Waters Company Insiders
WAT Stock | USD 417.28 13.11 3.24% |
Slightly above 75% of Waters' corporate insiders are selling. The analysis of insiders' sentiment of trading Waters stock suggests that many insiders are alarmed at this time. Waters employs about 7.9 K people. The company is managed by 36 executives with a total tenure of roughly 250 years, averaging almost 6.0 years of service per executive, having 219.44 employees per reported executive.
JoAnn Reed CEO Advisor to CEO, Director and Member of Audit Committee |
Flemming Ornskov Chairman Independent Chairman of the Board |
Waters' Insider Buying Vs Selling
25
Selling | Buying |
Latest Trades
2024-05-28 | Richard H Fearon | Acquired 1000 @ 332.9 | View | ||
2024-05-15 | Christopher A Kuebler | Disposed 4000 @ 361.64 | View | ||
2024-05-03 | Tommy Tuberville | Disposed @ 321.25 | |||
2024-03-13 | Linda Baddour | Disposed 500 @ 355.54 | View |
Monitoring Waters' insider sentiment can offer insights into its future performance, as insiders often have access to more information about their company's operations, financial health, and upcoming initiatives than the general public. However, it's essential to note that insider trading is regulated by securities laws, and insiders are required to disclose their trades publicly to ensure transparency and prevent unfair advantages based on non-public information.
Acquired vs Disposed
Filed vs Not Filed
Insider sentiment refers to the collective sentiment or feeling of Waters' insiders - typically its officers, directors, and beneficial owners holding more than a certain percentage of the company's stock - about the future prospects of Waters. This sentiment is often gauged based on the trading activities of these insiders. If insiders are purchasing more shares of their own company, it may be interpreted as a bullish sentiment, indicating that they believe Waters' stock will rise in value. Conversely, if insiders are selling shares, it might be seen as bearish, suggesting they expect the stock price to drop.
Waters |
Waters' Workforce Through the Years
Please note that employee historical analysis has become an increasingly important factor for investors assessing the risk associated with Waters' future performance. Based on our forecasts, it is anticipated that Waters will maintain a workforce of slightly above 7900 employees by March 2025.Waters' latest congressional trading
Congressional trading in companies like Waters, is subject to rigorous scrutiny to prevent conflicts of interest and insider trading. This is governed by multiple SEC regulations which were established to foster transparency and deter members of Congress from leveraging non-public information for personal gain. This oversight helps maintain public trust and ensures that investments in Waters by those in governmental positions are based on the same information available to the general public.
2024-10-08 | Representative Ro Khanna | Acquired Under $15K | Verify | ||
2024-06-14 | Senator Tommy Tuberville | Acquired Under $15K | Verify | ||
2024-06-13 | Senator Tommy Tuberville | Acquired Under $15K | Verify |
Waters Management Team Effectiveness
The company has Return on Asset of 0.1133 % which means that on every $100 spent on assets, it made $0.1133 of profit. This is way below average. In the same way, it shows a return on shareholders' equity (ROE) of 0.4964 %, implying that it generated $0.4964 on every 100 dollars invested. Waters' management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well Waters manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities. Return On Capital Employed is likely to gain to 0.23 in 2025, whereas Return On Tangible Assets are likely to drop 0.14 in 2025. At this time, Waters' Liabilities And Stockholders Equity is comparatively stable compared to the past year. Non Current Liabilities Total is likely to gain to about 3.2 B in 2025, whereas Total Current Liabilities is likely to drop slightly above 719.7 M in 2025.Common Stock Shares Outstanding is likely to gain to about 78.9 M in 2025. Net Income Applicable To Common Shares is likely to gain to about 854.6 M in 2025
Waters Workforce Comparison
Waters is rated below average in number of employees category among its peers. The total workforce of Health Care industry is at this time estimated at about 394,059. Waters holds roughly 7,900 in number of employees claiming about 2.0% of equities under Health Care industry.
