Oshkosh Company Leadership
OSK Stock | USD 111.81 2.48 2.27% |
Oshkosh employs about 18 K people. The company is managed by 32 executives with a total tenure of roughly 175 years, averaging almost 5.0 years of service per executive, having 562.5 employees per reported executive. Inspection of Oshkosh's management performance can provide insight into the company performance.
Wilson Jones CEO President, Chief Executive Officer, Director |
Stephen Newlin Chairman Independent Chairman of the Board |
Oshkosh |
Oshkosh's Workforce Through the Years
Please note that employee historical analysis has become an increasingly important factor for investors assessing the risk associated with Oshkosh's future performance. Based on our forecasts, it is anticipated that Oshkosh will maintain a workforce of about 18000 employees by December 2024.Oshkosh's latest congressional trading
Congressional trading in companies like Oshkosh, is subject to rigorous scrutiny to prevent conflicts of interest and insider trading. This is governed by multiple SEC regulations which were established to foster transparency and deter members of Congress from leveraging non-public information for personal gain. This oversight helps maintain public trust and ensures that investments in Oshkosh by those in governmental positions are based on the same information available to the general public.
2024-07-22 | Representative Michael McCaul | Acquired $100K to $250K | Verify | ||
2024-06-20 | Representative Michael McCaul | Acquired $15K to $50K | Verify |
Oshkosh Management Team Effectiveness
The company has Return on Asset of 0.0707 % which means that on every $100 spent on assets, it made $0.0707 of profit. This is way below average. In the same way, it shows a return on shareholders' equity (ROE) of 0.1776 %, implying that it generated $0.1776 on every 100 dollars invested. Oshkosh's management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well Oshkosh manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities. Return On Capital Employed is expected to rise to 0.17 this year, although the value of Return On Tangible Assets will most likely fall to 0.06. At this time, Oshkosh's Total Current Liabilities is quite stable compared to the past year. Liabilities And Stockholders Equity is expected to rise to about 9.6 B this year, although the value of Non Current Liabilities Other will most likely fall to about 442.4 M.Common Stock Shares Outstanding is expected to rise to about 73.6 M this year. Net Income Applicable To Common Shares is expected to rise to about 286.7 M this year
Oshkosh Workforce Comparison
Oshkosh is regarded third in number of employees category among its peers. The total workforce of Industrials industry is now estimated at about 140,492. Oshkosh retains roughly 18,000 in number of employees claiming about 13% of equities under Industrials industry.
Oshkosh Profit Margins
The company has Net Profit Margin of 0.06 %, which implies that it may need a different competitive strategy as even a very small decline in it revenue may erase profits and result in a net loss. This is way below average. In the same way, it shows Net Operating Margin of 0.1 %, which entails that for every 100 dollars of revenue, it generated $0.1 of operating income.Current Value | Last Year | Change From Last Year | 10 Year Trend | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gross Profit Margin | 0.13 | 0.1839 |
|
| |||||
Net Profit Margin | 0.0651 | 0.062 |
|
| |||||
Operating Profit Margin | 0.0447 | 0.0875 |
|
| |||||
Pretax Profit Margin | 0.0868 | 0.0827 |
|
| |||||
Return On Assets | 0.0586 | 0.0655 |
|
| |||||
Return On Equity | 0.0963 | 0.1614 |
|
|
Oshkosh Insider Trading History
Some recent studies suggest that insider trading raises the cost of capital for securities issuers and decreases overall economic growth. Trading by specific Oshkosh insiders, such as employees or executives, is commonly permitted as long as it does not rely on Oshkosh's material information that is not in the public domain. Local jurisdictions usually require such trading to be reported in order to monitor insider transactions. In many U.S. states, trading conducted by corporate officers, key employees, directors, or significant shareholders must be reported to the regulator or publicly disclosed, usually within a few business days of the trade. In these cases, Oshkosh insiders must file a Form 4 with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) when buying or selling shares of their own companies.
