Science Applications Competitors
| SAIC Stock | USD 92.66 -1.27 -1.35% |
Science Applications and Concentrix Correlation Summary
Excellent diversification
Across the chosen horizon, Science Applications and Concentrix show a correlation of -0.17 and fall into the Excellent diversification bucket. This chart measures the degree of risk overlap between Science Applications and Concentrix.
The mean reversion principle applied to Science Applications' suggests that neither prolonged outperformance nor underperformance is permanent. Identifying the root cause of Science Applications' price dislocation is essential before acting on a mean reversion signal. The mean reversion tendency in Science Applications' price is a well-documented phenomenon in academic research. In many cases, Science Applications' price extremes present statistical patterns that have recurred historically.
Science Applications Competition Correlation Matrix
Studying peer correlation around Science Applications International provides a cleaner read on how much independent price behavior still exists across the competitive set. When interpreted alongside fundamentals, correlation analysis separates broad industry exposure from company-specific behavior before additional capital is allocated across the peer group.
Please upgrade your account to get full access to Macroaxis premium features
High positive correlations
| High negative correlations
|
Risk-Adjusted Indicators
Strong recent returns in Science Stock do not always mean Science Applications Company is outperforming peers on business quality. Without risk-adjusted context, short-term returns may appear stronger than the volatility required to achieve them would suggest. These indicators are quantitative in nature and measure volatility and risk-adjusted expected returns across different positions.| Mean Deviation | Jensen Alpha | Sortino Ratio | Treynor Ratio | Semi Deviation | Expected Shortfall | Potential Upside | Value @Risk | Maximum Drawdown | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PSFE | 2.86 | 0.56 | 0.17 | 0.29 | 2.91 | 6.89 | 27.49 | |||
| AVT | 1.63 | 0.40 | 0.24 | 0.31 | 1.41 | 4.15 | 13.02 | |||
| NIQ | 2.75 | -0.17 | 0.00 | -0.24 | 0.00 | 6.18 | 18.36 | |||
| VRRM | 1.44 | -0.39 | 0.00 | -0.62 | 0.00 | 2.56 | 16.23 | |||
| INGM | 2.33 | 0.41 | 0.09 | 0.33 | 3.96 | 4.34 | 30.64 | |||
| PAY | 2.03 | 0.12 | 0.03 | 0.12 | 3.26 | 4.01 | 13.84 | |||
| VICR | 4.39 | 0.96 | 0.15 | 0.24 | 5.44 | 10.77 | 26.31 | |||
| DLO | 2.10 | 0.12 | 0.04 | 0.08 | 2.56 | 4.60 | 14.50 | |||
| SLAB | 0.32 | 0.09 | 0.27 | 0.79 | 0.03 | 0.82 | 1.91 | |||
| CNXC | 3.84 | -0.56 | 0.00 | -0.42 | 0.00 | 6.60 | 26.45 |
Peer Comparison: Net Income
Net income is what remains after all costs — operating expenses, interest, taxes, and preferred dividends — are deducted from Science Applications's total revenue. The relationship between net income growth and revenue growth at Science Applications reveals whether margin expansion is driving earnings or whether top-line growth is being consumed by rising costs and financing charges.Compare Science Applications and related stocks such as Paysafe, Avnet Inc, and NIQ Global Intelligence Net Income Over Time
Select Fundamental| 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PSFE | -39.7 M | -39.7 M | -39.7 M | -39.7 M | -39.7 M | -39.7 M | -39.7 M | -39.7 M | -39.7 M | -110.2 M | -126.7 M | -111 M | -1.9 B | -20.3 M | 22.2 M | -182.5 M | -191.6 M |
| AVT | 23.9 M | 567 M | 450.1 M | 545.6 M | 571.9 M | 506.5 M | 525.3 M | -156.4 M | 176.3 M | -31.1 M | 193.1 M | 692.4 M | 770.8 M | 498.7 M | 240.2 M | 276.2 M | 209.5 M |