Waters Profit Margins
The company has Net Profit Margin of 0.21 %, which implies that it may need a different competitive strategy as even a very small decline in it revenue may erase profits and result in a net loss. This is way below average. In the same way, it shows Net Operating Margin of 0.29 %, which entails that for every 100 dollars of revenue, it generated $0.29 of operating income.Current Value | Last Year | Change From Last Year | 10 Year Trend | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gross Profit Margin | 0.66 | 0.69 |
|
| |||||
Net Profit Margin | 0.14 | 0.2 |
|
| |||||
Operating Profit Margin | 0.2 | 0.25 |
|
| |||||
Pretax Profit Margin | 0.18 | 0.22 |
|
| |||||
Return On Assets | 0.11 | 0.12 |
|
|
Waters Insider Trading History
Some recent studies suggest that insider trading raises the cost of capital for securities issuers and decreases overall economic growth. Trading by specific Waters insiders, such as employees or executives, is commonly permitted as long as it does not rely on Waters' material information that is not in the public domain. Local jurisdictions usually require such trading to be reported in order to monitor insider transactions. In many U.S. states, trading conducted by corporate officers, key employees, directors, or significant shareholders must be reported to the regulator or publicly disclosed, usually within a few business days of the trade. In these cases, Waters insiders must file a Form 4 with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) when buying or selling shares of their own companies.
Buy/Sell Ratio | # Purchases Trades | # Sales Trades | Total Shares Purchased | Total Shares Sold | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024-06-01 | 1.5 | 6 | 4 | 12,925 | 8,347 |
2024-03-01 | 7.3333 | 22 | 3 | 66,760 | 7,084 |
2023-12-01 | 2.0 | 2 | 1 | 190.09 | 94.00 |
2023-09-01 | 0.6667 | 2 | 3 | 4,074 | 9,901 |
2023-06-01 | 0.6667 | 2 | 3 | 156.30 | 388.00 |
2023-03-01 | 9.3333 | 28 | 3 | 65,630 | 857.00 |
2022-12-01 | 1.8 | 9 | 5 | 8,635 | 10,176 |
2022-09-01 | 3.0 | 3 | 1 | 208.33 | 1,743 |
2022-06-01 | 0.5 | 8 | 16 | 7,561 | 27,475 |
2022-03-01 | 4.7143 | 33 | 7 | 83,332 | 701.00 |
2021-12-01 | 1.75 | 7 | 4 | 4,576 | 8,100 |
2021-09-01 | 1.0 | 9 | 9 | 2,815 | 20,414 |
2021-06-01 | 2.25 | 9 | 4 | 15,776 | 3,659 |
2021-03-01 | 2.0 | 42 | 21 | 101,370 | 24,269 |
2020-12-01 | 0.6667 | 8 | 12 | 35,988 | 60,974 |
2020-09-01 | 1.1429 | 16 | 14 | 125,368 | 145,672 |
2020-06-01 | 1.0 | 3 | 3 | 5,280 | 10,352 |
2020-03-01 | 1.4412 | 49 | 34 | 204,742 | 74,067 |
2019-12-01 | 0.64 | 16 | 25 | 91,028 | 167,355 |
2019-03-01 | 0.9524 | 40 | 42 | 158,082 | 284,328 |
2018-12-01 | 0.9231 | 24 | 26 | 208,411 | 66,334 |
2018-09-01 | 3.3333 | 10 | 3 | 7,600 | 10,999 |
2018-06-01 | 0.7778 | 7 | 9 | 33,473 | 69,689 |
