Liquidity Services Company Insiders
| LQDT Stock | USD 32.00 0.15 0.47% |
Liquidity Services' insiders are aggressively selling. The analysis of insiders' sentiment of trading Liquidity Services stock suggests that vertually all insiders are panicking at this time. Liquidity Services employs about 818 people. The company is managed by 10 executives with a total tenure of roughly 37 years, averaging almost 3.0 years of service per executive, having 81.8 employees per reported executive.
| John Daunt President Executive Vice President Chief Commercial Officer |
Insider Sentiment 0
Mostly Selling
Selling | Buying |
Latest Trades
| 2025-09-15 | Jaime Mateus-Tique | Disposed 5403 @ 27.45 | View | ||
| 2025-09-12 | Jaime Mateus-Tique | Disposed 4597 @ 27.44 | View | ||
| 2025-08-13 | George H Ellis | Disposed 7500 @ 25.35 | View | ||
| 2025-05-05 | Jaime Mateus-Tique | Disposed 10000 @ 31.55 | View | ||
| 2025-04-28 | Jaime Mateus-Tique | Disposed 10000 @ 31.56 | View | ||
| 2025-04-21 | Jaime Mateus-Tique | Disposed 10000 @ 30.25 | View | ||
| 2025-04-14 | Jaime Mateus-Tique | Disposed 10000 @ 29.72 | View | ||
| 2025-04-09 | Jaime Mateus-Tique | Disposed 931 @ 29.43 | View | ||
| 2025-04-07 | Jaime Mateus-Tique | Disposed 29169 @ 29.06 | View | ||
| 2025-03-24 | Jaime Mateus-Tique | Disposed 35000 @ 31.93 | View | ||
| 2025-02-25 | Novelette Murray | Disposed 7938 @ 33.96 | View | ||
| 2025-02-20 | Beatriz V Infante | Disposed 5000 @ 35.36 | View | ||
| 2025-02-12 | Jorge Celaya | Disposed 7500 @ 35.33 | View | ||
| 2025-02-10 | Steven Weiskircher | Disposed 10815 @ 33.99 | View |
Monitoring Liquidity Services' insider sentiment can offer insights into its future performance, as insiders often have access to more information about their company's operations, financial health, and upcoming initiatives than the general public. However, it's essential to note that insider trading is regulated by securities laws, and insiders are required to disclose their trades publicly to ensure transparency and prevent unfair advantages based on non-public information.
Liquidity | Build AI portfolio with Liquidity Stock |
Liquidity Services' Workforce Through the Years
Please note that employee historical analysis has become an increasingly important factor for investors assessing the risk associated with Liquidity Services' future performance. Based on our forecasts, it is anticipated that Liquidity will maintain a workforce of slightly above 820 employees by March 2026.Liquidity Services Management Team Effectiveness
The company has return on total asset (ROA) of 0.0622 % which means that it generated a profit of $0.0622 on every $100 spent on assets. This is way below average. Similarly, it shows a return on stockholder's equity (ROE) of 0.1456 %, meaning that it created $0.1456 on every $100 dollars invested by stockholders. Liquidity Services' management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well Liquidity Services manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities. Return On Equity is likely to gain to 0.18 in 2026, whereas Return On Tangible Assets are likely to drop 0.06 in 2026. Total Current Liabilities is likely to gain to about 195.2 M in 2026, whereas Liabilities And Stockholders Equity is likely to drop slightly above 237 M in 2026.Net Income Applicable To Common Shares is likely to gain to about 38.1 M in 2026, whereas Common Stock Shares Outstanding is likely to drop slightly above 31.8 M in 2026. Liquidity Services maintains a total of 30.81 Million outstanding shares. The majority of Liquidity Services outstanding shares are owned by institutional investors. These third-party entities are usually referred to as non-private investors looking to shop for positions in Liquidity Services to benefit from reduced commissions. Consequently, institutional holders are subject to a different set of regulations than regular investors in Liquidity Services. Please pay attention to any change in the institutional holdings of Liquidity Services as this could imply that something significant has changed or is about to change at the company. Also note that almost two million seven hundred thirty-two thousand four hundred fifty-four invesors are currently shorting Liquidity Services expressing very little confidence in its future performance.
