Martin Competitors
| MLM Stock | USD 670.95 0.22 0.03% |
Martin Marietta vs ArcelorMittal Correlation
Very poor diversification
The correlation between Martin Marietta Materials and MT is 0.83 (i.e., Very poor diversification) for selected investment horizon. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Martin Marietta Materials and MT in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed.
Moving together with Martin Stock
| 0.89 | CX | Cemex SAB de | PairCorr |
| 0.63 | EXP | Eagle Materials | PairCorr |
| 0.9 | VMC | Vulcan Materials Sell-off Trend | PairCorr |
Moving against Martin Stock
| 0.83 | GCMGW | GCM Grosvenor | PairCorr |
| 0.77 | BROGF | BROGF | PairCorr |
| 0.68 | ADVWW | Advantage Solutions | PairCorr |
| 0.64 | MAPSW | WM Technology | PairCorr |
| 0.48 | DECAU | Denali Capital Acqui | PairCorr |
Martin Marietta Competition Correlation Matrix
Typically, diversification allows investors to combine positions across different asset classes to reduce overall portfolio risk. Correlation between Martin Marietta and its competitors represents the degree of relationship between the price movements of corresponding stocks. A correlation of about +1.0 implies that the price of Martin and its corresponding peer move in tandem. A correlation of -1.0 means that prices move in opposite directions. A correlation of close to zero suggests that the price movements of assets are uncorrelated; in other words, the historical price movement of Martin Marietta Materials does not affect the price movement of the other competitor.
Risk-Adjusted Indicators
There is a big difference between Martin Stock performing well and Martin Marietta Company doing well as a business compared to the competition. There are so many exceptions to the norm that investors cannot definitively determine what's good or bad unless they analyze Martin Marietta's multiple risk-adjusted performance indicators across the competitive landscape. These indicators are quantitative in nature and help investors forecast volatility and risk-adjusted expected returns across various positions.| Mean Deviation | Jensen Alpha | Sortino Ratio | Treynor Ratio | Semi Deviation | Expected Shortfall | Potential Upside | Value @Risk | Maximum Drawdown | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VMC | 1.09 | 0.05 | 0.03 | 0.09 | 1.66 | 2.10 | 8.21 | |||
| AMRZ | 1.42 | 0.04 | (0.01) | 1.59 | 1.56 | 3.30 | 7.17 | |||
| FNV | 1.48 | 0.32 | 0.12 | 0.41 | 2.24 | 3.37 | 15.02 | |||
| NUE | 1.36 | 0.32 | 0.22 | 0.37 | 1.08 | 3.50 | 6.60 | |||
| CTVA | 0.94 | 0.26 | 0.21 | 0.44 | 0.76 | 2.24 | 5.41 | |||
| GFI | 2.78 | 0.46 | 0.12 | 0.41 | 3.47 | 6.95 | 23.45 | |||
| AU | 2.79 | 0.58 | 0.14 | 0.47 | 3.58 | 6.75 | 21.11 | |||
| WPM | 2.04 | 0.52 | 0.14 | 0.50 | 3.02 | 4.16 | 18.32 | |||
| JHX | 1.64 | 0.11 | 0.05 | 0.14 | 2.23 | 4.42 | 10.48 | |||
| MT | 1.47 | 0.55 | 0.40 | 0.73 | 0.87 | 3.97 | 8.20 |
Cross Equities Net Income Analysis
Compare Martin Marietta Materials and related stocks such as Vulcan Materials, Amrize, and Franco Nevada Net Income Over Time
Select Fundamental| 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VMC | 71.3 M | (70.8 M) | (52.6 M) | 24.4 M | 204.9 M | 221.2 M | 419.5 M | 601.2 M | 515.8 M | 617.7 M | 584.5 M | 670.8 M | 575.6 M | 933.2 M | 911.9 M | 1 B | 1.1 B |
| AMRZ | 841 M | 841 M | 841 M | 841 M | 841 M | 841 M | 841 M | 841 M | 841 M | 841 M | 841 M | 841 M | 1.1 B | 956 M | 1.4 B | 1.6 B | 1.2 B |
| FNV | (33.1 M) | (6.8 M) | 102.6 M | 11.7 M | 106.7 M | 24.6 M | 122.2 M | 194.7 M | 131.9 M | 352.1 M | 343.4 M | 727.2 M | 672.8 M | (466.4 M) | 552.1 M | 634.9 M | 666.7 M |
| NUE | 58.5 M | 778.2 M | 504.6 M | 488 M | 713.9 M | 357.7 M | 796.3 M | 1.3 B | 2.4 B | 1.3 B | 721.5 M | 6.8 B | 7.6 B | 4.5 B | 2 B | 1.7 B | 1.1 B |
| CTVA | 503 M | 503 M | 503 M | 503 M | 503 M | 503 M | 503 M | 2.5 B | (5.1 B) | (959 M) | 681 M | 1.8 B | 1.1 B | 735 M | 907 M | 1 B | 1.1 B |
| GFI | 188 M | 881.5 M | 654.3 M | (583.6 M) | 12.8 M | (239.1 M) | 157 M | (31.8 M) | (348.2 M) | 161.6 M | 723 M | 789.3 M | 711 M | 703.3 M | 1.2 B | 1.4 B | 1.5 B |
| AU | 49.9 M | 1.4 B | 829 M | (2 B) | (74 M) | 31 M | 63 M | 145 M | 216 M | (7 M) | 1 B | 614 M | 233 M | (235 M) | 1 B | 1.2 B | 1.2 B |
| WPM | 6.6 K | 550 M | 586 M | 375.5 M | 199.8 M | (162 M) | 195.1 M | 57.7 M | 427.1 M | 86.1 M | 507.8 M | 754.9 M | 669.1 M | 537.6 M | 529.1 M | 608.5 M | 638.9 M |
| JHX | 96.1 M | 604.3 M | 45.5 M | 99.5 M | 291.3 M | 244.4 M | 276.5 M | 146.1 M | 228.8 M | 241.5 M | 262.8 M | 459.1 M | 512 M | 510.2 M | 424 M | 487.6 M | 512 M |
| MT | 289 M | 2.3 B | (3.7 B) | (2.5 B) | (1.1 B) | (7.9 B) | 1.8 B | 4.6 B | 5.1 B | (2.5 B) | (733 M) | 15 B | 9.3 B | 919 M | 1.3 B | 1.5 B | 2.3 B |
Martin Marietta Materials and related stocks such as Vulcan Materials, Amrize, and Franco Nevada Net Income description
Net income is one of the most important fundamental items in finance. It plays a large role in Martin Marietta Materials financial statement analysis. It represents the amount of money remaining after all of Martin Marietta Materials operating expenses, interest, taxes and preferred stock dividends have been deducted from a company total revenue.Martin Marietta Competitive Analysis