2018-03-01 | 1.0 | 36 | 36 | 136,729 | 192,619 |
2017-12-01 | 0.6349 | 40 | 63 | 464,358 | 252,482 |
2017-09-01 | 1.0 | 6 | 6 | 28,912 | 50,424 |
2017-06-01 | 0.54 | 27 | 50 | 172,445 | 363,669 |
2017-03-01 | 1.1613 | 36 | 31 | 189,891 | 234,873 |
2016-12-01 | 0.8333 | 15 | 18 | 249,374 | 116,921 |
2016-09-01 | 0.5682 | 25 | 44 | 364,915 | 753,373 |
2016-06-01 | 0.6842 | 13 | 19 | 97,549 | 185,809 |
2016-03-01 | 2.381 | 50 | 21 | 152,350 | 31,231 |
2015-12-01 | 0.625 | 20 | 32 | 561,055 | 705,957 |
2015-09-01 | 0.8 | 8 | 10 | 124,469 | 58,783 |
2015-06-01 | 0.8462 | 11 | 13 | 34,933 | 70,500 |
2015-03-01 | 1.5 | 27 | 18 | 94,269 | 132,813 |
2014-12-01 | 0.68 | 17 | 25 | 589,691 | 769,409 |
2014-09-01 | 1.3333 | 4 | 3 | 4,735 | 19,500 |
2014-03-01 | 1.0313 | 33 | 32 | 274,024 | 433,225 |
2013-12-01 | 0.7805 | 32 | 41 | 655,133 | 904,358 |
2013-09-01 | 0.6667 | 4 | 6 | 14,882 | 48,374 |
2013-06-01 | 0.5556 | 5 | 9 | 110,350 | 224,953 |
2013-03-01 | 2.25 | 27 | 12 | 133,588 | 128,225 |
2012-12-01 | 0.9231 | 12 | 13 | 289,893 | 335,653 |
2012-09-01 | 0.7143 | 5 | 7 | 22,222 | 27,163 |
2012-06-01 | 1.1429 | 8 | 7 | 8,805 | 14,000 |
2012-03-01 | 5.6667 | 17 | 3 | 104,000 | 122,000 |
2011-12-01 | 0.8333 | 20 | 24 | 488,233 | 518,900 |
2011-09-01 | 2.0 | 4 | 2 | 10,645 | 10,272 |
2011-06-01 | 0.625 | 20 | 32 | 378,143 | 728,829 |
2011-03-01 | 9.5 | 19 | 2 | 45,404 | 3,000 |
2010-12-01 | 0.6667 | 16 | 24 | 564,946 | 621,367 |
2010-09-01 | 0.75 | 3 | 4 | 60,475 | 128,039 |
2010-06-01 | 1.5 | 3 | 2 | 3,427 | 6,000 |
2010-03-01 | 10.0 | 10 | 1 | 22,528 | 1,500 |
2009-12-01 | 0.625 | 5 | 8 | 12,313 | 29,000 |
2008-12-01 | 0.6 | 3 | 5 | 7,606 | 44,200 |
2008-09-01 | 0.7 | 7 | 10 | 10,815 | 16,200 |
2007-12-01 | 0.7778 | 7 | 9 | 13,614 | 29,300 |
2007-06-01 | 0.75 | 3 | 4 | 4,291 | 8,200 |
2006-12-01 | 1.0 | 3 | 3 | 1,749 | 9,000 |
2006-06-01 | 2.0 | 2 | 1 | 4,189 | 4,000 |
2005-03-01 | 1.875 | 15 | 8 | 114,350 | 188,000 |
2004-12-01 | 5.5 | 11 | 2 | 62,631 | 19,500 |
2004-09-01 | 1.0 | 8 | 8 | 239,484 | 478,000 |
2004-06-01 | 1.2 | 6 | 5 | 126,139 | 256,328 |
2004-03-01 | 2.2222 | 20 | 9 | 226,162 | 406,700 |
2003-12-01 | 1.4 | 7 | 5 | 396,236 | 667,208 |
2003-09-01 | 1.3333 | 8 | 6 | 351,231 | 700,000 |
2003-06-01 | 1.0 | 3 | 3 | 847.45 | 350,000 |
Waters Notable Stakeholders
A Waters stakeholder refers to an individual interested in an outcome of the business. Different stakeholders have different interests, and companies such as Waters often face trade-offs trying to please all of them. Waters' stakeholders can have a positive or negative influence on the entity's direction, and there are a lot of executives involved in getting Waters' stock to the level that pleases all shareholders. Keeping track of the stakeholders is a great way to stay on top of things affecting its ongoing price.