Shares in Circulation | First Issued 2005-03-31 | Previous Quarter 32.5 M | Current Value 32.3 M | Avarage Shares Outstanding 30.8 M | Quarterly Volatility 2.8 M |
Liquidity Services Workforce Comparison
Liquidity Services is currently regarded as number one stock in number of employees category among its peers. The total workforce of Industrials industry is now estimated at about 156,357. Liquidity Services maintains roughly 818 in number of employees contributing less than 1% to equities under Industrials industry.
Liquidity Services Profit Margins
The company has Profit Margin (PM) of 0.06 %, which maeans that even a very small decline in it revenue will erase profits resulting in a net loss. This is way below average. Similarly, it shows Operating Margin (OM) of 0.09 %, which suggests for every 100 dollars of sales, it generated a net operating income of $0.09.| Current Value | Last Year | Change From Last Year | 10 Year Trend | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Profit Margin | 0.7 | 0.5 |
|
|
Liquidity Services Insider Trading History
Some recent studies suggest that insider trading raises the cost of capital for securities issuers and decreases overall economic growth. Trading by specific Liquidity Services insiders, such as employees or executives, is commonly permitted as long as it does not rely on Liquidity Services' material information that is not in the public domain. Local jurisdictions usually require such trading to be reported in order to monitor insider transactions. In many U.S. states, trading conducted by corporate officers, key employees, directors, or significant shareholders must be reported to the regulator or publicly disclosed, usually within a few business days of the trade. In these cases, Liquidity Services insiders must file a Form 4 with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) when buying or selling shares of their own companies.
| Buy/Sell Ratio | # Purchases Trades | # Sales Trades | Total Shares Purchased | Total Shares Sold | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-01 | 0.9231 | 24 | 26 | 107,856 | 143,898 |
| 2025-12-01 | 1.125 | 45 | 40 | 484,943 | 208,358 |
| 2025-09-01 | 0.6471 | 11 | 17 | 32,836 | 72,711 |
| 2025-03-01 | 0.7789 | 74 | 95 | 280,565 | 713,737 |
| 2024-12-01 | 0.8387 | 26 | 31 | 392,700 | 496,264 |
| 2024-09-01 | 0.5333 | 24 | 45 | 155,592 | 384,002 |
| 2024-03-01 | 1.1212 | 37 | 33 | 190,266 | 160,814 |
| 2023-12-01 | 13.0 | 13 | 1 | 292,223 | 18,953 |
| 2023-09-01 | 0.2143 | 3 | 14 | 12,708 | 381,366 |
| 2023-06-01 | 0.6842 | 13 | 19 | 61,888 | 173,927 |
| 2023-03-01 | 1.0 | 42 | 42 | 192,247 | 190,508 |
| 2022-12-01 | 0.25 | 3 | 12 | 104,083 | 267,303 |
| 2022-09-01 | 0.475 | 19 | 40 | 134,129 | 487,846 |
| 2022-06-01 | 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 2,621 | 3,750 |
| 2022-03-01 | 1.0556 | 38 | 36 | 168,977 | 177,600 |
| 2021-12-01 | 1.2941 | 22 | 17 | 269,140 | 143,913 |
| 2021-09-01 | 0.6 | 3 | 5 | 32,319 | 63,951 |
| 2021-06-01 | 0.25 | 9 | 36 | 162,733 | 738,292 |
| 2021-03-01 | 0.9271 | 89 | 96 | 790,426 | 1,160,850 |
