PAR Technology Company Insiders
| PAR Stock | USD 37.73 0.51 1.37% |
PAR Technology employs about 1.6 K people. The company is managed by 25 executives with a total tenure of roughly 70 years, averaging almost 2.0 years of service per executive, having 63.24 employees per reported executive. Discussion of PAR Technology's management performance can provide insight into the enterprise performance.
| Savneet Singh CEO President, Chief Executive Officer, Director, President of ParTech, Inc. |
| John Sammon Chairman Non-Executive Chairman of the Board, Director |
PAR Technology's Workforce Through the Years
Please note that employee historical analysis has become an increasingly important factor for investors assessing the risk associated with PAR Technology's future performance. Based on our forecasts, it is anticipated that PAR will maintain a workforce of slightly above 1580 employees by January 2026.PAR Technology Management Team Effectiveness
The company has Return on Asset of (0.0316) % which means that on every $100 spent on assets, it lost $0.0316. This is way below average. In the same way, it shows a return on shareholders' equity (ROE) of (0.1164) %, meaning that it generated no profit with money invested by stockholders. PAR Technology's management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well PAR Technology manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities. As of 12/29/2025, Return On Tangible Assets is likely to drop to -0.02. In addition to that, Return On Capital Employed is likely to grow to -0.06. At this time, PAR Technology's Intangibles To Total Assets are relatively stable compared to the past year. As of 12/29/2025, Debt To Assets is likely to grow to 0.29, while Return On Tangible Assets are likely to drop (0.02).As of 12/29/2025, Common Stock Shares Outstanding is likely to grow to about 35.9 M, while Net Loss is likely to drop (5.2 M).
PAR Technology Workforce Comparison
PAR Technology is rated below average in number of employees category among its peers. The total workforce of Information Technology industry is at this time estimated at about 132,374. PAR Technology claims roughly 1,581 in number of employees contributing just under 2% to equities under Information Technology industry.
PAR Technology Profit Margins
The company has Net Profit Margin of (0.19) %, which means that it does not effectively control expenditures or properly executes on its pricing strategies. This is way below average. In the same way, it shows Net Operating Margin of (0.12) %, which entails that for every $100 of revenue, it lost $0.12.| Current Value | Last Year | Change From Last Year | 10 Year Trend | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Profit Margin | 0.28 | 0.4175 |
|
|
PAR Technology Insider Trading History
Some recent studies suggest that insider trading raises the cost of capital for securities issuers and decreases overall economic growth. Trading by specific PAR Technology insiders, such as employees or executives, is commonly permitted as long as it does not rely on PAR Technology's material information that is not in the public domain. Local jurisdictions usually require such trading to be reported in order to monitor insider transactions. In many U.S. states, trading conducted by corporate officers, key employees, directors, or significant shareholders must be reported to the regulator or publicly disclosed, usually within a few business days of the trade. In these cases, PAR Technology insiders must file a Form 4 with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) when buying or selling shares of their own companies.
