Madison Competitors
| MSGE Stock | USD 60.85 1.50 2.53% |
Madison Square vs Cogent Communications Correlation
Significant diversification
The correlation between Madison Square Garden and CCOI is 0.03 (i.e., Significant diversification) for selected investment horizon. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Madison Square Garden and CCOI in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed.
Moving against Madison Stock
| 0.93 | NFLX | Netflix | PairCorr |
| 0.92 | PBCRY | Bank Central Asia | PairCorr |
| 0.86 | SNAL | Snail Class A | PairCorr |
| 0.86 | SPOT | Spotify Technology Earnings Call This Week | PairCorr |
| 0.8 | AIM | Ai Media Technologies | PairCorr |
Madison Square Competition Correlation Matrix
Typically, diversification allows investors to combine positions across different asset classes to reduce overall portfolio risk. Correlation between Madison Square and its competitors represents the degree of relationship between the price movements of corresponding stocks. A correlation of about +1.0 implies that the price of Madison and its corresponding peer move in tandem. A correlation of -1.0 means that prices move in opposite directions. A correlation of close to zero suggests that the price movements of assets are uncorrelated; in other words, the historical price movement of Madison Square Garden does not affect the price movement of the other competitor.
High positive correlations
| High negative correlations
|
Risk-Adjusted Indicators
There is a big difference between Madison Stock performing well and Madison Square Company doing well as a business compared to the competition. There are so many exceptions to the norm that investors cannot definitively determine what's good or bad unless they analyze Madison Square's multiple risk-adjusted performance indicators across the competitive landscape. These indicators are quantitative in nature and help investors forecast volatility and risk-adjusted expected returns across various positions.| Mean Deviation | Jensen Alpha | Sortino Ratio | Treynor Ratio | Semi Deviation | Expected Shortfall | Potential Upside | Value @Risk | Maximum Drawdown | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SPHR | 2.04 | 0.45 | 0.26 | 0.50 | 1.45 | 5.43 | 9.49 | |||
| IQ | 2.06 | (0.22) | 0.00 | (0.32) | 0.00 | 4.69 | 10.91 | |||
| IMAX | 1.64 | 0.21 | 0.06 | 1.98 | 1.90 | 3.42 | 13.79 | |||
| LION | 1.97 | 0.56 | 0.26 | (3.18) | 1.50 | 4.84 | 11.61 | |||
| YELP | 1.54 | (0.51) | 0.00 | (0.48) | 0.00 | 2.38 | 12.51 | |||
| DOYU | 1.64 | (0.30) | 0.00 | (0.46) | 0.00 | 3.58 | 11.18 | |||
| IHS | 2.10 | 0.26 | 0.11 | 0.28 | 2.38 | 4.98 | 14.12 | |||
| WLY | 1.77 | (0.44) | 0.00 | (0.26) | 0.00 | 2.97 | 12.41 | |||
| CCOI | 4.04 | (0.70) | 0.00 | (0.33) | 0.00 | 7.09 | 34.85 |
Cross Equities Net Income Analysis
Compare Madison Square Garden and related stocks such as Sphere Entertainment, iQIYI Inc, and Imax Corp Net Income Over Time
Select Fundamental| 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SPHR | (77.3 M) | (77.3 M) | (77.3 M) | (77.3 M) | (77.3 M) | (77.3 M) | (108.5 M) | 6.9 M | (8.2 M) | 181.7 M | (148.2 M) | (194.4 M) | 502.8 M | (200.6 M) | (200.6 M) | (180.6 M) | (171.6 M) |
| IQ | (2.6 B) | (2.6 B) | (2.6 B) | (2.6 B) | (2.6 B) | (2.6 B) | (3.1 B) | (3.7 B) | (9.1 B) | (10.3 B) | (7 B) | (6.2 B) | (136.2 M) | 1.9 B | 764.1 M | 878.7 M | 922.6 M |
| IMAX | (9.5 M) | 15.3 M | 41.3 M | 44.1 M | 39.7 M | 55.8 M | 28.8 M | 2.3 M | 22.8 M | 46.9 M | (143.8 M) | (22.3 M) | (22.8 M) | 25.3 M | 26.1 M | 30 M | 31.5 M |
| LION | 150 K | 11.4 M | 25.3 M | 27.6 M | 30 M | 39.1 M | 38.8 M | 39.8 M | 43.8 M | (19.6 M) | (19.6 M) | 11.1 M | (300 K) | (93.5 M) | (128.5 M) | (115.7 M) | (109.9 M) |
| YELP | (2.3 M) | (16.7 M) | (19.1 M) | (10.1 M) | 36.5 M | (32.9 M) | (4.7 M) | 152.9 M | 55.4 M | 40.9 M | (19.4 M) | 39.7 M | 36.3 M | 99.2 M | 132.8 M | 152.8 M | 160.4 M |
| DOYU | (782.9 M) | (782.9 M) | (782.9 M) | (782.9 M) | (782.9 M) | (782.9 M) | (782.9 M) | (612.9 M) | (876.3 M) | 33.3 M | 485.5 M | (338.8 M) | (152.8 M) | 35.5 M | (297.4 M) | (342.1 M) | (359.2 M) |
| IHS | 56.3 M | 135.4 M | 158.2 M | 131.7 M | 194.5 M | (435.6 M) | (826.4 M) | (425.4 M) | (132.8 M) | (423.5 M) | (322 M) | (25.8 M) | (459 M) | (2 B) | (1.6 B) | (1.5 B) | (1.4 B) |
| WLY | 7.6 M | 212.7 M | 144.2 M | 160.5 M | 176.9 M | 145.8 M | 113.6 M | 192.2 M | 168.3 M | (74.3 M) | 148.3 M | 148.3 M | 17.2 M | (200.3 M) | 84.2 M | 96.8 M | 78.6 M |
| CCOI | (11.8 M) | 7.5 M | (4.3 M) | 56.7 M | 797 K | 4.9 M | 14.9 M | 5.9 M | 28.7 M | 37.5 M | 6.2 M | 48.2 M | 5.1 M | 1.3 B | (204.1 M) | (234.7 M) | (223 M) |
Madison Square Garden and related stocks such as Sphere Entertainment, iQIYI Inc, and Imax Corp Net Income description
Net income is one of the most important fundamental items in finance. It plays a large role in Madison Square Garden financial statement analysis. It represents the amount of money remaining after all of Madison Square Garden operating expenses, interest, taxes and preferred stock dividends have been deducted from a company total revenue.Madison Square Competitive Analysis
