Bradford LCA - Microsoft Pres Chairman
| MSFT Stock | USD 415.57 0.00 0.00% |
Insider
Bradford LCA is Pres Chairman of Microsoft
| Age | 64 |
| Phone | 425 882 8080 |
| Web | https://www.microsoft.com |
Microsoft Management Efficiency
The company has return on total asset (ROA) of 0.1483 % which means that it generated a profit of $0.1483 on every $100 spent on assets. This is way below average. Similarly, it shows a return on equity (ROE) of 0.3931 %, meaning that it generated $0.3931 on every $100 dollars invested by stockholders. Microsoft's management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well Microsoft manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities.Microsoft has accumulated 47.03 B in total debt with debt to equity ratio (D/E) of 83.9, indicating the company may have difficulties to generate enough cash to satisfy its financial obligations. Microsoft has a current ratio of 2.48, suggesting that it is liquid and has the ability to pay its financial obligations in time and when they become due. Debt can assist Microsoft until it has trouble settling it off, either with new capital or with free cash flow. So, Microsoft's shareholders could walk away with nothing if the company can't fulfill its legal obligations to repay debt. However, a more frequent occurrence is when companies like Microsoft sell additional shares at bargain prices, diluting existing shareholders. Debt, in this case, can be an excellent and much better tool for Microsoft to invest in growth at high rates of return. When we think about Microsoft's use of debt, we should always consider it together with cash and equity.
Similar Executives
| Showing other executives | INSIDER Age | ||
| Paula Raventos | Sociedad Matriz SAAM | N/A | |
| Fernando Ciesla | Sociedad Matriz SAAM | N/A | |
| Gustavo E | Cuprum | N/A | |
| Javier Mara | Sociedad Matriz SAAM | N/A | |
| Ivan Torres | Salfacorp | N/A | |
| Cristian Montero | Salfacorp | N/A | |
| Cecilia Zepeda | Vina Concha To | 65 | |
| Jorge Carvallo | Salfacorp | N/A | |
| Claudio Canete | Sociedad Matriz SAAM | N/A | |
| MCJ LLB | Masisa | 81 | |
| Marcelo Cortesi | Vina Concha To | 56 | |
| Jos Santelices | Salfacorp | N/A | |
| Enrique Vergara | Vina Concha To | 49 | |
| Rodrigo Guzmn | Cuprum | N/A | |
| Coello Csar | Salfacorp | N/A | |
| Claudia Fuenzalida | Masisa | N/A | |
| Mauricio Medina | Sociedad Matriz SAAM | N/A | |
| Eduardo Gana | Vina Concha To | 71 | |
| Anibal Saavedra | Salfacorp | N/A | |
| Karen Berdichewsky | Sociedad Matriz SAAM | N/A | |
| Daniela E | Cuprum | N/A | |
Management Performance
| Return On Equity | 0.39 | |||
| Return On Asset | 0.15 |
Microsoft Leadership Team
Elected by the shareholders, the Microsoft's board of directors comprises two types of representatives: Microsoft inside directors who are chosen from within the company, and outside directors, selected externally and held independent of Microsoft. The board's role is to monitor Microsoft's management team and ensure that shareholders' interests are well served. Microsoft's inside directors are responsible for reviewing and approving budgets prepared by upper management to implement core corporate initiatives and projects. On the other hand, Microsoft's outside directors are responsible for providing unbiased perspectives on the board's policies.
| Bradford LCA, Pres Chairman | ||
| Judson Althoff, Ex Officer | ||
| Brett Iversen, Gen Relations | ||
| Christopher Young, Strategy Devel | ||
| Alice Jolla, Co Officer | ||
| Frank Shaw, Corp Communications | ||
| Satya Nadella, CEO, Director | ||
| Keith Esq, Deputy VP | ||
| Christopher Capossela, Executive Vice President Marketing and Consumer Business, and Chief Marketing Officer | ||
| Amy Hood, CFO, Executive Vice President |
Microsoft Stock Performance Indicators
The ability to make a profit is the ultimate goal of any investor. But to identify the right stock is not an easy task. Is Microsoft a good investment? Although profit is still the single most important financial element of any organization, multiple performance indicators can help investors identify the equity that they will appreciate over time.
| Return On Equity | 0.39 | |||
| Return On Asset | 0.15 | |||
| Profit Margin | 0.33 % | |||
| Operating Margin | 0.41 % | |||
| Current Valuation | 1.78 T | |||
| Shares Outstanding | 7.44 B | |||
| Shares Owned By Insiders | 0.06 % | |||
| Shares Owned By Institutions | 73.54 % | |||
| Price To Earning | 27.85 X | |||
| Price To Book | 9.85 X |
Pair Trading with Microsoft
One of the main advantages of trading using pair correlations is that every trade hedges away some risk. Because there are two separate transactions required, even if Microsoft position performs unexpectedly, the other equity can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Microsoft will appreciate offsetting losses from the drop in the long position's value.Moving against Microsoft Stock
The ability to find closely correlated positions to Microsoft could be a great tool in your tax-loss harvesting strategies, allowing investors a quick way to find a similar-enough asset to replace Microsoft when you sell it. If you don't do this, your portfolio allocation will be skewed against your target asset allocation. So, investors can't just sell and buy back Microsoft - that would be a violation of the tax code under the "wash sale" rule, and this is why you need to find a similar enough asset and use the proceeds from selling Microsoft to buy it.
The correlation of Microsoft is a statistical measure of how it moves in relation to other instruments. This measure is expressed in what is known as the correlation coefficient, which ranges between -1 and +1. A perfect positive correlation (i.e., a correlation coefficient of +1) implies that as Microsoft moves, either up or down, the other security will move in the same direction. Alternatively, perfect negative correlation means that if Microsoft moves in either direction, the perfectly negatively correlated security will move in the opposite direction. If the correlation is 0, the equities are not correlated; they are entirely random. A correlation greater than 0.8 is generally described as strong, whereas a correlation less than 0.5 is generally considered weak.
Correlation analysis and pair trading evaluation for Microsoft can also be used as hedging techniques within a particular sector or industry or even over random equities to generate a better risk-adjusted return on your portfolios.Additional Information and Resources on Investing in Microsoft Stock
When determining whether Microsoft is a good investment, qualitative aspects like company management, corporate governance, and ethical practices play a significant role. A comparison with peer companies also provides context and helps to understand if Microsoft Stock is undervalued or overvalued. This multi-faceted approach, blending both quantitative and qualitative analysis, forms a solid foundation for making an informed investment decision about Microsoft Stock. Highlighted below are key reports to facilitate an investment decision about Microsoft Stock:Check out Correlation Analysis to better understand how to build diversified portfolios. Also, note that the market value of any company could be closely tied with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in board of governors. You can also try the USA ETFs module to find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) in USA.