Science Applications Company Insiders
| SAIC Stock | USD 100.66 1.82 1.78% |
Science Applications employs about 24 K people. The company is managed by 35 executives with a total tenure of roughly 143 years, averaging almost 4.0 years of service per executive, having 685.71 employees per reported executive. Evaluation of Science Applications' management performance can provide insight into the firm performance.
| Donna Morea Chairman Non-Executive Independent Chairman of the Board |
| Steven Mahon President Executive Vice President, General Counsel, Secretary |
Science Applications' latest congressional trading
Congressional trading in companies like Science Applications, is subject to rigorous scrutiny to prevent conflicts of interest and insider trading. This is governed by multiple SEC regulations which were established to foster transparency and deter members of Congress from leveraging non-public information for personal gain. This oversight helps maintain public trust and ensures that investments in Science Applications by those in governmental positions are based on the same information available to the general public.
| 2025-10-23 | Representative Lisa McClain | Acquired Under $15K | Verify | ||
| 2025-10-22 | Representative Lisa McClain | Acquired Under $15K | Verify | ||
| 2025-05-19 | Representative Gerald E Connolly | Acquired Under $15K | Verify | ||
| 2025-02-07 | Representative Gerald E Connolly | Acquired Under $15K | Verify | ||
| 2024-10-14 | Representative Gerald E Connolly | Acquired Under $15K | Verify | ||
| 2024-07-05 | Representative Gerald E Connolly | Acquired Under $15K | Verify | ||
| 2024-03-22 | Representative Gerald E Connolly | Acquired Under $15K | Verify | ||
| 2023-11-14 | Representative Gerald E Connolly | Acquired Under $15K | Verify | ||
| 2023-08-25 | Representative Gerald E Connolly | Acquired Under $15K | Verify | ||
| 2023-04-04 | Representative Gerald E Connolly | Acquired Under $15K | Verify | ||
| 2023-01-24 | Representative Gerald E Connolly | Acquired Under $15K | Verify | ||
| 2022-09-01 | Representative Gerald E Connolly | Acquired Under $15K | Verify | ||
| 2021-09-05 | Representative Gerald E Connolly | Acquired Under $15K | Verify | ||
| 2021-01-27 | Representative Gerald E Connolly | Acquired Under $15K | Verify | ||
| 2020-11-03 | Representative Gerald E Connolly | Acquired Under $15K | Verify |
Science Applications Management Team Effectiveness
The company has return on total asset (ROA) of 0.0596 % which means that it generated a profit of $0.0596 on every $100 spent on assets. This is way below average. Similarly, it shows a return on stockholder's equity (ROE) of 0.2375 %, meaning that it created $0.2375 on every $100 dollars invested by stockholders. Science Applications' management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well Science Applications manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities.Science Applications Workforce Comparison
Science Applications International is currently regarded as top stock in number of employees category among its peers. The total workforce of Information Technology industry is at this time estimated at about 522,809. Science Applications holds roughly 24,000 in number of employees claiming about 5% of equities under Information Technology industry.
The company has Profit Margin (PM) of 0.05 %, which maeans that even a very small decline in it revenue will erase profits resulting in a net loss. This is way below average. Similarly, it shows Operating Margin (OM) of 0.07 %, which suggests for every 100 dollars of sales, it generated a net operating income of $0.07. Science Applications Insider Trading
Some recent studies suggest that insider trading raises the cost of capital for securities issuers and decreases overall economic growth. Trading by specific Science Applications insiders, such as employees or executives, is commonly permitted as long as it does not rely on Science Applications' material information that is not in the public domain. Local jurisdictions usually require such trading to be reported in order to monitor insider transactions. In many U.S. states, trading conducted by corporate officers, key employees, directors, or significant shareholders must be reported to the regulator or publicly disclosed, usually within a few business days of the trade. In these cases, Science Applications insiders must file a Form 4 with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) when buying or selling shares of their own companies.
Donna Morea over six months ago Disposition of 950 shares by Donna Morea of Science Applications subject to Rule 16b-3 | ||
Townes-whitley Toni over six months ago Disposition of 3612 shares by Townes-whitley Toni of Science Applications at 103.8 subject to Rule 16b-3 | ||
Reagan James over six months ago Acquisition by Reagan James of 1644 shares of Science Applications at 103.43 subject to Rule 16b-3 | ||
Mccarthy Kathleen T. over six months ago Insider Trading | ||
Difronzo Vincent P. over six months ago Disposition of 155 shares by Difronzo Vincent P. of Science Applications at 111.7 subject to Rule 16b-3 | ||
Attili Srinivas over six months ago Acquisition by Attili Srinivas of 100 shares of Science Applications at 111.75 subject to Rule 16b-3 | ||
Jackson James Joshua over six months ago Disposition of 142 shares by Jackson James Joshua of Science Applications at 112.27 subject to Rule 16b-3 | ||
Reagan James over six months ago Acquisition by Reagan James of 1451 shares of Science Applications subject to Rule 16b-3 |
Science Applications Notable Stakeholders
A Science Applications stakeholder refers to an individual interested in an outcome of the business. Different stakeholders have different interests, and companies such as Science Applications often face trade-offs trying to please all of them. Science Applications' stakeholders can have a positive or negative influence on the entity's direction, and there are a lot of executives involved in getting Science Applications' stock to the level that pleases all shareholders. Keeping track of the stakeholders is a great way to stay on top of things affecting its ongoing price.
