Snap On Company Insiders

SNA Stock  USD 354.20  3.25  0.93%   
Snap On's insiders are aggressively selling. The analysis of insiders' sentiment of trading Snap On stock suggests that vertually all insiders are panicking at this time. Snap On employs about 13 K people. The company is managed by 33 executives with a total tenure of roughly 259 years, averaging almost 7.0 years of service per executive, having 393.94 employees per reported executive.
Nicholas Pinchuk  Chairman
Chairman of the Board, President, Chief Executive Officer
Iain Boyd  President
Vice President - Operations Development

Insider Sentiment 0

 Mostly Selling

 
Selling
 
Buying

Latest Trades

2025-08-15Aldo John PagliariDisposed 125 @ 325.21View
2025-08-14Aldo John PagliariDisposed 4731 @ 327.38View
2025-08-11Nicholas T PinchukDisposed 23042 @ 320.88View
2025-06-05Karen L DanielDisposed 1090 @ 319.92View
2025-06-02Nicholas T PinchukDisposed 23172 @ 315.85View
2025-05-15Aldo John PagliariDisposed 5553 @ 326.84View
2025-03-27Nicholas T PinchukDisposed 22700 @ 335.32View
2025-02-20Aldo John PagliariDisposed 6860 @ 339.05View
2025-02-10Jesus ArreguiDisposed 6451 @ 337.81View
2024-12-18Aldo John PagliariDisposed 6909 @ 347.62View
2024-12-09Nicholas T PinchukDisposed 21783 @ 354.83View
2024-12-04June C LemerandDisposed 3500 @ 362.86View
2024-10-28Thomas J WardDisposed 12737 @ 333.21View
Monitoring Snap On's insider sentiment can offer insights into its future performance, as insiders often have access to more information about their company's operations, financial health, and upcoming initiatives than the general public. However, it's essential to note that insider trading is regulated by securities laws, and insiders are required to disclose their trades publicly to ensure transparency and prevent unfair advantages based on non-public information.
Check out World Market Map to better understand how to build diversified portfolios, which includes a position in Snap On. Also, note that the market value of any company could be closely tied with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in employment.
For information on how to trade Snap Stock refer to our How to Trade Snap Stock guide.

Snap On's Workforce Through the Years

Please note that employee historical analysis has become an increasingly important factor for investors assessing the risk associated with Snap On's future performance. Based on our forecasts, it is anticipated that Snap will maintain a workforce of about 13000 employees by February 2026.
 
Dot-com Bubble
 
Housing Crash
 
Credit Downgrade
 
Yuan Drop
 
Covid

Snap On's latest congressional trading

Congressional trading in companies like Snap On, is subject to rigorous scrutiny to prevent conflicts of interest and insider trading. This is governed by multiple SEC regulations which were established to foster transparency and deter members of Congress from leveraging non-public information for personal gain. This oversight helps maintain public trust and ensures that investments in Snap On by those in governmental positions are based on the same information available to the general public.
2017-07-12Senator Susan M CollinsAcquired $15K to $50KVerify
2017-07-11Senator Susan M CollinsAcquired $15K to $50KVerify

Snap On Management Team Effectiveness

The company has Return on Asset of 0.1002 % which means that on every $100 spent on assets, it made $0.1002 of profit. This is way below average. In the same way, it shows a return on shareholders' equity (ROE) of 0.1833 %, implying that it generated $0.1833 on every 100 dollars invested. Snap On's management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well Snap On manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities. As of January 7, 2026, Return On Tangible Assets is expected to decline to 0.09. In addition to that, Return On Capital Employed is expected to decline to 0.18. At present, Snap On's Total Assets are projected to increase significantly based on the last few years of reporting. The current year's Non Current Assets Total is expected to grow to about 4.7 B, whereas Non Currrent Assets Other are forecasted to decline to about 155.9 M.
The current year's Net Income Applicable To Common Shares is expected to grow to about 1.3 B, whereas Common Stock Shares Outstanding is forecasted to decline to about 47.4 M.
Snap On shows a total of 52.01 Million outstanding shares. The majority of Snap On outstanding shares are owned by institutional holders. These institutional investors are usually referred to as non-private investors looking to take positions in Snap On to benefit from reduced commissions. Consequently, institutions are subject to a different set of regulations than regular investors in Snap On. Please pay attention to any change in the institutional holdings of Snap On as this could imply that something significant has changed or is about to change at the company. Please note that on July 12, 2017, Senator Susan M Collins of US Senate acquired $15k to $50k worth of Snap On's common stock.
 
