Ford (Mexico) Insiders
| F Stock | MXN 229.47 7.62 3.43% |
Ford employs about 173 K people. The company is managed by 20 executives with a total tenure of roughly 29 years, averaging almost 1.0 years of service per executive, having 8650.0 employees per reported executive. Break down of Ford's management performance can provide insight into the company performance.
| William Ford Chairman Executive Chairman, Chairman of Fin. Committee and Member of Sustainability and Innovation Committee |
| John Lawler President Vice President Controller |
Ford |
Ford Management Team Effectiveness
The company has return on total asset (ROA) of 0.0187 % which means that it generated a profit of $0.0187 on every $100 spent on assets. This is way below average. Similarly, it shows a return on stockholder's equity (ROE) of (0.0469) %, meaning that it created substantial loss on money invested by shareholders. Ford's management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well Ford manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities.Ford Workforce Comparison
Ford Motor is rated # 2 in number of employees category among its peers. The total workforce of Auto Manufacturers industry is currently estimated at about 676,251. Ford totals roughly 173,000 in number of employees claiming about 26% of stocks in Auto Manufacturers industry.
The company has Profit Margin (PM) of (0.01) %, which may suggest that it does not properly executes on its current pricing strategies or is unable to control all of the operational costs. This is way below average. Similarly, it shows Operating Margin (OM) of 0.05 %, which suggests for every 100 dollars of sales, it generated a net operating income of $0.05. Ford Motor Benchmark Summation
Operator |
The output start index for this execution was zero with a total number of output elements of sixty-one. Ford Motor Price Series Summation is a cross summation of Ford price series and its benchmark/peer.
Ford Notable Stakeholders
A Ford stakeholder refers to an individual interested in an outcome of the business. Different stakeholders have different interests, and companies such as Ford often face trade-offs trying to please all of them. Ford's stakeholders can have a positive or negative influence on the entity's direction, and there are a lot of executives involved in getting Ford's stock to the level that pleases all shareholders. Keeping track of the stakeholders is a great way to stay on top of things affecting its ongoing price.
| William Ford | Executive Chairman, Chairman of Fin. Committee and Member of Sustainability and Innovation Committee | Profile | |
| John Lawler | Vice President Controller | Profile | |
| James Farley | Executive VP and President of Europe, Middle East and Africa | Profile | |
| Michael Amend | Chief Officer | Profile | |
| Eugenio Garza | Director Officer | Profile | |
| Daniel Cofr | Chief Officer | Profile | |
| Ambassador Huntsman | Vice Director | Profile | |
| Jose GarzaLaguera | Chief Division | Profile | |
| Kenneth Washington | Chief Officer | Profile | |
| Cynthia Williams | Homologation Sustainability | Profile | |
| Francisco Beltrn | Chief Officer | Profile | |
| Raymundo Vela | Director HR | Profile | |
| Juan Fonseca | VP Relations | Profile | |
| John Field | Chief e | Profile | |
| Gerardo Attolini | VP Control | Profile | |
| Lynn Tyson | Ex Relations | Profile | |
| Alexandra English | Director Director | Profile | |
| Carlos Cadena | Chief Division | Profile | |
| Alfonso Garza | CEO Estratgicos | Profile | |
| Jose Carbajal | Ex Chairman | Profile |
About Ford Management Performance
The success or failure of an entity such as Ford Motor often depends on how effective the management is. Ford management team is responsible for propelling the future growth in the right direction and administering and controlling the business activities and accounting for the results. Ineffective management usually contributes to failure in the company's future performance for all stakeholders equally, but most importantly, for investors. So it is important to measure the effectiveness of Ford management before purchasing its stock. In many ways, it's all about finding the answer to one important question - Are they doing the right thing right now? How would we assess whether the Ford management is utilizing all available resources in the best possible way? Also, how well is the company doing relative to others in its sector and the market as a whole? The answer can be found by analyzing a few important fundamental indicators such as return on assets and return on equity.
Ford Motor Company designs, manufactures, markets, and services a range of Ford cars, trucks, sport utility vehicles, and electrified vehicles worldwide. Ford Motor Company was founded in 1903 and is based in Dearborn, Michigan. FORD MOTOR operates under Auto Manufacturers classification in Mexico and is traded on Mexico Stock Exchange. It employs 199000 people.
Please note, the imprecision that can be found in Ford's accounting process means that the reasonable investor should take a skeptical approach toward the financial statement analysis of Ford Motor. Check Ford's Beneish M Score to see the likelihood of Ford's management manipulating its earnings.
Ford Workforce Analysis
Traditionally, organizations such as Ford use manpower efficiency calculations for various incentive schemes, employee appraisal, or as an initiative to improve the processes. However, it can also be used by investors to make long-term investment decisions. The trends in the profit per employee or revenue per employee are measured by net income or revenue divided by the current number of full-time employees over a given time interval. Because workforce needs differ across sectors, these ratios could be used to compare Ford within its industry.Ford Manpower Efficiency
Return on Ford Manpower
| Revenue Per Employee | 913.6K | |
| Revenue Per Executive | 7.9B | |
| Net Loss Per Employee | 11.5K | |
| Net Loss Per Executive | 99M |
Additional Tools for Ford Stock Analysis
When running Ford's price analysis, check to measure Ford's market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Ford is operating at the current time. Most of Ford's value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Ford's future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Ford's price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Ford to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.