Science Applications Competitors

SAIC Stock  USD 92.66  -1.27  -1.35%   
For benchmarking purposes, Science Applications International is compared with Paysafe, Avnet, NIQ Global, Verra Mobility, and Ingram Micro and related companies. Revenue per employee for Science Applications versus peers measures operational efficiency at a basic level.

Science Applications and Concentrix Correlation Summary

Excellent diversification
Across the chosen horizon, Science Applications and Concentrix show a correlation of -0.17 and fall into the Excellent diversification bucket. This chart measures the degree of risk overlap between Science Applications and Concentrix.
Diversification Candidates
  0.58MI NFT LimitedPairCorr
  0.57DTT0 DATATEC LTD 2PairCorr
  0.54DM Datametrex AIPairCorr
  0.46AMI amalphi agPairCorr
Specify up to 10 symbols:
The mean reversion principle applied to Science Applications' suggests that neither prolonged outperformance nor underperformance is permanent. Identifying the root cause of Science Applications' price dislocation is essential before acting on a mean reversion signal. The mean reversion tendency in Science Applications' price is a well-documented phenomenon in academic research. In many cases, Science Applications' price extremes present statistical patterns that have recurred historically.
Sentiment
Range
LowSentimentHigh
90.3293.1295.92
Details
Intrinsic
Valuation
LowIntrinsicHigh
83.76245.22248.02
Details
Naive
Forecast
LowNextHigh
90.4793.2696.06
Details
Analyst
Consensus
LowTargetHigh
99.90109.78121.85
Details
Competitive analysis for Science Applications compares its financial performance and valuation metrics against sector peers. Cross-sectional comparison separates idiosyncratic performance from sector-level dynamics. Science Applications' metrics are most informative when compared against the strongest and weakest performers in its sector. Cross-company comparison helps validate or challenge assumptions embedded in Science Applications' current valuation.

Science Applications Competition Correlation Matrix

Studying peer correlation around Science Applications International provides a cleaner read on how much independent price behavior still exists across the competitive set. When interpreted alongside fundamentals, correlation analysis separates broad industry exposure from company-specific behavior before additional capital is allocated across the peer group.

High positive correlations

PAYPSFE
SLABAVT
INGMPSFE
VICRAVT
SLABINGM
VICRPSFE
  

High negative correlations

CNXCSLAB
CNXCINGM
CNXCVICR
CNXCAVT
INGMVRRM
CNXCPSFE

Risk-Adjusted Indicators

Strong recent returns in Science Stock do not always mean Science Applications Company is outperforming peers on business quality. Without risk-adjusted context, short-term returns may appear stronger than the volatility required to achieve them would suggest. These indicators are quantitative in nature and measure volatility and risk-adjusted expected returns across different positions.