Shares in Circulation  
First Issued
1985-09-30
Previous Quarter
53 M
Current Value
53.1 M
Avarage Shares Outstanding
59.1 M
Quarterly Volatility
2.8 M
 
Black Monday
 
Oil Shock
 
Dot-com Bubble
 
Housing Crash
 
Credit Downgrade
 
Yuan Drop
 
Covid
Some institutional investors establish a significant position in stocks such as Snap On in order to find ways to drive up its value. Retail investors, on the other hand, need to know that institutional holders can own millions of shares of Snap On, and when they decide to sell, the stock will often sell-off, which may instantly impact shareholders' value. So, traders who get in early or near the beginning of the institutional investor's buying cycle could potentially generate profits.

Snap On Workforce Comparison

Snap On is rated below average in number of employees category among its peers. The total workforce of Industrials industry is at this time estimated at about 220,753. Snap On holds roughly 13,000 in number of employees claiming about 6% of equities under Industrials industry.

Snap On Profit Margins

The company has Net Profit Margin of 0.2 %, which implies that it may need a different competitive strategy as even a very small decline in it revenue may erase profits and result in a net loss. This is way below average. In the same way, it shows Net Operating Margin of 0.25 %, which entails that for every 100 dollars of revenue, it generated $0.25 of operating income.
Current ValueLast YearChange From Last Year 10 Year Trend
Gross Profit Margin0.540.59
Significantly Down
Slightly volatile
Net Profit Margin0.190.18
Notably Up
Slightly volatile
Operating Profit Margin0.120.23
Way Down
Slightly volatile
Pretax Profit Margin0.120.23
Way Down
Slightly volatile
Return On Assets0.06960.12
Way Down
Slightly volatile
Return On Equity0.120.18
Way Down
Pretty Stable

Snap On Insider Trading History

Some recent studies suggest that insider trading raises the cost of capital for securities issuers and decreases overall economic growth. Trading by specific Snap On insiders, such as employees or executives, is commonly permitted as long as it does not rely on Snap On's material information that is not in the public domain. Local jurisdictions usually require such trading to be reported in order to monitor insider transactions. In many U.S. states, trading conducted by corporate officers, key employees, directors, or significant shareholders must be reported to the regulator or publicly disclosed, usually within a few business days of the trade. In these cases, Snap On insiders must file a Form 4 with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) when buying or selling shares of their own companies.
 
