Microsoft Correlations
| MSFT Stock | USD 415.57 0.00 0.00% |
The current 90-days correlation between Microsoft and Administradora Americana de is -0.11 (i.e., Good diversification). A perfect positive correlation (i.e., a correlation coefficient of +1) implies that as Microsoft moves, either up or down, the other security will move in the same direction. Alternatively, perfect negative correlation means that if Microsoft moves in either direction, the perfectly negatively correlated security will move in the opposite direction.
Microsoft Correlation With Market
Good diversification
The correlation between Microsoft and DJI is -0.03 (i.e., Good diversification) for selected investment horizon. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Microsoft and DJI in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed.
Microsoft |
The ability to find closely correlated positions to Microsoft could be a great tool in your tax-loss harvesting strategies, allowing investors a quick way to find a similar-enough asset to replace Microsoft when you sell it. If you don't do this, your portfolio allocation will be skewed against your target asset allocation. So, investors can't just sell and buy back Microsoft - that would be a violation of the tax code under the "wash sale" rule, and this is why you need to find a similar enough asset and use the proceeds from selling Microsoft to buy it.
Moving against Microsoft Stock
Related Correlations Analysis
| Click cells to compare fundamentals | Check Volatility | Backtest Portfolio |
Correlation Matchups
Over a given time period, the two securities move together when the Correlation Coefficient is positive. Conversely, the two assets move in opposite directions when the Correlation Coefficient is negative. Determining your positions' relationship to each other is valuable for analyzing and projecting your portfolio's future expected return and risk.High positive correlations
| High negative correlations
|
Risk-Adjusted Indicators
There is a big difference between Microsoft Stock performing well and Microsoft Company doing well as a business compared to the competition. There are so many exceptions to the norm that investors cannot definitively determine what's good or bad unless they analyze Microsoft's multiple risk-adjusted performance indicators across the competitive landscape. These indicators are quantitative in nature and help investors forecast volatility and risk-adjusted expected returns across various positions.| Mean Deviation | Jensen Alpha | Sortino Ratio | Treynor Ratio | Semi Deviation | Expected Shortfall | Potential Upside | Value @Risk | Maximum Drawdown | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ENLASA | 0.12 | 0.04 | 0.00 | 0.51 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 3.89 | |||
| AAISA | 0.88 | 0.26 | 0.12 | (6.15) | 0.72 | 2.36 | 9.50 | |||
| ANDINAA | 0.62 | 0.03 | 0.00 | 0.03 | 0.00 | 1.51 | 3.91 | |||
| SALFACORP | 0.85 | 0.09 | (0.03) | (0.55) | 0.81 | 2.67 | 5.03 | |||
| CONCHATORO | 0.71 | (0.03) | 0.00 | 0.18 | 0.00 | 1.45 | 4.24 | |||
| SMSAAM | 0.71 | (0.03) | 0.00 | (0.78) | 0.00 | 1.98 | 6.12 | |||
| NITRATOS | 0.49 | (0.03) | 0.00 | 0.14 | 0.00 | 0.77 | 12.21 | |||
| CUPRUM | 0.58 | 0.20 | 0.00 | (0.82) | 0.00 | 1.98 | 7.27 | |||
| MASISA | 0.59 | (0.23) | 0.00 | (2.64) | 0.00 | 1.15 | 5.35 | |||
| AFPCAPITAL | 0.50 | 0.24 | 0.00 | 1.24 | 0.00 | 1.80 | 6.70 |
Microsoft Related Equities
One of the popular trading techniques among algorithmic traders is to use market-neutral strategies where every trade hedges away some risk. Because there are two separate transactions required, even if one position performs unexpectedly, the other equity can make up some of the losses. Below are some of the equities that can be combined with Microsoft stock to make a market-neutral strategy. Peer analysis of Microsoft could also be used in its relative valuation, which is a method of valuing Microsoft by comparing valuation metrics with similar companies.
| Risk & Return | Correlation |
Microsoft Corporate Management
Elected by the shareholders, the Microsoft's board of directors comprises two types of representatives: Microsoft inside directors who are chosen from within the company, and outside directors, selected externally and held independent of Microsoft. The board's role is to monitor Microsoft's management team and ensure that shareholders' interests are well served. Microsoft's inside directors are responsible for reviewing and approving budgets prepared by upper management to implement core corporate initiatives and projects. On the other hand, Microsoft's outside directors are responsible for providing unbiased perspectives on the board's policies.
| Bradford LCA | Pres Chairman | Profile | |
| Judson Althoff | Ex Officer | Profile | |
| Brett Iversen | Gen Relations | Profile | |
| Christopher Young | Strategy Devel | Profile | |
| Alice Jolla | Co Officer | Profile | |
| Frank Shaw | Corp Communications | Profile |