| Toni TownesWhitley | CEO Director | Profile | |
| Donna Morea | Non-Executive Independent Chairman of the Board | Profile | |
| Steven Mahon | Executive Vice President, General Counsel, Secretary | Profile | |
| Prabu Natarajan | Chief Financial Officer, Executive Vice President | Profile | |
| Nazzic Keene | Sector President of Global Markets and Missions | Profile | |
| Garth Graham | Independent Director | Profile | |
| Robert Bedingfield | Independent Director | Profile | |
| Steven Shane | Independent Director | Profile | |
| James CPA | Interim Director | Profile | |
| Katharina McFarland | Independent Director | Profile | |
| John Hamre | Independent Director | Profile | |
| Timothy Mayopoulos | Independent Director | Profile | |
| Hilary Hageman | General VP | Profile | |
| Hilary JD | General VP | Profile | |
| Srinivas Attili | Executive Group | Profile | |
| Dorothy Helfenstein | Executive Vice President Chief Strategic Growth Officer | Profile | |
| Yvette Kanouff | Independent Director | Profile | |
| Heather Wilson | Senior Resources | Profile | |
| Nathan Rogers | Chief Officer | Profile | |
| Joseph DeNardi | Senior Treasurer | Profile | |
| John Bonsell | Senior Affairs | Profile | |
| Robert Genter | Executive Vice President and General Manager - Civilian Markets Group | Profile | |
| Mark Escobar | Executive Operations | Profile | |
| Milford McGuirt | Director | Profile | |
| Josh Jackson | Executive Unit | Profile | |
| David Ray | Executive Officer | Profile | |
| Stephen Ambrose | Chief Scientist | Profile | |
| Catherine HernandezBlades | Senior Communications | Profile | |
| Michelle OHara | Chief Human Resource Officer, Executive Vice President | Profile | |
| Paul Greiner | Senior Counsel | Profile | |
| Michael LaRouche | Executive Vice President and General Manager - National Security Group | Profile | |
| Lucy Fitch | Chief VP | Profile | |
| Maria Bishop | Senior Controls | Profile | |
| Carol Goode | Independent Director | Profile | |
| Kathleen McCarthy | Executive Officer | Profile |
About Science Applications Management Performance
The success or failure of an entity such as Science Applications often depends on how effective the management is. Science Applications management team is responsible for propelling the future growth in the right direction and administering and controlling the business activities and accounting for the results. Ineffective management usually contributes to failure in the company's future performance for all stakeholders equally, but most importantly, for investors. So it is important to measure the effectiveness of Science management before purchasing its stock. In many ways, it's all about finding the answer to one important question - Are they doing the right thing right now? How would we assess whether the Science management is utilizing all available resources in the best possible way? Also, how well is the company doing relative to others in its sector and the market as a whole? The answer can be found by analyzing a few important fundamental indicators such as return on assets and return on equity.
Science Applications International Corporation provides technical, engineering, and enterprise information technology services primarily in the United States. Science Applications International Corporation was founded in 1969 and is headquartered in Reston, Virginia. Science Applications operates under Information Technology Services classification in the United States and is traded on New York Stock Exchange. It employs 26000 people.
Please note, the presentation of Science Applications' financial position, as portrayed in its financial statements, is often influenced by management's estimates, judgments, and sometimes even manipulations. In the best case, Science Applications' management is honest, while the outside auditors are strict and uncompromising. Please utilize our Beneish M Score to check the likelihood of Science Applications' management manipulating its earnings.
Science Applications Workforce Analysis
Traditionally, organizations such as Science Applications use manpower efficiency calculations for various incentive schemes, employee appraisal, or as an initiative to improve the processes. However, it can also be used by investors to make long-term investment decisions. The trends in the profit per employee or revenue per employee are measured by net income or revenue divided by the current number of full-time employees over a given time interval. Because workforce needs differ across sectors, these ratios could be used to compare Science Applications within its industry.Science Applications Manpower Efficiency
Return on Science Applications Manpower
| Revenue Per Employee | 311.6K | |
| Revenue Per Executive | 213.7M | |
| Net Income Per Employee | 15.1K | |
| Net Income Per Executive | 10.3M |
Complementary Tools for Science Stock analysis
When running Science Applications' price analysis, check to measure Science Applications' market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Science Applications is operating at the current time. Most of Science Applications' value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Science Applications' future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Science Applications' price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Science Applications to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.
| Funds Screener Find actively-traded funds from around the world traded on over 30 global exchanges | |
| Options Analysis Analyze and evaluate options and option chains as a potential hedge for your portfolios | |
| Premium Stories Follow Macroaxis premium stories from verified contributors across different equity types, categories and coverage scope | |
| Bollinger Bands Use Bollinger Bands indicator to analyze target price for a given investing horizon | |
| Theme Ratings Determine theme ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis theme ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance |