Snap On Company Insiders
| SNA Stock | USD 354.20 3.25 0.93% |
Snap On's insiders are aggressively selling. The analysis of insiders' sentiment of trading Snap On stock suggests that vertually all insiders are panicking at this time. Snap On employs about 13 K people. The company is managed by 33 executives with a total tenure of roughly 259 years, averaging almost 7.0 years of service per executive, having 393.94 employees per reported executive.
| Nicholas Pinchuk Chairman Chairman of the Board, President, Chief Executive Officer |
| Iain Boyd President Vice President - Operations Development |
Insider Sentiment 0
Mostly Selling
Selling | Buying |
Latest Trades
| 2025-08-15 | Aldo John Pagliari | Disposed 125 @ 325.21 | View | ||
| 2025-08-14 | Aldo John Pagliari | Disposed 4731 @ 327.38 | View | ||
| 2025-08-11 | Nicholas T Pinchuk | Disposed 23042 @ 320.88 | View | ||
| 2025-06-05 | Karen L Daniel | Disposed 1090 @ 319.92 | View | ||
| 2025-06-02 | Nicholas T Pinchuk | Disposed 23172 @ 315.85 | View | ||
| 2025-05-15 | Aldo John Pagliari | Disposed 5553 @ 326.84 | View | ||
| 2025-03-27 | Nicholas T Pinchuk | Disposed 22700 @ 335.32 | View | ||
| 2025-02-20 | Aldo John Pagliari | Disposed 6860 @ 339.05 | View | ||
| 2025-02-10 | Jesus Arregui | Disposed 6451 @ 337.81 | View | ||
| 2024-12-18 | Aldo John Pagliari | Disposed 6909 @ 347.62 | View | ||
| 2024-12-09 | Nicholas T Pinchuk | Disposed 21783 @ 354.83 | View | ||
| 2024-12-04 | June C Lemerand | Disposed 3500 @ 362.86 | View | ||
| 2024-10-28 | Thomas J Ward | Disposed 12737 @ 333.21 | View |
Monitoring Snap On's insider sentiment can offer insights into its future performance, as insiders often have access to more information about their company's operations, financial health, and upcoming initiatives than the general public. However, it's essential to note that insider trading is regulated by securities laws, and insiders are required to disclose their trades publicly to ensure transparency and prevent unfair advantages based on non-public information.
Check out World Market Map to better understand how to build diversified portfolios, which includes a position in Snap On. Also, note that the market value of any company could be closely tied with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in employment. Snap On's Workforce Through the Years
Please note that employee historical analysis has become an increasingly important factor for investors assessing the risk associated with Snap On's future performance. Based on our forecasts, it is anticipated that Snap will maintain a workforce of about 13000 employees by February 2026.Snap On's latest congressional trading
Congressional trading in companies like Snap On, is subject to rigorous scrutiny to prevent conflicts of interest and insider trading. This is governed by multiple SEC regulations which were established to foster transparency and deter members of Congress from leveraging non-public information for personal gain. This oversight helps maintain public trust and ensures that investments in Snap On by those in governmental positions are based on the same information available to the general public.
| 2017-07-12 | Senator Susan M Collins | Acquired $15K to $50K | Verify | ||
| 2017-07-11 | Senator Susan M Collins | Acquired $15K to $50K | Verify |
Snap On Management Team Effectiveness
The company has Return on Asset of 0.1002 % which means that on every $100 spent on assets, it made $0.1002 of profit. This is way below average. In the same way, it shows a return on shareholders' equity (ROE) of 0.1833 %, implying that it generated $0.1833 on every 100 dollars invested. Snap On's management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well Snap On manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities. As of January 7, 2026, Return On Tangible Assets is expected to decline to 0.09. In addition to that, Return On Capital Employed is expected to decline to 0.18. At present, Snap On's Total Assets are projected to increase significantly based on the last few years of reporting. The current year's Non Current Assets Total is expected to grow to about 4.7 B, whereas Non Currrent Assets Other are forecasted to decline to about 155.9 M.The current year's Net Income Applicable To Common Shares is expected to grow to about 1.3 B, whereas Common Stock Shares Outstanding is forecasted to decline to about 47.4 M. Snap On shows a total of 52.01 Million outstanding shares. The majority of Snap On outstanding shares are owned by institutional holders. These institutional investors are usually referred to as non-private investors looking to take positions in Snap On to benefit from reduced commissions. Consequently, institutions are subject to a different set of regulations than regular investors in Snap On. Please pay attention to any change in the institutional holdings of Snap On as this could imply that something significant has changed or is about to change at the company. Please note that on July 12, 2017, Senator Susan M Collins of US Senate acquired $15k to $50k worth of Snap On's common stock.
