Huntington Competitors
| HII Stock | USD 444.52 2.90 0.66% |
Huntington Ingalls vs Thales SA Correlation
Almost no diversification
The correlation between Huntington Ingalls Industries and THLLY is 0.9 (i.e., Almost no diversification) for selected investment horizon. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Huntington Ingalls Industries and THLLY in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed.
Moving together with Huntington Stock
| 0.87 | BA | Boeing | PairCorr |
| 0.97 | CW | Curtiss Wright | PairCorr |
| 0.78 | GD | General Dynamics | PairCorr |
| 0.69 | GE | GE Aerospace | PairCorr |
Moving against Huntington Stock
The Huntington Ingalls' current Return On Equity is estimated to increase to 0.18, while Return On Tangible Assets are projected to decrease to 0.06. As of now, Huntington Ingalls' Net Tangible Assets are increasing as compared to previous years. The Huntington Ingalls' current Fixed Asset Turnover is estimated to increase to 3.64, while Total Assets are projected to decrease to under 8.6 B.Huntington Ingalls Competition Correlation Matrix
Typically, diversification allows investors to combine positions across different asset classes to reduce overall portfolio risk. Correlation between Huntington Ingalls and its competitors represents the degree of relationship between the price movements of corresponding stocks. A correlation of about +1.0 implies that the price of Huntington and its corresponding peer move in tandem. A correlation of -1.0 means that prices move in opposite directions. A correlation of close to zero suggests that the price movements of assets are uncorrelated; in other words, the historical price movement of Huntington Ingalls does not affect the price movement of the other competitor.
High positive correlations
| High negative correlations
|
Risk-Adjusted Indicators
There is a big difference between Huntington Stock performing well and Huntington Ingalls Company doing well as a business compared to the competition. There are so many exceptions to the norm that investors cannot definitively determine what's good or bad unless they analyze Huntington Ingalls' multiple risk-adjusted performance indicators across the competitive landscape. These indicators are quantitative in nature and help investors forecast volatility and risk-adjusted expected returns across various positions.| Mean Deviation | Jensen Alpha | Sortino Ratio | Treynor Ratio | Semi Deviation | Expected Shortfall | Potential Upside | Value @Risk | Maximum Drawdown | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ATRO | 2.27 | 0.73 | 0.30 | 0.60 | 1.94 | 6.28 | 18.76 | |||
| EADSY | 1.39 | (0.18) | 0.00 | (0.12) | 0.00 | 2.36 | 11.82 | |||
| HEI-A | 1.22 | (0.04) | (0.03) | 0.03 | 1.81 | 2.15 | 12.11 | |||
| PEW | 2.26 | (0.34) | 0.00 | 18.29 | 0.00 | 4.61 | 29.97 | |||
| PRZO | 5.72 | (0.09) | 0.01 | 0.04 | 6.24 | 11.76 | 57.11 | |||
| RGR | 1.26 | 0.30 | 0.21 | 0.45 | 1.01 | 3.00 | 7.14 | |||
| THLLY | 1.51 | 0.26 | 0.09 | (3.70) | 1.58 | 3.81 | 11.88 |
Cross Equities Net Income Analysis
Compare Huntington Ingalls and related stocks such as Astronics, Airbus Group NV, and HEICO Net Income Over Time
Select Fundamental| 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ATRO | 800 K | 21.6 M | 21.9 M | 27.3 M | 56.2 M | 67 M | 48.4 M | 19.7 M | 46.8 M | 52 M | (115.8 M) | (25.6 M) | (35.7 M) | (26.4 M) | (16.2 M) | 29.4 M | 30.8 M |
| HEI-A | 2.7 M | 85.1 M | 102.4 M | 121.3 M | 133.4 M | 156.2 M | 186 M | 259.2 M | 327.9 M | 314 M | 304.2 M | 351.7 M | 403.6 M | 514.1 M | 690.4 M | 793.9 M | 833.6 M |
| PEW | 414.5 K | 414.5 K | 414.5 K | 414.5 K | 414.5 K | 414.5 K | 414.5 K | 414.5 K | 414.5 K | 414.5 K | 414.5 K | 414.5 K | 414.5 K | 414.5 K | 5.8 M | 6.6 M | 3.4 M |
| PRZO | (1.9 M) | (1.9 M) | (1.9 M) | (1.9 M) | (1.9 M) | (1.9 M) | (1.9 M) | (1.9 M) | (1.9 M) | (1.9 M) | (1.9 M) | (615.4 K) | (1.7 M) | (3.8 M) | (11.1 M) | (9.9 M) | (9.5 M) |
| RGR | 9.6 M | 40 M | 70.6 M | 111.3 M | 38.6 M | 62.1 M | 87.5 M | 52.1 M | 50.9 M | 32.3 M | 90.4 M | 155.9 M | 88.3 M | 48.2 M | 30.6 M | 35.1 M | 39 M |
Huntington Ingalls and related stocks such as Astronics, Airbus Group NV, and HEICO Net Income description
Net income is one of the most important fundamental items in finance. It plays a large role in Huntington Ingalls financial statement analysis. It represents the amount of money remaining after all of Huntington Ingalls Industries operating expenses, interest, taxes and preferred stock dividends have been deducted from a company total revenue.Huntington Ingalls Competitive Analysis
The better you understand Huntington Ingalls competitors, the better chance you have of utilizing it as a position in your portfolios. From an individual investor's perspective, Huntington Ingalls' competitive analysis can cover a whole range of metrics. Some of these will be more critical depending on who you are as an investor and how you react to market volatility. However, if you are locking your investment sandscape to a long-term horizon, comparing the fundamental indicator across Huntington Ingalls' competition over several years is one of the best ways to analyze its investment potential.| Better Than Average | Worse Than Peers | View Performance Chart |
