Full House Company Leadership
FLL Stock | USD 4.91 0.05 1.03% |
About 95 percent of Full House's insiders are activelly selling. The analysis of insider sentiment suggests that many Full House Resorts insiders are, at present, panicking. Full House employs about 1.5 K people. The company is managed by 7 executives with a total tenure of roughly 19 years, averaging almost 2.0 years of service per executive, having 221.29 employees per reported executive.
Daniel Lee CEO CEO, Director |
Full House's Insider Buying Vs Selling
5
Selling | Buying |
Latest Trades
2024-11-25 | Lewis A Fanger | Disposed 3856 @ 5.01 | View | ||
2024-11-21 | Lewis A Fanger | Disposed 37738 @ 5.05 | View | ||
2024-10-18 | Daniel R Lee | Disposed 2388 @ 4.99 | View | ||
2024-10-16 | Daniel R Lee | Disposed 13188 @ 4.99 | View | ||
2024-10-14 | Daniel R Lee | Disposed 13002 @ 4.96 | View | ||
2024-10-11 | Daniel R Lee | Disposed 10793 @ 5 | View | ||
2024-10-08 | Daniel R Lee | Disposed 3540 @ 5 | View | ||
2024-10-03 | Daniel R Lee | Disposed 23890 @ 4.84 | View | ||
2024-09-30 | Daniel R Lee | Disposed 1675 @ 5.01 | View | ||
2024-09-26 | Daniel R Lee | Disposed 652 @ 5 | View | ||
2024-09-20 | Daniel R Lee | Disposed 207 @ 5 | View | ||
2024-09-18 | Daniel R Lee | Disposed 8676 @ 5.09 | View | ||
2024-09-16 | Daniel R Lee | Disposed 11737 @ 5.07 | View | ||
2024-09-13 | Daniel R Lee | Disposed 8954 @ 5.08 | View | ||
2024-08-20 | John Ferrucci | Disposed 8328 @ 4.97 | View | ||
2024-08-15 | John Ferrucci | Disposed 18499 @ 5 | View | ||
2024-08-13 | Eric J Green | Acquired 7500 @ 5.14 | View | ||
2024-06-12 | John Ferrucci | Disposed 1501 @ 5.06 | View |
Monitoring Full House's insider sentiment can offer insights into its future performance, as insiders often have access to more information about their company's operations, financial health, and upcoming initiatives than the general public. However, it's essential to note that insider trading is regulated by securities laws, and insiders are required to disclose their trades publicly to ensure transparency and prevent unfair advantages based on non-public information.
Full |
Full House's Workforce Through the Years
Please note that employee historical analysis has become an increasingly important factor for investors assessing the risk associated with Full House's future performance. Based on our forecasts, it is anticipated that Full will maintain a workforce of about 1550 employees by December 2024.Full House's latest congressional trading
Congressional trading in companies like Full House Resorts, is subject to rigorous scrutiny to prevent conflicts of interest and insider trading. This is governed by multiple SEC regulations which were established to foster transparency and deter members of Congress from leveraging non-public information for personal gain. This oversight helps maintain public trust and ensures that investments in Full House by those in governmental positions are based on the same information available to the general public.
2022-06-21 | Representative Susie Lee | Acquired Under $15K | Verify | ||
2022-05-18 | Representative Susie Lee | Acquired Under $15K | Verify |
Full House Management Team Effectiveness
Return On Tangible Assets is expected to rise to -0.04 this year. Return On Capital Employed is expected to rise to -0.0018 this year. At this time, Full House's Intangible Assets are quite stable compared to the past year. Other Assets is expected to rise to about 1.5 M this year, although the value of Return On Tangible Assets are projected to rise to (0.04). Full House's management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well Full House manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities.The value of Common Stock Shares Outstanding is expected to slide to about 19.5 M. Net Loss is expected to rise to about (12.7 M) this year
Full House Workforce Comparison
Full House Resorts is rated below average in number of employees category among its peers. The total workforce of Consumer Discretionary industry is currently estimated at about 93,996. Full House claims roughly 1,549 in number of employees contributing just under 2% to stocks in Consumer Discretionary industry.
Full House Profit Margins
The company has Net Profit Margin of (0.15) %, which means that it does not effectively control expenditures or properly executes on its pricing strategies. This is way below average. In the same way, it shows Net Operating Margin of 0.01 %, which entails that for every 100 dollars of revenue, it generated $0.01 of operating income.Current Value | Last Year | Change From Last Year | 10 Year Trend | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gross Profit Margin | 0.62 | 0.4162 |
|
|
Full House Insider Trading History
Some recent studies suggest that insider trading raises the cost of capital for securities issuers and decreases overall economic growth. Trading by specific Full House insiders, such as employees or executives, is commonly permitted as long as it does not rely on Full House's material information that is not in the public domain. Local jurisdictions usually require such trading to be reported in order to monitor insider transactions. In many U.S. states, trading conducted by corporate officers, key employees, directors, or significant shareholders must be reported to the regulator or publicly disclosed, usually within a few business days of the trade. In these cases, Full House insiders must file a Form 4 with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) when buying or selling shares of their own companies.
