Premium Brands Financials
| PRBZF Stock | USD 53.91 2.07 3.70% |
Premium |
Premium Brands Stock Summary
Premium Brands competes with Maple Leaf, Powerof Canada, North West, Badger Infrastructure, and Saputo. Premium Brands Holdings Corporation, through its subsidiaries, manufactures and distributes food products primarily in Canada and the United States. The company was founded in 1917 and is headquartered in Richmond, Canada. Premium Brands is traded on OTC Exchange in the United States.| Instrument | USA Pink Sheet View All |
| Exchange | PINK Exchange |
| Business Address | 100 - 10991 |
| Sector | Food Products |
| Industry | Consumer Staples |
| Benchmark | Dow Jones Industrial |
| Website | www.premiumbrandsholdings.com |
| Phone | 604 656 3100 |
| Currency | USD - US Dollar |
Premium Brands Key Financial Ratios
There are many critical financial ratios that Premium Brands' investors are exposed to on a daily basis, but they are usually grouped into few meaningful categories from each financial statement that Premium Brands Holdings reports annually and quarterly.| Return On Equity | 0.0976 | |||
| Return On Asset | 0.0355 | |||
| Number Of Employees | 21 | |||
| Beta | 0.99 | |||
| Z Score | 2.2 |
Premium Financial Ratios Relationships
Comparative valuation techniques use various fundamental indicators to help in determining Premium Brands's current stock value. Our valuation model uses many indicators to compare Premium Brands value to that of its competitors to determine the firm's financial worth. You can analyze the relationship between different fundamental ratios across Premium Brands competition to find correlations between indicators driving Premium Brands's intrinsic value. More Info.Premium Brands Holdings is considered to be number one stock in return on equity category among its peers. It is regarded fourth in return on asset category among its peers reporting about 0.36 of Return On Asset per Return On Equity. The ratio of Return On Equity to Return On Asset for Premium Brands Holdings is roughly 2.75 . The reason why the comparable model can be used in almost all circumstances is due to the vast number of multiples that can be utilized, such as the price-to-earnings (P/E), price-to-book (P/B), price-to-sales (P/S), price-to-cash flow (P/CF), and many others. The P/E ratio is the most commonly used of these ratios because it focuses on the Premium Brands' earnings, one of the primary drivers of an investment's value.Premium Brands Holdings Systematic Risk
Premium Brands' systematic risk plays a vital role in portfolio allocation when considering its stock to be added to a well-diversified portfolio. Premium Brands volatility which cannot be eliminated through diversification, requires returns over the risk-free rate. Over the long run, a well-diversified portfolio provides returns that match its exposure to systematic risk. In this case, investors face a trade-off between expected returns and systematic risk and, therefore, can only reduce a portfolio's exposure to systematic risk by sacrificing expected returns on the portfolio.
The output start index for this execution was thirty with a total number of output elements of thirty-one. The Beta measures systematic risk based on how returns on Premium Brands Holdings correlated with the market. If Beta is less than 0 Premium Brands generally moves in the opposite direction as compared to the market. If Premium Brands Beta is about zero movement of price series is uncorrelated with the movement of the benchmark. if Beta is between zero and one Premium Brands Holdings is generally moves in the same direction as, but less than the movement of the market. For Beta = 1 movement of Premium Brands is generally in the same direction as the market. If Beta > 1 Premium Brands moves generally in the same direction as, but more than the movement of the benchmark.
Premium Brands February 1, 2025 Opportunity Range
Along with financial statement analysis, the daily predictive indicators of Premium Brands help investors to analyze its daily demand and supply, volume, patterns, and price swings to determine the real value of Premium Brands Holdings. We use our internally-developed statistical techniques to arrive at the intrinsic value of Premium Brands Holdings based on widely used predictive technical indicators. In general, we focus on analyzing Premium Pink Sheet price patterns and their correlations with different microeconomic environment and drivers. We also apply predictive analytics to build Premium Brands's daily price indicators and compare them against related drivers.
| Information Ratio | (0.14) | |||
| Maximum Drawdown | 17.42 | |||
| Value At Risk | (2.27) | |||
| Potential Upside | 1.19 |
Complementary Tools for Premium Pink Sheet analysis
When running Premium Brands' price analysis, check to measure Premium Brands' market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Premium Brands is operating at the current time. Most of Premium Brands' value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Premium Brands' future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Premium Brands' price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Premium Brands to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.
| My Watchlist Analysis Analyze my current watchlist and to refresh optimization strategy. Macroaxis watchlist is based on self-learning algorithm to remember stocks you like | |
| Portfolio Suggestion Get suggestions outside of your existing asset allocation including your own model portfolios | |
| Share Portfolio Track or share privately all of your investments from the convenience of any device | |
| ETFs Find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) from around the world | |
| Volatility Analysis Get historical volatility and risk analysis based on latest market data |