| 2020-12-01 | 2.1875 | 35 | 16 | 786,104 | 75,171 |
| 2020-09-01 | 0.625 | 5 | 8 | 58,321 | 43,748 |
| 2020-06-01 | 42.0 | 42 | 1 | 1,322,338 | 8,000 |
| 2020-03-01 | 2.45 | 49 | 20 | 710,408 | 99,590 |
| 2019-12-01 | 1.8636 | 41 | 22 | 567,285 | 104,461 |
| 2019-09-01 | 0.6667 | 4 | 6 | 21,358 | 111,490 |
| 2019-06-01 | 0.125 | 6 | 48 | 22,371 | 504,416 |
| 2019-03-01 | 0.7647 | 26 | 34 | 214,955 | 180,604 |
| 2018-12-01 | 0.4107 | 23 | 56 | 526,512 | 301,204 |
| 2018-09-01 | 0.2 | 1 | 5 | 3,750 | 65,089 |
| 2018-06-01 | 0.2609 | 6 | 23 | 55,580 | 115,410 |
| 2018-03-01 | 1.5556 | 14 | 9 | 162,732 | 62,132 |
| 2017-12-01 | 0.9 | 36 | 40 | 791,541 | 338,401 |
| 2017-09-01 | 0.1667 | 3 | 18 | 10,554 | 94,181 |
| 2017-06-01 | 0.5455 | 6 | 11 | 29,928 | 45,562 |
| 2017-03-01 | 3.125 | 25 | 8 | 321,287 | 84,969 |
| 2016-12-01 | 0.2029 | 14 | 69 | 247,270 | 439,216 |
| 2016-09-01 | 0.2857 | 2 | 7 | 16,342 | 66,256 |
| 2016-06-01 | 0.7143 | 5 | 7 | 41,115 | 43,559 |
| 2015-12-01 | 2.5833 | 31 | 12 | 673,395 | 195,404 |
| 2015-06-01 | 20.0 | 20 | 1 | 375,466 | 3,900 |
| 2015-03-01 | 0.5333 | 8 | 15 | 108,097 | 192,252 |
| 2014-06-01 | 2.5714 | 18 | 7 | 548,775 | 321,170 |
| 2014-03-01 | 2.0833 | 25 | 12 | 385,818 | 43,367 |
| 2013-12-01 | 1.75 | 21 | 12 | 273,775 | 88,534 |
| 2013-09-01 | 0.7778 | 14 | 18 | 203,176 | 726,685 |
| 2013-06-01 | 1.2143 | 17 | 14 | 54,909 | 346,589 |
| 2013-03-01 | 0.1538 | 2 | 13 | 22,466 | 218,843 |
| 2012-12-01 | 4.8 | 24 | 5 | 102,397 | 31,951 |
| 2012-09-01 | 0.5882 | 10 | 17 | 97,585 | 117,855 |
| 2012-06-01 | 0.3968 | 25 | 63 | 232,424 | 906,656 |
| 2012-03-01 | 0.6667 | 34 | 51 | 382,838 | 1,418,692 |
| 2011-12-01 | 0.3659 | 30 | 82 | 282,474 | 794,644 |
| 2011-09-01 | 0.5882 | 20 | 34 | 417,211 | 703,675 |
| 2011-06-01 | 0.2941 | 5 | 17 | 58,849 | 1,455,686 |
| 2011-03-01 | 0.4375 | 42 | 96 | 386,723 | 1,169,283 |
| 2010-12-01 | 0.4898 | 24 | 49 | 356,495 | 824,428 |
| 2010-09-01 | 0.1944 | 7 | 36 | 60,875 | 563,734 |
| 2010-06-01 | 0.1 | 3 | 30 | 55,681 | 447,362 |
| 2010-03-01 | 0.3784 | 14 | 37 | 141,978 | 400,037 |
| 2009-12-01 | 0.4444 | 8 | 18 | 90,017 | 662,300 |
| 2009-09-01 | 0.0417 | 1 | 24 | 11,458 | 180,446 |
| 2009-06-01 | 0.5385 | 7 | 13 | 89,255 | 104,773 |
| 2008-12-01 | 2.0 | 4 | 2 | 277,000 | 8,100 |
| 2008-09-01 | 0.0952 | 2 | 21 | 31,479 | 479,058 |
| 2007-12-01 | 4.0 | 4 | 1 | 431,000 | 1,000.00 |
| 2007-03-01 | 0.05 | 1 | 20 | 3,437 | 6,738,582 |
| 2006-12-01 | 0.5 | 2 | 4 | 26,900 | 149,900 |
| 2006-03-01 | 0.5 | 5 | 10 | 6,630,986 | 10,771,009 |
Liquidity Services Notable Stakeholders
A Liquidity Services stakeholder refers to an individual interested in an outcome of the business. Different stakeholders have different interests, and companies such as Liquidity Services often face trade-offs trying to please all of them. Liquidity Services' stakeholders can have a positive or negative influence on the entity's direction, and there are a lot of executives involved in getting Liquidity Services' stock to the level that pleases all shareholders. Keeping track of the stakeholders is a great way to stay on top of things affecting its ongoing price.
