Snap On Company Insiders
SNA Stock | USD 365.97 4.57 1.26% |
About 90 percent of Snap On's insiders are activelly selling. The analysis of insiders' sentiment of trading Snap On stock suggests that a very large number of insiders are panicking at this time. Snap On employs about 13.2 K people. The company is managed by 28 executives with a total tenure of roughly 219 years, averaging almost 7.0 years of service per executive, having 471.43 employees per reported executive.
Nicholas Pinchuk Chairman Chairman of the Board, President, Chief Executive Officer |
Iain Boyd President Vice President - Operations Development |
Snap On's Insider Buying Vs Selling
10
Selling | Buying |
Latest Trades
2024-10-28 | Thomas J Ward | Disposed 12737 @ 333.21 | View | ||
2024-10-18 | Richard Thomas Miller | Disposed 1750 @ 330 | View | ||
2024-10-15 | Iain Boyd | Disposed 6044 @ 298.99 | View | ||
2024-08-26 | June C Lemerand | Disposed 1186 @ 283.97 | View | ||
2024-08-22 | Aldo John Pagliari | Disposed 4473 @ 278.74 | View | ||
2024-08-12 | Nicholas T Pinchuk | Disposed 24145 @ 268.95 | View | ||
2024-07-05 | Jared Moskowitz | Disposed @ 255.35 | |||
2024-07-01 | Jared Moskowitz | Acquired @ 256.9 | |||
2024-06-04 | Nicholas T Pinchuk | Disposed 24220 @ 266.8 | View | ||
2024-05-29 | Jesus Arregui | Disposed 8434 @ 265.17 | View | ||
2024-05-21 | Aldo John Pagliari | Disposed 5978 @ 276.86 | View | ||
2024-03-28 | Richard Thomas Miller | Disposed 704 @ 298.16 | View | ||
2024-03-19 | Nicholas T Pinchuk | Disposed 23514 @ 287.48 | View | ||
2024-03-04 | Anup R Banerjee | Disposed 12397 @ 283.13 | View | ||
2024-02-27 | Aldo John Pagliari | Disposed 7522 @ 271.94 | View | ||
2024-02-26 | Jesus Arregui | Disposed 2562 @ 269.35 | View | ||
2024-02-23 | Aldo John Pagliari | Disposed 3231 @ 270.58 | View | ||
2024-02-01 | Jared Moskowitz | Acquired @ 289.93 | |||
2023-12-26 | Thomas J Ward | Disposed 1435 @ 289.91 | View | ||
2023-12-20 | Thomas J Ward | Disposed 5921 @ 289.52 | View |
Monitoring Snap On's insider sentiment can offer insights into its future performance, as insiders often have access to more information about their company's operations, financial health, and upcoming initiatives than the general public. However, it's essential to note that insider trading is regulated by securities laws, and insiders are required to disclose their trades publicly to ensure transparency and prevent unfair advantages based on non-public information.
Acquired vs Disposed
Filed vs Not Filed
Insider sentiment refers to the collective sentiment or feeling of Snap On's insiders - typically its officers, directors, and beneficial owners holding more than a certain percentage of the company's stock - about the future prospects of Snap On. This sentiment is often gauged based on the trading activities of these insiders. If insiders are purchasing more shares of their own company, it may be interpreted as a bullish sentiment, indicating that they believe Snap On's stock will rise in value. Conversely, if insiders are selling shares, it might be seen as bearish, suggesting they expect the stock price to drop.
Snap |
Snap On's Workforce Through the Years
Please note that employee historical analysis has become an increasingly important factor for investors assessing the risk associated with Snap On's future performance. Based on our forecasts, it is anticipated that Snap will maintain a workforce of about 13200 employees by December 2024.Snap On's latest congressional trading
Congressional trading in companies like Snap On, is subject to rigorous scrutiny to prevent conflicts of interest and insider trading. This is governed by multiple SEC regulations which were established to foster transparency and deter members of Congress from leveraging non-public information for personal gain. This oversight helps maintain public trust and ensures that investments in Snap On by those in governmental positions are based on the same information available to the general public.
2024-08-21 | Representative Jared Moskowitz | Acquired Under $15K | Verify | ||
2024-08-19 | Representative Jared Moskowitz | Acquired Under $15K | Verify | ||
2024-08-06 | Representative Jared Moskowitz | Acquired Under $15K | Verify |
Snap On Management Team Effectiveness
The company has Return on Asset of 0.114 % which means that on every $100 spent on assets, it made $0.114 of profit. This is way below average. In the same way, it shows a return on shareholders' equity (ROE) of 0.206 %, implying that it generated $0.206 on every 100 dollars invested. Snap On's management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well Snap On manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities. As of November 25, 2024, Return On Tangible Assets is expected to decline to 0.08. In addition to that, Return On Capital Employed is expected to decline to 0.18. At present, Snap On's Total Assets are projected to increase significantly based on the last few years of reporting. The current year's Non Current Assets Total is expected to grow to about 4.1 B, whereas Other Current Assets are forecasted to decline to about 122 M.The current year's Net Income Applicable To Common Shares is expected to grow to about 1.1 B, whereas Common Stock Shares Outstanding is forecasted to decline to about 47.5 M.