The better you understand Martin Marietta competitors, the better chance you have of utilizing it as a position in your portfolios. From an individual investor's perspective, Martin Marietta's competitive analysis can cover a whole range of metrics. Some of these will be more critical depending on who you are as an investor and how you react to market volatility. However, if you are locking your investment sandscape to a long-term horizon, comparing the fundamental indicator across Martin Marietta's competition over several years is one of the best ways to analyze its investment potential.| Better Than Average | Worse Than Peers | View Performance Chart |
Martin Marietta Competition Performance Charts
Five steps to successful analysis of Martin Marietta Competition
Martin Marietta's competitive analysis is the process of researching and evaluating its competitive landscape. It provides an understanding of the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) faced by Martin Marietta Materials in relation to its competition. Martin Marietta's competition analysis typically involves several steps, including:- Identifying the key players in the market: This involves identifying the major competitors of Martin Marietta in the market, both direct and indirect, as well as new entrants and disruptive technologies.
- Assessing the strengths and weaknesses of each competitor: This involves evaluating each competitor's strengths and weaknesses in areas such as product offerings, market share, brand recognition, financial performance, and distribution channels.
- Understanding the competitive environment: This involves evaluating the regulatory environment, economic conditions, and other factors that may impact Martin Marietta's competitive landscape.
- Identifying opportunities and threats: This involves using the information gathered during the analysis to identify opportunities and threats to Martin Marietta Materials, and developing a strategy to address them.
- Evaluating the competitive landscape: This involves understanding the competitive dynamics of the market, such as pricing, marketing, and distribution strategies, as well as analyzing the competitive advantage of each competitor.
Complement your Martin Marietta position
In addition to having Martin Marietta in your portfolios, you can quickly add positions using our predefined set of ideas and optimize them against your very unique investing style. A single investing idea is a collection of funds, stocks, ETFs, or cryptocurrencies that are programmatically selected from a pull of investment themes. After you determine your investment opportunity, you can then find an optimal portfolio that will maximize potential returns on the chosen idea or minimize its exposure to market volatility.Did You Try This Idea?
Run IT Thematic Idea Now
IT
Information Technology (IT) companies and IT service providers across different domains. The IT theme has 37 constituents at this time.
You can either use a buy-and-hold strategy to lock in the entire theme or actively trade it to take advantage of the short-term price volatility of individual constituents. Macroaxis can help you discover thousands of investment opportunities in different asset classes. In addition, you can partner with us for reliable portfolio optimization as you plan to utilize IT Theme or any other thematic opportunities.
| View All Next | Launch |
Check out Martin Marietta Correlation with its peers. You can also try the Bonds Directory module to find actively traded corporate debentures issued by US companies.
Will Construction Materials sector continue expanding? Could Martin diversify its offerings? Factors like these will boost the valuation of Martin Marietta. Expected growth trajectory for Martin significantly influences the price investors are willing to assign. Accurate valuation requires analyzing both current fundamentals and future growth trajectories. Every Martin Marietta data point contributes insight, yet successful analysis hinges on identifying the most consequential variables.
Quarterly Earnings Growth 0.157 | Dividend Share 3.2 | Earnings Share 19.49 | Revenue Per Share | Quarterly Revenue Growth 0.124 |
The market value of Martin Marietta Materials is measured differently than its book value, which is the value of Martin that is recorded on the company's balance sheet. Investors also form their own opinion of Martin Marietta's value that differs from its market value or its book value, called intrinsic value, which is Martin Marietta's true underlying value. Seasoned market participants apply comprehensive analytical frameworks to derive fundamental worth and identify mispriced opportunities. Because Martin Marietta's market value can be influenced by many factors that don't directly affect Martin Marietta's underlying business (such as a pandemic or basic market pessimism), market value can vary widely from intrinsic value.
Understanding that Martin Marietta's value differs from its trading price is crucial, as each reflects different aspects of the company. Evaluating whether Martin Marietta represents a sound investment requires analyzing earnings trends, revenue growth, technical signals, industry dynamics, and expert forecasts. Meanwhile, Martin Marietta's quoted price indicates the marketplace figure where supply meets demand through bilateral consent.
