Waters Revenue vs. EBITDA
| WAT Stock | USD 368.50 10.73 3.00% |
Total Revenue | First Reported 1995-03-31 | Previous Quarter 708.5 M | Current Value 740.3 M | Quarterly Volatility 202.6 M |
| Current Value | Last Year | Change From Last Year | 10 Year Trend | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Profit Margin | 0.66 | 0.5957 |
|
| |||||
| Net Profit Margin | 0.14 | 0.2172 |
|
| |||||
| Operating Profit Margin | 0.2 | 0.2766 |
|
| |||||
| Pretax Profit Margin | 0.18 | 0.249 |
|
| |||||
| Return On Assets | 0.11 | 0.1388 |
|
|
For Waters profitability analysis, we use financial ratios and fundamental drivers that measure the ability of Waters to generate income relative to revenue, assets, operating costs, and current equity. These fundamental indicators attest to how well Waters utilizes its assets to generate profit and value for its shareholders. The profitability module also shows relationships between Waters's most relevant fundamental drivers. It provides multiple suggestions of what could affect the performance of Waters over time as well as its relative position and ranking within its peers.
Waters |
Waters' Revenue Breakdown by Earning Segment
Check out Your Current Watchlist.
Is Life Sciences Tools & Services space expected to grow? Or is there an opportunity to expand the business' product line in the future? Factors like these will boost the valuation of Waters. If investors know Waters will grow in the future, the company's valuation will be higher. The financial industry is built on trying to define current growth potential and future valuation accurately. All the valuation information about Waters listed above have to be considered, but the key to understanding future value is determining which factors weigh more heavily than others.
Quarterly Earnings Growth 0.194 | Earnings Share 10.48 | Revenue Per Share 49.019 | Quarterly Revenue Growth 0.04 | Return On Assets 0.1133 |
The market value of Waters is measured differently than its book value, which is the value of Waters that is recorded on the company's balance sheet. Investors also form their own opinion of Waters' value that differs from its market value or its book value, called intrinsic value, which is Waters' true underlying value. Investors use various methods to calculate intrinsic value and buy a stock when its market value falls below its intrinsic value. Because Waters' market value can be influenced by many factors that don't directly affect Waters' underlying business (such as a pandemic or basic market pessimism), market value can vary widely from intrinsic value.
Please note, there is a significant difference between Waters' value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if Waters is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, Waters' price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.
Waters EBITDA vs. Revenue Fundamental Analysis
Comparative valuation techniques use various fundamental indicators to help in determining Waters's current stock value. Our valuation model uses many indicators to compare Waters value to that of its competitors to determine the firm's financial worth. Waters is rated below average in revenue category among its peers. It is rated below average in ebitda category among its peers totaling about 0.28 of EBITDA per Revenue. The ratio of Revenue to EBITDA for Waters is roughly 3.62 . At this time, Waters' Total Revenue is comparatively stable compared to the past year. Comparative valuation analysis is a catch-all technique that is used if you cannot value Waters by discounting back its dividends or cash flows. It compares the stock's price multiples to nearest competition to determine if the stock is relatively undervalued or overvalued.Waters Revenue vs. Competition
Waters is rated below average in revenue category among its peers. Market size based on revenue of Health Care industry is at this time estimated at about 113 Billion. Waters holds roughly 2.96 Billion in revenue claiming about 2.62% of equities under Health Care industry.
Waters EBITDA vs. Revenue
Revenue is income that a firm generates from business activities such us rendering services or selling goods to customers. It is a crucial part of a business and an essential item when evaluating a company's financial statements. Revenues from a firm's primary business operations can be reported on the income statement as sales revenue, net sales, or simply sales, depending on the industry in which a given company operates.
Waters |
| = | 2.96 B |
Revenue is typically recorded when cash or cash equivalents are exchanged for services or goods and can include products or services discounts, promotions, as well as early payments on invoices or services rendered in advance.
EBITDA stands for earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization. It is a measure of a company operating cash flow based on data from the company income statement and is a very good way to compare companies within industries or across different sectors. However, unlike Operating Cash Flow, EBITDA does not include the effects of changes in working capital.
Waters |
| = | 817.68 M |
In a nutshell, EBITDA is calculated by adding back each of the excluded items to the post-tax profit, and can be used to compare companies with very different capital structures.
Waters EBITDA Comparison
Waters is currently under evaluation in ebitda category among its peers.
