Pangaea Logistic Competitors
| PANL Stock | USD 7.84 -0.03 -0.38% |
Correlation: Pangaea Logistic vs AirJoule Technologies Details
Moderate diversification
The correlation between Pangaea Logistic and AirJoule Technologies is 0.34, which Macroaxis classifies as Moderate diversification for the selected horizon. In portfolio terms, the overlap shows how much shared movement remains after combining both positions.
Experienced market participants anticipate that Pangaea Logistic's price will even out over time. Periods when Pangaea Logistic's deviates significantly from its historical mean may warrant further fundamental analysis. Mean reversion in Pangaea Logistic's serves as a complement to momentum analysis.
Pangaea Logistic Competition Correlation Matrix
Correlation analysis between Pangaea Logistic and its competitors provides context for understanding whether diversification is real or only superficial inside the same peer group. A reading near +1 usually means prices have moved in tandem, a reading near -1 suggests opposite movement, and a reading near zero points to weaker historical dependence.
Please upgrade your account to get full access to Macroaxis premium features
High positive correlations
| High negative correlations
|
Risk-Adjusted Indicators
Strong recent returns in Pangaea Logistic Stock do not always mean Pangaea Logistic Company is outperforming peers on business quality. Reviewing Pangaea Logistic's risk-adjusted indicators gives a clearer view of whether returns are being earned efficiently. These indicators are quantitative in nature and measure volatility and risk-adjusted expected returns across different positions.| Mean Deviation | Jensen Alpha | Sortino Ratio | Treynor Ratio | Semi Deviation | Expected Shortfall | Potential Upside | Value @Risk | Maximum Drawdown | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CMDB | 2.17 | 0.11 | 0.04 | 0.41 | 3.01 | 4.40 | 12.17 | |||
| KNOP | 1.52 | 0.09 | 0.05 | -0.18 | 2.24 | 3.25 | 13.60 | |||
| HSHP | 2.42 | 0.75 | 0.29 | -4.28 | 2.17 | 5.62 | 11.87 | |||
| LXFR | 1.87 | 0.05 | 0.02 | -0.38 | 3.55 | 4.26 | 19.29 | |||
| GASS | 1.95 | 0.36 | 0.16 | -0.63 | 2.14 | 3.73 | 15.63 | |||
| MG | 1.70 | 0.33 | 0.13 | 6.65 | 2.15 | 3.84 | 9.86 | |||
| WNC | 2.53 | -0.52 | 0.00 | 4.32 | 0.00 | 5.61 | 20.92 | |||
| ACCO | 2.14 | 0.06 | 0.04 | -0.12 | 2.35 | 3.40 | 22.80 | |||
| MAGN | 2.44 | -0.22 | 0.00 | 0.32 | 0.00 | 6.14 | 13.94 | |||
| AIRJ | 3.07 | 0.21 | 0.06 | -0.29 | 3.92 | 5.92 | 25.21 |
Pangaea Logistic Competitive Analysis
Within its peer group that includes Costamare Bulkers, KNOT Offshore, and Himalaya Shipping, Pangaea Logistic stands out in several ways. The company commands a 512.1 M market valuation built on 632.0 M in annual revenue. Shareholders see a 4.25% return on equity, supported by a 3.07% profit margin. Profit margins tilt toward Pangaea Logistic at 3.07% against Costamare Bulkers at -6.25%. Valuation multiples differ: Pangaea Logistic at 19.46x P/E versus KNOT Offshore at 8.08x, suggesting different growth expectations. Pangaea Logistic leads on revenue, 632.0 M to 131.9 M, a substantial gap.| Better Than Average | Worse Than Peers | View Performance Chart |
Pangaea Logistic Competition Peer Performance Charts
How to Analyze Pangaea Logistic Against Peers
Pangaea Logistic's peer analysis compares Pangaea Logistic with related companies to put valuation, quality, and risk metrics in context. This establishes whether recent performance is company-specific or broadly sector-driven. A practical workflow includes:- Set a relevant peer group: Include direct competitors and close alternatives with comparable business exposure.
- Benchmark core financials: Compare profitability, growth, capital structure, and cash flow quality.
- Check valuation dispersion: Review whether Pangaea Logistic trades at a premium or discount versus peers and why.
- Evaluate risk profile: Compare volatility, drawdowns, and correlation to avoid false diversification assumptions.
- Document the thesis: Record where Pangaea Logistic leads or lags and what catalysts could close or widen the gap.
Peer Comparison Metrics & Methodology
Analyst consensus for Pangaea Logistic shows a wider price target range than peers, reflecting higher uncertainty about its intrinsic value estimate. Peer comparisons can reduce single-name bias by forcing a wider operating and valuation context. For peer comparison, Pangaea Logistic has a market cap of 512.1 million, P/E of 19.46, profit margin of 3.07%.
Pangaea Logistic analytics rely on periodic company reporting and market reference feeds, with quality checks and normalization applied.
Editorial review and methodology oversight provided by: Raphi Shpitalnik, Junior Member of Macroaxis Editorial Board