JoAnn Reed | Advisor to CEO, Director and Member of Audit Committee | Profile | |
Udit Batra | President, Chief Executive Officer, Director | Profile | |
Flemming Ornskov | Independent Chairman of the Board | Profile | |
Christopher OConnell | Chairman of the Board, President, Chief Executive Officer | Profile | |
John Lynch | Vice President Investor Relations | Profile | |
Sherry Buck | Chief Financial Officer, Senior Vice President | Profile | |
Amol Chaubal | Chief Financial Officer, Senior Vice President | Profile | |
Michael Harrington | Senior Vice President - Global Markets | Profile | |
Ian King | Senior Vice President - Instrument Technology | Profile | |
Robert Carson | Senior Vice President - Corporate Development | Profile | |
Elizabeth Rae | Senior Vice President - Global Human Resources | Profile | |
Michael Silveira | Chief Financial Officer, Principal Accounting Officer | Profile | |
Gary Hendrickson | Independent Director | Profile | |
Edward Conard | Independent Director | Profile | |
Linda Baddour | Independent Director | Profile | |
Christopher Kuebler | Independent Director | Profile | |
Michael Berendt | Independent Director | Profile | |
Laurie Glimcher | Independent Director | Profile | |
Thomas Salice | Lead Independent Director | Profile | |
Caspar Tudor | Director Relations | Profile | |
Keeley JD | General VP | Profile | |
Christos Ross | Senior Operations | Profile | |
Kevin Kempskie | Director PR | Profile | |
Belinda Hyde | Senior Vice President of Global Human Resources | Profile | |
Daniel Rush | Senior Transformation | Profile | |
Cheryl Kennedy | Senior Resources | Profile | |
Pearl Huang | Independent Director | Profile | |
Robert III | Senior Division | Profile | |
Patrick Conway | Interim Resources | Profile | |
Jiang Wei | Director | Profile | |
Jonathan Pratt | Senior Vice President and President of TA Instruments | Profile | |
Dan Welch | Senior Vice President of Global Operations | Profile | |
Jianqing Bennett | VP Division | Profile | |
Kristen Garvey | Vice Communications | Profile | |
John Ballbach | Independent Director | Profile | |
Keeley Aleman | Senior Vice President General Counsel and Corporate Secretary | Profile |
About Waters Management Performance
The success or failure of an entity such as Waters often depends on how effective the management is. Waters management team is responsible for propelling the future growth in the right direction and administering and controlling the business activities and accounting for the results. Ineffective management usually contributes to failure in the company's future performance for all stakeholders equally, but most importantly, for investors. So it is important to measure the effectiveness of Waters management before purchasing its stock. In many ways, it's all about finding the answer to one important question - Are they doing the right thing right now? How would we assess whether the Waters management is utilizing all available resources in the best possible way? Also, how well is the company doing relative to others in its sector and the market as a whole? The answer can be found by analyzing a few important fundamental indicators such as return on assets and return on equity.
Last Reported | Projected for Next Year | ||
Return On Tangible Assets | 0.21 | 0.14 | |
Return On Capital Employed | 0.19 | 0.23 | |
Return On Assets | 0.12 | 0.11 | |
Return On Equity | 0.50 | 0.29 |
Please note, the imprecision that can be found in Waters' accounting process means that the reasonable investor should take a skeptical approach toward the financial statement analysis of Waters. Check Waters' Beneish M Score to see the likelihood of Waters' management manipulating its earnings.
Waters Workforce Analysis
Traditionally, organizations such as Waters use manpower efficiency calculations for various incentive schemes, employee appraisal, or as an initiative to improve the processes. However, it can also be used by investors to make long-term investment decisions. The trends in the profit per employee or revenue per employee are measured by net income or revenue divided by the current number of full-time employees over a given time interval. Because workforce needs differ across sectors, these ratios could be used to compare Waters within its industry.Waters Manpower Efficiency
Return on Waters Manpower
Revenue Per Employee | 374.2K | |
Revenue Per Executive | 82.1M | |
Net Income Per Employee | 81.3K | |
Net Income Per Executive | 17.8M | |
Working Capital Per Employee | 121.9K | |
Working Capital Per Executive | 26.8M |
Additional Tools for Waters Stock Analysis
When running Waters' price analysis, check to measure Waters' market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Waters is operating at the current time. Most of Waters' value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Waters' future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Waters' price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Waters to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.