Shares in Circulation | First Issued 1985-09-30 | Previous Quarter 53 M | Current Value 53.1 M | Avarage Shares Outstanding 59.1 M | Quarterly Volatility 2.8 M |
Snap On Workforce Comparison
Snap On is rated below average in number of employees category among its peers. The total workforce of Industrials industry is at this time estimated at about 220,753. Snap On holds roughly 13,000 in number of employees claiming about 6% of equities under Industrials industry.
Snap On Profit Margins
The company has Net Profit Margin of 0.2 %, which implies that it may need a different competitive strategy as even a very small decline in it revenue may erase profits and result in a net loss. This is way below average. In the same way, it shows Net Operating Margin of 0.25 %, which entails that for every 100 dollars of revenue, it generated $0.25 of operating income.| Current Value | Last Year | Change From Last Year | 10 Year Trend | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Profit Margin | 0.54 | 0.59 |
|
| |||||
| Net Profit Margin | 0.19 | 0.18 |
|
| |||||
| Operating Profit Margin | 0.12 | 0.23 |
|
| |||||
| Pretax Profit Margin | 0.12 | 0.23 |
|
| |||||
| Return On Assets | 0.0696 | 0.12 |
|
| |||||
| Return On Equity | 0.12 | 0.18 |
|
|
Snap On Insider Trading History
Some recent studies suggest that insider trading raises the cost of capital for securities issuers and decreases overall economic growth. Trading by specific Snap On insiders, such as employees or executives, is commonly permitted as long as it does not rely on Snap On's material information that is not in the public domain. Local jurisdictions usually require such trading to be reported in order to monitor insider transactions. In many U.S. states, trading conducted by corporate officers, key employees, directors, or significant shareholders must be reported to the regulator or publicly disclosed, usually within a few business days of the trade. In these cases, Snap On insiders must file a Form 4 with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) when buying or selling shares of their own companies.
| Buy/Sell Ratio | # Purchases Trades | # Sales Trades | Total Shares Purchased | Total Shares Sold | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-12-01 | 0.2308 | 6 | 26 | 54,018 | 97,983 |
| 2025-09-01 | 0.2667 | 4 | 15 | 40,792 | 68,648 |
| 2025-06-01 | 0.25 | 3 | 12 | 41,861 | 71,565 |
