Full Net Tangible Assets from 2010 to 2026
| FLL Stock | USD 2.26 0.05 2.26% |
Net Tangible Assets | First Reported 2011-06-30 | Previous Quarter 6.7 M | Current Value 1.9 M | Quarterly Volatility 22.2 M |
Check Full House financial statements over time to gain insight into future company performance. You can evaluate financial statements to find patterns among Full House's main balance sheet or income statement drivers, such as Depreciation And Amortization of 50.8 M, Interest Expense of 53.1 M or Total Revenue of 352.7 M, as well as many indicators such as Price To Sales Ratio of 0.53, Dividend Yield of 0.0428 or PTB Ratio of 4.25. Full financial statements analysis is a perfect complement when working with Full House Valuation or Volatility modules.
Full | Net Tangible Assets | Build AI portfolio with Full Stock |
Historical Net Tangible Assets data for Full House serves as a key indicator of operational performance and financial stability. Tracking changes in this metric over time helps investors spot emerging trends before they become obvious, providing an edge in assessing whether Full House Resorts represents a compelling investment opportunity.
Latest Full House's Net Tangible Assets Growth Pattern
Below is the plot of the Net Tangible Assets of Full House Resorts over the last few years. It is the total assets of a company minus any intangible assets such as patents, copyrights, and goodwill; it represents the physical assets of a company. Full House's Net Tangible Assets historical data analysis aims to capture in quantitative terms the overall pattern of either growth or decline in Full House's overall financial position and show how it may be relating to other accounts over time.
| Net Tangible Assets | 10 Years Trend |
|
Net Tangible Assets |
| Timeline |
Full Net Tangible Assets Regression Statistics
| Arithmetic Mean | 52,953,935 | |
| Geometric Mean | 49,053,245 | |
| Coefficient Of Variation | 36.74 | |
| Mean Deviation | 16,331,771 | |
| Median | 56,523,000 | |
| Standard Deviation | 19,453,937 | |
| Sample Variance | 378.5T | |
| Range | 57.4M | |
| R-Value | 0.11 | |
| Mean Square Error | 399.1T | |
| R-Squared | 0.01 | |
| Significance | 0.68 | |
| Slope | 411,248 | |
| Total Sum of Squares | 6055.3T |
Full Net Tangible Assets History
About Full House Financial Statements
Full House investors utilize fundamental indicators, such as Net Tangible Assets, to predict how Full Stock might perform in the future. Analyzing these trends over time helps investors make informed market timing decisions. For further insights, please visit our fundamental analysis page.
| Last Reported | Projected for Next Year | ||
| Net Tangible Assets | 60.9 M | 42.1 M |
Building efficient market-beating portfolios requires time, education, and a lot of computing power!
The Portfolio Prophet is an AI-driven system that provides multiple benefits to our users by leveraging cutting-edge machine learning algorithms, statistical analysis, and predictive modeling to automate the process of asset selection and portfolio construction, saving time and reducing human error for individual and institutional investors.
Try AI Portfolio ProphetCheck out the analysis of Full House Correlation against competitors. You can also try the Latest Portfolios module to quick portfolio dashboard that showcases your latest portfolios.
Is Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure space expected to grow? Or is there an opportunity to expand the business' product line in the future? Factors like these will boost the valuation of Full House. Market participants price Full higher when confident in its future expansion prospects. The financial industry is built on trying to define current growth potential and future valuation accurately. Comprehensive Full House assessment requires weighing all these inputs, though not all factors influence outcomes equally.
Quarterly Earnings Growth 0.056 | Earnings Share (1.11) | Revenue Per Share | Quarterly Revenue Growth 0.03 | Return On Equity |
The market value of Full House Resorts is measured differently than its book value, which is the value of Full that is recorded on the company's balance sheet. Investors also form their own opinion of Full House's value that differs from its market value or its book value, called intrinsic value, which is Full House's true underlying value. Investors use various methods to calculate intrinsic value and buy a stock when its market value falls below its intrinsic value. Because Full House's market value can be influenced by many factors that don't directly affect Full House's underlying business (such as a pandemic or basic market pessimism), market value can vary widely from intrinsic value.
Please note, there is a significant difference between Full House's value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if Full House is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. Meanwhile, Full House's quoted price indicates the marketplace figure where supply meets demand through bilateral consent.