Full House Correlations

FLL Stock  USD 4.91  0.05  1.03%   
The current 90-days correlation between Full House Resorts and Monarch Casino Resort is 0.3 (i.e., Weak diversification). A perfect positive correlation (i.e., a correlation coefficient of +1) implies that as Full House moves, either up or down, the other security will move in the same direction. Alternatively, perfect negative correlation means that if Full House Resorts moves in either direction, the perfectly negatively correlated security will move in the opposite direction.

Full House Correlation With Market

Very weak diversification

The correlation between Full House Resorts and DJI is 0.45 (i.e., Very weak diversification) for selected investment horizon. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Full House Resorts and DJI in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed.
  
Check out Investing Opportunities to better understand how to build diversified portfolios, which includes a position in Full House Resorts. Also, note that the market value of any company could be closely tied with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in bureau of economic analysis.

Moving against Full Stock

  0.54BH Biglari HoldingsPairCorr
  0.47BROS Dutch BrosPairCorr
  0.44LZB La Z Boy Earnings Call TomorrowPairCorr
  0.36GPI Group 1 AutomotivePairCorr

Related Correlations Analysis

Click cells to compare fundamentals   Check Volatility   Backtest Portfolio

Correlation Matchups

Over a given time period, the two securities move together when the Correlation Coefficient is positive. Conversely, the two assets move in opposite directions when the Correlation Coefficient is negative. Determining your positions' relationship to each other is valuable for analyzing and projecting your portfolio's future expected return and risk.
High positive correlations   
CNTYPLYA
BVHPLYA
CNTYMCRI
BALYPLYA
CNTYBALY
PLYAMCRI
  
High negative correlations   
BALYRRR
BVHRRR
PLYARRR
CNTYRRR
RRRMCRI
MLCOGDEN

Risk-Adjusted Indicators

There is a big difference between Full Stock performing well and Full House Company doing well as a business compared to the competition. There are so many exceptions to the norm that investors cannot definitively determine what's good or bad unless they analyze Full House's multiple risk-adjusted performance indicators across the competitive landscape. These indicators are quantitative in nature and help investors forecast volatility and risk-adjusted expected returns across various positions.
Mean DeviationJensen AlphaSortino RatioTreynor RatioSemi DeviationExpected ShortfallPotential UpsideValue @RiskMaximum Drawdown
MCRI  0.88  0.13  0.10  0.31  0.80 
 1.87 
 7.86 
RRR  1.48 (0.29) 0.00 (0.06) 0.00 
 2.69 
 12.47 
GDEN  1.58  0.00  0.04  0.12  1.55 
 3.80 
 8.13 
PLYA  1.30  0.24  0.17  0.32  1.12 
 3.23 
 9.17 
BALY  0.23  0.03 (0.28) 0.34  0.00 
 0.52 
 1.32 
BVH  2.02  0.44  0.08 (0.53) 2.76 
 5.30 
 15.57 
CNTY  2.97  1.03  0.29  3.98  2.37 
 7.30 
 17.01 
MSC  3.22  0.28  0.05  1.08  3.91 
 8.94 
 29.65 
MLCO  2.30  0.04  0.01  0.16  2.62 
 5.17 
 22.74 
HGV  1.57  0.01  0.04  0.13  1.61 
 3.07 
 9.00 

Full House Corporate Executives

Elected by the shareholders, the Full House's board of directors comprises two types of representatives: Full House inside directors who are chosen from within the company, and outside directors, selected externally and held independent of Full. The board's role is to monitor Full House's management team and ensure that shareholders' interests are well served. Full House's inside directors are responsible for reviewing and approving budgets prepared by upper management to implement core corporate initiatives and projects. On the other hand, Full House's outside directors are responsible for providing unbiased perspectives on the board's policies.
Lewis FangerCFO, Sr. VP and TreasurerProfile
John FerrucciSenior COOProfile