Core Molding Competitors

CMT Stock  USD 24.18  -0.23  -0.94%   
Peers commonly used for benchmarking Core Molding Technologies include Friedman Industries, FutureFuel Corp, Flexible Solutions, US GoldMining, and American Vanguard. Debt loads across Core Molding's peer group vary widely and affect risk profiles in different ways.

Correlation: Core Molding vs Northern Technologies Snapshot

Near-perfect hedge
Across the chosen horizon, Core Molding and Northern Technologies show a correlation of -0.81 and fall into the Near-perfect hedge bucket. This chart measures the degree of risk overlap between Core Molding and Northern Technologies.
Related Assets
  0.75KRO Kronos WorldwidePairCorr
  0.74ASIX AdvanSixPairCorr
  0.87TROX Tronox Holdings PLCPairCorr
Diversification Candidates
  0.89TANH Tantech HoldingsPairCorr
  0.85BKRKF PT Bank RakyatPairCorr
  0.82PPERY Bank Mandiri PerseroPairCorr
  0.81BKRKY Bank RakyatPairCorr
  0.8PBCRY Bank Central AsiaPairCorr
Specify up to 10 symbols:
Mean reversion in Core Molding's price occurs when temporary dislocations correct back toward its historical intrinsic value estimate. This tendency of Core Molding's price to converge to an average value over time is called mean reversion.
Sentiment
Range
LowSentimentHigh
20.8124.1427.47
Details
Intrinsic
Valuation
LowIntrinsicHigh
21.8832.5135.84
Details
Naive
Forecast
LowNextHigh
19.3622.6926.03
Details
Analyst
Consensus
LowTargetHigh
26.3929.0032.19
Details
Peer benchmarking frames Core Molding's operating metrics and market pricing against comparable companies. Placing Core Molding's results in peer context distinguishes company-specific performance from industry-wide trends.

Core Molding Competition Correlation Matrix

Studying peer correlation around Core Molding Technologies provides a cleaner read on how much independent price behavior still exists across the competitive set. This matrix is most informative when seeking to know whether adding another peer would improve diversification, increase crowding, or leave total risk largely unchanged.

High positive correlations

NTICAVD
AVDLVRO
BHSTLVRO
NTICLVRO
TRXAVD
NTICTRX
  

High negative correlations

TRXFSI
USGOBHST
NTICFSI
TRXFRD
NTICUSGO
USGOLVRO

Risk-Adjusted Indicators

Return momentum in Core Molding Stock is more useful when tested against peer-relative fundamentals and risk. Without risk-adjusted context, short-term returns may appear stronger than the volatility required to achieve them would suggest. These indicators are quantitative in nature and measure volatility and risk-adjusted expected returns across different positions.