| 2025-03-01 | 1.2258 | 76 | 62 | 200,803 | 174,106 |
| 2024-12-01 | 0.3409 | 15 | 44 | 75,563 | 137,536 |
| 2024-09-01 | 0.2308 | 3 | 13 | 38,547 | 70,004 |
| 2024-06-01 | 0.2 | 3 | 15 | 40,616 | 86,552 |
| 2024-03-01 | 1.197 | 79 | 66 | 323,761 | 263,384 |
| 2023-12-01 | 0.44 | 11 | 25 | 106,919 | 199,494 |
| 2023-09-01 | 0.4286 | 6 | 14 | 58,769 | 99,282 |
| 2023-06-01 | 0.3333 | 12 | 36 | 94,515 | 179,631 |
| 2023-03-01 | 1.3333 | 72 | 54 | 289,258 | 275,179 |
| 2022-12-01 | 0.3125 | 5 | 16 | 71,056 | 119,588 |
| 2022-09-01 | 0.3077 | 4 | 13 | 58,155 | 153,262 |
| 2022-06-01 | 0.2 | 2 | 10 | 30,141 | 79,394 |
| 2022-03-01 | 2.8095 | 59 | 21 | 182,297 | 40,942 |
| 2021-12-01 | 0.3571 | 5 | 14 | 72,407 | 107,433 |
| 2021-09-01 | 0.3333 | 4 | 12 | 49,671 | 82,123 |
| 2021-06-01 | 0.42 | 21 | 50 | 120,647 | 223,140 |
| 2021-03-01 | 0.8395 | 68 | 81 | 325,128 | 315,091 |
| 2020-12-01 | 0.3684 | 14 | 38 | 115,687 | 213,595 |
| 2020-09-01 | 1.0 | 3 | 3 | 41,906 | 69,216 |
| 2020-06-01 | 0.75 | 3 | 4 | 42,217 | 70,328 |
| 2020-03-01 | 1.0833 | 52 | 48 | 276,614 | 84,894 |
| 2019-12-01 | 0.5 | 20 | 40 | 70,598 | 124,260 |
| 2019-09-01 | 0.75 | 3 | 4 | 33,577 | 55,808 |
| 2019-06-01 | 0.3077 | 4 | 13 | 54,734 | 114,682 |
| 2019-03-01 | 0.7581 | 47 | 62 | 293,698 | 222,467 |
| 2018-12-01 | 0.5217 | 12 | 23 | 66,691 | 100,433 |
| 2018-09-01 | 0.3684 | 7 | 19 | 82,200 | 173,260 |
| 2018-06-01 | 0.625 | 5 | 8 | 96,395 | 173,921 |
| 2018-03-01 | 1.381 | 58 | 42 | 412,888 | 296,414 |
| 2017-12-01 | 0.64 | 16 | 25 | 84,663 | 123,789 |
| 2017-09-01 | 1.75 | 7 | 4 | 22,526 | 40,418 |
| 2017-06-01 | 0.5 | 8 | 16 | 54,004 | 109,931 |
| 2017-03-01 | 1.6905 | 71 | 42 | 484,523 | 166,435 |
| 2016-12-01 | 0.5833 | 21 | 36 | 107,012 | 171,103 |
| 2016-09-01 | 0.5 | 6 | 12 | 42,407 | 98,197 |
| 2016-06-01 | 1.1429 | 8 | 7 | 16,082 | 37,481 |
| 2016-03-01 | 1.3968 | 88 | 63 | 572,718 | 290,228 |
| 2015-12-01 | 2.5 | 5 | 2 | 409.00 | 3,446 |
| 2015-09-01 | 0.75 | 9 | 12 | 20,949 | 49,873 |
| 2015-06-01 | 0.8182 | 9 | 11 | 55,114 | 116,229 |
| 2015-03-01 | 1.2206 | 83 | 68 | 597,327 | 365,864 |
| 2014-12-01 | 1.0 | 6 | 6 | 3,686 | 10,668 |
| 2014-09-01 | 0.6667 | 6 | 9 | 1,933 | 10,314 |
| 2014-06-01 | 0.875 | 7 | 8 | 61,226 | 121,666 |
| 2014-03-01 | 1.6667 | 70 | 42 | 551,995 | 278,253 |
| 2013-12-01 | 0.6316 | 12 | 19 | 97,485 | 144,107 |
| 2013-09-01 | 1.0 | 3 | 3 | 252.00 | 17,343 |
| 2013-06-01 | 0.5714 | 8 | 14 | 50,334 | 96,748 |