Waters Profitability Projections
The most important aspect of a successful company is its ability to generate a profit. For investors in Waters, profitability is also one of the essential criteria for including it into their portfolios because, without profit, Waters will eventually generate negative long term returns. The profitability progress is the general direction of Waters' change in net profit over the period of time. It can combine multiple indicators of Waters, where stable trends show no significant progress. An accelerating trend is seen as positive, while a decreasing one is unfavorable. A rising trend means that profits are rising, and operational efficiency may be rising as well. A decreasing trend is a sign of poor performance and may indicate upcoming losses.
| Last Reported | Projected for Next Year | ||
| Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income | -134.1 M | -127.4 M | |
| Operating Income | 817.7 M | 464.1 M | |
| Income Before Tax | 736.2 M | 438.4 M | |
| Total Other Income Expense Net | -81.4 M | -77.4 M | |
| Net Income | 642.2 M | 352.5 M | |
| Income Tax Expense | 94 M | 85.7 M | |
| Net Income Applicable To Common Shares | 813.9 M | 854.6 M | |
| Net Income From Continuing Ops | 653.1 M | 534.5 M | |
| Non Operating Income Net Other | 33.8 M | 35.5 M | |
| Interest Income | 15.5 M | 23.3 M | |
| Net Interest Income | -66.6 M | -63.3 M | |
| Change To Netincome | 18.5 M | 34.6 M | |
| Net Income Per Share | 10.87 | 11.41 | |
| Income Quality | 0.94 | 1.62 | |
| Net Income Per E B T | 0.87 | 0.54 |
Waters Profitability Driver Comparison
Profitability drivers are factors that can directly affect your investment outlook on Waters. Investors often realize that things won't turn out the way they predict. There are maybe way too many unforeseen events and contingencies during the holding period of Waters position where the market behavior may be hard to predict, tax policy changes, gold or oil price hikes, calamities change, and many others. The question is, are you prepared for these unexpected events? Although some of these situations are obviously beyond your control, you can still follow the important profit indicators to know where you should focus on when things like this occur. Below are some of the Waters' important profitability drivers and their relationship over time.
Use Waters in pair-trading
One of the main advantages of trading using pair correlations is that every trade hedges away some risk. Because there are two separate transactions required, even if Waters position performs unexpectedly, the other equity can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Waters will appreciate offsetting losses from the drop in the long position's value.Waters Pair Trading
Waters Pair Trading Analysis
The ability to find closely correlated positions to Waters could be a great tool in your tax-loss harvesting strategies, allowing investors a quick way to find a similar-enough asset to replace Waters when you sell it. If you don't do this, your portfolio allocation will be skewed against your target asset allocation. So, investors can't just sell and buy back Waters - that would be a violation of the tax code under the "wash sale" rule, and this is why you need to find a similar enough asset and use the proceeds from selling Waters to buy it.
The correlation of Waters is a statistical measure of how it moves in relation to other instruments. This measure is expressed in what is known as the correlation coefficient, which ranges between -1 and +1. A perfect positive correlation (i.e., a correlation coefficient of +1) implies that as Waters moves, either up or down, the other security will move in the same direction. Alternatively, perfect negative correlation means that if Waters moves in either direction, the perfectly negatively correlated security will move in the opposite direction. If the correlation is 0, the equities are not correlated; they are entirely random. A correlation greater than 0.8 is generally described as strong, whereas a correlation less than 0.5 is generally considered weak.
Correlation analysis and pair trading evaluation for Waters can also be used as hedging techniques within a particular sector or industry or even over random equities to generate a better risk-adjusted return on your portfolios.Use Investing Themes to Complement your Waters position
In addition to having Waters in your portfolios, you can quickly add positions using our predefined set of ideas and optimize them against your very unique investing style. A single investing idea is a collection of funds, stocks, ETFs, or cryptocurrencies that are programmatically selected from a pull of investment themes. After you determine your investment opportunity, you can then find an optimal portfolio that will maximize potential returns on the chosen idea or minimize its exposure to market volatility.Did You Try This Idea?
Run Healthcare Thematic Idea Now
Healthcare
Fama and French investing themes focus on testing asset pricing under different economic assumptions. The Healthcare theme has 61 constituents at this time.
You can either use a buy-and-hold strategy to lock in the entire theme or actively trade it to take advantage of the short-term price volatility of individual constituents. Macroaxis can help you discover thousands of investment opportunities in different asset classes. In addition, you can partner with us for reliable portfolio optimization as you plan to utilize Healthcare Theme or any other thematic opportunities.
| View All Next | Launch |
Additional Tools for Waters Stock Analysis
When running Waters' price analysis, check to measure Waters' market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Waters is operating at the current time. Most of Waters' value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Waters' future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Waters' price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Waters to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.