Catherine JD - PAR Technology Chief Secretary
| PAR Stock | USD 80.06 3.14 4.08% |
Executive
Catherine JD is Chief Secretary of PAR Technology
| Age | 61 |
| Address | PAR Technology Park, New Hartford, NY, United States, 13413-4991 |
| Phone | 315 738 0600 |
| Web | https://www.partech.com |
PAR Technology Management Efficiency
The company has Return on Asset of (0.0383) % which means that on every $100 spent on assets, it lost $0.0383. This is way below average. In the same way, it shows a return on shareholders' equity (ROE) of (0.1449) %, meaning that it generated no profit with money invested by stockholders. PAR Technology's management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well PAR Technology manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities. As of 11/29/2024, Return On Tangible Assets is likely to grow to -0.3. In addition to that, Return On Capital Employed is likely to grow to -0.08. At this time, PAR Technology's Debt To Assets are relatively stable compared to the past year.Similar Executives
| Showing other executives | EXECUTIVE Age | ||
| Michael Wu | PROS Holdings | N/A | |
| Scott CPA | PROS Holdings | 56 | |
| Tatiana Starikova | Semrush Holdings | N/A | |
| Matt Campobasso | Enfusion | N/A | |
| Andrea Popovecz | CS Disco LLC | N/A | |
| Lauren Caruso | CS Disco LLC | N/A | |
| Jesse Platz | Semrush Holdings | N/A | |
| Tessa Barron | ON24 Inc | N/A | |
| Robert Taylor | Enfusion | N/A | |
| Alice Geene | Paycor HCM | 52 | |
| Ignatius Njoku | Enfusion | N/A | |
| Damian Olthoff | PROS Holdings | 49 | |
| Michael Nelson | ON24 Inc | N/A | |
| Bradley Herring | Enfusion | 53 | |
| William Weesner | ON24 Inc | N/A | |
| Susan Garcia | CS Disco LLC | N/A | |
| Kayla Dailey | Meridianlink | N/A | |
| Douglas Linebarger | Alkami Technology | 53 | |
| Swati Garodia | Paycor HCM | N/A | |
| Gianna Rotellini | Meridianlink | N/A | |
| Devesh Khare | Meridianlink | N/A | |
Management Performance
| Return On Equity | -0.14 | ||||
| Return On Asset | -0.0383 |
PAR Technology Leadership Team
Elected by the shareholders, the PAR Technology's board of directors comprises two types of representatives: PAR Technology inside directors who are chosen from within the company, and outside directors, selected externally and held independent of PAR. The board's role is to monitor PAR Technology's management team and ensure that shareholders' interests are well served. PAR Technology's inside directors are responsible for reviewing and approving budgets prepared by upper management to implement core corporate initiatives and projects. On the other hand, PAR Technology's outside directors are responsible for providing unbiased perspectives on the board's policies.
| Raju Malhotra, Chief Product and Chief Technology Officer | ||
| Catherine King, Chief Secretary | ||
| Victor Melnikow, Exec Unit | ||
| James Stoffel, Lead Independent Director | ||
| Bryan CPA, CFO VP | ||
| Savneet Singh, President, Chief Executive Officer, Director, President of ParTech, Inc. | ||
| Seth Temko, Chief Officer | ||
| Thamba Tharmalingam, Chief Officer | ||
| Paul Rubin, Chief Retail | ||
| William Williams, VP Retail | ||
| Christopher Byrnes, VP - Business & Financial Relations | ||
| Keith Pascal, Independent Director | ||
| Candice Levy, Senior Resources | ||
| Michael Nelson, President of PAR Government | ||
| Steven Berkovitz, Chief Officer | ||
| John Sammon, Non-Executive Chairman of the Board, Director | ||
| Bryan Menar, Chief Financial Officer, Vice President | ||
| Cynthia Russo, Independent Director | ||
| Catherine JD, Chief Secretary | ||
| Michael Steenberge, Chief Officer | ||
| Douglas Rauch, Independent Director | ||
| Matthew Cicchinelli, President of PAR Government Systems Corporation and Rome Research Corporation |
PAR Stock Performance Indicators
The ability to make a profit is the ultimate goal of any investor. But to identify the right stock is not an easy task. Is PAR Technology a good investment? Although profit is still the single most important financial element of any organization, multiple performance indicators can help investors identify the equity that they will appreciate over time.
| Return On Equity | -0.14 | ||||
| Return On Asset | -0.0383 | ||||
| Profit Margin | (0.01) % | ||||
| Operating Margin | (0.14) % | ||||
| Current Valuation | 3.26 B | ||||
| Shares Outstanding | 36.31 M | ||||
| Shares Owned By Insiders | 1.81 % | ||||
| Shares Owned By Institutions | 98.19 % | ||||
| Number Of Shares Shorted | 5.82 M | ||||
| Price To Earning | 58.30 X |
Pair Trading with PAR Technology
One of the main advantages of trading using pair correlations is that every trade hedges away some risk. Because there are two separate transactions required, even if PAR Technology position performs unexpectedly, the other equity can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in PAR Technology will appreciate offsetting losses from the drop in the long position's value.Moving together with PAR Stock
Moving against PAR Stock
| 0.86 | CDW | CDW Corp | PairCorr |
| 0.85 | VRME | VerifyMe | PairCorr |
| 0.81 | IVAC | Intevac | PairCorr |
| 0.57 | EVLV | Evolv Technologies Trending | PairCorr |
| 0.41 | DM | Desktop Metal | PairCorr |
The ability to find closely correlated positions to PAR Technology could be a great tool in your tax-loss harvesting strategies, allowing investors a quick way to find a similar-enough asset to replace PAR Technology when you sell it. If you don't do this, your portfolio allocation will be skewed against your target asset allocation. So, investors can't just sell and buy back PAR Technology - that would be a violation of the tax code under the "wash sale" rule, and this is why you need to find a similar enough asset and use the proceeds from selling PAR Technology to buy it.
The correlation of PAR Technology is a statistical measure of how it moves in relation to other instruments. This measure is expressed in what is known as the correlation coefficient, which ranges between -1 and +1. A perfect positive correlation (i.e., a correlation coefficient of +1) implies that as PAR Technology moves, either up or down, the other security will move in the same direction. Alternatively, perfect negative correlation means that if PAR Technology moves in either direction, the perfectly negatively correlated security will move in the opposite direction. If the correlation is 0, the equities are not correlated; they are entirely random. A correlation greater than 0.8 is generally described as strong, whereas a correlation less than 0.5 is generally considered weak.
Correlation analysis and pair trading evaluation for PAR Technology can also be used as hedging techniques within a particular sector or industry or even over random equities to generate a better risk-adjusted return on your portfolios.Additional Tools for PAR Stock Analysis
When running PAR Technology's price analysis, check to measure PAR Technology's market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy PAR Technology is operating at the current time. Most of PAR Technology's value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of PAR Technology's future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move PAR Technology's price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of PAR Technology to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.