BEST Competitors
| BSAA Stock | 10.20 0.01 0.1% |
BEST SPAC vs Iron Horse Correlation
Very good diversification
The correlation between BEST SPAC I and IROH is -0.31 (i.e., Very good diversification) for selected investment horizon. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding BEST SPAC I and IROH in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed.
Moving together with BEST Stock
Moving against BEST Stock
BEST SPAC Competition Correlation Matrix
Typically, diversification allows investors to combine positions across different asset classes to reduce overall portfolio risk. Correlation between BEST SPAC and its competitors represents the degree of relationship between the price movements of corresponding stocks. A correlation of about +1.0 implies that the price of BEST and its corresponding peer move in tandem. A correlation of -1.0 means that prices move in opposite directions. A correlation of close to zero suggests that the price movements of assets are uncorrelated; in other words, the historical price movement of BEST SPAC I does not affect the price movement of the other competitor.
High positive correlations
| High negative correlations
|
Risk-Adjusted Indicators
There is a big difference between BEST Stock performing well and BEST SPAC Company doing well as a business compared to the competition. There are so many exceptions to the norm that investors cannot definitively determine what's good or bad unless they analyze BEST SPAC's multiple risk-adjusted performance indicators across the competitive landscape. These indicators are quantitative in nature and help investors forecast volatility and risk-adjusted expected returns across various positions.| Mean Deviation | Jensen Alpha | Sortino Ratio | Treynor Ratio | Semi Deviation | Expected Shortfall | Potential Upside | Value @Risk | Maximum Drawdown | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ATMV | 8.14 | (0.21) | 0.00 | (0.04) | 0.00 | 21.92 | 92.48 | |||
| ALCY | 1.19 | 0.06 | (0.01) | (0.29) | 1.86 | 2.55 | 26.29 | |||
| WLACW | 4.50 | (0.08) | 0.00 | (0.03) | 0.00 | 7.78 | 26.39 | |||
| TBMC | 1.45 | 0.06 | (0.02) | (0.20) | 2.04 | 4.35 | 17.45 | |||
| EURK | 0.19 | 0.04 | (0.06) | (0.37) | 0.20 | 0.83 | 2.74 | |||
| DMYY | 1.23 | (0.04) | 0.00 | (0.36) | 0.00 | 2.54 | 9.77 | |||
| KOYN | 0.09 | 0.00 | (0.52) | (0.51) | 0.04 | 0.20 | 1.10 | |||
| HSPO | 1.95 | 0.18 | 0.00 | (0.08) | 3.38 | 2.46 | 61.25 | |||
| RIBB | 0.17 | 0.02 | (0.15) | 3.11 | 0.19 | 0.48 | 2.65 | |||
| IROH | 7.79 | 0.14 | 0.00 | (0.10) | 13.94 | 12.65 | 129.16 |
BEST SPAC Competitive Analysis
The better you understand BEST SPAC competitors, the better chance you have of utilizing it as a position in your portfolios. From an individual investor's perspective, BEST SPAC's competitive analysis can cover a whole range of metrics. Some of these will be more critical depending on who you are as an investor and how you react to market volatility. However, if you are locking your investment sandscape to a long-term horizon, comparing the fundamental indicator across BEST SPAC's competition over several years is one of the best ways to analyze its investment potential.| Better Than Average | Worse Than Peers | View Performance Chart |
BEST SPAC Competition Performance Charts
Five steps to successful analysis of BEST SPAC Competition
BEST SPAC's competitive analysis is the process of researching and evaluating its competitive landscape. It provides an understanding of the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) faced by BEST SPAC I in relation to its competition. BEST SPAC's competition analysis typically involves several steps, including:- Identifying the key players in the market: This involves identifying the major competitors of BEST SPAC in the market, both direct and indirect, as well as new entrants and disruptive technologies.
- Assessing the strengths and weaknesses of each competitor: This involves evaluating each competitor's strengths and weaknesses in areas such as product offerings, market share, brand recognition, financial performance, and distribution channels.
- Understanding the competitive environment: This involves evaluating the regulatory environment, economic conditions, and other factors that may impact BEST SPAC's competitive landscape.
- Identifying opportunities and threats: This involves using the information gathered during the analysis to identify opportunities and threats to BEST SPAC I, and developing a strategy to address them.
- Evaluating the competitive landscape: This involves understanding the competitive dynamics of the market, such as pricing, marketing, and distribution strategies, as well as analyzing the competitive advantage of each competitor.
Complement your BEST SPAC position
In addition to having BEST SPAC in your portfolios, you can quickly add positions using our predefined set of ideas and optimize them against your very unique investing style. A single investing idea is a collection of funds, stocks, ETFs, or cryptocurrencies that are programmatically selected from a pull of investment themes. After you determine your investment opportunity, you can then find an optimal portfolio that will maximize potential returns on the chosen idea or minimize its exposure to market volatility.Did You Try This Idea?
Run Iron Thematic Idea Now
Iron
Companies involved in production of steel and iron. The Iron theme has 47 constituents at this time.
You can either use a buy-and-hold strategy to lock in the entire theme or actively trade it to take advantage of the short-term price volatility of individual constituents. Macroaxis can help you discover thousands of investment opportunities in different asset classes. In addition, you can partner with us for reliable portfolio optimization as you plan to utilize Iron Theme or any other thematic opportunities.
| View All Next | Launch |
Check out BEST SPAC Correlation with its peers. You can also try the Portfolio Rebalancing module to analyze risk-adjusted returns against different time horizons to find asset-allocation targets.
Is Shell Companies space expected to grow? Or is there an opportunity to expand the business' product line in the future? Factors like these will boost the valuation of BEST SPAC. Projected growth potential of BEST fundamentally drives upward valuation adjustments. The financial industry is built on trying to define current growth potential and future valuation accurately. Comprehensive BEST SPAC assessment requires weighing all these inputs, though not all factors influence outcomes equally.
The market value of BEST SPAC I is measured differently than its book value, which is the value of BEST that is recorded on the company's balance sheet. Investors also form their own opinion of BEST SPAC's value that differs from its market value or its book value, called intrinsic value, which is BEST SPAC's true underlying value. Investors use various methods to calculate intrinsic value and buy a stock when its market value falls below its intrinsic value. Because BEST SPAC's market value can be influenced by many factors that don't directly affect BEST SPAC's underlying business (such as a pandemic or basic market pessimism), market value can vary widely from intrinsic value.
It's important to distinguish between BEST SPAC's intrinsic value and market price, which are calculated using different methodologies. Investment decisions regarding BEST SPAC should consider multiple factors including financial performance, growth metrics, competitive position, and professional analysis. Meanwhile, BEST SPAC's quoted price indicates the marketplace figure where supply meets demand through bilateral consent.