| VRRM | 11.4 M | 11.4 M | 11.4 M | 11.4 M | 11.4 M | 11.4 M | 29 M | 1.4 M | -58.4 M | 17.1 M | -4.6 M | 41.4 M | 92.5 M | 57 M | 31.4 M | 136.6 M | 143.5 M |
| INGM | 310.6 M | 310.6 M | 310.6 M | 310.6 M | 266.7 M | 215.1 M | 100.4 M | 199 M | 352.2 M | 503.6 M | 640.5 M | 475.2 M | 2.4 B | 352.7 M | 264.2 M | 327.9 M | 541.8 M |
| PAY | -63.8 M | 282.4 M | 65 M | -296.1 M | -38.1 M | 79.1 M | -9.3 M | -173.9 M | 13.7 M | 13.7 M | 13.7 M | 9.3 M | -513 K | 22.3 M | 44.2 M | 66.9 M | 70.3 M |
| VICR | 2.5 M | 8.8 M | -4.1 M | -23.6 M | -13.9 M | 4.9 M | -6.2 M | 167 K | 31.7 M | 14.1 M | 17.9 M | 56.6 M | 25.4 M | 53.6 M | 6.1 M | 118.6 M | 124.5 M |
| DLO | 15.6 M | 15.6 M | 15.6 M | 15.6 M | 15.6 M | 15.6 M | 15.6 M | 15.6 M | 15.6 M | 15.6 M | 28.2 M | 77.9 M | 108.7 M | 149 M | 120.4 M | 196.8 M | 109.5 M |
| SLAB | 11 M | 35.5 M | 63.5 M | 49.8 M | 38 M | 29.6 M | 61.5 M | 47.1 M | 83.6 M | 19.3 M | 12.5 M | 2.1 B | 91.4 M | -34.5 M | -191 M | -64.9 M | -61.7 M |
| CNXC | 72.2 M | 72.2 M | 72.2 M | 72.2 M | 72.2 M | 72.2 M | 72.2 M | 48.3 M | 117.2 M | 164.8 M | 405.6 M | 435 M | 313.8 M | 251.2 M | -1.3 B | -1.2 B | -1.1 B |
Science Applications Competitive Analysis
How does Science Applications measure up against Paysafe, Avnet, and NIQ Global? The financials tell a nuanced story. Science Applications operates at a 4.05 B scale with 7.26 B flowing through the income statement. The company converts revenue to profit at a 4.93% rate and delivers 23.27% on shareholder equity. Market capitalization diverges sharply here: 4.05 B versus 479.6 M, giving Science Applications a clear size advantage. Science Applications keeps more of each revenue dollar with a 4.93% margin versus 0.86% at Avnet. The market prices Science Applications more richly at 30.77x earnings, while NIQ Global trades at 18.78x.| Better Than Average | Worse Than Peers | View Performance Chart |
Science Applications Competition Peer Performance Charts
How to Analyze Science Applications Against Peers
Science Applications' peer analysis compares Science Applications with related companies to put valuation, quality, and risk metrics in context. This establishes whether recent performance is company-specific or broadly sector-driven. A practical workflow includes:- Set a relevant peer group: Include direct competitors and close alternatives with comparable business exposure.
- Benchmark core financials: Compare profitability, growth, capital structure, and cash flow quality.
- Check valuation dispersion: Review whether Science Applications trades at a premium or discount versus peers and why.
- Evaluate risk profile: Compare volatility, drawdowns, and correlation to avoid false diversification assumptions.
- Document the thesis: Record where Science Applications leads or lags and what catalysts could close or widen the gap.
Peer Comparison Metrics & Methodology
Revenue at Science Applications has grown faster than the peer median over the last four quarters, widening its competitive lead. Relative analysis can highlight whether current pricing already reflects peer-group strengths or weaknesses. For peer comparison, Science Applications has a market cap of 4.05 billion, P/E of 30.77, profit margin of 4.93%.
Reported values for Science Applications International are derived from periodic company reporting and market reference feeds and standardized for analysis. Analyst projections are included when active coverage applies.
Editorial review and methodology oversight provided by: Michael Smolkin, Member of Macroaxis Board of Directors