Peer Comparison: Net Income

Net income is what remains after all costs — operating expenses, interest, taxes, and preferred dividends — are deducted from Science Applications's total revenue. The relationship between net income growth and revenue growth at Science Applications reveals whether margin expansion is driving earnings or whether top-line growth is being consumed by rising costs and financing charges.
Compare Science Applications and related stocks such as Paysafe, Avnet Inc, and NIQ Global Intelligence Net Income Over Time
Select Fundamental
Price To Sales RatioDividend Yield
Ptb RatioDays Sales Outstanding
Book Value Per ShareFree Cash Flow Yield
Invested CapitalOperating Cash Flow Per Share
Average PayablesStock Based Compensation To Revenue
Capex To DepreciationPb Ratio
Ev To SalesFree Cash Flow Per Share
RoicInventory Turnover
Net Income Per ShareDays Of Inventory On Hand
Payables TurnoverSales General And Administrative To Revenue
Average InventoryResearch And Ddevelopement To Revenue
Capex To RevenueCash Per Share
PocfratioInterest Coverage
Payout RatioCapex To Operating Cash Flow
Pfcf RatioDays Payables Outstanding
Net Current Asset ValueIncome Quality
RoeTangible Asset Value
Ev To Operating Cash FlowPe Ratio
Return On Tangible AssetsEv To Free Cash Flow
Earnings YieldIntangibles To Total Assets
Net Debt To EBITDACurrent Ratio
Tangible Book Value Per ShareReceivables Turnover
Graham NumberShareholders Equity Per Share
Debt To EquityCapex Per Share
Graham Net NetAverage Receivables
Revenue Per ShareInterest Debt Per Share
Debt To AssetsShort Term Coverage Ratios
Price Earnings RatioOperating Cycle
Price Book Value RatioPrice Earnings To Growth Ratio
Days Of Payables OutstandingDividend Payout Ratio
Price To Operating Cash Flows RatioPrice To Free Cash Flows Ratio
Pretax Profit MarginEbt Per Ebit
Operating Profit MarginEffective Tax Rate
Company Equity MultiplierLong Term Debt To Capitalization
Total Debt To CapitalizationReturn On Capital Employed
Debt Equity RatioEbit Per Revenue
Quick RatioDividend Paid And Capex Coverage Ratio
Net Income Per EBTCash Ratio
Cash Conversion CycleOperating Cash Flow Sales Ratio
Days Of Inventory OutstandingDays Of Sales Outstanding
Free Cash Flow Operating Cash Flow RatioCash Flow Coverage Ratios
Price To Book RatioFixed Asset Turnover
Capital Expenditure Coverage RatioPrice Cash Flow Ratio
Enterprise Value MultipleDebt Ratio
Cash Flow To Debt RatioPrice Sales Ratio
Return On AssetsAsset Turnover
Net Profit MarginGross Profit Margin
Price Fair ValueReturn On Equity
20102011201220132014201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
PSFE-39.7 M-39.7 M-39.7 M-39.7 M-39.7 M-39.7 M-39.7 M-39.7 M-39.7 M-110.2 M-126.7 M-111 M-1.9 B-20.3 M22.2 M-182.5 M-191.6 M
AVT23.9 M567 M450.1 M545.6 M571.9 M506.5 M525.3 M-156.4 M176.3 M-31.1 M193.1 M692.4 M770.8 M498.7 M240.2 M276.2 M209.5 M
VRRM11.4 M11.4 M11.4 M11.4 M11.4 M11.4 M29 M1.4 M-58.4 M17.1 M-4.6 M41.4 M92.5 M57 M31.4 M136.6 M143.5 M
INGM310.6 M310.6 M310.6 M310.6 M266.7 M215.1 M100.4 M199 M352.2 M503.6 M640.5 M475.2 M2.4 B352.7 M264.2 M327.9 M541.8 M
PAY-63.8 M282.4 M65 M-296.1 M-38.1 M79.1 M-9.3 M-173.9 M13.7 M13.7 M13.7 M9.3 M-513 K22.3 M44.2 M66.9 M70.3 M
VICR2.5 M8.8 M-4.1 M-23.6 M-13.9 M4.9 M-6.2 M167 K31.7 M14.1 M17.9 M56.6 M25.4 M53.6 M6.1 M118.6 M124.5 M
DLO15.6 M15.6 M15.6 M15.6 M15.6 M15.6 M15.6 M15.6 M15.6 M15.6 M28.2 M77.9 M108.7 M149 M120.4 M196.8 M109.5 M
SLAB11 M35.5 M63.5 M49.8 M38 M29.6 M61.5 M47.1 M83.6 M19.3 M12.5 M2.1 B91.4 M-34.5 M-191 M-64.9 M-61.7 M
CNXC72.2 M72.2 M72.2 M72.2 M72.2 M72.2 M72.2 M48.3 M117.2 M164.8 M405.6 M435 M313.8 M251.2 M-1.3 B-1.2 B-1.1 B

Science Applications Competitive Analysis

How does Science Applications measure up against Paysafe, Avnet, and NIQ Global? The financials tell a nuanced story. Science Applications operates at a 4.05 B scale with 7.26 B flowing through the income statement. The company converts revenue to profit at a 4.93% rate and delivers 23.27% on shareholder equity. Market capitalization diverges sharply here: 4.05 B versus 479.6 M, giving Science Applications a clear size advantage. Science Applications keeps more of each revenue dollar with a 4.93% margin versus 0.86% at Avnet. The market prices Science Applications more richly at 30.77x earnings, while NIQ Global trades at 18.78x.
    