Snap On Workforce Comparison
Snap On is rated third in number of employees category among its peers. The total workforce of Industrials industry is at this time estimated at about 128,007. Snap On retains roughly 13,200 in number of employees claiming about 10% of equities under Industrials industry.
Snap On Profit Margins
The company has Net Profit Margin of 0.2 %, which implies that it may need a different competitive strategy as even a very small decline in it revenue may erase profits and result in a net loss. This is way below average. In the same way, it shows Net Operating Margin of 0.27 %, which entails that for every 100 dollars of revenue, it generated $0.27 of operating income.Current Value | Last Year | Change From Last Year | 10 Year Trend | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gross Profit Margin | 0.54 | 0.56 |
|
| |||||
Net Profit Margin | 0.19 | 0.18 |
|
| |||||
Operating Profit Margin | 0.25 | 0.24 |
|
| |||||
Pretax Profit Margin | 0.25 | 0.24 |
|
| |||||
Return On Assets | 0.0686 | 0.12 |
|
| |||||
Return On Equity | 0.12 | 0.18 |
|
|
Snap On Insider Trading History
Some recent studies suggest that insider trading raises the cost of capital for securities issuers and decreases overall economic growth. Trading by specific Snap On insiders, such as employees or executives, is commonly permitted as long as it does not rely on Snap On's material information that is not in the public domain. Local jurisdictions usually require such trading to be reported in order to monitor insider transactions. In many U.S. states, trading conducted by corporate officers, key employees, directors, or significant shareholders must be reported to the regulator or publicly disclosed, usually within a few business days of the trade. In these cases, Snap On insiders must file a Form 4 with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) when buying or selling shares of their own companies.
Buy/Sell Ratio | # Purchases Trades | # Sales Trades | Total Shares Purchased | Total Shares Sold | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024-12-01 | 0.4762 | 10 | 21 | 29,563 | 59,344 |
2024-09-01 | 0.2308 | 3 | 13 | 38,547 | 70,004 |
2024-06-01 | 0.2 | 3 | 15 | 40,616 | 86,552 |
2024-03-01 | 1.197 | 79 | 66 | 323,761 | 263,384 |
2023-12-01 | 0.44 | 11 | 25 | 106,919 | 199,494 |
2023-09-01 | 0.4286 | 6 | 14 | 58,769 | 99,282 |
2023-06-01 | 0.3333 | 12 | 36 | 94,515 | 179,631 |
2023-03-01 | 1.3333 | 72 | 54 | 289,258 | 275,179 |
2022-12-01 | 0.3125 | 5 | 16 | 71,056 | 119,588 |
2022-09-01 | 0.3077 | 4 | 13 | 58,155 | 153,262 |
2022-06-01 | 0.2 | 2 | 10 | 30,141 | 79,394 |
2022-03-01 | 2.8095 | 59 | 21 | 182,297 | 40,942 |
2021-12-01 | 0.3571 | 5 | 14 | 72,407 | 107,433 |
2021-09-01 | 0.3333 | 4 | 12 | 49,671 | 82,123 |
2021-06-01 | 0.42 | 21 | 50 | 120,647 | 223,140 |
2021-03-01 | 0.8395 | 68 | 81 | 325,128 | 315,091 |
2020-12-01 | 0.3684 | 14 | 38 | 115,687 | 213,595 |
2020-09-01 | 1.0 | 3 | 3 | 41,906 | 69,216 |
2020-06-01 | 0.75 | 3 | 4 | 42,217 | 70,328 |
2020-03-01 | 1.0833 | 52 | 48 | 276,614 | 84,894 |
2019-12-01 | 0.5 | 20 | 40 | 70,598 | 124,260 |
2019-09-01 | 0.75 | 3 | 4 | 33,577 | 55,808 |
2019-06-01 | 0.3077 | 4 | 13 | 54,734 | 114,682 |
2019-03-01 | 0.7581 | 47 | 62 | 293,698 | 222,467 |
2018-12-01 | 0.5217 | 12 | 23 | 66,691 | 100,433 |
2018-09-01 | 0.3684 | 7 | 19 | 82,200 | 173,260 |