Housing Crash
 
Credit Downgrade
 
Yuan Drop
 
Covid
Buy/Sell Ratio# Purchases Trades# Sales TradesTotal Shares PurchasedTotal Shares Sold
2025-12-01
0.2308
6
26
 54,018 
 97,983 
2025-09-01
0.2667
4
15
 40,792 
 68,648 
2025-06-01
0.25
3
12
 41,861 
 71,565 
2025-03-01
1.2258
76
62
 200,803 
 174,106 
2024-12-01
0.3409
15
44
 75,563 
 137,536 
2024-09-01
0.2308
3
13
 38,547 
 70,004 
2024-06-01
0.2
3
15
 40,616 
 86,552 
2024-03-01
1.197
79
66
 323,761 
 263,384 
2023-12-01
0.44
11
25
 106,919 
 199,494 
2023-09-01
0.4286
6
14
 58,769 
 99,282 
2023-06-01
0.3333
12
36
 94,515 
 179,631 
2023-03-01
1.3333
72
54
 289,258 
 275,179 
2022-12-01
0.3125
5
16
 71,056 
 119,588 
2022-09-01
0.3077
4
13
 58,155 
 153,262 
2022-06-01
0.2
2
10
 30,141 
 79,394 
2022-03-01
2.8095
59
21
 182,297 
 40,942 
2021-12-01
0.3571
5
14
 72,407 
 107,433 
2021-09-01
0.3333
4
12
 49,671 
 82,123 
2021-06-01
0.42
21
50
 120,647 
 223,140 
2021-03-01
0.8395
68
81
 325,128 
 315,091 
2020-12-01
0.3684
14
38
 115,687 
 213,595 
2020-09-01
1.0
3
3
 41,906 
 69,216 
2020-06-01
0.75
3
4
 42,217 
 70,328 
2020-03-01
1.0833
52
48
 276,614 
 84,894 
2019-12-01
0.5
20
40
 70,598 
 124,260 
2019-09-01
0.75
3
4
 33,577 
 55,808 
2019-06-01
0.3077
4
13
 54,734 
 114,682 
2019-03-01
0.7581
47
62
 293,698 
 222,467 
2018-12-01
0.5217
12
23
 66,691 
 100,433 
2018-09-01
0.3684
7
19
 82,200 
 173,260 
2018-06-01
0.625
5
8
 96,395 
 173,921 
2018-03-01
1.381
58
42
 412,888 
 296,414 
2017-12-01
0.64
16
25
 84,663 
 123,789 
2017-09-01
1.75
7
4
 22,526 
 40,418 
2017-06-01
0.5
8
16
 54,004 
 109,931 
2017-03-01
1.6905
71
42
 484,523 
 166,435 
2016-12-01
0.5833
21
36
 107,012 
 171,103 
2016-09-01
0.5
6
12
 42,407 
 98,197 
2016-06-01
1.1429
8
7
 16,082 
 37,481 
2016-03-01
1.3968
88
63
 572,718 
 290,228 
2015-12-01
2.5
5
2
 409.00 
 3,446 
2015-09-01
0.75
9
12
 20,949 
 49,873 
2015-06-01
0.8182
9
11
 55,114 
 116,229 
2015-03-01
1.2206
83
68
 597,327 
 365,864 
2014-12-01
1.0
6
6
 3,686 
 10,668 
2014-09-01
0.6667
6
9
 1,933 
 10,314 
2014-06-01
0.875
7
8
 61,226 
 121,666 
2014-03-01
1.6667
70
42
 551,995 
 278,253 
2013-12-01
0.6316
12
19
 97,485 
 144,107 
2013-09-01
1.0
3
3
 252.00 
 17,343 
2013-06-01
0.5714
8
14
 50,334 
 96,748 
2013-03-01
1.3256
57
43
 597,641 
 252,772 
2012-12-01
0.6154
16
26
 176,493 
 291,706 
2012-09-01
0.6087
14
23
 148,973 
 283,601 
2012-06-01
2.8
14
5
 25,820 
 26,497 
2012-03-01
1.2
66
55
 596,395 
 303,212 
2011-12-01
0.7059
12
17
 37,323 
 55,485 
2011-09-01
1.5
9
6
 22,808 
 21,640 
2011-03-01
2.4211
46
19
 449,661 
 162,542 
2010-12-01
0.7368
14
19
 26,243 
 63,456 
2010-09-01
1.1667
7
6
 12,380 
 22,820 
2010-06-01
5.3333
16
3
 27,676 
 5,457 
2010-03-01
1.0
29
29
 373,811 
 152,231 
2009-12-01
0.5
5
10
 2,005 
 3,700 
2009-06-01
7.0
14
2
 35,517 
 5,900 
2009-03-01
2.9167
35
12
 489,276 
 148,437 
2008-12-01
12.0
12
1
 18,422 
 1,000.00 
2008-09-01
3.3333
10
3
 13,313 
 19,643 
2008-06-01
0.5814
25
43
 361,408 
 720,690 
2008-03-01
0.2143
42
196
 583,575 
 488,634 
2007-12-01
0.381
8
21
 12,671 
 38,072 
2007-09-01
1.25
20
16
 33,612 
 49,800 
2007-06-01
0.5778
26
45
 107,589 
 120,096 
2007-03-01
2.0714
29
14
 527,358 
 96,268 
2006-12-01
0.8182
9
11
 60,194 
 118,000 
2006-09-01
1.75
7
4
 16,369 
 28,717 
2006-06-01
2.6667
16
6
 69,492 
 103,000 
2006-03-01
1.3704
37
27
 497,433 
 297,177 
2005-12-01
0.6111
11
18
 27,720 
 58,477 
2005-09-01
5.0
15
3
 9,644 
 12,000 
2005-06-01
19.0
19
1
 49,723 
 1,500 
2005-03-01
3.5556
32
9
 148,177 
 41,493 
2004-12-01
3.5714
25
7
 244,686 
 86,318 
2004-09-01
4.1667
25
6
 24,393 
 44,200 
2004-03-01
2.3846
31
13
 418,998 
 126,587 
2003-12-01
2.7778
25
9
 16,435 
 21,975 
2003-06-01
6.0
6
1
 429.00 
 2,200 