Buy/Sell Ratio | # Purchases Trades | # Sales Trades | Total Shares Purchased | Total Shares Sold | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024-12-01 | 2.0 | 2 | 1 | 21,373 | 5,162 |
2024-09-01 | 1.5 | 3 | 2 | 7,216 | 2,045 |
2024-06-01 | 5.0 | 10 | 2 | 16,800 | 5,381 |
2024-03-01 | 0.7222 | 39 | 54 | 168,020 | 107,195 |
2023-12-01 | 0.6429 | 36 | 56 | 119,767 | 73,302 |
2023-09-01 | 0.5333 | 8 | 15 | 29,775 | 58,800 |
2023-06-01 | 2.75 | 11 | 4 | 23,346 | 7,238 |
2023-03-01 | 1.619 | 102 | 63 | 133,407 | 55,144 |
2022-12-01 | 0.9462 | 176 | 186 | 69,136 | 74,592 |
2022-06-01 | 3.0556 | 55 | 18 | 30,117 | 49,357 |
2022-03-01 | 21.25 | 85 | 4 | 116,495 | 8,388 |
2021-12-01 | 0.9096 | 171 | 188 | 132,805 | 103,063 |
2021-06-01 | 1.8158 | 69 | 38 | 79,989 | 181,416 |
2021-03-01 | 4.4118 | 75 | 17 | 141,098 | 280,109 |
2020-12-01 | 0.9181 | 157 | 171 | 236,146 | 180,966 |
2020-09-01 | 13.75 | 55 | 4 | 17,624 | 32,600 |
2020-06-01 | 4.8462 | 63 | 13 | 37,097 | 40,440 |
2020-03-01 | 5.75 | 69 | 12 | 177,612 | 313,288 |
2019-12-01 | 0.984 | 184 | 187 | 442,858 | 352,949 |
2019-09-01 | 11.0 | 55 | 5 | 4,403 | 4,010 |
2019-06-01 | 13.5 | 54 | 4 | 61,991 | 12,865 |
2019-03-01 | 2.8462 | 74 | 26 | 94,507 | 170,780 |
2018-12-01 | 1.0133 | 152 | 150 | 444,484 | 189,167 |
2018-09-01 | 4.5 | 54 | 12 | 97,146 | 198,556 |
2018-06-01 | 14.5 | 58 | 4 | 8,606 | 9,288 |
2018-03-01 | 4.5 | 72 | 16 | 25,232 | 17,736 |
2017-12-01 | 1.0144 | 141 | 139 | 450,636 | 418,693 |
2017-09-01 | 1.5185 | 82 | 54 | 88,590 | 157,587 |
2017-06-01 | 19.0 | 57 | 3 | 1,853 | 2,621 |
2017-03-01 | 3.04 | 76 | 25 | 155,425 | 272,147 |
2016-12-01 | 1.507 | 107 | 71 | 450,756 | 311,110 |
2016-09-01 | 0.9483 | 110 | 116 | 237,195 | 443,598 |
2016-06-01 | 11.8 | 59 | 5 | 6,318 | 8,134 |
2016-03-01 | 22.3333 | 67 | 3 | 49,382 | 2,763 |
2015-12-01 | 9.5455 | 105 | 11 | 512,838 | 48,318 |
2015-09-01 | 1.0 | 85 | 85 | 95,384 | 183,649 |
2015-06-01 | 3.8571 | 54 | 14 | 55,311 | 125,874 |
2015-03-01 | 6.6667 | 60 | 9 | 61,444 | 66,299 |
2014-12-01 | 2.6957 | 62 | 23 | 309,766 | 213,150 |
2014-09-01 | 1.303 | 86 | 66 | 493,016 | 104,804 |
2014-06-01 | 17.5 | 35 | 2 | 29,921 | 28,000 |
2014-03-01 | 1.3273 | 73 | 55 | 419,082 | 645,290 |
2013-12-01 | 1.0484 | 65 | 62 | 488,394 | 836,755 |
2013-09-01 | 0.8163 | 40 | 49 | 311,839 | 71,197 |
