SGHC Competitors
| SGHC Stock | USD 12.97 0.04 0.31% |
SGHC and Sealed Air Correlation View
Minimal diversification benefit
Across the chosen horizon, SGHC and Sealed Air show a correlation of 0.91 and fall into the Minimal diversification benefit bucket. The overlap area shows the portion of risk diversified away by holding both instruments together.
The mean reversion effect in SGHC is stronger when the initial deviation was driven by sentiment rather than fundamentals. Such deviations have sometimes corrected when the initial catalyst fades, though timing remains uncertain. The degree to which SGHC's exhibits mean reversion depends on how efficiently the market prices new information.
SGHC Competition Correlation Matrix
Correlation analysis between SGHC Limited and its competitors provides context for understanding whether diversification is real or only superficial inside the same peer group. This matrix is most informative when seeking to know whether adding another peer would improve diversification, increase crowding, or leave total risk largely unchanged.
Please upgrade your account to get full access to Macroaxis premium features
High positive correlations
| High negative correlations
|
Risk-Adjusted Indicators
Return momentum in SGHC Stock is more useful when tested against peer-relative fundamentals and risk. Risk-adjusted metrics help compare SGHC's efficiency and downside exposure against peers on a like-for-like basis. These indicators are quantitative in nature and measure volatility and risk-adjusted expected returns across different positions.| Mean Deviation | Jensen Alpha | Sortino Ratio | Treynor Ratio | Semi Deviation | Expected Shortfall | Potential Upside | Value @Risk | Maximum Drawdown | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RSI | 2.21 | 0.78 | 0.32 | 0.94 | 1.89 | 5.37 | 21.07 | |||
| MTN | 1.96 | 0.01 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 2.26 | 4.11 | 14.75 | |||
| LNW | 2.37 | -0.51 | 0.00 | 1.42 | 0.00 | 5.01 | 14.15 | |||
| REYN | 1.24 | 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.04 | 1.57 | 2.86 | 14.28 | |||
| BYD | 1.58 | 0.05 | 0.02 | 0.05 | 1.97 | 3.28 | 9.39 | |||
| CZR | 2.42 | 0.52 | 0.18 | 0.85 | 2.38 | 6.76 | 22.98 | |||
| LTH | 2.02 | 0.16 | 0.08 | 0.11 | 1.99 | 4.53 | 10.82 | |||
| M | 1.89 | -0.12 | 0.00 | -0.10 | 0.00 | 4.36 | 10.93 | |||
| VFC | 2.13 | -0.11 | 0.00 | -0.05 | 0.00 | 4.47 | 12.59 | |||
| SEE | 0.10 | 0.02 | 0.14 | -3.03 | 0.00 | 0.24 | 0.55 |
Peer Comparison: Net Income
Net income is what remains after all costs — operating expenses, interest, taxes, and preferred dividends — are deducted from SGHC's total revenue. The relationship between net income growth and revenue growth at SGHC reveals whether margin expansion is driving earnings or whether top-line growth is being consumed by rising costs and financing charges.Compare SGHC Limited and related stocks such as Rush Street Interactive, Vail Resorts, and Light Wonder Net Income Over Time
Select Fundamental| 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RSI | -10.7 M | -10.7 M | -10.7 M | -10.7 M | -10.7 M | -10.7 M | -10.7 M | -10.7 M | -10.7 M | -22.4 M | 1.1 M | -29.1 M | -38.6 M | -18.3 M | 2.4 M | 33.3 M | 35 M |
| MTN | 4.7 M | 16.5 M | 37.7 M | 28.5 M | 114.8 M | 149.8 M | 210.6 M | 379.9 M | 301.2 M | 98.8 M | 127.8 M | 347.9 M | 265.8 M | 231.1 M | 280 M | 322 M | 338.1 M |