Snap On Notable Stakeholders

A Snap On stakeholder refers to an individual interested in an outcome of the business. Different stakeholders have different interests, and companies such as Snap On often face trade-offs trying to please all of them. Snap On's stakeholders can have a positive or negative influence on the entity's direction, and there are a lot of executives involved in getting Snap On's stock to the level that pleases all shareholders. Keeping track of the stakeholders is a great way to stay on top of things affecting its ongoing price.
Nicholas PinchukChairman of the Board, President, Chief Executive OfficerProfile
Benny OhChairman AsiaPacificProfile
Iain BoydVice President - Operations DevelopmentProfile
June LemerandChief Information Officer, Vice PresidentProfile
Jeffery ZuehlsPresident EuropeProfile
Thomas WardSenior Vice President, President - Repair Systems and Information GroupProfile
Andrew LoboPresident IndustrialProfile
Leslie KaniaPresident DiagnosticsProfile
Richard StregePrincipal Accounting Officer, Vice President ControllerProfile
John WolfPresident SystemsProfile
Timothy ChambersSenior Vice President and President - Snap-on Tools GroupProfile
Richard MillerVice President General Counsel, SecretaryProfile
Eugenio AmadorPresident EquipmentProfile
Anup BanerjeeSenior Vice President - Human Resources and Chief Development OfficerProfile
Aldo PagliariChief Financial Officer, Senior Vice President - FinanceProfile
David HietpasPresident ToolsProfile
William LehmanIndependent DirectorProfile
Nathan JonesIndependent DirectorProfile
Karen DanielIndependent DirectorProfile
David AdamsIndependent DirectorProfile
James HoldenLead Independent DirectorProfile
Ruth GillisIndependent DirectorProfile
Gregg SherrillIndependent DirectorProfile
Henry KnueppelIndependent DirectorProfile
Donald StebbinsIndependent DirectorProfile
Bradley LewisTechnology, OperationsProfile
Sara VerbskyVice RelationsProfile
Maria VieiraCommercial OperationsProfile
Mary BauerschmidtSenior ResourcesProfile
Marty OzolinsPrincipal Accounting Officer, Vice President ControllerProfile
Jesus ArreguiSenior Vice President and President – Commercial GroupProfile
Raul ColonSocial EnvironmentalProfile
Samuel BottumChief VPProfile
String symbol = request.getParameter("s");

About Snap On Management Performance

The success or failure of an entity such as Snap On often depends on how effective the management is. Snap On management team is responsible for propelling the future growth in the right direction and administering and controlling the business activities and accounting for the results. Ineffective management usually contributes to failure in the company's future performance for all stakeholders equally, but most importantly, for investors. So it is important to measure the effectiveness of Snap management before purchasing its stock. In many ways, it's all about finding the answer to one important question - Are they doing the right thing right now? How would we assess whether the Snap management is utilizing all available resources in the best possible way? Also, how well is the company doing relative to others in its sector and the market as a whole? The answer can be found by analyzing a few important fundamental indicators such as return on assets and return on equity.
Last ReportedProjected for Next Year
Return On Tangible Assets 0.15  0.09 
Return On Capital Employed 0.23  0.18 
Return On Assets 0.12  0.07 
Return On Equity 0.18  0.12 
Please note, the presentation of Snap On's financial position, as portrayed in its financial statements, is often influenced by management's estimates, judgments, and sometimes even manipulations. In the best case, Snap On's management is honest, while the outside auditors are strict and uncompromising. Please utilize our Beneish M Score to check the likelihood of Snap On's management manipulating its earnings.

Snap On Workforce Analysis

Traditionally, organizations such as Snap On use manpower efficiency calculations for various incentive schemes, employee appraisal, or as an initiative to improve the processes. However, it can also be used by investors to make long-term investment decisions. The trends in the profit per employee or revenue per employee are measured by net income or revenue divided by the current number of full-time employees over a given time interval. Because workforce needs differ across sectors, these ratios could be used to compare Snap On within its industry.

Snap On Manpower Efficiency

Return on Snap On Manpower

Revenue Per Employee393K
Revenue Per Executive154.8M
Net Income Per Employee82.2K
Net Income Per Executive32.4M
Working Capital Per Employee232.9K
Working Capital Per Executive91.8M

Complementary Tools for Snap Stock analysis

When running Snap On's price analysis, check to measure Snap On's market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Snap On is operating at the current time. Most of Snap On's value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Snap On's future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Snap On's price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Snap On to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.
Performance Analysis
Check effects of mean-variance optimization against your current asset allocation
Insider Screener
Find insiders across different sectors to evaluate their impact on performance
Global Correlations
Find global opportunities by holding instruments from different markets
Alpha Finder
Use alpha and beta coefficients to find investment opportunities after accounting for the risk
Transaction History
View history of all your transactions and understand their impact on performance
Equity Analysis
Research over 250,000 global equities including funds, stocks and ETFs to find investment opportunities