 Better Than Average     
    
 Worse Than Peers    View Performance Chart
SAIC PSFE AVT NIQ VRRM INGM PAY
 1.35 
92.66
Science
 6.03 
8.72
Paysafe
 0.94 
82.86
Avnet
 5.88 
10.09
NIQ Global
 0.00 
13.81
Verra Mobility
 0.74 
27.00
Ingram Micro
 0.11 
26.67
Paymentus
Market Volatility
(90 Days Market Risk)
Market Performance
(90 Days Performance)
Odds of Financial Distress
(Probability Of Bankruptcy)
Current Valuation
(Equity Enterprise Value)
Buy or Sell Analysis
(Average Analysts Consensus)
Not Available
Not Available
Trade Advice
(90 Days Macroaxis Advice)
Return On Asset TTM
Total Asset TTM
Net Income TTM
Total Debt TTM
Retained Earnings TTM
Current Liabilities TTM
Net Asset
Current Ratio TTM
Price To Book TTM
Current Valuation
Five Year Return
One Year Return
Cash And Equivalents TTM
Number Of Employees
Shares Outstanding
Three Year Return
Debt To Equity TTM
Annual Yield
Current Asset TTM
Trailing Beta
Return On Equity TTM
Profit Margin TTM
Number Of Shares Shorted
Price To Sales TTM
Book Value Per Share TTM
Target Price
Last Dividend Paid
Shares Owned By Institutions
EBITDA TTM
Price To Earnings TTM
Price To Earnings To Growth
Gross Profit TTM
Market Capitalization TTM
Earnings Per Share
Short Ratio TTM
Operating Margin TTM
Cash Per Share TTM
Working Capital TTM
Shares Owned By Insiders
Revenue TTM
Cash Flow From Operations TTM
Year To Date Return
Day Typical Price
Accumulation Distribution
Daily Balance Of Power
Period Momentum Indicator
Rate Of Daily Change
Day Median Price
Price Action Indicator
Relative Strength Index
Coefficient Of Variation
Mean Deviation
Jensen Alpha
Total Risk Alpha
Sortino Ratio
Downside Variance
Standard Deviation
Kurtosis
Potential Upside
Treynor Ratio
Maximum Drawdown
Variance
Market Risk Adjusted Performance
Risk Adjusted Performance
Skewness
Semi Deviation
Information Ratio
Value At Risk
Expected Short fall
Downside Deviation
Semi Variance

Science Applications Competition Peer Performance Charts

How to Analyze Science Applications Against Peers

Science Applications' peer analysis compares Science Applications with related companies to put valuation, quality, and risk metrics in context. This establishes whether recent performance is company-specific or broadly sector-driven. A practical workflow includes:
  • Set a relevant peer group: Include direct competitors and close alternatives with comparable business exposure.
  • Benchmark core financials: Compare profitability, growth, capital structure, and cash flow quality.
  • Check valuation dispersion: Review whether Science Applications trades at a premium or discount versus peers and why.
  • Evaluate risk profile: Compare volatility, drawdowns, and correlation to avoid false diversification assumptions.
  • Document the thesis: Record where Science Applications leads or lags and what catalysts could close or widen the gap.
Use this as an educational baseline, then validate conclusions with current filings, market conditions, and portfolio objectives.

Peer Comparison Metrics & Methodology

Revenue at Science Applications has grown faster than the peer median over the last four quarters, widening its competitive lead. Relative analysis can highlight whether current pricing already reflects peer-group strengths or weaknesses. For peer comparison, Science Applications has a market cap of 4.05 billion, P/E of 30.77, profit margin of 4.93%.

Reported values for Science Applications International are derived from periodic company reporting and market reference feeds and standardized for analysis. Analyst projections are included when active coverage applies.

Editorial review and methodology oversight provided by: Michael Smolkin, Member of Macroaxis Board of Directors