DDD Competitors
| DDD Stock | USD 2.31 0.07 3.12% |
3D Systems vs Rimini Street Correlation
Weak diversification
The correlation between 3D Systems and RMNI is 0.32 (i.e., Weak diversification) for selected investment horizon. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding 3D Systems and RMNI in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed.
Moving against DDD Stock
| 0.5 | FTV | Fortive Corp Earnings Call This Week | PairCorr |
Sophisticated investors, who have witnessed many market ups and downs, anticipate that the market will even out over time. This tendency of 3D Systems' price to converge to an average value over time is called mean reversion. However, historically, high market prices usually discourage investors that believe in mean reversion to invest, while low prices are viewed as an opportunity to buy.
3D Systems Competition Correlation Matrix
Typically, diversification allows investors to combine positions across different asset classes to reduce overall portfolio risk. Correlation between 3D Systems and its competitors represents the degree of relationship between the price movements of corresponding stocks. A correlation of about +1.0 implies that the price of DDD and its corresponding peer move in tandem. A correlation of -1.0 means that prices move in opposite directions. A correlation of close to zero suggests that the price movements of assets are uncorrelated; in other words, the historical price movement of 3D Systems does not affect the price movement of the other competitor.
High positive correlations
| High negative correlations
|
Risk-Adjusted Indicators
There is a big difference between DDD Stock performing well and 3D Systems Company doing well as a business compared to the competition. There are so many exceptions to the norm that investors cannot definitively determine what's good or bad unless they analyze 3D Systems' multiple risk-adjusted performance indicators across the competitive landscape. These indicators are quantitative in nature and help investors forecast volatility and risk-adjusted expected returns across various positions.| Mean Deviation | Jensen Alpha | Sortino Ratio | Treynor Ratio | Semi Deviation | Expected Shortfall | Potential Upside | Value @Risk | Maximum Drawdown | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NNDM | 2.30 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.04 | 2.81 | 6.21 | 16.30 | |||
| MVIS | 3.18 | (0.47) | 0.00 | (0.85) | 0.00 | 6.52 | 14.78 | |||
| LSAK | 1.68 | 0.11 | 0.04 | 0.44 | 2.01 | 4.36 | 10.30 | |||
| VERI | 3.95 | (0.97) | 0.00 | (1.37) | 0.00 | 7.35 | 26.00 | |||
| RXT | 2.86 | (1.47) | 0.00 | 15.44 | 0.00 | 4.04 | 19.84 | |||
| BZAI | 4.32 | (1.69) | 0.00 | (1.69) | 0.00 | 6.40 | 29.46 | |||
| BGIN | 4.13 | (0.52) | 0.00 | (8.58) | 0.00 | 8.37 | 25.24 | |||
| RPAY | 2.52 | (0.52) | 0.00 | (0.88) | 0.00 | 3.79 | 16.12 | |||
| GRRR | 3.74 | (0.22) | 0.00 | (0.09) | 0.00 | 9.43 | 19.51 | |||
| RMNI | 1.71 | (0.39) | 0.00 | 55.73 | 0.00 | 2.53 | 15.77 |
Cross Equities Net Income Analysis
Compare 3D Systems and related stocks such as Nano Dimension, Microvision, and Lesaka Technologies Net Income Over Time
Select Fundamental| 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NNDM | 13.1 M | (7 M) | (8 K) | (5.8 M) | (3.6 M) | (5.4 M) | (9 M) | (17.5 M) | (15.5 M) | (8.4 M) | (48.5 M) | (200.8 M) | (227.4 M) | (54.5 M) | (95.9 M) | (86.3 M) | (82 M) |
| MVIS | (3.5 M) | (35.8 M) | (22.7 M) | (13.2 M) | (18.1 M) | (14.5 M) | (16.5 M) | (24.2 M) | (27.2 M) | (24.8 M) | (13.6 M) | (43.2 M) | (53.1 M) | (82.8 M) | (96.9 M) | (87.2 M) | (82.9 M) |
| LSAK | (267.2 K) | 44.7 M | 13 M | 70.1 M | 94.7 M | 82.5 M | 73 M | 39.1 M | (311 M) | (78.4 M) | (38.1 M) | (43.9 M) | (35.1 M) | (17.4 M) | (87.5 M) | (78.8 M) | (74.8 M) |
| VERI | (4.2 M) | (4.2 M) | (4.2 M) | (4.2 M) | (4.2 M) | (6.2 M) | (27 M) | (59.6 M) | (61.1 M) | (62.1 M) | (47.9 M) | (47.8 M) | (25.6 M) | (58.6 M) | (37.4 M) | (33.6 M) | (35.3 M) |
| RXT | (59.9 M) | (59.9 M) | (59.9 M) | (59.9 M) | (59.9 M) | (59.9 M) | (59.9 M) | (59.9 M) | (470.6 M) | (102.3 M) | (245.8 M) | (218.3 M) | (804.8 M) | (837.8 M) | (858.2 M) | (772.4 M) | (733.8 M) |
| BZAI | (65.9 K) | (65.9 K) | (65.9 K) | (65.9 K) | (65.9 K) | (65.9 K) | (65.9 K) | (65.9 K) | (65.9 K) | (65.9 K) | (65.9 K) | (65.9 K) | (104.6 M) | (87.6 M) | (61.2 M) | (55.1 M) | (57.8 M) |
| BGIN | 7.7 M | 7.7 M | 7.7 M | 7.7 M | 7.7 M | 7.7 M | 7.7 M | 7.7 M | 7.7 M | 7.7 M | 7.7 M | 7.7 M | (220.4 K) | 139.7 M | 65.9 M | 75.8 M | 58.6 M |
| RPAY | (511.7 K) | (511.7 K) | (511.7 K) | (511.7 K) | (511.7 K) | (511.7 K) | (511.7 K) | 9.4 M | 1.5 M | (55.3 M) | (105.6 M) | (50.1 M) | 12.8 M | (110.5 M) | (10.2 M) | (9.1 M) | (9.6 M) |
| GRRR | (535.9 K) | (535.9 K) | (535.9 K) | (535.9 K) | (535.9 K) | (535.9 K) | (535.9 K) | (535.9 K) | (535.9 K) | (535.9 K) | (5.9 M) | (8.5 M) | (87.5 M) | 13.5 M | (64.8 M) | (58.3 M) | (55.4 M) |
| RMNI | (9.9 M) | (9.9 M) | (9.9 M) | (12.1 M) | (127.8 M) | (45.3 M) | (2.9 M) | (53.3 M) | (68 M) | 21.4 M | 11.6 M | 75.2 M | (2.5 M) | 26.1 M | (36.3 M) | (41.7 M) | (39.6 M) |
3D Systems and related stocks such as Nano Dimension, Microvision, and Lesaka Technologies Net Income description
Net income is one of the most important fundamental items in finance. It plays a large role in 3D Systems financial statement analysis. It represents the amount of money remaining after all of 3D Systems operating expenses, interest, taxes and preferred stock dividends have been deducted from a company total revenue.3D Systems Competitive Analysis
