Whirlpool Company Insiders
WHR Stock | USD 112.52 1.34 1.21% |
Whirlpool's insiders are aggressively selling. The analysis of insiders' sentiment of trading Whirlpool stock suggests that virtually all insiders are panicking at this time. Whirlpool employs about 59 K people. The company is managed by 38 executives with a total tenure of roughly 197 years, averaging almost 5.0 years of service per executive, having 1552.63 employees per reported executive.
Marc Bitzer Chairman Chairman of the Board, President, Chief Executive Officer |
Joseph Liotine President Executive Vice President and President - Whirlpool North America |
Whirlpool's Insider Buying Vs Selling
0
Selling | Buying |
Latest Trades
2024-10-28 | James W Peters | Disposed 6000 @ 104.48 | View | ||
2024-09-03 | Juan Carlos Puente | Disposed 3266 @ 100 | View |
Monitoring Whirlpool's insider sentiment can offer insights into its future performance, as insiders often have access to more information about their company's operations, financial health, and upcoming initiatives than the general public. However, it's essential to note that insider trading is regulated by securities laws, and insiders are required to disclose their trades publicly to ensure transparency and prevent unfair advantages based on non-public information.
Whirlpool |
Whirlpool's Workforce Through the Years
Please note that employee historical analysis has become an increasingly important factor for investors assessing the risk associated with Whirlpool's future performance. Based on our forecasts, it is anticipated that Whirlpool will maintain a workforce of slightly above 59000 employees by December 2024.Whirlpool's latest congressional trading
Congressional trading in companies like Whirlpool, is subject to rigorous scrutiny to prevent conflicts of interest and insider trading. This is governed by multiple SEC regulations which were established to foster transparency and deter members of Congress from leveraging non-public information for personal gain. This oversight helps maintain public trust and ensures that investments in Whirlpool by those in governmental positions are based on the same information available to the general public.
Whirlpool Management Team Effectiveness
The company has Return on Asset of 0.0313 % which means that on every $100 spent on assets, it made $0.0313 of profit. This is way below average. In the same way, it shows a return on shareholders' equity (ROE) of 0.2086 %, implying that it generated $0.2086 on every 100 dollars invested. Whirlpool's management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well Whirlpool manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities. At this time, Whirlpool's Return On Capital Employed is relatively stable compared to the past year. As of 11/25/2024, Return On Assets is likely to grow to 0.04, while Return On Tangible Assets are likely to drop 0.04. At this time, Whirlpool's Non Currrent Assets Other are relatively stable compared to the past year. As of 11/25/2024, Intangible Assets is likely to grow to about 3.3 B, while Non Current Assets Total are likely to drop slightly above 6.9 B.As of 11/25/2024, Common Stock Shares Outstanding is likely to grow to about 57.7 M, though Net Loss is likely to grow to (1.7 B).
Whirlpool Workforce Comparison
Whirlpool is rated first in number of employees category among its peers. The total workforce of Consumer Discretionary industry is at this time estimated at about 174,854. Whirlpool totals roughly 59,000 in number of employees claiming about 34% of stocks in Consumer Discretionary industry.
Whirlpool Profit Margins
The company has Net Profit Margin of 0.03 %, which implies that it may need a different competitive strategy as even a very small decline in it revenue may erase profits and result in a net loss. This is way below average. In the same way, it shows Net Operating Margin of 0.06 %, which entails that for every 100 dollars of revenue, it generated $0.06 of operating income.Current Value | Last Year | Change From Last Year | 10 Year Trend | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gross Profit Margin | 0.23 | 0.1629 |
|
| |||||
Operating Profit Margin | 0.0657 | 0.0522 |
|
|
Whirlpool Insider Trading History
Some recent studies suggest that insider trading raises the cost of capital for securities issuers and decreases overall economic growth. Trading by specific Whirlpool insiders, such as employees or executives, is commonly permitted as long as it does not rely on Whirlpool's material information that is not in the public domain. Local jurisdictions usually require such trading to be reported in order to monitor insider transactions. In many U.S. states, trading conducted by corporate officers, key employees, directors, or significant shareholders must be reported to the regulator or publicly disclosed, usually within a few business days of the trade. In these cases, Whirlpool insiders must file a Form 4 with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) when buying or selling shares of their own companies.