2013-06-01 | 0.2308 | 3 | 13 | 11,423 | 40,834 |
2013-03-01 | 1.0 | 25 | 25 | 255,752 | 409,338 |
2012-12-01 | 1.3333 | 4 | 3 | 25,364 | 15,011 |
2012-09-01 | 1.6364 | 36 | 22 | 487,524 | 67,892 |
2012-06-01 | 1.3333 | 4 | 3 | 16,637 | 39,278 |
2012-03-01 | 2.8333 | 17 | 6 | 90,560 | 53,000 |
2011-12-01 | 8.0 | 16 | 2 | 36,326 | 12,731 |
2011-09-01 | 5.0 | 35 | 7 | 431,515 | 12,198 |
2011-06-01 | 4.5 | 9 | 2 | 1,934 | 1,902 |
2011-03-01 | 1.2174 | 28 | 23 | 77,078 | 205,000 |
2010-12-01 | 0.6667 | 6 | 9 | 37,667 | 61,606 |
2010-09-01 | 4.0 | 24 | 6 | 384,049 | 51,000 |
2010-06-01 | 0.7407 | 20 | 27 | 741,011 | 1,686,406 |
2010-03-01 | 3.6667 | 33 | 9 | 60,585 | 79,800 |
2009-12-01 | 4.1429 | 29 | 7 | 38,083 | 68,000 |
2009-09-01 | 7.5714 | 53 | 7 | 583,313 | 22,391 |
2009-03-01 | 9.6667 | 58 | 6 | 55,200 | 47,566 |
2008-09-01 | 2.6154 | 34 | 13 | 1,001,428 | 128,743 |
2008-06-01 | 11.0 | 22 | 2 | 1,404 | 1,950 |
2008-03-01 | 7.4 | 37 | 5 | 191,594 | 278,668 |
2007-12-01 | 1.7778 | 16 | 9 | 8,675 | 30,744 |
2007-09-01 | 1.0 | 34 | 34 | 415,393 | 93,798 |
2007-06-01 | 1.1667 | 21 | 18 | 105,080 | 264,629 |
2007-03-01 | 5.2857 | 37 | 7 | 70,568 | 60,017 |
2006-09-01 | 1.9 | 57 | 30 | 443,050 | 147,906 |
2006-06-01 | 19.0 | 19 | 1 | 734.81 | 14.58 |
2005-12-01 | 0.7857 | 33 | 42 | 223,263 | 729,413 |
2005-09-01 | 1.1053 | 42 | 38 | 462,170 | 362,056 |
2005-06-01 | 0.3093 | 30 | 97 | 995,726 | 1,517,213 |
2005-03-01 | 0.9688 | 31 | 32 | 33,741 | 63,339 |
2004-12-01 | 0.1046 | 41 | 392 | 904,619 | 1,863,167 |
2004-09-01 | 1.8261 | 42 | 23 | 243,987 | 43,000 |
2004-06-01 | 3.0 | 12 | 4 | 438.70 | 6,502 |
2004-03-01 | 0.875 | 28 | 32 | 249,494 | 377,017 |
2003-12-01 | 0.3243 | 12 | 37 | 50,802 | 277,924 |
2003-09-01 | 0.427 | 38 | 89 | 688,567 | 563,832 |
Oshkosh Notable Stakeholders
An Oshkosh stakeholder refers to an individual interested in an outcome of the business. Different stakeholders have different interests, and companies such as Oshkosh often face trade-offs trying to please all of them. Oshkosh's stakeholders can have a positive or negative influence on the entity's direction, and there are a lot of executives involved in getting Oshkosh's stock to the level that pleases all shareholders. Keeping track of the stakeholders is a great way to stay on top of things affecting its ongoing price.
