ||
2005-07-26 | 2005-06-30 | 0.02 | 0.04 | 0.02 | 100 | ||
2005-04-26 | 2005-03-31 | -0.11 | -0.08 | 0.03 | 27 | ||
2005-02-15 | 2004-12-31 | -0.07 | -0.05 | 0.02 | 28 | ||
2004-10-26 | 2004-09-30 | 0.09 | 0.1 | 0.01 | 11 | ||
2004-07-21 | 2004-06-30 | 0.03 | -0.01 | -0.04 | 133 | ||
2004-04-20 | 2004-03-31 | -0.08 | -0.1 | -0.02 | 25 | ||
2004-02-04 | 2003-12-31 | -0.08 | 0.12 | 0.2 | 250 | ||
2003-10-17 | 2003-09-30 | -0.14 | -0.05 | 0.09 | 64 | ||
2003-07-17 | 2003-06-30 | 0.1 | -0.11 | -0.21 | 210 | ||
2003-04-17 | 2003-03-31 | -0.16 | 0.03 | 0.19 | 118 | ||
2003-02-14 | 2002-12-31 | -0.22 | -0.23 | -0.01 | 4 | ||
2002-10-16 | 2002-09-30 | -0.28 | -0.34 | -0.06 | 21 | ||
2002-07-18 | 2002-06-30 | -0.23 | -0.16 | 0.07 | 30 | ||
2002-04-18 | 2002-03-31 | -0.26 | -0.29 | -0.03 | 11 | ||
2002-02-22 | 2001-12-31 | -0.24 | -0.32 | -0.08 | 33 | ||
2001-10-18 | 2001-09-30 | -0.2 | -0.26 | -0.06 | 30 | ||
2001-07-26 | 2001-06-30 | -0.19 | -0.26 | -0.07 | 36 | ||
2001-04-12 | 2001-03-31 | -0.14 | -0.25 | -0.11 | 78 | ||
2001-02-13 | 2000-12-31 | -0.11 | -0.1 | 0.01 | 9 | ||
2000-10-20 | 2000-09-30 | -0.11 | -0.08 | 0.03 | 27 | ||
2000-07-21 | 2000-06-30 | -0.02 | -0.05 | -0.03 | 150 | ||
2000-04-24 | 2000-03-31 | -0.08 | -0.1 | -0.02 | 25 | ||
2000-02-10 | 1999-12-31 | -0.05 | -0.09 | -0.04 | 80 | ||
1999-10-22 | 1999-09-30 | -0.1 | -0.17 | -0.07 | 70 | ||
1999-07-22 | 1999-06-30 | -0.13 | -0.09 | 0.04 | 30 | ||
1999-04-21 | 1999-03-31 | -0.16 | -0.21 | -0.05 | 31 | ||
1999-02-05 | 1998-12-31 | -0.2 | -0.17 | 0.03 | 15 | ||
1998-12-09 | 1998-09-30 | -0.15 | -0.1 | 0.05 | 33 | ||
1998-08-06 | 1998-06-30 | -0.09 | -0.14 | -0.05 | 55 | ||
1998-05-06 | 1998-03-31 | -0.2 | -0.16 | 0.04 | 20 | ||
1998-02-05 | 1997-12-31 | -0.07 | -0.17 | -0.1 | 142 | ||
1997-11-06 | 1997-09-30 | -0.08 | -0.06 | 0.02 | 25 | ||
1997-08-07 | 1997-06-30 | -0.11 | -0.02 | 0.09 | 81 | ||
1997-05-01 | 1997-03-31 | -0.24 | -0.11 | 0.13 | 54 | ||
1997-03-13 | 1996-12-31 | -0.19 | -0.1 | 0.09 | 47 | ||
1996-11-07 | 1996-09-30 | -0.07 | -0.04 | 0.03 | 42 | ||
1996-08-01 | 1996-06-30 | -0.17 | -0.2 | -0.03 | 17 | ||
1996-05-01 | 1996-03-31 | -0.12 | -0.12 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
1996-02-09 | 1995-12-31 | -0.1 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 200 | ||
1995-11-02 | 1995-09-30 | -0.09 | -0.1 | -0.01 | 11 | ||
1995-02-15 | 1994-12-31 | -0.17 | -0.23 | -0.06 | 35 |
Use Rogers Communications in pair-trading
One of the main advantages of trading using pair correlations is that every trade hedges away some risk. Because there are two separate transactions required, even if Rogers Communications position performs unexpectedly, the other equity can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Rogers Communications will appreciate offsetting losses from the drop in the long position's value.Rogers Communications Pair Trading
Rogers Communications Pair Trading Analysis
The ability to find closely correlated positions to Rogers Communications could be a great tool in your tax-loss harvesting strategies, allowing investors a quick way to find a similar-enough asset to replace Rogers Communications when you sell it. If you don't do this, your portfolio allocation will be skewed against your target asset allocation. So, investors can't just sell and buy back Rogers Communications - that would be a violation of the tax code under the "wash sale" rule, and this is why you need to find a similar enough asset and use the proceeds from selling Rogers Communications to buy it.
The correlation of Rogers Communications is a statistical measure of how it moves in relation to other instruments. This measure is expressed in what is known as the correlation coefficient, which ranges between -1 and +1. A perfect positive correlation (i.e., a correlation coefficient of +1) implies that as Rogers Communications moves, either up or down, the other security will move in the same direction. Alternatively, perfect negative correlation means that if Rogers Communications moves in either direction, the perfectly negatively correlated security will move in the opposite direction. If the correlation is 0, the equities are not correlated; they are entirely random. A correlation greater than 0.8 is generally described as strong, whereas a correlation less than 0.5 is generally considered weak.
Correlation analysis and pair trading evaluation for Rogers Communications can also be used as hedging techniques within a particular sector or industry or even over random equities to generate a better risk-adjusted return on your portfolios.Use Investing Themes to Complement your Rogers Communications position
In addition to having Rogers Communications in your portfolios, you can quickly add positions using our predefined set of ideas and optimize them against your very unique investing style. A single investing idea is a collection of funds, stocks, ETFs, or cryptocurrencies that are programmatically selected from a pull of investment themes. After you determine your investment opportunity, you can then find an optimal portfolio that will maximize potential returns on the chosen idea or minimize its exposure to market volatility.Did You Try This Idea?
Run Marijuana Thematic Idea Now
Marijuana
Small and mid-cap equities that are involved in production and delivery of Marijuana products. This theme is designed for investors that are willing to accept higher levels of market risk inherited by Marijuana production in the United States. The Marijuana theme has 49 constituents at this time.
You can either use a buy-and-hold strategy to lock in the entire theme or actively trade it to take advantage of the short-term price volatility of individual constituents. Macroaxis can help you discover thousands of investment opportunities in different asset classes. In addition, you can partner with us for reliable portfolio optimization as you plan to utilize Marijuana Theme or any other thematic opportunities.
| View All Next | Launch |
Check out Your Equity Center. For more detail on how to invest in Rogers Stock please use our How to Invest in Rogers Communications guide.You can also try the Performance Analysis module to check effects of mean-variance optimization against your current asset allocation.
To fully project Rogers Communications' future profitability, investors should examine all historical financial statements. These statements provide investors with a comprehensive snapshot of the financial position of Rogers Communications at a specified time, usually calculated after every quarter, six months, or one year. Three primary documents fall into the category of financial statements. These documents include Rogers Communications' income statement, its balance sheet, and the statement of cash flows.