Huntington Ingalls Competition Performance Charts
Five steps to successful analysis of Huntington Ingalls Competition
Huntington Ingalls' competitive analysis is the process of researching and evaluating its competitive landscape. It provides an understanding of the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) faced by Huntington Ingalls in relation to its competition. Huntington Ingalls' competition analysis typically involves several steps, including:- Identifying the key players in the market: This involves identifying the major competitors of Huntington Ingalls in the market, both direct and indirect, as well as new entrants and disruptive technologies.
- Assessing the strengths and weaknesses of each competitor: This involves evaluating each competitor's strengths and weaknesses in areas such as product offerings, market share, brand recognition, financial performance, and distribution channels.
- Understanding the competitive environment: This involves evaluating the regulatory environment, economic conditions, and other factors that may impact Huntington Ingalls' competitive landscape.
- Identifying opportunities and threats: This involves using the information gathered during the analysis to identify opportunities and threats to Huntington Ingalls, and developing a strategy to address them.
- Evaluating the competitive landscape: This involves understanding the competitive dynamics of the market, such as pricing, marketing, and distribution strategies, as well as analyzing the competitive advantage of each competitor.
Complement your Huntington Ingalls position
In addition to having Huntington Ingalls in your portfolios, you can quickly add positions using our predefined set of ideas and optimize them against your very unique investing style. A single investing idea is a collection of funds, stocks, ETFs, or cryptocurrencies that are programmatically selected from a pull of investment themes. After you determine your investment opportunity, you can then find an optimal portfolio that will maximize potential returns on the chosen idea or minimize its exposure to market volatility.Did You Try This Idea?
Run Heavy Metals Thematic Idea Now
Heavy Metals
Companies involved in mining, production, and distribution of various industrial metals and minerals. The Heavy Metals theme has 47 constituents at this time.
You can either use a buy-and-hold strategy to lock in the entire theme or actively trade it to take advantage of the short-term price volatility of individual constituents. Macroaxis can help you discover thousands of investment opportunities in different asset classes. In addition, you can partner with us for reliable portfolio optimization as you plan to utilize Heavy Metals Theme or any other thematic opportunities.
| View All Next | Launch |
Check out Huntington Ingalls Correlation with its peers. You can also try the Investing Opportunities module to build portfolios using our predefined set of ideas and optimize them against your investing preferences.
Is there potential for Aerospace & Defense market expansion? Will Huntington introduce new products? Factors like these will boost the valuation of Huntington Ingalls. Market participants price Huntington higher when confident in its future expansion prospects. Understanding fair value requires weighing current performance against future potential. All the valuation information about Huntington Ingalls listed above have to be considered, but the key to understanding future value is determining which factors weigh more heavily than others.
Quarterly Earnings Growth 0.281 | Dividend Share 5.43 | Earnings Share 15.38 | Revenue Per Share | Quarterly Revenue Growth 0.157 |
Huntington Ingalls's market price often diverges from its book value, the accounting figure shown on Huntington's balance sheet. Smart investors calculate Huntington Ingalls' intrinsic value - its true economic worth - which may differ significantly from both market price and book value. Analysts utilize numerous techniques to assess fundamental value, seeking to purchase shares when trading prices fall beneath estimated intrinsic worth. Since Huntington Ingalls' trading price responds to investor sentiment, macroeconomic conditions, and market psychology, it can swing far from fundamental value.
Please note, there is a significant difference between Huntington Ingalls' value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if Huntington Ingalls is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, Huntington Ingalls' price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.