Buy/Sell Ratio | # Purchases Trades | # Sales Trades | Total Shares Purchased | Total Shares Sold | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024-12-01 | 0.25 | 1 | 4 | 14,500 | 31,500 |
2024-09-01 | 0.6667 | 6 | 9 | 9,000 | 9,985 |
2024-06-01 | 3.0 | 12 | 4 | 26,125 | 11,627 |
2024-03-01 | 0.8537 | 35 | 41 | 422,618 | 146,144 |
2023-12-01 | 2.0 | 2 | 1 | 25,416 | 23,000 |
2023-09-01 | 0.1667 | 1 | 6 | 5,000 | 43,746 |
2023-06-01 | 0.5417 | 13 | 24 | 29,894 | 133,156 |
2023-03-01 | 1.2353 | 21 | 17 | 457,207 | 244,357 |
2022-09-01 | 0.75 | 3 | 4 | 4,500 | 7,130 |
2022-06-01 | 3.5 | 14 | 4 | 14,037 | 4,661 |
2022-03-01 | 1.1923 | 31 | 26 | 480,072 | 244,637 |
2021-09-01 | 0.3333 | 2 | 6 | 15,000 | 28,032 |
2021-06-01 | 0.5636 | 31 | 55 | 319,724 | 609,432 |
2021-03-01 | 0.9318 | 41 | 44 | 298,569 | 203,879 |
2020-12-01 | 0.2727 | 3 | 11 | 42,234 | 86,301 |
2020-06-01 | 2.2857 | 16 | 7 | 35,358 | 22,228 |
2020-03-01 | 1.0435 | 48 | 46 | 267,535 | 76,242 |
2019-09-01 | 0.0909 | 1 | 11 | 5,000 | 10,669 |
2019-06-01 | 2.4286 | 17 | 7 | 29,582 | 5,502 |
2019-03-01 | 0.75 | 33 | 44 | 192,581 | 46,227 |
2018-12-01 | 0.5 | 3 | 6 | 373,358 | 662,647 |
2018-09-01 | 0.2222 | 2 | 9 | 4,958 | 14,267 |
2018-06-01 | 1.8889 | 17 | 9 | 45,236 | 38,871 |
2018-03-01 | 1.0169 | 60 | 59 | 304,467 | 45,873 |
2017-12-01 | 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 1,000.00 | 0.00 |
2017-06-01 | 1.6 | 16 | 10 | 35,100 | 56,027 |
2017-03-01 | 0.883 | 83 | 94 | 452,477 | 389,480 |
2016-09-01 | 0.4074 | 11 | 27 | 144,894 | 324,336 |
2016-06-01 | 1.2727 | 14 | 11 | 26,374 | 57,934 |
2016-03-01 | 0.95 | 57 | 60 | 527,823 | 155,429 |
2015-12-01 | 1.0 | 2 | 2 | 1,057 | 114.00 |
2015-09-01 | 0.5 | 2 | 4 | 120,000 | 122,176 |
2015-06-01 | 1.0833 | 13 | 12 | 22,796 | 29,017 |
2015-03-01 | 0.6496 | 76 | 117 | 706,561 | 702,569 |
2014-12-01 | 0.125 | 1 | 8 | 86.00 | 7,484 |
2014-06-01 | 0.7209 | 31 | 43 | 207,830 | 357,305 |
2014-03-01 | 0.8696 | 40 | 46 | 336,783 | 200,159 |
2013-12-01 | 0.5455 | 12 | 22 | 73,532 | 167,093 |
2013-09-01 | 0.5455 | 12 | 22 | 121,002 | 240,156 |
2013-06-01 | 0.6364 | 28 | 44 | 96,212 | 233,330 |
2013-03-01 | 1.0 | 34 | 34 | 511,724 | 370,616 |
2012-12-01 | 0.4583 | 11 | 24 | 167,810 | 394,220 |
2012-06-01 | 7.0 | 14 | 2 | 38,170 | 1,270 |
2012-03-01 | 1.0556 | 38 | 36 | 870,294 | 559,842 |
2011-12-01 | 2.3333 | 7 | 3 | 34,924 | 21,924 |
2011-09-01 | 0.6923 | 9 | 13 | 86,000 | 114,420 |
2011-06-01 | 1.7143 | 12 | 7 | 46,493 | 61,737 |
2011-03-01 | 1.0909 | 36 | 33 | 695,031 | 180,710 |
2010-09-01 | 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 1,000.00 | 0.00 |
2010-06-01 | 2.75 | 33 | 12 | 96,300 | 113,640 |
2010-03-01 | 1.2222 | 11 | 9 | 92,656 | 20,706 |
2009-12-01 | 0.25 | 1 | 4 | 1,000.00 | 1,415 |
2009-09-01 | 0.5 | 2 | 4 | 22,500 | 31,680 |
2009-03-01 | 1.7143 | 12 | 7 | 215,225 | 27,887 |
2008-09-01 | 3.0 | 3 | 1 | 39,561 | 0.00 |
2008-03-01 | 1.75 | 14 | 8 | 150,316 | 49,839 |
2007-09-01 | 0.5 | 4 | 8 | 45,000 | 63,663 |
2007-06-01 | 1.3571 | 19 | 14 | 99,369 | 21,412 |
2007-03-01 | 0.6667 | 30 | 45 | 197,747 | 135,594 |
2006-09-01 | 3.7778 | 34 | 9 | 78,273 | 64,409 |
2006-06-01 | 3.6667 | 44 | 12 | 21,650 | 20,578 |
2006-03-01 | 2.2222 | 40 | 18 | 72,921 | 75,887 |
2005-12-01 | 7.3333 | 22 | 3 | 25,613 | 50,000 |
2005-09-01 | 6.6667 | 20 | 3 | 22,665 | 66,000 |
2005-06-01 | 10.3333 | 31 | 3 | 15,250 | 600.00 |
2005-03-01 | 2.6 | 26 | 10 | 45,680 | 75,309 |
2004-06-01 | 33.0 | 33 | 1 | 68,996 | 10.00 |
2004-03-01 | 3.1 | 31 | 10 | 268,657 | 197,406 |
2003-12-01 | 15.0 | 15 | 1 | 2,651 | 0.00 |
2003-09-01 | 1.6667 | 20 | 12 | 117,351 | 208,464 |
Whirlpool Notable Stakeholders
A Whirlpool stakeholder refers to an individual interested in an outcome of the business. Different stakeholders have different interests, and companies such as Whirlpool often face trade-offs trying to please all of them. Whirlpool's stakeholders can have a positive or negative influence on the entity's direction, and there are a lot of executives involved in getting Whirlpool's stock to the level that pleases all shareholders. Keeping track of the stakeholders is a great way to stay on top of things affecting its ongoing price.