Net Income vs. Peers

Net income is what remains after all costs — operating expenses, interest, taxes, and preferred dividends — are deducted from Core Molding's total revenue. The relationship between net income growth and revenue growth at Core Molding reveals whether margin expansion is driving earnings or whether top-line growth is being consumed by rising costs and financing charges.
Compare Core Molding Technologies and related stocks such as Friedman Industries, Lavoro Limited Class, and FutureFuel Corp Net Income Over Time
Select Fundamental
Price To Sales RatioDividend Yield
Ptb RatioDays Sales Outstanding
Book Value Per ShareFree Cash Flow Yield
Invested CapitalOperating Cash Flow Per Share
Average PayablesStock Based Compensation To Revenue
Capex To DepreciationPb Ratio
Ev To SalesFree Cash Flow Per Share
RoicInventory Turnover
Net Income Per ShareDays Of Inventory On Hand
Payables TurnoverSales General And Administrative To Revenue
Average InventoryResearch And Ddevelopement To Revenue
Capex To RevenueCash Per Share
PocfratioInterest Coverage
Payout RatioCapex To Operating Cash Flow
Pfcf RatioDays Payables Outstanding
Net Current Asset ValueIncome Quality
RoeTangible Asset Value
Ev To Operating Cash FlowPe Ratio
Return On Tangible AssetsEv To Free Cash Flow
Earnings YieldIntangibles To Total Assets
Net Debt To EBITDACurrent Ratio
Tangible Book Value Per ShareReceivables Turnover
Graham NumberShareholders Equity Per Share
Debt To EquityCapex Per Share
Graham Net NetAverage Receivables
Revenue Per ShareInterest Debt Per Share
Debt To AssetsShort Term Coverage Ratios
Price Earnings RatioOperating Cycle
Price Book Value RatioPrice Earnings To Growth Ratio
Days Of Payables OutstandingDividend Payout Ratio
Price To Operating Cash Flows RatioPrice To Free Cash Flows Ratio
Pretax Profit MarginEbt Per Ebit
Operating Profit MarginEffective Tax Rate
Company Equity MultiplierLong Term Debt To Capitalization
Total Debt To CapitalizationReturn On Capital Employed
Debt Equity RatioEbit Per Revenue
Quick RatioDividend Paid And Capex Coverage Ratio
Net Income Per EBTCash Ratio
Cash Conversion CycleOperating Cash Flow Sales Ratio
Days Of Inventory OutstandingDays Of Sales Outstanding
Free Cash Flow Operating Cash Flow RatioCash Flow Coverage Ratios
Price To Book RatioFixed Asset Turnover
Capital Expenditure Coverage RatioPrice Cash Flow Ratio
Enterprise Value MultipleDebt Ratio
Cash Flow To Debt RatioPrice Sales Ratio
Return On AssetsAsset Turnover
Net Profit MarginGross Profit Margin
Price Fair ValueReturn On Equity
20102011201220132014201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
FRD2.8 M8.2 M6.1 M1.7 M382.3 K294 K-2.7 M2.8 M5.1 M-5.2 M11.4 M14.1 M21.3 M17.3 M6.1 MM4.9 M
LVRO-108.7 M-108.7 M-108.7 M-108.7 M-108.7 M-108.7 M-108.7 M-108.7 M-108.7 M-108.7 M38.4 M78.2 M-260.7 M-762.5 M-466.1 M-419.5 M-398.5 M
FF-14.9 M34.5 M34.3 M74 M53.2 M46.4 M56.3 M23.5 M53.2 M88.2 M46.6 M26.3 M15.2 M37.4 M15.5 M-49.4 M-46.9 M
FSI102.8 K183 K-1.1 M1.8 M403.3 K1.5 M1.8 M1.8 M2.5 M1.9 MM3.4 MM2.8 MM786.9 KM
AVD1000 K22.1 M36.9 M34.4 M4.8 M6.6 M12.8 M20.3 M24.2 M13.6 M15.2 M18.6 M27.4 M7.5 M-126.3 M-49.9 M-47.4 M
TRX-773.4 K-8.9 M-3 M-2 M-8.8 M-12.6 M-5.9 M-6.7 M-30.3 M-11.5 M-4 M-7.9 MM-639 K943.7 K849.3 K891.8 K
SMID200 K-351.7 K376.7 K691.5 K-804.8 KM2.8 M2.7 M1.7 M1.9 M2.7 M7.6 M800 K795 K7.7 M12.5 M13.1 M
NTIC800 K3.4 M3.4 M4.1 M1.8 M-867.5 K3.4 M6.7 M5.2 M-1.3 M6.3 M6.3 M2.9 M5.4 M17.6 K20.3 K19.2 K

Core Molding Competitive Analysis

Core Molding competes directly with Friedman Industries, Lavoro Limited, and FutureFuel Corp, and the financial data points to clear areas of divergence. On scale alone, Core Molding's 207.0 M valuation and 273.8 M revenue define its weight class. The company converts revenue to profit at a 3.55% rate and delivers 6.24% on shareholder equity. Earnings multiples split the pair: 11.19x for Core Molding against 3.63x for Friedman Industries. Return on equity favors Core Molding at 6.24%, well ahead of Lavoro Limited at -252.90%. Core Molding keeps more of each revenue dollar with a 3.55% margin versus -51.59% at FutureFuel Corp.
    
