Campbells Competitors
| CPB Stock | USD 28.43 1.53 5.69% |
Campbells vs Hormel Foods Correlation
Very good diversification
The correlation between Campbells Co and HRL is -0.41 (i.e., Very good diversification) for selected investment horizon. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Campbells Co and HRL in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed.
Moving together with Campbells Stock
Moving against Campbells Stock
| 0.75 | JJ1 | JJ SNACK FOODS | PairCorr |
| 0.67 | SFD | Smithfield Foods Common | PairCorr |
| 0.66 | TSN | Tyson Foods | PairCorr |
| 0.64 | MFI | Maple Leaf Foods | PairCorr |
| 0.5 | CYF | Canyon Creek Food | PairCorr |
Campbells Competition Correlation Matrix
Typically, diversification allows investors to combine positions across different asset classes to reduce overall portfolio risk. Correlation between Campbells and its competitors represents the degree of relationship between the price movements of corresponding stocks. A correlation of about +1.0 implies that the price of Campbells and its corresponding peer move in tandem. A correlation of -1.0 means that prices move in opposite directions. A correlation of close to zero suggests that the price movements of assets are uncorrelated; in other words, the historical price movement of Campbells does not affect the price movement of the other competitor.
High positive correlations
| High negative correlations
|
Risk-Adjusted Indicators
There is a big difference between Campbells Stock performing well and Campbells Company doing well as a business compared to the competition. There are so many exceptions to the norm that investors cannot definitively determine what's good or bad unless they analyze Campbells' multiple risk-adjusted performance indicators across the competitive landscape. These indicators are quantitative in nature and help investors forecast volatility and risk-adjusted expected returns across various positions.| Mean Deviation | Jensen Alpha | Sortino Ratio | Treynor Ratio | Semi Deviation | Expected Shortfall | Potential Upside | Value @Risk | Maximum Drawdown | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAG | 1.30 | 0.21 | 0.11 | 0.66 | 1.35 | 3.38 | 7.17 | |||
| PPC | 1.08 | 0.19 | 0.10 | 0.73 | 1.37 | 3.22 | 8.77 | |||
| LW | 1.75 | (0.34) | 0.00 | (3.69) | 0.00 | 3.22 | 30.34 | |||
| INGR | 0.83 | 0.04 | 0.01 | 0.13 | 1.21 | 2.27 | 6.05 | |||
| SJM | 1.10 | 0.10 | 0.03 | 0.83 | 1.35 | 2.52 | 5.77 | |||
| POST | 1.18 | 0.03 | (0.01) | 0.23 | 1.77 | 2.06 | 9.22 | |||
| SFD | 0.81 | 0.14 | 0.11 | 1.06 | 0.74 | 1.90 | 4.79 | |||
| TAP | 1.28 | 0.26 | 0.13 | 2.58 | 1.37 | 3.45 | 8.40 | |||
| EDU | 1.49 | 0.08 | 0.02 | 0.36 | 1.73 | 3.07 | 8.57 | |||
| HRL | 1.15 | 0.27 | 0.19 | (11.83) | 0.96 | 2.76 | 6.59 |
Cross Equities Net Income Analysis
Compare Campbells and related stocks such as ConAgra Foods, Pilgrims Pride Corp, and Lamb Weston Holdings Net Income Over Time
Select Fundamental| 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAG | 105.3 M | 467.9 M | 773.9 M | 303.1 M | (252.6 M) | (677 M) | 639.3 M | 808.4 M | 678.3 M | 840.1 M | 1.3 B | 888.2 M | 683.6 M | 347.2 M | 1.2 B | 1.3 B | 1.4 B |
| PPC | 9.2 M | (496.8 M) | 174.2 M | 549.6 M | 711.6 M | 662.9 M | 480.9 M | 718.1 M | 247.9 M | 455.9 M | 94.8 M | 31 M | 745.9 M | 321.6 M | 1.1 B | 1.2 B | 1.3 B |
| INGR | (75 M) | 415.7 M | 427.5 M | 395.7 M | 354.9 M | 402.2 M | 484.9 M | 519 M | 443 M | 413 M | 348 M | 117 M | 492 M | 643 M | 647 M | 729 M | 765.5 M |
| SJM | 15.9 M | 459.7 M | 544.2 M | 565.2 M | 344.9 M | 688.7 M | 592.3 M | 1.3 B | 514.4 M | 779.5 M | 876.3 M | 631.7 M | (91.3 M) | 744 M | (1.2 B) | (1.4 B) | (1.3 B) |
| POST | 121.8 M | 49.9 M | 15.2 M | (343.2 M) | (115.3 M) | (3.3 M) | 48.3 M | 467.3 M | 124.7 M | 800 K | 166.7 M | 756.6 M | 301.3 M | 366.7 M | 335.7 M | 386.1 M | 405.4 M |
| SFD | 9.2 M | 361.3 M | 183.8 M | 556.1 M | 556.1 M | 452.3 M | 472 M | 472 M | 472 M | 472 M | 472 M | 472 M | 870 M | 17 M | 953 M | 1.1 B | 1.2 B |
| TAP | 53.4 M | 676.3 M | 443 M | 567.3 M | 514 M | 359.5 M | 2 B | 1.4 B | 1.1 B | 241.7 M | (945.7 M) | 1 B | (175.3 M) | 948.9 M | 1.1 B | 1.3 B | 1.4 B |
| EDU | 2.3 M | 132.7 M | 136.3 M | 215.7 M | 190.9 M | 224.9 M | 274.5 M | 296.1 M | 238.1 M | 413.3 M | 334.4 M | (1.2 B) | 177.3 M | 309.6 M | 372.4 M | 428.3 M | 449.7 M |
Campbells and related stocks such as ConAgra Foods, Pilgrims Pride Corp, and Lamb Weston Holdings Net Income description
Net income is one of the most important fundamental items in finance. It plays a large role in Campbells financial statement analysis. It represents the amount of money remaining after all of Campbells Co operating expenses, interest, taxes and preferred stock dividends have been deducted from a company total revenue.Campbells Competitive Analysis