| Buy/Sell Ratio | # Purchases Trades | # Sales Trades | Total Shares Purchased | Total Shares Sold | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-12-01 | 0.5 | 1 | 2 | 6,500 | 13,000 |
| 2025-09-01 | 0.3333 | 1 | 3 | 6,500 | 189,891 |
| 2025-06-01 | 1.4 | 7 | 5 | 22,880 | 15,935 |
| 2025-03-01 | 0.875 | 7 | 8 | 266,111 | 282,048 |
| 2024-09-01 | 3.0 | 6 | 2 | 20,370 | 5,000 |
| 2024-06-01 | 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 3,617 | 803.00 |
| 2024-03-01 | 0.8333 | 10 | 12 | 254,018 | 106,179 |
| 2023-03-01 | 0.6 | 6 | 10 | 143,922 | 47,137 |
| 2022-06-01 | 5.0 | 5 | 1 | 19,715 | 7,060 |
| 2022-03-01 | 0.7 | 7 | 10 | 127,725 | 72,396 |
| 2021-06-01 | 2.3333 | 7 | 3 | 11,495 | 8,889 |
| 2021-03-01 | 0.8 | 4 | 5 | 7,154 | 50,586 |
| 2020-09-01 | 0.0333 | 1 | 30 | 5,500 | 11,000 |
| 2020-06-01 | 6.0 | 6 | 1 | 25,163 | 862,096 |
| 2020-03-01 | 1.375 | 11 | 8 | 1,594,757 | 25,463 |
| 2019-12-01 | 0.005 | 2 | 397 | 24,000 | 3,756,710 |
| 2019-09-01 | 0.0083 | 4 | 480 | 11,176 | 243,290 |
| 2019-06-01 | 6.0 | 6 | 1 | 38,264 | 1,057 |
| 2018-12-01 | 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 481.00 | 351.00 |
| 2018-06-01 | 1.6667 | 5 | 3 | 26,670 | 1,413 |
| 2018-03-01 | 1.3333 | 4 | 3 | 12,240 | 1,419 |
| 2017-12-01 | 2.3333 | 7 | 3 | 62,564 | 1,255 |
| 2017-09-01 | 0.3333 | 1 | 3 | 408.00 | 1,234 |
| 2017-06-01 | 2.0 | 2 | 1 | 24,405 | 481.00 |
| 2017-03-01 | 0.5 | 1 | 2 | 746.00 | 6,334 |
| 2016-03-01 | 0.5 | 1 | 2 | 746.00 | 23,168 |
| 2015-09-01 | 3.0 | 3 | 1 | 205,712 | 182,324 |
| 2014-12-01 | 0.7143 | 5 | 7 | 84,097 | 17,950 |
| 2014-03-01 | 15.0 | 15 | 1 | 714,510 | 931,085 |
| 2013-06-01 | 3.0 | 12 | 4 | 162,500 | 14,600 |
| 2013-03-01 | 0.25 | 1 | 4 | 568,915 | 603,915 |
| 2012-06-01 | 3.5 | 7 | 2 | 717,357 | 638,857 |
| 2012-03-01 | 2.3333 | 7 | 3 | 1,180,716 | 1,243,890 |
| 2011-06-01 | 3.75 | 15 | 4 | 2,022,243 | 1,428,243 |
| 2011-03-01 | 0.6667 | 2 | 3 | 1,403,628 | 2,031,856 |
| 2010-09-01 | 0.25 | 6 | 24 | 139,647 | 1,395,370 |
| 2010-06-01 | 0.95 | 19 | 20 | 2,207,350 | 2,129,613 |
| 2010-03-01 | 0.1257 | 22 | 175 | 713,740 | 3,501,319 |
| 2009-12-01 | 0.1455 | 8 | 55 | 10,000 | 1,520,726 |
| 2009-09-01 | 0.3182 | 7 | 22 | 43,050 | 83,350 |
| 2009-06-01 | 0.7297 | 27 | 37 | 243,077 | 137,891 |
| 2009-03-01 | 10.0 | 20 | 2 | 2,152,800 | 2,000,000 |
| 2008-12-01 | 0.5 | 2 | 4 | 3,500 | 9,000 |
| 2008-09-01 | 0.3684 | 7 | 19 | 169,250 | 190,000 |
| 2008-06-01 | 0.5714 | 4 | 7 | 11,200 | 6,650 |
| 2008-03-01 | 0.6 | 3 | 5 | 26,000 | 256,200 |
| 2007-12-01 | 0.75 | 15 | 20 | 19,827,060 | 5,913,535 |
| 2007-06-01 | 4.0 | 4 | 1 | 11,200 | 550.00 |
| 2007-03-01 | 0.3889 | 14 | 36 | 16,000 | 47,790 |
| 2006-09-01 | 20.0 | 20 | 1 | 37,396 | 5,800 |
| 2006-06-01 | 0.3636 | 4 | 11 | 8,500 | 18,100 |
| 2006-03-01 | 0.5 | 3 | 6 | 14,867 | 17,867 |
| 2005-12-01 | 0.25 | 9 | 36 | 7,700 | 51,045 |
| 2005-06-01 | 0.2265 | 53 | 234 | 88,224 | 410,809 |
| 2005-03-01 | 0.0588 | 2 | 34 | 10,600 | 82,700 |
| 2004-12-01 | 0.36 | 9 | 25 | 51,700 | 33,400 |
| 2004-09-01 | 0.3333 | 1 | 3 | 14,545 | 30,635 |
| 2004-06-01 | 0.3125 | 5 | 16 | 19,534 | 70,000 |
| 2004-03-01 | 0.2708 | 13 | 48 | 69,900 | 127,300 |
| 2003-12-01 | 0.3077 | 4 | 13 | 24,900 | 42,100 |
PAR Technology Notable Stakeholders
A PAR Technology stakeholder refers to an individual interested in an outcome of the business. Different stakeholders have different interests, and companies such as PAR Technology often face trade-offs trying to please all of them. PAR Technology's stakeholders can have a positive or negative influence on the entity's direction, and there are a lot of executives involved in getting PAR Technology's stock to the level that pleases all shareholders. Keeping track of the stakeholders is a great way to stay on top of things affecting its ongoing price.