| LNW | 1.1 M | -12.6 M | -62.6 M | -30.2 M | -234.3 M | -1.4 B | -353.7 M | -242.3 M | -352.4 M | -130 M | -569 M | 371 M | 3.7 B | 163 M | 336 M | 454 M | 476.7 M |
| REYN | 68 M | 68 M | 68 M | 68 M | 68 M | 68 M | 79 M | 302 M | 176 M | 225 M | 363 M | 324 M | 258 M | 298 M | 352 M | 301 M | 274.6 M |
| BYD | 12.7 M | -3.9 M | -908.9 M | -80.3 M | -53 M | 47.2 M | 418 M | 189.4 M | 115 M | 157.6 M | -134.7 M | 463.8 M | 639.4 M | 620 M | 578 M | 1.8 B | 1.9 B |
| CZR | 154 M | -50.4 M | -991 K | 18.9 M | -14.4 M | 114.2 M | 24.5 M | 73.4 M | 95 M | 81 M | -1.8 B | -1 B | -899 M | 786 M | -278 M | -502 M | -476.9 M |
| LTH | 40.9 M | 40.9 M | 40.9 M | 40.9 M | 40.9 M | 40.9 M | 40.9 M | 40.9 M | 40.9 M | 30 M | -360.2 M | -579.4 M | -1.8 M | 76.1 M | 156.2 M | 373.7 M | 392.4 M |
| M | 113 M | 1.3 B | 1.3 B | 1.5 B | 1.5 B | 1.1 B | 627 M | 1.6 B | 1.1 B | 564 M | -3.9 B | 1.4 B | 1.2 B | 45 M | 582 M | 642 M | 475.8 M |
| VFC | 139.4 M | 888.1 M | 1.2 B | 1.2 B | 1 B | 1.2 B | 1.1 B | 658.6 M | 1.3 B | 679.4 M | 407.9 M | 1.4 B | 118.6 M | -968.9 M | -189.7 M | -218.2 M | -207.3 M |
| SEE | 2.9 B | 149.1 M | -1.1 B | 124.2 M | 258.1 M | 335.4 M | 486.4 M | 814.9 M | 193.1 M | 263 M | 502.9 M | 506.8 M | 491.6 M | 341.6 M | 264.7 M | 505.5 M | 530.8 M |
SGHC Competitive Analysis
Among Rush Street, Vail Resorts, and Light Wonder and SGHC, each company brings a distinct financial profile to the table. SGHC contributes 2.23 B in revenue from a 6.57 B base. Profitability stands at a 9.73% net margin with return on equity reaching 31.62%. Net profitability gives SGHC an edge at 9.73% versus Rush Street at 2.98%. Earnings multiples split the pair: 71.25x for Vail Resorts against 6.59x for SGHC. Light Wonder converts shareholder equity more efficiently at 50.47% versus SGHC at 31.62%.| Better Than Average | Worse Than Peers | View Performance Chart |
SGHC Competition Peer Performance Charts
How to Analyze SGHC Against Peers
SGHC's peer analysis compares SGHC with related companies to put valuation, quality, and risk metrics in context. This establishes whether recent performance is company-specific or broadly sector-driven. A practical workflow includes:- Set a relevant peer group: Include direct competitors and close alternatives with comparable business exposure.
- Benchmark core financials: Compare profitability, growth, capital structure, and cash flow quality.
- Check valuation dispersion: Review whether SGHC trades at a premium or discount versus peers and why.
- Evaluate risk profile: Compare volatility, drawdowns, and correlation to avoid false diversification assumptions.
- Document the thesis: Record where SGHC leads or lags and what catalysts could close or widen the gap.
Peer Comparison Metrics & Methodology
Analyst consensus for SGHC shows a wider price target range than peers, reflecting higher uncertainty about its intrinsic value estimate. Competitive positioning can change as margins, market share, and balance-sheet flexibility shift. For peer comparison, SGHC has a market cap of 6.57 billion, P/E of 6.59, profit margin of 9.73%.
SGHC Limited inputs come from periodic company reporting and market reference feeds and are mapped into a consistent reporting framework.
Editorial review and methodology oversight provided by: Raphi Shpitalnik, Junior Member of Macroaxis Editorial Board