 Better Than Average     
    
 Worse Than Peers    View Performance Chart
CMT FRD LVRO FF FSI BHST USGO
 0.94 
24.18
Core Molding
 0.70 
21.66
Friedman
 20.76 
0.05
Lavoro Limited
 0.49 
4.09
FutureFuel Corp
 5.79 
6.40
Flexible
 4.07 
3.84
BioHarvest
 1.93 
13.24
USGO
Market Volatility
(90 Days Market Risk)
Market Performance
(90 Days Performance)
Odds of Financial Distress
(Probability Of Bankruptcy)
Comparative Valuation
(Enterprise Value)
Buy or Sell Analysis
(Average Analysts Consensus)
Not Available
Not Available
Trade Advice
(90 Days Macroaxis Advice)
Return On Asset TTM
Total Asset TTM
Net Income TTM
Total Debt TTM
Retained Earnings TTM
Current Liabilities TTM
Net Asset
Current Ratio TTM
Price To Book TTM
Current Valuation
Five Year Return
Cash And Equivalents TTM
Number Of Employees
Shares Outstanding
Debt To Equity TTM
Annual Yield
Current Asset TTM
Trailing Beta
Return On Equity TTM
Profit Margin TTM
Number Of Shares Shorted
Price To Sales TTM
Book Value Per Share TTM
Target Price
Last Dividend Paid
Shares Owned By Institutions
EBITDA TTM
Price To Earnings TTM
Price To Earnings To Growth
Gross Profit TTM
Market Capitalization TTM
Earnings Per Share
Short Ratio TTM
Operating Margin TTM
Cash Per Share TTM
Working Capital TTM
Shares Owned By Insiders
Revenue TTM
Cash Flow From Operations TTM
Day Typical Price
Accumulation Distribution
Market Facilitation Index
Daily Balance Of Power
Period Momentum Indicator
Rate Of Daily Change
Day Median Price
Price Action Indicator
Relative Strength Index
Coefficient Of Variation
Mean Deviation
Jensen Alpha
Total Risk Alpha
Sortino Ratio
Downside Variance
Standard Deviation
Kurtosis
Potential Upside
Treynor Ratio
Maximum Drawdown
Variance
Market Risk Adjusted Performance
Risk Adjusted Performance
Skewness
Semi Deviation
Information Ratio
Value At Risk
Expected Short fall
Downside Deviation
Semi Variance

Core Molding Competition Peer Performance Charts

How to Analyze Core Molding Against Peers

Core Molding's peer analysis compares Core Molding with related companies to put valuation, quality, and risk metrics in context. This establishes whether recent performance is company-specific or broadly sector-driven. A practical workflow includes:
  • Set a relevant peer group: Include direct competitors and close alternatives with comparable business exposure.
  • Benchmark core financials: Compare profitability, growth, capital structure, and cash flow quality.
  • Check valuation dispersion: Review whether Core Molding trades at a premium or discount versus peers and why.
  • Evaluate risk profile: Compare volatility, drawdowns, and correlation to avoid false diversification assumptions.
  • Document the thesis: Record where Core Molding leads or lags and what catalysts could close or widen the gap.
Use this as an educational baseline, then validate conclusions with current filings, market conditions, and portfolio objectives.

Peer Comparison Metrics & Methodology

Core Molding's free cash flow conversion rate exceeds the peer group norm, a sign that reported profits are backed by real cash. Relative ranking may help frame which fundamentals deserve deeper follow-up. For peer comparison, Core Molding has a market cap of 206.97 million, P/E of 11.19, profit margin of 3.55%.

Core Molding Technologies data is compiled from periodic company reporting and market reference feeds and standardized for comparability. Analyst inputs may be included when coverage is available.

Editorial review and methodology oversight provided by: Gabriel Shpitalnik, Member of Macroaxis Editorial Board