| John Daunt | Executive Vice President Chief Commercial Officer | Profile | |
| Jorge Celaya | CFO and Executive VP | Profile | |
| Jaime MateusTique | CoFounder Director | Profile | |
| Mark JD | Chief Secretary | Profile | |
| Novelette Murray | Chief Officer | Profile | |
| William III | Chairman Cofounder | Profile | |
| Anthony Long | Vice Marketing | Profile | |
| Steven Weiskircher | Chief Officer | Profile | |
| Mark Shaffer | General Counsel, Corporate Secretary | Profile | |
| Roger Gravley | Advisor | Profile |
About Liquidity Services Management Performance
The success or failure of an entity such as Liquidity Services often depends on how effective the management is. Liquidity Services management team is responsible for propelling the future growth in the right direction and administering and controlling the business activities and accounting for the results. Ineffective management usually contributes to failure in the company's future performance for all stakeholders equally, but most importantly, for investors. So it is important to measure the effectiveness of Liquidity management before purchasing its stock. In many ways, it's all about finding the answer to one important question - Are they doing the right thing right now? How would we assess whether the Liquidity management is utilizing all available resources in the best possible way? Also, how well is the company doing relative to others in its sector and the market as a whole? The answer can be found by analyzing a few important fundamental indicators such as return on assets and return on equity.
| Last Reported | Projected for Next Year | ||
| Return On Tangible Assets | 0.12 | 0.06 | |
| Return On Capital Employed | 0.19 | 0.11 | |
| Return On Assets | 0.09 | 0.04 | |
| Return On Equity | 0.16 | 0.18 |
Please note, the imprecision that can be found in Liquidity Services' accounting process means that the reasonable investor should take a skeptical approach toward the financial statement analysis of Liquidity Services. Check Liquidity Services' Beneish M Score to see the likelihood of Liquidity Services' management manipulating its earnings.
Liquidity Services Workforce Analysis
Traditionally, organizations such as Liquidity Services use manpower efficiency calculations for various incentive schemes, employee appraisal, or as an initiative to improve the processes. However, it can also be used by investors to make long-term investment decisions. The trends in the profit per employee or revenue per employee are measured by net income or revenue divided by the current number of full-time employees over a given time interval. Because workforce needs differ across sectors, these ratios could be used to compare Liquidity Services within its industry.Liquidity Services Manpower Efficiency
Return on Liquidity Services Manpower
| Revenue Per Employee | 582.7K | |
| Revenue Per Executive | 47.7M | |
| Net Income Per Employee | 34.3K | |
| Net Income Per Executive | 2.8M | |
| Working Capital Per Employee | 77.2K | |
| Working Capital Per Executive | 6.3M |
Additional Tools for Liquidity Stock Analysis
When running Liquidity Services' price analysis, check to measure Liquidity Services' market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Liquidity Services is operating at the current time. Most of Liquidity Services' value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Liquidity Services' future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Liquidity Services' price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Liquidity Services to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.