| 2013-03-01 | 1.3256 | 57 | 43 | 597,641 | 252,772 |
| 2012-12-01 | 0.6154 | 16 | 26 | 176,493 | 291,706 |
| 2012-09-01 | 0.6087 | 14 | 23 | 148,973 | 283,601 |
| 2012-06-01 | 2.8 | 14 | 5 | 25,820 | 26,497 |
| 2012-03-01 | 1.2 | 66 | 55 | 596,395 | 303,212 |
| 2011-12-01 | 0.7059 | 12 | 17 | 37,323 | 55,485 |
| 2011-09-01 | 1.5 | 9 | 6 | 22,808 | 21,640 |
| 2011-03-01 | 2.4211 | 46 | 19 | 449,661 | 162,542 |
| 2010-12-01 | 0.7368 | 14 | 19 | 26,243 | 63,456 |
| 2010-09-01 | 1.1667 | 7 | 6 | 12,380 | 22,820 |
| 2010-06-01 | 5.3333 | 16 | 3 | 27,676 | 5,457 |
| 2010-03-01 | 1.0 | 29 | 29 | 373,811 | 152,231 |
| 2009-12-01 | 0.5 | 5 | 10 | 2,005 | 3,700 |
| 2009-06-01 | 7.0 | 14 | 2 | 35,517 | 5,900 |
| 2009-03-01 | 2.9167 | 35 | 12 | 489,276 | 148,437 |
| 2008-12-01 | 12.0 | 12 | 1 | 18,422 | 1,000.00 |
| 2008-09-01 | 3.3333 | 10 | 3 | 13,313 | 19,643 |
| 2008-06-01 | 0.5814 | 25 | 43 | 361,408 | 720,690 |
| 2008-03-01 | 0.2143 | 42 | 196 | 583,575 | 488,634 |
| 2007-12-01 | 0.381 | 8 | 21 | 12,671 | 38,072 |
| 2007-09-01 | 1.25 | 20 | 16 | 33,612 | 49,800 |
| 2007-06-01 | 0.5778 | 26 | 45 | 107,589 | 120,096 |
| 2007-03-01 | 2.0714 | 29 | 14 | 527,358 | 96,268 |
| 2006-12-01 | 0.8182 | 9 | 11 | 60,194 | 118,000 |
| 2006-09-01 | 1.75 | 7 | 4 | 16,369 | 28,717 |
| 2006-06-01 | 2.6667 | 16 | 6 | 69,492 | 103,000 |
| 2006-03-01 | 1.3704 | 37 | 27 | 497,433 | 297,177 |
| 2005-12-01 | 0.6111 | 11 | 18 | 27,720 | 58,477 |
| 2005-09-01 | 5.0 | 15 | 3 | 9,644 | 12,000 |
| 2005-06-01 | 19.0 | 19 | 1 | 49,723 | 1,500 |
| 2005-03-01 | 3.5556 | 32 | 9 | 148,177 | 41,493 |
| 2004-12-01 | 3.5714 | 25 | 7 | 244,686 | 86,318 |
| 2004-09-01 | 4.1667 | 25 | 6 | 24,393 | 44,200 |
| 2004-03-01 | 2.3846 | 31 | 13 | 418,998 | 126,587 |
| 2003-12-01 | 2.7778 | 25 | 9 | 16,435 | 21,975 |
| 2003-06-01 | 6.0 | 6 | 1 | 429.00 | 2,200 |
Snap On Notable Stakeholders
A Snap On stakeholder refers to an individual interested in an outcome of the business. Different stakeholders have different interests, and companies such as Snap On often face trade-offs trying to please all of them. Snap On's stakeholders can have a positive or negative influence on the entity's direction, and there are a lot of executives involved in getting Snap On's stock to the level that pleases all shareholders. Keeping track of the stakeholders is a great way to stay on top of things affecting its ongoing price.
