Core Laboratories Competitors

CLB Stock  USD 13.67  -0.56  -3.94%   
CLB runs in the Energy industry (Energy Equipment & Services sector). Core Laboratories NV is grouped alongside Crossamerica Partners, Borr Drilling, Precision Drilling, Granite Ridge, and Nabors Industries for cross-company financial comparison. Gross margin gaps between Core Laboratories and its closest rivals often point to structural cost advantages.

Correlation: Core Laboratories vs Highpeak Energy Overview

Strong inverse diversification
Across the chosen horizon, Core Laboratories and Highpeak Energy show a correlation of -0.24 and fall into the Strong inverse diversification bucket. Lower overlap tends to improve diversification, while higher overlap means both positions carry similar risk.
Moving Against Core Stock
Specify up to 10 symbols:
Statistical evidence for mean reversion in Core Laboratories' appears through its tendency to revert after extreme valuations. Under mean reversion theory, Core Laboratories' price extremes are viewed as temporary dislocations that may self-correct. Mean reversion in Core Laboratories' is often observed around historical valuation multiples. Historical data for Core Laboratories shows that extreme valuations have tended to normalize over multi-year periods.
Sentiment
Range
LowSentimentHigh
10.4513.7317.01
Details
Intrinsic
Valuation
LowIntrinsicHigh
9.3212.6015.88
Details
Naive
Forecast
LowNextHigh
9.2912.5715.84
Details
Bollinger
Band Projection (param)
LowerMiddle BandUpper
13.5916.1218.66
Details
Core Laboratories is positioned within its peer group by benchmarking margins, returns, and multiples. This peer-relative view identifies where Core Laboratories leads, trails, or tracks its competitive set. Benchmarking earnings quality and balance sheet strength against peers provides additional valuation context. Core Laboratories's relative positioning within the peer group reflects its competitive dynamics as currently priced by the market.

Core Laboratories Competition Correlation Matrix

Competition correlation for Core Laboratories NV matters because related securities often respond to the same industry, factor, or macro drivers even when their business stories differ. A reading near +1 usually means prices have moved in tandem, a reading near -1 suggests opposite movement, and a reading near zero points to weaker historical dependence.

High positive correlations

HPKPDS
HPKSOC
SOCPDS
HPKNBR
TXOPDS
NBRPDS
  

High negative correlations

SOCVTS
HPKVTS
VTSNBR
BORRCAPL
VTSGRNT
NBRCAPL

Risk-Adjusted Indicators

Headline performance for Core Stock may not fully reflect how the business compares across its competitive set. Risk-adjusted metrics help compare Core Laboratories' efficiency and downside exposure against peers on a like-for-like basis. These indicators are quantitative in nature and measure volatility and risk-adjusted expected returns across different positions.

Core Laboratories Competitive Analysis

A side-by-side look at Core Laboratories, Crossamerica Partners, Borr Drilling, and Tsakos Energy highlights where each stock leads or lags. Core Laboratories enters the comparison at 635.2 M with 526.5 M in revenue. Profitability stands at a 5.53% net margin with return on equity reaching 11.06%. Revenue tilts toward Crossamerica Partners at 3.66 B compared with 526.5 M. On pure scale, Borr Drilling is the bigger entity with market caps of 1.82 B versus 635.2 M. Profit margins tilt toward Tsakos Energy at 21.41% against Core Laboratories at 5.53%.
    
 Better Than Average     
    
 Worse Than Peers    View Performance Chart
CLB CAPL BORR PDS GRNT NBR
 3.94 
13.67
Core
 2.80 
21.30
Crossamerica
 2.17 
5.85
Borr Drilling
 1.78 
89.93
Precision
 1.93 
5.59
Granite Ridge
 2.93 
96.52
Nabors
Market Volatility
(90 Days Market Risk)
Market Performance
(90 Days Performance)
Odds of Financial Distress
(Probability Of Bankruptcy)
Current Valuation
(Equity Enterprise Value)
Buy or Sell Analysis
(Average Analysts Consensus)
Not Available
Not Available
Trade Advice
(90 Days Macroaxis Advice)
Return On Asset TTM
Total Asset TTM
Net Income TTM
Total Debt TTM
Retained Earnings TTM
Current Liabilities TTM
Net Asset
Current Ratio TTM
Price To Book TTM
Current Valuation
Five Year Return
Cash And Equivalents TTM
Number Of Employees
Shares Outstanding
Debt To Equity TTM
Annual Yield
Current Asset TTM
Trailing Beta
Return On Equity TTM
Profit Margin TTM
Number Of Shares Shorted
Price To Sales TTM
Book Value Per Share TTM
Target Price
Last Dividend Paid
Shares Owned By Institutions
EBITDA TTM
Price To Earnings TTM
Price To Earnings To Growth
Gross Profit TTM
Market Capitalization TTM
Earnings Per Share
Short Ratio TTM
Operating Margin TTM
Cash Per Share TTM
Working Capital TTM
Shares Owned By Insiders
Revenue TTM
Cash Flow From Operations TTM
Day Typical Price
Accumulation Distribution
Market Facilitation Index
Daily Balance Of Power
Period Momentum Indicator
Rate Of Daily Change
Day Median Price
Price Action Indicator
Relative Strength Index
Coefficient Of Variation
Mean Deviation
Jensen Alpha
Total Risk Alpha
Sortino Ratio
Downside Variance
Standard Deviation
Kurtosis
Potential Upside
Treynor Ratio
Maximum Drawdown
Variance
Market Risk Adjusted Performance
Risk Adjusted Performance
Skewness
Semi Deviation
Information Ratio
Value At Risk
Expected Short fall
Downside Deviation
Semi Variance

Core Laboratories Competition Peer Performance Charts

How to Analyze Core Laboratories Against Peers

Core Laboratories' peer analysis compares Core Laboratories with related companies to put valuation, quality, and risk metrics in context. This establishes whether recent performance is company-specific or broadly sector-driven. A practical workflow includes:
  • Set a relevant peer group: Include direct competitors and close alternatives with comparable business exposure.
  • Benchmark core financials: Compare profitability, growth, capital structure, and cash flow quality.
  • Check valuation dispersion: Review whether Core Laboratories trades at a premium or discount versus peers and why.
  • Evaluate risk profile: Compare volatility, drawdowns, and correlation to avoid false diversification assumptions.
  • Document the thesis: Record where Core Laboratories leads or lags and what catalysts could close or widen the gap.
Use this as an educational baseline, then validate conclusions with current filings, market conditions, and portfolio objectives.

Peer Comparison Metrics & Methodology

Core Laboratories' capital allocation track record stands out when measured by cumulative returns on acquisitions versus peers. Margin trends that move in opposite directions across peers often foreshadow shifts in competitive positioning. Comparative analysis works best when peers share business drivers, cycle exposure, and capital structure characteristics. For peer comparison, Core Laboratories has a market cap of 635.21 million, P/E of 101.74, profit margin of 5.53%.

Core Laboratories NV figures are aggregated from periodic company reporting and market reference feeds and normalized across reporting formats.

Editorial review and methodology oversight provided by: Gabriel Shpitalnik, Member of Macroaxis Editorial Board