The better you understand 3D Systems competitors, the better chance you have of utilizing it as a position in your portfolios. From an individual investor's perspective, 3D Systems' competitive analysis can cover a whole range of metrics. Some of these will be more critical depending on who you are as an investor and how you react to market volatility. However, if you are locking your investment sandscape to a long-term horizon, comparing the fundamental indicator across 3D Systems' competition over several years is one of the best ways to analyze its investment potential.| Better Than Average | Worse Than Peers | View Performance Chart |
3D Systems Competition Performance Charts
Five steps to successful analysis of 3D Systems Competition
3D Systems' competitive analysis is the process of researching and evaluating its competitive landscape. It provides an understanding of the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) faced by 3D Systems in relation to its competition. 3D Systems' competition analysis typically involves several steps, including:- Identifying the key players in the market: This involves identifying the major competitors of 3D Systems in the market, both direct and indirect, as well as new entrants and disruptive technologies.
- Assessing the strengths and weaknesses of each competitor: This involves evaluating each competitor's strengths and weaknesses in areas such as product offerings, market share, brand recognition, financial performance, and distribution channels.
- Understanding the competitive environment: This involves evaluating the regulatory environment, economic conditions, and other factors that may impact 3D Systems' competitive landscape.
- Identifying opportunities and threats: This involves using the information gathered during the analysis to identify opportunities and threats to 3D Systems, and developing a strategy to address them.
- Evaluating the competitive landscape: This involves understanding the competitive dynamics of the market, such as pricing, marketing, and distribution strategies, as well as analyzing the competitive advantage of each competitor.
Complement your 3D Systems position
In addition to having 3D Systems in your portfolios, you can quickly add positions using our predefined set of ideas and optimize them against your very unique investing style. A single investing idea is a collection of funds, stocks, ETFs, or cryptocurrencies that are programmatically selected from a pull of investment themes. After you determine your investment opportunity, you can then find an optimal portfolio that will maximize potential returns on the chosen idea or minimize its exposure to market volatility.Did You Try This Idea?
Run Dividend Beast Thematic Idea Now
Dividend Beast
An experimental equal-weighted theme of equities with high dividend yield and solid fundamentals based on Macroaxis rating system. The Dividend Beast theme has 65 constituents at this time.
You can either use a buy-and-hold strategy to lock in the entire theme or actively trade it to take advantage of the short-term price volatility of individual constituents. Macroaxis can help you discover thousands of investment opportunities in different asset classes. In addition, you can partner with us for reliable portfolio optimization as you plan to utilize Dividend Beast Theme or any other thematic opportunities.
| View All Next | Launch |
Check out 3D Systems Correlation with its peers. For information on how to trade DDD Stock refer to our How to Trade DDD Stock guide.You can also try the My Watchlist Analysis module to analyze my current watchlist and to refresh optimization strategy. Macroaxis watchlist is based on self-learning algorithm to remember stocks you like.
Will Industrial Machinery & Supplies & Components sector continue expanding? Could DDD diversify its offerings? Factors like these will boost the valuation of 3D Systems. Projected growth potential of DDD fundamentally drives upward valuation adjustments. Accurate valuation requires analyzing both current fundamentals and future growth trajectories. Every 3D Systems data point contributes insight, yet successful analysis hinges on identifying the most consequential variables.
Earnings Share 0.04 | Revenue Per Share | Quarterly Revenue Growth (0.19) | Return On Assets | Return On Equity |
Understanding 3D Systems requires distinguishing between market price and book value, where the latter reflects DDD's accounting equity. The concept of intrinsic value—what 3D Systems' is actually worth based on fundamentals—guides informed investors toward better entry and exit points. Seasoned market participants apply comprehensive analytical frameworks to derive fundamental worth and identify mispriced opportunities. Market sentiment, economic cycles, and investor behavior can push 3D Systems' price substantially above or below its fundamental value.
It's important to distinguish between 3D Systems' intrinsic value and market price, which are calculated using different methodologies. Investment decisions regarding 3D Systems should consider multiple factors including financial performance, growth metrics, competitive position, and professional analysis. In contrast, 3D Systems' trading price reflects the actual exchange value where willing buyers and sellers reach mutual agreement.