| Savneet Singh | President, Chief Executive Officer, Director, President of ParTech, Inc. | Profile | |
| John Sammon | Non-Executive Chairman of the Board, Director | Profile | |
| Matthew Cicchinelli | President of PAR Government Systems Corporation and Rome Research Corporation | Profile | |
| Bryan Menar | Chief Financial Officer, Vice President | Profile | |
| Bryan CPA | CFO VP | Profile | |
| Raju Malhotra | Chief Product and Chief Technology Officer | Profile | |
| Cynthia Russo | Independent Director | Profile | |
| Douglas Rauch | Independent Director | Profile | |
| James Stoffel | Lead Independent Director | Profile | |
| Christopher Byrnes | VP - Business & Financial Relations | Profile | |
| Catherine King | Chief Secretary | Profile | |
| Victor Melnikow | Exec Unit | Profile | |
| Oliver Ostertag | General Cloud | Profile | |
| Thamba Tharmalingam | Chief Officer | Profile | |
| Paul Rubin | Chief Retail | Profile | |
| Keith Pascal | Independent Director | Profile | |
| Candice Levy | Senior Resources | Profile | |
| Steven Berkovitz | Chief Officer | Profile | |
| Catherine JD | Chief Secretary | Profile | |
| Joseph Yetter | General Cloud | Profile | |
| Seth Temko | Chief Officer | Profile | |
| William Williams | VP Retail | Profile | |
| Michael Nelson | President of PAR Government | Profile | |
| Michael Steenberge | Chief Officer | Profile | |
| Beth Codner | Chief Officer | Profile |
About PAR Technology Management Performance
The success or failure of an entity such as PAR Technology often depends on how effective the management is. PAR Technology management team is responsible for propelling the future growth in the right direction and administering and controlling the business activities and accounting for the results. Ineffective management usually contributes to failure in the company's future performance for all stakeholders equally, but most importantly, for investors. So it is important to measure the effectiveness of PAR management before purchasing its stock. In many ways, it's all about finding the answer to one important question - Are they doing the right thing right now? How would we assess whether the PAR management is utilizing all available resources in the best possible way? Also, how well is the company doing relative to others in its sector and the market as a whole? The answer can be found by analyzing a few important fundamental indicators such as return on assets and return on equity.
| Last Reported | Projected for Next Year | ||
| Return On Tangible Assets | (0.02) | (0.02) | |
| Return On Capital Employed | (0.06) | (0.06) | |
| Return On Equity | (0.01) | (0.01) |
PAR Technology Workforce Analysis
Traditionally, organizations such as PAR Technology use manpower efficiency calculations for various incentive schemes, employee appraisal, or as an initiative to improve the processes. However, it can also be used by investors to make long-term investment decisions. The trends in the profit per employee or revenue per employee are measured by net income or revenue divided by the current number of full-time employees over a given time interval. Because workforce needs differ across sectors, these ratios could be used to compare PAR Technology within its industry.PAR Technology Manpower Efficiency
Return on PAR Technology Manpower
| Revenue Per Employee | 221.4K | |
| Revenue Per Executive | 14M | |
| Net Loss Per Employee | 56.9K | |
| Net Loss Per Executive | 3.6M | |
| Working Capital Per Employee | 67.2K | |
| Working Capital Per Executive | 4.2M |
Additional Tools for PAR Stock Analysis
When running PAR Technology's price analysis, check to measure PAR Technology's market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy PAR Technology is operating at the current time. Most of PAR Technology's value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of PAR Technology's future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move PAR Technology's price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of PAR Technology to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.