| Nicholas Pinchuk | Chairman of the Board, President, Chief Executive Officer | Profile | |
| Benny Oh | Chairman AsiaPacific | Profile | |
| Iain Boyd | Vice President - Operations Development | Profile | |
| June Lemerand | Chief Information Officer, Vice President | Profile | |
| Jeffery Zuehls | President Europe | Profile | |
| Thomas Ward | Senior Vice President, President - Repair Systems and Information Group | Profile | |
| Andrew Lobo | President Industrial | Profile | |
| Leslie Kania | President Diagnostics | Profile | |
| Richard Strege | Principal Accounting Officer, Vice President Controller | Profile | |
| John Wolf | President Systems | Profile | |
| Timothy Chambers | Senior Vice President and President - Snap-on Tools Group | Profile | |
| Richard Miller | Vice President General Counsel, Secretary | Profile | |
| Eugenio Amador | President Equipment | Profile | |
| Anup Banerjee | Senior Vice President - Human Resources and Chief Development Officer | Profile | |
| Aldo Pagliari | Chief Financial Officer, Senior Vice President - Finance | Profile | |
| David Hietpas | President Tools | Profile | |
| William Lehman | Independent Director | Profile | |
| Nathan Jones | Independent Director | Profile | |
| Karen Daniel | Independent Director | Profile | |
| David Adams | Independent Director | Profile | |
| James Holden | Lead Independent Director | Profile | |
| Ruth Gillis | Independent Director | Profile | |
| Gregg Sherrill | Independent Director | Profile | |
| Henry Knueppel | Independent Director | Profile | |
| Donald Stebbins | Independent Director | Profile | |
| Bradley Lewis | Technology, Operations | Profile | |
| Sara Verbsky | Vice Relations | Profile | |
| Maria Vieira | Commercial Operations | Profile | |
| Mary Bauerschmidt | Senior Resources | Profile | |
| Marty Ozolins | Principal Accounting Officer, Vice President Controller | Profile | |
| Jesus Arregui | Senior Vice President and President – Commercial Group | Profile | |
| Raul Colon | Social Environmental | Profile | |
| Samuel Bottum | Chief VP | Profile |
About Snap On Management Performance
The success or failure of an entity such as Snap On often depends on how effective the management is. Snap On management team is responsible for propelling the future growth in the right direction and administering and controlling the business activities and accounting for the results. Ineffective management usually contributes to failure in the company's future performance for all stakeholders equally, but most importantly, for investors. So it is important to measure the effectiveness of Snap management before purchasing its stock. In many ways, it's all about finding the answer to one important question - Are they doing the right thing right now? How would we assess whether the Snap management is utilizing all available resources in the best possible way? Also, how well is the company doing relative to others in its sector and the market as a whole? The answer can be found by analyzing a few important fundamental indicators such as return on assets and return on equity.
| Last Reported | Projected for Next Year | ||
| Return On Tangible Assets | 0.15 | 0.09 | |
| Return On Capital Employed | 0.23 | 0.18 | |
| Return On Assets | 0.12 | 0.07 | |
| Return On Equity | 0.18 | 0.12 |
Please note, the presentation of Snap On's financial position, as portrayed in its financial statements, is often influenced by management's estimates, judgments, and sometimes even manipulations. In the best case, Snap On's management is honest, while the outside auditors are strict and uncompromising. Please utilize our Beneish M Score to check the likelihood of Snap On's management manipulating its earnings.
Snap On Workforce Analysis
Traditionally, organizations such as Snap On use manpower efficiency calculations for various incentive schemes, employee appraisal, or as an initiative to improve the processes. However, it can also be used by investors to make long-term investment decisions. The trends in the profit per employee or revenue per employee are measured by net income or revenue divided by the current number of full-time employees over a given time interval. Because workforce needs differ across sectors, these ratios could be used to compare Snap On within its industry.Snap On Manpower Efficiency
Return on Snap On Manpower
| Revenue Per Employee | 393K | |
| Revenue Per Executive | 154.8M | |
| Net Income Per Employee | 82.2K | |
| Net Income Per Executive | 32.4M | |
| Working Capital Per Employee | 232.9K | |
| Working Capital Per Executive | 91.8M |
Complementary Tools for Snap Stock analysis
When running Snap On's price analysis, check to measure Snap On's market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Snap On is operating at the current time. Most of Snap On's value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Snap On's future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Snap On's price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Snap On to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.
| Performance Analysis Check effects of mean-variance optimization against your current asset allocation | |
| Insider Screener Find insiders across different sectors to evaluate their impact on performance | |
| Global Correlations Find global opportunities by holding instruments from different markets | |
| Alpha Finder Use alpha and beta coefficients to find investment opportunities after accounting for the risk | |
| Transaction History View history of all your transactions and understand their impact on performance | |
| Equity Analysis Research over 250,000 global equities including funds, stocks and ETFs to find investment opportunities |