SFA Engineering (Korea) Top Management
056190 Stock | KRW 20,250 950.00 4.48% |
SFA Engineering employs about 30 people. The company is managed by 30 executives with a total tenure of roughly 98 years, averaging almost 3.0 years of service per executive, having 1.0 employees per reported executive. Analysis of SFA Engineering's management performance can provide insight into the company performance.
Yeong Kim CEO Chief Executive Officer, Vice President, Director |
Jin Won Chairman Vice Chairman of the Board |
SFA |
SFA Engineering Management Team Effectiveness
The company has return on total asset (ROA) of 0.0664 % which means that it generated a profit of $0.0664 on every $100 spent on assets. This is way below average. Similarly, it shows a return on equity (ROE) of 0.0994 %, meaning that it generated $0.0994 on every $100 dollars invested by stockholders. SFA Engineering's management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well SFA Engineering manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities.SFA Engineering Workforce Comparison
SFA Engineering is number one stock in number of employees category among its peers. The total workforce of Information Technology industry is presently estimated at about 52.0. SFA Engineering totals roughly 30.0 in number of employees claiming about 58% of equities under Information Technology industry.
The company has Profit Margin (PM) of 0.06 %, which maeans that even a very small decline in it revenue will erase profits resulting in a net loss. This is way below average. Similarly, it shows Operating Margin (OM) of 0.12 %, which suggests for every 100 dollars of sales, it generated a net operating income of $0.12. SFA Engineering Benchmark Summation
Operator |
The output start index for this execution was zero with a total number of output elements of sixty-one. SFA Engineering Price Series Summation is a cross summation of SFA Engineering price series and its benchmark/peer.
SFA Engineering Notable Stakeholders
A SFA Engineering stakeholder refers to an individual interested in an outcome of the business. Different stakeholders have different interests, and companies such as SFA Engineering often face trade-offs trying to please all of them. SFA Engineering's stakeholders can have a positive or negative influence on the entity's direction, and there are a lot of executives involved in getting SFA Engineering's stock to the level that pleases all shareholders. Keeping track of the stakeholders is a great way to stay on top of things affecting its ongoing price.
Yeong Kim | Chief Executive Officer, Vice President, Director | Profile | |
Jin Won | Vice Chairman of the Board | Profile | |
Myeong Lee | Vice President, Director | Profile | |
Hyeon Seo | Non-Executive Independent Director | Profile | |
Yin Lee | Director | Profile | |
Bong Goh | Non-Executive Independent Director | Profile | |
Yong Jeon | Assistant Managing Director | Profile | |
Dong Seo | Assistant Managing Director | Profile | |
Chae Nah | Assistant Managing Director | Profile | |
Yeong Lee | Assistant Managing Director | Profile | |
Song Jung | Non-Executive Independent Director | Profile | |
HyungSeok Youn | Head Center | Profile | |
Gu Won | Assistant Managing Director | Profile | |
Cheol Lee | Assistant Managing Director | Profile | |
YoungMin Kim | Chairman CEO | Profile | |
Jun Huh | Assistant Managing Director | Profile | |
Sun Jang | Non-Executive Independent Director | Profile | |
MyungJae Lee | VicePres Director | Profile | |
Seok Kang | Managing Director | Profile | |
Sang Kim | Assistant Managing Director | Profile | |
Jun Heo | MD Dept | Profile | |
SangKyung Kim | Head MD | Profile | |
Chan Jung | Assistant Managing Director | Profile | |
SukHee Kang | Managing Director | Profile | |
KyungWook Lee | Managing Director | Profile | |
YongBae Jeon | GM MD | Profile | |
CheolRae Noh | Ex Director | Profile | |
ChanSun Jung | Managing Director | Profile | |
Jong Kim | Assistant Managing Director | Profile | |
Yin Cho | Non-Executive Independent Director | Profile |
About SFA Engineering Management Performance
The success or failure of an entity such as SFA Engineering often depends on how effective the management is. SFA Engineering management team is responsible for propelling the future growth in the right direction and administering and controlling the business activities and accounting for the results. Ineffective management usually contributes to failure in the company's future performance for all stakeholders equally, but most importantly, for investors. So it is important to measure the effectiveness of SFA management before purchasing its stock. In many ways, it's all about finding the answer to one important question - Are they doing the right thing right now? How would we assess whether the SFA management is utilizing all available resources in the best possible way? Also, how well is the company doing relative to others in its sector and the market as a whole? The answer can be found by analyzing a few important fundamental indicators such as return on assets and return on equity.
SFA Engineering Corporation manufactures and sells display equipment, logistics systems, semiconductor equipment, solar and fuel cell equipment, and special industrial equipment in South Korea and internationally. The company was founded in 1998 and is headquartered in Hwaseong-si, South Korea. SFA is traded on Korean Securities Dealers Automated Quotations in South Korea.
Please note, the presentation of SFA Engineering's financial position, as portrayed in its financial statements, is often influenced by management's estimates, judgments, and sometimes even manipulations. In the best case, SFA Engineering's management is honest, while the outside auditors are strict and uncompromising. Please utilize our Beneish M Score to check the likelihood of SFA Engineering's management manipulating its earnings.
SFA Engineering Workforce Analysis
Traditionally, organizations such as SFA Engineering use manpower efficiency calculations for various incentive schemes, employee appraisal, or as an initiative to improve the processes. However, it can also be used by investors to make long-term investment decisions. The trends in the profit per employee or revenue per employee are measured by net income or revenue divided by the current number of full-time employees over a given time interval. Because workforce needs differ across sectors, these ratios could be used to compare SFA Engineering within its industry.SFA Engineering Manpower Efficiency
Return on SFA Engineering Manpower
Revenue Per Employee | 52.2B | |
Revenue Per Executive | 52.2B | |
Net Income Per Employee | 3.9B | |
Net Income Per Executive | 3.9B | |
Working Capital Per Employee | 8.7B | |
Working Capital Per Executive | 8.7B |
Complementary Tools for SFA Stock analysis
When running SFA Engineering's price analysis, check to measure SFA Engineering's market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy SFA Engineering is operating at the current time. Most of SFA Engineering's value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of SFA Engineering's future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move SFA Engineering's price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of SFA Engineering to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.
Alpha Finder Use alpha and beta coefficients to find investment opportunities after accounting for the risk | |
Analyst Advice Analyst recommendations and target price estimates broken down by several categories | |
Balance Of Power Check stock momentum by analyzing Balance Of Power indicator and other technical ratios | |
Premium Stories Follow Macroaxis premium stories from verified contributors across different equity types, categories and coverage scope |