Marc Bitzer | Chairman of the Board, President, Chief Executive Officer | Profile | |
Winn Everhart | Executive Vice President and President of the North America Region | Profile | |
Joseph Liotine | Executive Vice President and President - Whirlpool North America | Profile | |
Shengpo Wu | Executive Vice President and President Whirlpool Asia | Profile | |
Joao Brega | Executive Vice President and Presidentident - Whirlpool Latin America | Profile | |
James Peters | Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Executive Vice President - Whirlpool Asia | Profile | |
Danielle Brown | Senior Vice President, Chief Information Officer | Profile | |
John Liu | Independent Director | Profile | |
James Loree | Independent Director | Profile | |
Larry Spencer | Independent Director | Profile | |
Samuel Allen | Independent Director | Profile | |
Patricia Poppe | Independent Director | Profile | |
Joseph Lovechio | Sr. Director of Investor Relations | Profile | |
Harish Manwani | Independent Director | Profile | |
Greg Creed | Independent Director | Profile | |
Geraldine Elliott | Independent Director | Profile | |
Diane Dietz | Independent Director | Profile | |
Michael White | Independent Director | Profile | |
Gary DiCamillo | Independent Director | Profile | |
Roxanne Warner | Corporate VP | Profile | |
Juan Puente | Executive America | Profile | |
Korey Thomas | Head Relations | Profile | |
Alessandro Perucchetti | Executive NAR | Profile | |
Holger Gottstein | Executive Development | Profile | |
Pamela Klyn | Executive Sustainability | Profile | |
Kyle Jong | Senior Counsel | Profile | |
Scott Cartwright | Head Relations | Profile | |
Tom Arent | VP Marketing | Profile | |
Ava Harter | Senior Vice President Chief Legal Officer | Profile | |
Ludovic Beaufils | Executive Appliances | Profile | |
Kirsten Hewitt | Senior Vice President Chief Legal Officer | Profile | |
Carey Martin | Executive Officer | Profile | |
Jennifer LaClair | Independent Director | Profile | |
Gilles Morel | Executive Vice President and Presidentident - Whirlpool Europe, Middle East & Africa | Profile | |
Christopher Conley | Principal Accounting Officer, Corporate Controller | Profile | |
Bridget Quinn | Assistant Secretary | Profile | |
Roberto Campos | Executive Sourcing | Profile | |
Carl Everhart | Executive Vice President and President of the North America Region | Profile |
About Whirlpool Management Performance
The success or failure of an entity such as Whirlpool often depends on how effective the management is. Whirlpool management team is responsible for propelling the future growth in the right direction and administering and controlling the business activities and accounting for the results. Ineffective management usually contributes to failure in the company's future performance for all stakeholders equally, but most importantly, for investors. So it is important to measure the effectiveness of Whirlpool management before purchasing its stock. In many ways, it's all about finding the answer to one important question - Are they doing the right thing right now? How would we assess whether the Whirlpool management is utilizing all available resources in the best possible way? Also, how well is the company doing relative to others in its sector and the market as a whole? The answer can be found by analyzing a few important fundamental indicators such as return on assets and return on equity.
Last Reported | Projected for Next Year | ||
Return On Tangible Assets | 0.04 | 0.04 | |
Return On Capital Employed | 0.10 | 0.15 | |
Return On Assets | 0.03 | 0.04 | |
Return On Equity | 0.20 | 0.21 |
Whirlpool Workforce Analysis
Traditionally, organizations such as Whirlpool use manpower efficiency calculations for various incentive schemes, employee appraisal, or as an initiative to improve the processes. However, it can also be used by investors to make long-term investment decisions. The trends in the profit per employee or revenue per employee are measured by net income or revenue divided by the current number of full-time employees over a given time interval. Because workforce needs differ across sectors, these ratios could be used to compare Whirlpool within its industry.Whirlpool Manpower Efficiency
Return on Whirlpool Manpower
Revenue Per Employee | 329.7K | |
Revenue Per Executive | 512M | |
Net Income Per Employee | 8.3K | |
Net Income Per Executive | 12.8M |
Additional Tools for Whirlpool Stock Analysis
When running Whirlpool's price analysis, check to measure Whirlpool's market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Whirlpool is operating at the current time. Most of Whirlpool's value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Whirlpool's future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Whirlpool's price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Whirlpool to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.