Aramark Holdings Correlations
ARMK Stock | USD 39.16 0.15 0.38% |
The current 90-days correlation between Aramark Holdings and ABM Industries Incorporated is 0.51 (i.e., Very weak diversification). A perfect positive correlation (i.e., a correlation coefficient of +1) implies that as Aramark Holdings moves, either up or down, the other security will move in the same direction. Alternatively, perfect negative correlation means that if Aramark Holdings moves in either direction, the perfectly negatively correlated security will move in the opposite direction.
Aramark Holdings Correlation With Market
Modest diversification
The correlation between Aramark Holdings and DJI is 0.26 (i.e., Modest diversification) for selected investment horizon. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Aramark Holdings and DJI in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed.
Aramark |
Moving together with Aramark Stock
Moving against Aramark Stock
0.48 | TM | Toyota Motor | PairCorr |
0.42 | QS | Quantumscape Corp | PairCorr |
0.4 | JL | J Long Group | PairCorr |
0.36 | GV | Visionary Education | PairCorr |
0.36 | ZK | ZEEKR Intelligent | PairCorr |
0.34 | LI | Li Auto | PairCorr |
Related Correlations Analysis
Click cells to compare fundamentals | Check Volatility | Backtest Portfolio |
Correlation Matchups
Over a given time period, the two securities move together when the Correlation Coefficient is positive. Conversely, the two assets move in opposite directions when the Correlation Coefficient is negative. Determining your positions' relationship to each other is valuable for analyzing and projecting your portfolio's future expected return and risk.High positive correlations
| High negative correlations
|
Risk-Adjusted Indicators
There is a big difference between Aramark Stock performing well and Aramark Holdings Company doing well as a business compared to the competition. There are so many exceptions to the norm that investors cannot definitively determine what's good or bad unless they analyze Aramark Holdings' multiple risk-adjusted performance indicators across the competitive landscape. These indicators are quantitative in nature and help investors forecast volatility and risk-adjusted expected returns across various positions.Mean Deviation | Jensen Alpha | Sortino Ratio | Treynor Ratio | Semi Deviation | Expected Shortfall | Potential Upside | Value @Risk | Maximum Drawdown | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CVEO | 1.32 | (0.21) | 0.00 | (1.02) | 0.00 | 3.08 | 9.73 | |||
ABM | 1.21 | (0.02) | 0.00 | (0.03) | 0.00 | 2.04 | 13.29 | |||
ADMQ | 4.65 | (0.19) | 0.00 | (0.20) | 0.00 | 14.02 | 39.84 | |||
MMS | 1.15 | (0.22) | 0.00 | (0.68) | 0.00 | 2.18 | 9.73 | |||
CASS | 1.29 | (0.06) | 0.00 | (0.14) | 0.00 | 2.78 | 13.07 | |||
FA | 1.57 | (0.10) | 0.00 | (0.32) | 0.00 | 4.14 | 10.13 | |||
RTO | 1.32 | 0.02 | 0.00 | 0.07 | 1.49 | 2.32 | 12.08 | |||
CBZ | 1.28 | 0.39 | 0.26 | 1.14 | 1.11 | 2.55 | 11.45 | |||
AZZ | 1.64 | 0.13 | 0.06 | 0.24 | 1.98 | 2.80 | 15.54 | |||
BV | 1.67 | (0.03) | 0.00 | (0.01) | 0.00 | 2.85 | 19.91 |
Aramark Holdings Corporate Management
Lauren Harrington | Senior Vice President General Counsel | Profile | |
Autumn Bayles | Senior Organizations | Profile | |
Christopher Schilling | Controller, VP | Profile | |
Deborah Albert | Senior Vice President - Corporate Communications | Profile |