The better you understand Campbells competitors, the better chance you have of utilizing it as a position in your portfolios. From an individual investor's perspective, Campbells' competitive analysis can cover a whole range of metrics. Some of these will be more critical depending on who you are as an investor and how you react to market volatility. However, if you are locking your investment sandscape to a long-term horizon, comparing the fundamental indicator across Campbells' competition over several years is one of the best ways to analyze its investment potential.| Better Than Average | Worse Than Peers | View Performance Chart |
Campbells Competition Performance Charts
Five steps to successful analysis of Campbells Competition
Campbells' competitive analysis is the process of researching and evaluating its competitive landscape. It provides an understanding of the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) faced by Campbells in relation to its competition. Campbells' competition analysis typically involves several steps, including:- Identifying the key players in the market: This involves identifying the major competitors of Campbells in the market, both direct and indirect, as well as new entrants and disruptive technologies.
- Assessing the strengths and weaknesses of each competitor: This involves evaluating each competitor's strengths and weaknesses in areas such as product offerings, market share, brand recognition, financial performance, and distribution channels.
- Understanding the competitive environment: This involves evaluating the regulatory environment, economic conditions, and other factors that may impact Campbells' competitive landscape.
- Identifying opportunities and threats: This involves using the information gathered during the analysis to identify opportunities and threats to Campbells, and developing a strategy to address them.
- Evaluating the competitive landscape: This involves understanding the competitive dynamics of the market, such as pricing, marketing, and distribution strategies, as well as analyzing the competitive advantage of each competitor.
Complement your Campbells position
In addition to having Campbells in your portfolios, you can quickly add positions using our predefined set of ideas and optimize them against your very unique investing style. A single investing idea is a collection of funds, stocks, ETFs, or cryptocurrencies that are programmatically selected from a pull of investment themes. After you determine your investment opportunity, you can then find an optimal portfolio that will maximize potential returns on the chosen idea or minimize its exposure to market volatility.Did You Try This Idea?
Run Tech Funds Thematic Idea Now
Tech Funds
Funds or Etfs that invest in companies involved in research, development, testing, or distribution of technologically based goods and services. The Tech Funds theme has 48 constituents at this time.
You can either use a buy-and-hold strategy to lock in the entire theme or actively trade it to take advantage of the short-term price volatility of individual constituents. Macroaxis can help you discover thousands of investment opportunities in different asset classes. In addition, you can partner with us for reliable portfolio optimization as you plan to utilize Tech Funds Theme or any other thematic opportunities.
| View All Next | Launch |
Check out Campbells Correlation with its peers. You can also try the Portfolio Dashboard module to portfolio dashboard that provides centralized access to all your investments.
Is Packaged Foods & Meats space expected to grow? Or is there an opportunity to expand the business' product line in the future? Factors like these will boost the valuation of Campbells. Projected growth potential of Campbells fundamentally drives upward valuation adjustments. The financial industry is built on trying to define current growth potential and future valuation accurately. Comprehensive Campbells assessment requires weighing all these inputs, though not all factors influence outcomes equally.
Quarterly Earnings Growth (0.1) | Dividend Share 1.56 | Earnings Share 1.94 | Revenue Per Share | Quarterly Revenue Growth (0.03) |
The market value of Campbells is measured differently than its book value, which is the value of Campbells that is recorded on the company's balance sheet. Investors also form their own opinion of Campbells' value that differs from its market value or its book value, called intrinsic value, which is Campbells' true underlying value. Investors use various methods to calculate intrinsic value and buy a stock when its market value falls below its intrinsic value. Because Campbells' market value can be influenced by many factors that don't directly affect Campbells' underlying business (such as a pandemic or basic market pessimism), market value can vary widely from intrinsic value.
It's important to distinguish between Campbells' intrinsic value and market price, which are calculated using different methodologies. Investment decisions regarding Campbells should consider multiple factors including financial performance, growth metrics, competitive position, and professional analysis. Meanwhile, Campbells' quoted price indicates the marketplace figure where supply meets demand through bilateral consent.