Microsoft (Chile) Executives
| MSFT Stock | USD 470.54 4.86 1.02% |
Microsoft employs about 221 K people. The company is managed by 10 executives with a total tenure of roughly 35 years, averaging almost 3.0 years of service per executive, having 22100.0 employees per reported executive. Analysis of Microsoft's management performance can provide insight into the firm performance.
| Satya Nadella CEO CEO, Director |
| Christopher Capossela President Executive Vice President Marketing and Consumer Business, and Chief Marketing Officer |
Microsoft |
Microsoft Management Team Effectiveness
The company has return on total asset (ROA) of 0.1483 % which means that it generated a profit of $0.1483 on every $100 spent on assets. This is way below average. Similarly, it shows a return on equity (ROE) of 0.3931 %, meaning that it generated $0.3931 on every $100 dollars invested by stockholders. Microsoft's management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well Microsoft manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities.Microsoft maintains a total of 7.44 Billion outstanding shares. The majority of Microsoft outstanding shares are owned by institutional investors. These third-party entities are usually referred to as non-private investors looking to shop for positions in Microsoft to benefit from reduced commissions. Consequently, institutional holders are subject to a different set of regulations than regular investors in Microsoft. Please pay attention to any change in the institutional holdings of Microsoft as this could imply that something significant has changed or is about to change at the company. Please note that no matter how many assets the company has, if the real value of the firm is less than the current market value, you may not be able to make money on it.
Some institutional investors establish a significant position in stocks such as Microsoft in order to find ways to drive up its value. Retail investors, on the other hand, need to know that institutional holders can own millions of shares of Microsoft, and when they decide to sell, the stock will often sell-off, which may instantly impact shareholders' value. So, traders who get in early or near the beginning of the institutional investor's buying cycle could potentially generate profits.
Microsoft Workforce Comparison
Microsoft is considered to be number one stock in number of employees category among its peers. The total workforce of Software - Infrastructure industry is now estimated at about 252,354. Microsoft totals roughly 221,000 in number of employees claiming about 88% of equities listed under Software - Infrastructure industry.
The company has Profit Margin (PM) of 0.33 %, which maeans that even a very small decline in it revenue will erase profits resulting in a net loss. This is way below average. Similarly, it shows Operating Margin (OM) of 0.41 %, which suggests for every 100 dollars of sales, it generated a net operating income of $0.41. Microsoft Benchmark Summation
Operator |
The output start index for this execution was zero with a total number of output elements of sixty-one. Microsoft Price Series Summation is a cross summation of Microsoft price series and its benchmark/peer.
Microsoft Notable Stakeholders
A Microsoft stakeholder refers to an individual interested in an outcome of the business. Different stakeholders have different interests, and companies such as Microsoft often face trade-offs trying to please all of them. Microsoft's stakeholders can have a positive or negative influence on the entity's direction, and there are a lot of executives involved in getting Microsoft's stock to the level that pleases all shareholders. Keeping track of the stakeholders is a great way to stay on top of things affecting its ongoing price.
| Satya Nadella | CEO, Director | Profile | |
| Christopher Capossela | Executive Vice President Marketing and Consumer Business, and Chief Marketing Officer | Profile | |
| Amy Hood | CFO, Executive Vice President | Profile | |
| Bradford LCA | Pres Chairman | Profile | |
| Judson Althoff | Ex Officer | Profile | |
| Brett Iversen | Gen Relations | Profile | |
| Christopher Young | Strategy Devel | Profile | |
| Alice Jolla | Co Officer | Profile | |
| Frank Shaw | Corp Communications | Profile | |
| Keith Esq | Deputy VP | Profile |
About Microsoft Management Performance
The success or failure of an entity such as Microsoft often depends on how effective the management is. Microsoft management team is responsible for propelling the future growth in the right direction and administering and controlling the business activities and accounting for the results. Ineffective management usually contributes to failure in the company's future performance for all stakeholders equally, but most importantly, for investors. So it is important to measure the effectiveness of Microsoft management before purchasing its stock. In many ways, it's all about finding the answer to one important question - Are they doing the right thing right now? How would we assess whether the Microsoft management is utilizing all available resources in the best possible way? Also, how well is the company doing relative to others in its sector and the market as a whole? The answer can be found by analyzing a few important fundamental indicators such as return on assets and return on equity.
Microsoft Corporation develops, licenses, and supports software, services, devices, and solutions worldwide. The company was founded in 1975 and is headquartered in Redmond, Washington. MICROSOFT CORP operates under Software - Infrastructure classification in Exotistan and is traded on Commodity Exchange.
Microsoft Workforce Analysis
Traditionally, organizations such as Microsoft use manpower efficiency calculations for various incentive schemes, employee appraisal, or as an initiative to improve the processes. However, it can also be used by investors to make long-term investment decisions. The trends in the profit per employee or revenue per employee are measured by net income or revenue divided by the current number of full-time employees over a given time interval. Because workforce needs differ across sectors, these ratios could be used to compare Microsoft within its industry.Microsoft Manpower Efficiency
Return on Microsoft Manpower
| Revenue Per Employee | 897.1K | |
| Revenue Per Executive | 19.8B | |
| Net Income Per Employee | 329.1K | |
| Net Income Per Executive | 7.3B |
Additional Information and Resources on Investing in Microsoft Stock
When determining whether Microsoft is a good investment, qualitative aspects like company management, corporate governance, and ethical practices play a significant role. A comparison with peer companies also provides context and helps to understand if Microsoft Stock is undervalued or overvalued. This multi-faceted approach, blending both quantitative and qualitative analysis, forms a solid foundation for making an informed investment decision about Microsoft Stock. Highlighted below are key reports to facilitate an investment decision about Microsoft Stock:Check out Correlation Analysis to better understand how to build diversified portfolios, which includes a position in Microsoft. Also, note that the market value of any company could be closely tied with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in employment. To learn how to invest in Microsoft Stock, please use our How to Invest in Microsoft guide.You can also try the Cryptocurrency Center module to build and monitor diversified portfolio of extremely risky digital assets and cryptocurrency.