Full House Correlations
FLL Stock | USD 4.91 0.05 1.03% |
The current 90-days correlation between Full House Resorts and Monarch Casino Resort is 0.3 (i.e., Weak diversification). A perfect positive correlation (i.e., a correlation coefficient of +1) implies that as Full House moves, either up or down, the other security will move in the same direction. Alternatively, perfect negative correlation means that if Full House Resorts moves in either direction, the perfectly negatively correlated security will move in the opposite direction.
Full House Correlation With Market
Very weak diversification
The correlation between Full House Resorts and DJI is 0.45 (i.e., Very weak diversification) for selected investment horizon. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Full House Resorts and DJI in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed.
Full |
Moving against Full Stock
0.54 | BH | Biglari Holdings | PairCorr |
0.47 | BROS | Dutch Bros | PairCorr |
0.44 | LZB | La Z Boy Earnings Call Tomorrow | PairCorr |
0.36 | GPI | Group 1 Automotive | PairCorr |
Related Correlations Analysis
Click cells to compare fundamentals | Check Volatility | Backtest Portfolio |
Correlation Matchups
Over a given time period, the two securities move together when the Correlation Coefficient is positive. Conversely, the two assets move in opposite directions when the Correlation Coefficient is negative. Determining your positions' relationship to each other is valuable for analyzing and projecting your portfolio's future expected return and risk.High positive correlations
| High negative correlations
|
Risk-Adjusted Indicators
There is a big difference between Full Stock performing well and Full House Company doing well as a business compared to the competition. There are so many exceptions to the norm that investors cannot definitively determine what's good or bad unless they analyze Full House's multiple risk-adjusted performance indicators across the competitive landscape. These indicators are quantitative in nature and help investors forecast volatility and risk-adjusted expected returns across various positions.Mean Deviation | Jensen Alpha | Sortino Ratio | Treynor Ratio | Semi Deviation | Expected Shortfall | Potential Upside | Value @Risk | Maximum Drawdown | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MCRI | 0.88 | 0.13 | 0.10 | 0.31 | 0.80 | 1.87 | 7.86 | |||
RRR | 1.48 | (0.29) | 0.00 | (0.06) | 0.00 | 2.69 | 12.47 | |||
GDEN | 1.58 | 0.00 | 0.04 | 0.12 | 1.55 | 3.80 | 8.13 | |||
PLYA | 1.30 | 0.24 | 0.17 | 0.32 | 1.12 | 3.23 | 9.17 | |||
BALY | 0.23 | 0.03 | (0.28) | 0.34 | 0.00 | 0.52 | 1.32 | |||
BVH | 2.02 | 0.44 | 0.08 | (0.53) | 2.76 | 5.30 | 15.57 | |||
CNTY | 2.97 | 1.03 | 0.29 | 3.98 | 2.37 | 7.30 | 17.01 | |||
MSC | 3.22 | 0.28 | 0.05 | 1.08 | 3.91 | 8.94 | 29.65 | |||
MLCO | 2.30 | 0.04 | 0.01 | 0.16 | 2.62 | 5.17 | 22.74 | |||
HGV | 1.57 | 0.01 | 0.04 | 0.13 | 1.61 | 3.07 | 9.00 |
Full House Corporate Executives
Elected by the shareholders, the Full House's board of directors comprises two types of representatives: Full House inside directors who are chosen from within the company, and outside directors, selected externally and held independent of Full. The board's role is to monitor Full House's management team and ensure that shareholders' interests are well served. Full House's inside directors are responsible for reviewing and approving budgets prepared by upper management to implement core corporate initiatives and projects. On the other hand, Full House's outside directors are responsible for providing unbiased perspectives on the board's policies.
Lewis Fanger | CFO, Sr. VP and Treasurer | Profile | |
John Ferrucci | Senior COO | Profile |