2018-06-01 | 0.625 | 5 | 8 | 96,395 | 173,921 |
2018-03-01 | 1.381 | 58 | 42 | 412,888 | 296,414 |
2017-12-01 | 0.64 | 16 | 25 | 84,663 | 123,789 |
2017-09-01 | 1.75 | 7 | 4 | 22,526 | 40,418 |
2017-06-01 | 0.5 | 8 | 16 | 54,004 | 109,931 |
2017-03-01 | 1.6905 | 71 | 42 | 484,523 | 166,435 |
2016-12-01 | 0.5833 | 21 | 36 | 107,012 | 171,103 |
2016-09-01 | 0.5 | 6 | 12 | 42,407 | 98,197 |
2016-06-01 | 1.1429 | 8 | 7 | 16,082 | 37,481 |
2016-03-01 | 1.3968 | 88 | 63 | 572,718 | 290,228 |
2015-12-01 | 2.5 | 5 | 2 | 409.00 | 3,446 |
2015-09-01 | 0.75 | 9 | 12 | 20,949 | 49,873 |
2015-06-01 | 0.8182 | 9 | 11 | 55,114 | 116,229 |
2015-03-01 | 1.2206 | 83 | 68 | 597,327 | 365,864 |
2014-12-01 | 1.0 | 6 | 6 | 3,686 | 10,668 |
2014-09-01 | 0.6667 | 6 | 9 | 1,933 | 10,314 |
2014-06-01 | 0.875 | 7 | 8 | 61,226 | 121,666 |
2014-03-01 | 1.6667 | 70 | 42 | 551,995 | 278,253 |
2013-12-01 | 0.6316 | 12 | 19 | 97,485 | 144,107 |
2013-09-01 | 1.0 | 3 | 3 | 252.00 | 17,343 |
2013-06-01 | 0.5714 | 8 | 14 | 50,334 | 96,748 |
2013-03-01 | 1.3256 | 57 | 43 | 597,641 | 252,772 |
2012-12-01 | 0.6154 | 16 | 26 | 176,493 | 291,706 |
2012-09-01 | 0.6087 | 14 | 23 | 148,973 | 283,601 |
2012-06-01 | 2.8 | 14 | 5 | 25,820 | 26,497 |
2012-03-01 | 1.2 | 66 | 55 | 596,395 | 303,212 |
2011-12-01 | 0.7059 | 12 | 17 | 37,323 | 55,485 |
2011-09-01 | 1.5 | 9 | 6 | 22,808 | 21,640 |
2011-03-01 | 2.4211 | 46 | 19 | 449,661 | 162,542 |
2010-12-01 | 0.7368 | 14 | 19 | 26,243 | 63,456 |
2010-09-01 | 1.1667 | 7 | 6 | 12,380 | 22,820 |
2010-06-01 | 5.3333 | 16 | 3 | 27,676 | 5,457 |
2010-03-01 | 1.0 | 29 | 29 | 373,811 | 152,231 |
2009-12-01 | 0.5 | 5 | 10 | 2,005 | 3,700 |
2009-06-01 | 7.0 | 14 | 2 | 35,517 | 5,900 |
2009-03-01 | 2.9167 | 35 | 12 | 489,276 | 148,437 |
2008-12-01 | 12.0 | 12 | 1 | 18,422 | 1,000.00 |
2008-09-01 | 3.3333 | 10 | 3 | 13,313 | 19,643 |
2008-06-01 | 0.5814 | 25 | 43 | 361,408 | 720,690 |
2008-03-01 | 0.2143 | 42 | 196 | 583,575 | 488,634 |
2007-12-01 | 0.381 | 8 | 21 | 12,671 | 38,072 |
2007-09-01 | 1.25 | 20 | 16 | 33,612 | 49,800 |
2007-06-01 | 0.5778 | 26 | 45 | 107,589 | 120,096 |
2007-03-01 | 2.0714 | 29 | 14 | 527,358 | 96,268 |
2006-12-01 | 0.8182 | 9 | 11 | 60,194 | 118,000 |
2006-09-01 | 1.75 | 7 | 4 | 16,369 | 28,717 |
2006-06-01 | 2.6667 | 16 | 6 | 69,492 | 103,000 |
2006-03-01 | 1.3704 | 37 | 27 | 497,433 | 297,177 |
2005-12-01 | 0.6111 | 11 | 18 | 27,720 | 58,477 |
2005-09-01 | 5.0 | 15 | 3 | 9,644 | 12,000 |
2005-06-01 | 19.0 | 19 | 1 | 49,723 | 1,500 |
2005-03-01 | 3.5556 | 32 | 9 | 148,177 | 41,493 |
2004-12-01 | 3.5714 | 25 | 7 | 244,686 | 86,318 |
2004-09-01 | 4.1667 | 25 | 6 | 24,393 | 44,200 |
2004-03-01 | 2.3846 | 31 | 13 | 418,998 | 126,587 |
2003-12-01 | 2.7778 | 25 | 9 | 16,435 | 21,975 |
2003-06-01 | 6.0 | 6 | 1 | 429.00 | 2,200 |
Snap On Notable Stakeholders
A Snap On stakeholder refers to an individual interested in an outcome of the business. Different stakeholders have different interests, and companies such as Snap On often face trade-offs trying to please all of them. Snap On's stakeholders can have a positive or negative influence on the entity's direction, and there are a lot of executives involved in getting Snap On's stock to the level that pleases all shareholders. Keeping track of the stakeholders is a great way to stay on top of things affecting its ongoing price.
