Gitlab Competitors
| GTLB Stock | USD 21.51 0.85 4.11% |
Pair Correlation for Gitlab and Appfolio Overview
Very poor diversification
For the present investment horizon, the measured correlation between Gitlab and Appfolio stands at 0.85, or Very poor diversification. Lower overlap tends to improve diversification, while higher overlap means both positions carry similar risk.
| 0.92 | RPD | Rapid7 Inc | PairCorr |
| 0.68 | MSFT | Microsoft Earnings Call This Week | PairCorr |
| 0.64 | OSPN | OneSpan | PairCorr |
| 0.82 | PRGS | Progress Software | PairCorr |
Statistical evidence for mean reversion in Gitlab's appears through its tendency to revert after extreme valuations. Under mean reversion theory, Gitlab's price extremes are viewed as temporary dislocations that may self-correct. Mean reversion in Gitlab's is often observed around historical valuation multiples. Historical data for Gitlab shows that extreme valuations have tended to normalize over multi-year periods.
Gitlab Competition Correlation Matrix
Correlation analysis between Gitlab Inc and its competitors provides context for understanding whether diversification is real or only superficial inside the same peer group. When interpreted alongside fundamentals, correlation analysis separates broad industry exposure from company-specific behavior before additional capital is allocated across the peer group.
Please upgrade your account to get full access to Macroaxis premium features
High positive correlations
| High negative correlations
|
Risk-Adjusted Indicators
Headline performance for Gitlab Stock may not fully reflect how the business compares across its competitive set. Risk-adjusted metrics help compare Gitlab's efficiency and downside exposure against peers on a like-for-like basis. These indicators are quantitative in nature and measure volatility and risk-adjusted expected returns across different positions.| Mean Deviation | Jensen Alpha | Sortino Ratio | Treynor Ratio | Semi Deviation | Expected Shortfall | Potential Upside | Value @Risk | Maximum Drawdown | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NICE | 2.21 | -0.15 | 0.00 | 0.42 | 0.00 | 5.50 | 20.39 | |||
| LYFT | 2.49 | -0.34 | 0.00 | -1.87 | 0.00 | 4.77 | 20.89 | |||
| TTAN | 3.04 | -0.52 | 0.00 | 1.83 | 0.00 | 5.03 | 17.68 | |||
| PCTY | 2.38 | -0.44 | 0.00 | -71.45 | 0.00 | 4.62 | 15.59 | |||
| MTCH | 1.85 | 0.29 | 0.11 | 0.24 | 2.35 | 3.20 | 11.56 | |||
| SOUN | 3.83 | -0.34 | 0.00 | -1.64 | 0.00 | 6.77 | 24.15 | |||
| SRAD | 2.74 | -0.39 | 0.00 | -2.66 | 0.00 | 5.99 | 31.39 | |||
| LIF | 3.86 | -0.08 | 0.00 | -0.03 | 0.00 | 7.06 | 42.50 | |||
| DSGX | 2.12 | -0.17 | 0.00 | -5.19 | 0.00 | 4.87 | 10.04 | |||
| APPF | 2.19 | -0.35 | 0.00 | -0.55 | 0.00 | 4.32 | 10.46 |
Peer Comparison: Net Income
Net income is what remains after all costs — operating expenses, interest, taxes, and preferred dividends — are deducted from Gitlab's total revenue. The relationship between net income growth and revenue growth at Gitlab reveals whether margin expansion is driving earnings or whether top-line growth is being consumed by rising costs and financing charges.Compare Gitlab Inc and related stocks such as Nice Ltd ADR, LYFT Inc, and ServiceTitan Class Net Income Over Time
Select Fundamental| 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NICE | 300 K | 57.3 M | 67.9 M | 55.3 M | 103.1 M | 258.8 M | 116.9 M | 143.3 M | 159.3 M | 185.9 M | 196.3 M | 199.2 M | 265.9 M | 338.3 M | 442.6 M | 617 M | 647.8 M |
| LYFT | -682.8 M | -682.8 M | -682.8 M | -682.8 M | -682.8 M | -682.8 M | -682.8 M | -688.3 M | -911.3 M | -2.6 B | -1.8 B | -1.1 B | -1.6 B | -340.3 M | 22.8 M | 2.8 B | 3 B |