The better you understand Madison Square competitors, the better chance you have of utilizing it as a position in your portfolios. From an individual investor's perspective, Madison Square's competitive analysis can cover a whole range of metrics. Some of these will be more critical depending on who you are as an investor and how you react to market volatility. However, if you are locking your investment sandscape to a long-term horizon, comparing the fundamental indicator across Madison Square's competition over several years is one of the best ways to analyze its investment potential.| Better Than Average | Worse Than Peers | View Performance Chart |
Madison Square Competition Performance Charts
Five steps to successful analysis of Madison Square Competition
Madison Square's competitive analysis is the process of researching and evaluating its competitive landscape. It provides an understanding of the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) faced by Madison Square Garden in relation to its competition. Madison Square's competition analysis typically involves several steps, including:- Identifying the key players in the market: This involves identifying the major competitors of Madison Square in the market, both direct and indirect, as well as new entrants and disruptive technologies.
- Assessing the strengths and weaknesses of each competitor: This involves evaluating each competitor's strengths and weaknesses in areas such as product offerings, market share, brand recognition, financial performance, and distribution channels.
- Understanding the competitive environment: This involves evaluating the regulatory environment, economic conditions, and other factors that may impact Madison Square's competitive landscape.
- Identifying opportunities and threats: This involves using the information gathered during the analysis to identify opportunities and threats to Madison Square Garden, and developing a strategy to address them.
- Evaluating the competitive landscape: This involves understanding the competitive dynamics of the market, such as pricing, marketing, and distribution strategies, as well as analyzing the competitive advantage of each competitor.
Complement your Madison Square position
In addition to having Madison Square in your portfolios, you can quickly add positions using our predefined set of ideas and optimize them against your very unique investing style. A single investing idea is a collection of funds, stocks, ETFs, or cryptocurrencies that are programmatically selected from a pull of investment themes. After you determine your investment opportunity, you can then find an optimal portfolio that will maximize potential returns on the chosen idea or minimize its exposure to market volatility.Did You Try This Idea?
Run Large & Mid Caps ETFs Thematic Idea Now
Large & Mid Caps ETFs
ETF themes focus on helping investors to gain exposure to a broad range of assets, diversify, and lower overall costs. The Large & Mid Caps ETFs theme has 89 constituents at this time.
You can either use a buy-and-hold strategy to lock in the entire theme or actively trade it to take advantage of the short-term price volatility of individual constituents. Macroaxis can help you discover thousands of investment opportunities in different asset classes. In addition, you can partner with us for reliable portfolio optimization as you plan to utilize Large & Mid Caps ETFs Theme or any other thematic opportunities.
| View All Next | Launch |
Check out Madison Square Correlation with its peers. You can also try the Portfolio Optimization module to compute new portfolio that will generate highest expected return given your specified tolerance for risk.
Will Movies & Entertainment sector continue expanding? Could Madison diversify its offerings? Factors like these will boost the valuation of Madison Square. Expected growth trajectory for Madison significantly influences the price investors are willing to assign. Accurate valuation requires analyzing both current fundamentals and future growth trajectories. Every Madison Square data point contributes insight, yet successful analysis hinges on identifying the most consequential variables.
Quarterly Earnings Growth 0.244 | Earnings Share 1.09 | Revenue Per Share | Quarterly Revenue Growth 0.129 | Return On Assets |
Investors evaluate Madison Square Garden using market value (trading price) and book value (balance sheet equity), each telling a different story. Calculating Madison Square's intrinsic value - the estimated true worth - helps identify when the stock trades at a discount or premium to fair value. Seasoned market participants apply comprehensive analytical frameworks to derive fundamental worth and identify mispriced opportunities. External factors like market trends, sector rotation, and investor psychology can cause Madison Square's market price to deviate significantly from intrinsic value.
Understanding that Madison Square's value differs from its trading price is crucial, as each reflects different aspects of the company. Evaluating whether Madison Square represents a sound investment requires analyzing earnings trends, revenue growth, technical signals, industry dynamics, and expert forecasts. Conversely, Madison Square's market price signifies the transaction level at which participants voluntarily complete trades.