Nicholas Pinchuk | Chairman of the Board, President, Chief Executive Officer | Profile | |
Benny Oh | Chairman AsiaPacific | Profile | |
Iain Boyd | Vice President - Operations Development | Profile | |
June Lemerand | Chief Information Officer, Vice President | Profile | |
Thomas Ward | Senior Vice President, President - Repair Systems and Information Group | Profile | |
Richard Strege | Principal Accounting Officer, Vice President Controller | Profile | |
John Wolf | President Systems | Profile | |
Timothy Chambers | Senior Vice President and President - Snap-on Tools Group | Profile | |
Richard Miller | Vice President General Counsel, Secretary | Profile | |
Eugenio Amador | President Equipment | Profile | |
Anup Banerjee | Senior Vice President - Human Resources and Chief Development Officer | Profile | |
Aldo Pagliari | Chief Financial Officer, Senior Vice President - Finance | Profile | |
William Lehman | Independent Director | Profile | |
Nathan Jones | Independent Director | Profile | |
Karen Daniel | Independent Director | Profile | |
David Adams | Independent Director | Profile | |
James Holden | Lead Independent Director | Profile | |
Ruth Gillis | Independent Director | Profile | |
Gregg Sherrill | Independent Director | Profile | |
Henry Knueppel | Independent Director | Profile | |
Donald Stebbins | Independent Director | Profile | |
Bradley Lewis | Technology, Operations | Profile | |
Sara Verbsky | Vice Relations | Profile | |
Maria Vieira | Commercial Operations | Profile | |
Mary Bauerschmidt | Senior Resources | Profile | |
Marty Ozolins | Principal Accounting Officer, Vice President Controller | Profile | |
Jesus Arregui | Senior Vice President and President – Commercial Group | Profile | |
Samuel Bottum | Chief VP | Profile |
About Snap On Management Performance
The success or failure of an entity such as Snap On often depends on how effective the management is. Snap On management team is responsible for propelling the future growth in the right direction and administering and controlling the business activities and accounting for the results. Ineffective management usually contributes to failure in the company's future performance for all stakeholders equally, but most importantly, for investors. So it is important to measure the effectiveness of Snap management before purchasing its stock. In many ways, it's all about finding the answer to one important question - Are they doing the right thing right now? How would we assess whether the Snap management is utilizing all available resources in the best possible way? Also, how well is the company doing relative to others in its sector and the market as a whole? The answer can be found by analyzing a few important fundamental indicators such as return on assets and return on equity.
Last Reported | Projected for Next Year | ||
Return On Tangible Assets | 0.15 | 0.08 | |
Return On Capital Employed | 0.23 | 0.18 | |
Return On Assets | 0.12 | 0.07 | |
Return On Equity | 0.18 | 0.12 |
Please note, the presentation of Snap On's financial position, as portrayed in its financial statements, is often influenced by management's estimates, judgments, and sometimes even manipulations. In the best case, Snap On's management is honest, while the outside auditors are strict and uncompromising. Please utilize our Beneish M Score to check the likelihood of Snap On's management manipulating its earnings.
Snap On Workforce Analysis
Traditionally, organizations such as Snap On use manpower efficiency calculations for various incentive schemes, employee appraisal, or as an initiative to improve the processes. However, it can also be used by investors to make long-term investment decisions. The trends in the profit per employee or revenue per employee are measured by net income or revenue divided by the current number of full-time employees over a given time interval. Because workforce needs differ across sectors, these ratios could be used to compare Snap On within its industry.Snap On Manpower Efficiency
Return on Snap On Manpower
Revenue Per Employee | 387K | |
Revenue Per Executive | 182.4M | |
Net Income Per Employee | 76.6K | |
Net Income Per Executive | 36.1M | |
Working Capital Per Employee | 205.3K | |
Working Capital Per Executive | 96.8M |
Complementary Tools for Snap Stock analysis
When running Snap On's price analysis, check to measure Snap On's market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Snap On is operating at the current time. Most of Snap On's value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Snap On's future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Snap On's price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Snap On to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.
Portfolio Anywhere Track or share privately all of your investments from the convenience of any device | |
Performance Analysis Check effects of mean-variance optimization against your current asset allocation | |
Pattern Recognition Use different Pattern Recognition models to time the market across multiple global exchanges | |
Earnings Calls Check upcoming earnings announcements updated hourly across public exchanges |