| TTAN | -269.5 M | -269.5 M | -269.5 M | -269.5 M | -269.5 M | -269.5 M | -269.5 M | -269.5 M | -269.5 M | -269.5 M | -269.5 M | -269.5 M | -269.5 M | -195.1 M | -239.1 M | -159.9 M | -167.8 M |
| PCTY | -130 K | 1.7 M | 617 K | -7.1 M | -14 M | -3.9 M | 6.7 M | 38.6 M | 53.8 M | 64.5 M | 70.8 M | 90.8 M | 140.8 M | 206.8 M | 227.1 M | 261.2 M | 274.3 M |
| MTCH | -6.4 M | 174.2 M | 159.3 M | 285.8 M | 414.9 M | 119.5 M | -41.3 M | 304.9 M | 627 M | 431.1 M | 162.3 M | 277.7 M | 361.9 M | 651.5 M | 551.3 M | 613.4 M | 644.1 M |
| SOUN | -64.5 M | -64.5 M | -64.5 M | -64.5 M | -64.5 M | -64.5 M | -64.5 M | -64.5 M | -64.5 M | -64.5 M | -74.4 M | -79.5 M | -116.7 M | -88.9 M | -350.7 M | -14 M | -14.7 M |
| SRAD | 11.7 M | 11.7 M | 11.7 M | 11.7 M | 11.7 M | 11.7 M | 11.7 M | 11.7 M | 11.7 M | 11.7 M | 15.2 M | 12.6 M | 10.9 M | 34.7 M | 34.1 M | 96.4 M | 101.2 M |
| LIF | -29 M | -29 M | -29 M | -29 M | -29 M | -29 M | -29 M | -29 M | -29 M | -29 M | -16.3 M | -33.6 M | -91.6 M | -28.2 M | -4.6 M | 150.8 M | 158.4 M |
| DSGX | -11.7 M | 12 M | 16 M | 9.6 M | 15.1 M | 20.6 M | 23.8 M | 26.9 M | 31.3 M | 37 M | 52.1 M | 86.3 M | 102.2 M | 115.9 M | 143.3 M | 167.4 M | 175.7 M |
| APPF | -7.3 M | -7.3 M | -7.3 M | -7.3 M | -8.6 M | -15.7 M | -8.3 M | 9.7 M | 20 M | 36.3 M | 158.4 M | 1 M | -68.1 M | 2.7 M | 204.1 M | 140.9 M | 148 M |
Gitlab Competitive Analysis
A side-by-side look at Gitlab, Nice, LYFT, and ServiceTitan highlights where each stock leads or lags. Gitlab enters the comparison at 3.51 B with 956.8 M in revenue. Profitability is a concern, with a -5.86% net margin and -6.31% return on equity signaling pressure on earnings. Profit margins tilt toward Nice at 20.78% against Gitlab at -5.86%. On equity returns, LYFT earns 140.77% compared to -6.31% at Gitlab. On pure scale, ServiceTitan is the bigger entity with market caps of 5.80 B versus 3.51 B.| Better Than Average | Worse Than Peers | View Performance Chart |
Gitlab Competition Peer Performance Charts
How to Analyze Gitlab Against Peers
Gitlab's peer analysis compares Gitlab with related companies to put valuation, quality, and risk metrics in context. This establishes whether recent performance is company-specific or broadly sector-driven. A practical workflow includes:- Set a relevant peer group: Include direct competitors and close alternatives with comparable business exposure.
- Benchmark core financials: Compare profitability, growth, capital structure, and cash flow quality.
- Check valuation dispersion: Review whether Gitlab trades at a premium or discount versus peers and why.
- Evaluate risk profile: Compare volatility, drawdowns, and correlation to avoid false diversification assumptions.
- Document the thesis: Record where Gitlab leads or lags and what catalysts could close or widen the gap.
Peer Comparison Metrics & Methodology
Gitlab's capital allocation track record stands out when measured by cumulative returns on acquisitions versus peers. Sector headwinds tend to hit all peers, so outperformance by Gitlab during a downturn is a strong quality signal. Comparative analysis works best when peers share business drivers, cycle exposure, and capital structure characteristics. For peer comparison, Gitlab has a market cap of 3.51 B, profit margin of -5.86%.
Gitlab Inc figures are aggregated from periodic company reporting and market reference feeds and normalized across reporting formats. Analyst inputs may be included when coverage is available.
Editorial review and methodology oversight provided by: Gabriel Shpitalnik, Member of Macroaxis Editorial Board