Wilson Jones | President, Chief Executive Officer, Director | Profile | |
Stephen Newlin | Independent Chairman of the Board | Profile | |
Patrick Davidson | Vice President - Investor Relations | Profile | |
John Pfeifer | Chief Operating Officer, Executive Vice President | Profile | |
Anupam Khare | Senior Vice President and Chief Information Officer | Profile | |
Frank Nerenhausen | Executive Vice President and President - Access Equipment Segment | Profile | |
Tina Schoner | Senior Vice President and Chief Procurement Officer | Profile | |
Ignacio Cortina | Executive Vice President, General Counsel, Secretary | Profile | |
James Johnson | Executive Vice President and President - Fire and Emergency Segment | Profile | |
Robert Sims | Chief Human Resource Officer, Executive Vice President | Profile | |
Bradley Nelson | Senior Vice President and President - Commercial Segment | Profile | |
Bryan Brandt | Senior Vice President Chief Marketing Officer | Profile | |
Michael Pack | Chief Financial Officer, Executive Vice President | Profile | |
John Bryant | Executive Vice President and President - Defense Segment | Profile | |
Duncan Palmer | Independent Director | Profile | |
Raymond Odierno | Independent Director | Profile | |
John Shiely | Independent Director | Profile | |
Craig Omtvedt | Independent Director | Profile | |
Tyrone Jordan | Independent Director | Profile | |
Kimberley Kupres | Independent Director | Profile | |
Keith Allman | Independent Director | Profile | |
Sandra Rowland | Independent Director | Profile | |
Thomas Hawkins | Senior Vice President - Government Relations | Profile | |
Emma McTague | Senior Vice President Chief Human Resource Officer | Profile | |
John Verich | Senior Treasurer | Profile | |
Douglas Davis | Independent Director | Profile | |
James Freeders | Senior Officer | Profile | |
Mahesh Narang | Executive Segment | Profile | |
Jason Baab | Senior Vice President - Corporate Development and Strategy | Profile | |
Timothy Bleck | Senior Defense | Profile | |
Jayanthi Iyengar | Executive Vice President Chief Technology and Strategic Sourcing Officer | Profile | |
Tim Bleck | Senior Defense | Profile |
About Oshkosh Management Performance
The success or failure of an entity such as Oshkosh often depends on how effective the management is. Oshkosh management team is responsible for propelling the future growth in the right direction and administering and controlling the business activities and accounting for the results. Ineffective management usually contributes to failure in the company's future performance for all stakeholders equally, but most importantly, for investors. So it is important to measure the effectiveness of Oshkosh management before purchasing its stock. In many ways, it's all about finding the answer to one important question - Are they doing the right thing right now? How would we assess whether the Oshkosh management is utilizing all available resources in the best possible way? Also, how well is the company doing relative to others in its sector and the market as a whole? The answer can be found by analyzing a few important fundamental indicators such as return on assets and return on equity.
Last Reported | Projected for Next Year | ||
Return On Tangible Assets | 0.09 | 0.06 | |
Return On Capital Employed | 0.14 | 0.17 | |
Return On Assets | 0.07 | 0.06 | |
Return On Equity | 0.16 | 0.10 |
Oshkosh Workforce Analysis
Traditionally, organizations such as Oshkosh use manpower efficiency calculations for various incentive schemes, employee appraisal, or as an initiative to improve the processes. However, it can also be used by investors to make long-term investment decisions. The trends in the profit per employee or revenue per employee are measured by net income or revenue divided by the current number of full-time employees over a given time interval. Because workforce needs differ across sectors, these ratios could be used to compare Oshkosh within its industry.Oshkosh Manpower Efficiency
Return on Oshkosh Manpower
Revenue Per Employee | 536K | |
Revenue Per Executive | 301.5M | |
Net Income Per Employee | 33.2K | |
Net Income Per Executive | 18.7M | |
Working Capital Per Employee | 77.3K | |
Working Capital Per Executive | 43.5M |
Check out Your Equity Center to better understand how to build diversified portfolios, which includes a position in Oshkosh. Also, note that the market value of any company could be closely tied with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in state. For more information on how to buy Oshkosh Stock please use our How to buy in Oshkosh Stock guide.You can also try the Efficient Frontier module to plot and analyze your portfolio and positions against risk-return landscape of the market..
Is Construction Machinery & Heavy Transportation Equipment space expected to grow? Or is there an opportunity to expand the business' product line in the future? Factors like these will boost the valuation of Oshkosh. If investors know Oshkosh will grow in the future, the company's valuation will be higher. The financial industry is built on trying to define current growth potential and future valuation accurately. All the valuation information about Oshkosh listed above have to be considered, but the key to understanding future value is determining which factors weigh more heavily than others.
Quarterly Earnings Growth (0.01) | Dividend Share 1.79 | Earnings Share 10.3 | Revenue Per Share 161.798 | Quarterly Revenue Growth 0.092 |
The market value of Oshkosh is measured differently than its book value, which is the value of Oshkosh that is recorded on the company's balance sheet. Investors also form their own opinion of Oshkosh's value that differs from its market value or its book value, called intrinsic value, which is Oshkosh's true underlying value. Investors use various methods to calculate intrinsic value and buy a stock when its market value falls below its intrinsic value. Because Oshkosh's market value can be influenced by many factors that don't directly affect Oshkosh's underlying business (such as a pandemic or basic market pessimism), market value can vary widely from intrinsic value.
Please note, there is a significant difference between Oshkosh's value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if Oshkosh is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, Oshkosh's price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.