Buy/Sell Ratio | # Purchases Trades | # Sales Trades | Total Shares Purchased | Total Shares Sold | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024-12-01 | 0.5 | 16 | 32 | 200,141 | 400,282 |
2024-09-01 | 0.4444 | 12 | 27 | 815,363 | 1,186,423 |
2024-06-01 | 1.7333 | 26 | 15 | 290,745 | 79,290 |
2023-12-01 | 1.5 | 3 | 2 | 18,800 | 5,600 |
2023-09-01 | 5.0 | 5 | 1 | 55,000 | 5,252 |
2023-06-01 | 4.75 | 19 | 4 | 282,371 | 53,000 |
2023-03-01 | 0.5455 | 6 | 11 | 66,540 | 10,462 |
2022-12-01 | 1.5 | 3 | 2 | 18,570 | 17,140 |
2022-03-01 | 0.5 | 3 | 6 | 115,264 | 114,500 |
2021-12-01 | 0.5 | 5 | 10 | 15,088 | 30,176 |
2020-12-01 | 1.0 | 4 | 4 | 32,231 | 50,357 |
2020-09-01 | 2.0 | 4 | 2 | 31,894 | 0.00 |
2020-06-01 | 0.9 | 9 | 10 | 225,872 | 287,863 |
2019-12-01 | 1.0 | 4 | 4 | 36,444 | 12,888 |
2018-09-01 | 3.0 | 3 | 1 | 58,423 | 238,184 |
2016-09-01 | 2.6667 | 8 | 3 | 161,572 | 140,279 |
2015-03-01 | 10.0 | 10 | 1 | 360,100 | 35,000 |
2014-12-01 | 0.5 | 2 | 4 | 1,887,668 | 0.00 |
2012-12-01 | 2.0 | 2 | 1 | 4,153 | 0.00 |
2012-09-01 | 7.0 | 7 | 1 | 17,500 | 180,000 |
2010-06-01 | 0.2115 | 11 | 52 | 23,435 | 414,973 |
2009-12-01 | 0.0526 | 3 | 57 | 1,000.00 | 97,330 |
2007-09-01 | 4.0 | 4 | 1 | 12,000 | 103,896 |
2007-06-01 | 5.5 | 11 | 2 | 789,971 | 317,014 |
2007-03-01 | 1.5 | 6 | 4 | 712,500 | 934,191 |
2006-09-01 | 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 300,000 | 110,000 |
Full House Notable Stakeholders
A Full House stakeholder refers to an individual interested in an outcome of the business. Different stakeholders have different interests, and companies such as Full House often face trade-offs trying to please all of them. Full House's stakeholders can have a positive or negative influence on the entity's direction, and there are a lot of executives involved in getting Full House's stock to the level that pleases all shareholders. Keeping track of the stakeholders is a great way to stay on top of things affecting its ongoing price.
Daniel Lee | CEO, Director | Profile | |
Daniel CFA | CEO President | Profile | |
Lewis Fanger | CFO, Sr. VP and Treasurer | Profile | |
John Ferrucci | Senior COO | Profile | |
Alex Stolyar | Chief Devel. Officert and Sr. VP | Profile | |
Elaine Esq | Secretary, VP | Profile | |
William Schmitt | Investor Contact | Profile |
About Full House Management Performance
The success or failure of an entity such as Full House Resorts often depends on how effective the management is. Full House management team is responsible for propelling the future growth in the right direction and administering and controlling the business activities and accounting for the results. Ineffective management usually contributes to failure in the company's future performance for all stakeholders equally, but most importantly, for investors. So it is important to measure the effectiveness of Full management before purchasing its stock. In many ways, it's all about finding the answer to one important question - Are they doing the right thing right now? How would we assess whether the Full management is utilizing all available resources in the best possible way? Also, how well is the company doing relative to others in its sector and the market as a whole? The answer can be found by analyzing a few important fundamental indicators such as return on assets and return on equity.
Last Reported | Projected for Next Year | ||
Return On Tangible Assets | (0.04) | (0.04) | |
Return On Assets | (0.04) | (0.03) | |
Return On Equity | (0.32) | (0.30) |
Full House Workforce Analysis
Traditionally, organizations such as Full House use manpower efficiency calculations for various incentive schemes, employee appraisal, or as an initiative to improve the processes. However, it can also be used by investors to make long-term investment decisions. The trends in the profit per employee or revenue per employee are measured by net income or revenue divided by the current number of full-time employees over a given time interval. Because workforce needs differ across sectors, these ratios could be used to compare Full House within its industry.Full House Manpower Efficiency
Return on Full House Manpower
Revenue Per Employee | 155.6K | |
Revenue Per Executive | 34.4M | |
Net Loss Per Employee | 16.1K | |
Net Loss Per Executive | 3.6M | |
Working Capital Per Employee | 3.9K | |
Working Capital Per Executive | 869.6K |
Check out Investing Opportunities to better understand how to build diversified portfolios, which includes a position in Full House Resorts. Also, note that the market value of any company could be closely tied with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in bureau of economic analysis. You can also try the Stock Tickers module to use high-impact, comprehensive, and customizable stock tickers that can be easily integrated to any websites.
Is Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure space expected to grow? Or is there an opportunity to expand the business' product line in the future? Factors like these will boost the valuation of Full House. If investors know Full will grow in the future, the company's valuation will be higher. The financial industry is built on trying to define current growth potential and future valuation accurately. All the valuation information about Full House listed above have to be considered, but the key to understanding future value is determining which factors weigh more heavily than others.
Quarterly Earnings Growth 0.056 | Earnings Share (1.18) | Revenue Per Share 8.042 | Quarterly Revenue Growth 0.058 | Return On Assets (0) |
The market value of Full House Resorts is measured differently than its book value, which is the value of Full that is recorded on the company's balance sheet. Investors also form their own opinion of Full House's value that differs from its market value or its book value, called intrinsic value, which is Full House's true underlying value. Investors use various methods to calculate intrinsic value and buy a stock when its market value falls below its intrinsic value. Because Full House's market value can be influenced by many factors that don't directly affect Full House's underlying business (such as a pandemic or basic market pessimism), market value can vary widely from intrinsic value.
Please note, there is a significant difference between Full House's value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if Full House is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, Full House's price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.