Mallika Srinivasan - AGCO Director
| AGCO Stock | USD 98.43 0.98 1.01% |
Director
Ms. Mallika Srinivasan is Director of the Company. She is Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Tractors and Farm Equipment Limited, the second largest agricultural tractor manufacturer in India, since 2011. Various positions at Tractors and Farm Equipment Limited since 1981, including Director, Vice President and General Manager Planning Coordination . Member of the Boards of Directors of Tata Global Beverages Limited and Tata Steel Limited . Member of the Board of Medical Research Foundation. Member of the Board of Trustees for The Childs Trust, Kanchi Kamakoti Childs Trust Hospital. Former President of the Tractor Manufacturers Association of India, the Madras Management Association and the Madras Chamber of Commerce Industry. Former member of the Board of Governors of the Indian Institute of Technology, Madras and the Indian Institute of Management, Tiruchirappalli. since 2015.
| Age | 61 |
| Tenure | 9 years |
| Address | 4205 River Green Parkway, Duluth, GA, United States, 30096-2568 |
| Phone | 770 813 9200 |
| Web | https://www.agcocorp.com |
AGCO Management Efficiency
The company has return on total asset (ROA) of 0.0556 % which means that it generated a profit of $0.0556 on every $100 spent on assets. This is way below average. Similarly, it shows a return on stockholder's equity (ROE) of 0.0378 %, meaning that it created $0.0378 on every $100 dollars invested by stockholders. AGCO's management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well AGCO manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities. As of the 25th of November 2024, Return On Tangible Assets is likely to grow to 0.13. Also, Return On Capital Employed is likely to grow to 0.25. At this time, AGCO's Return On Tangible Assets are very stable compared to the past year. As of the 25th of November 2024, Fixed Asset Turnover is likely to grow to 9.99, while Non Current Assets Total are likely to drop about 2.6 B.Similar Executives
| Showing other executives | DIRECTOR Age | ||
| Dennis LaBarre | Hyster Yale Materials Handling | 78 | |
| Tami Erwin | Deere Company | 56 | |
| Kelly Ayotte | Caterpillar | 52 | |
| Robert Bauer | Alamo Group | 62 | |
| Anne Belec | Manitowoc | 58 | |
| Donald Condon | Manitowoc | 71 | |
| Anthony Soave | Titan International | 80 | |
| William Osborn | Caterpillar | 71 | |
| Juan Gallardo | Caterpillar | 71 | |
| Clayton Jones | Deere Company | 70 | |
| Miles White | Caterpillar | 65 | |
| Robert Brunner | Lindsay | 63 | |
| Charles Holliday | Deere Company | 73 | |
| Gerald Johnson | Caterpillar | 57 | |
| Laura Thompson | Titan International | 56 | |
| Ibrahim Gokcen | Lindsay | 42 | |
| Christopher Rossi | Terex | 56 | |
| Mark Rachesky | Titan International | 61 | |
| Andra Rush | Terex | 60 | |
| Thomas Hansen | Terex | 72 | |
| Britton Taplin | Hyster Yale Materials Handling | 64 | |
Management Performance
| Return On Equity | 0.0378 | ||||
| Return On Asset | 0.0556 |
AGCO Leadership Team
Elected by the shareholders, the AGCO's board of directors comprises two types of representatives: AGCO inside directors who are chosen from within the company, and outside directors, selected externally and held independent of AGCO. The board's role is to monitor AGCO's management team and ensure that shareholders' interests are well served. AGCO's inside directors are responsible for reviewing and approving budgets prepared by upper management to implement core corporate initiatives and projects. On the other hand, AGCO's outside directors are responsible for providing unbiased perspectives on the board's policies.
| Wolfgang Deml, Independent Director | ||
| Mallika Srinivasan, Director | ||
| Kelvin Bennett, Senior Vice President - Engineering | ||
| Roy Armes, Independent Director | ||
| George Minnich, Independent Director | ||
| Ivory HarrisBrown, Chief Human Resource Officer, Senior Vice President | ||
| Greg Peterson, Director of Investor Relations | ||
| Eric Hansotia, Senior Vice President - Global Harvesting and Advanced Technology Solutions | ||
| Helmut Endres, Senior Vice President - Engineering | ||
| Michael Arnold, Lead Independent Director | ||
| Gerald Shaheen, Lead Independent Director | ||
| Josip Tomasevic, Senior Vice President Chief Procurement Officer | ||
| Louisa ParkerSmith, Director - Global Sustainability | ||
| Andrew Sunderman, Senior Lead | ||
| Torsten Dehner, Senior Vice President General Manager of Europe/Middle East | ||
| Suzanne Clark, Independent Director | ||
| Andrew Beck, Chief Financial Officer - Senior Vice President | ||
| Luis Felli, Senior Vice President, General Manager - Massey Ferguson | ||
| Niels Poerksen, Independent Director | ||
| Lucinda Smith, Senior Vice President - Global Business Services | ||
| Robert Crain, Senior Vice President and General Manager, North America | ||
| Sondra Barbour, Independent Director | ||
| Bradley Arnold, Senior Vice President - Global Crop Cycle and Fuse Connected Se | ||
| P Benson, Independent Director | ||
| Stefan Caspari, Senior Vice President General Manager of Grain and Protein | ||
| Matthew Tsien, Independent Director | ||
| David Sagehorn, Independent Director | ||
| Gary Collar, Senior Vice President and General Manager, Asia/Pacific/Africa | ||
| HansBernd Veltmaat, Senior Vice President - Chief Supply Chain Officer | ||
| Viren Shah, Senior Officer | ||
| Bob Lange, Independent Director | ||
| Indira Agarwal, Chief Officer | ||
| Lara Long, Chief Accounting Officer, Vice President | ||
| Roger Batkin, Senior Vice President, General Counsel, Chief ESG Officer and Corporate Secretary | ||
| Seth Crawford, Senior Vice President General Manager - Precision Ag and Digital | ||
| Damon Audia, Senior CFO | ||
| Wolfgang Kirsch, Independent Director | ||
| Cristiane Masina, Global Manager |
AGCO Stock Performance Indicators
The ability to make a profit is the ultimate goal of any investor. But to identify the right stock is not an easy task. Is AGCO a good investment? Although profit is still the single most important financial element of any organization, multiple performance indicators can help investors identify the equity that they will appreciate over time.
| Return On Equity | 0.0378 | ||||
| Return On Asset | 0.0556 | ||||
| Profit Margin | 0.01 % | ||||
| Operating Margin | 0.05 % | ||||
| Current Valuation | 10.88 B | ||||
| Shares Outstanding | 74.65 M | ||||
| Shares Owned By Insiders | 16.80 % | ||||
| Shares Owned By Institutions | 85.69 % | ||||
| Number Of Shares Shorted | 3.38 M | ||||
| Price To Earning | 11.73 X |
Pair Trading with AGCO
One of the main advantages of trading using pair correlations is that every trade hedges away some risk. Because there are two separate transactions required, even if AGCO position performs unexpectedly, the other equity can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in AGCO will appreciate offsetting losses from the drop in the long position's value.Moving together with AGCO Stock
| 0.76 | DE | Deere Company Fiscal Year End 27th of November 2024 | PairCorr |
| 0.67 | HY | Hyster Yale Materials | PairCorr |
Moving against AGCO Stock
| 0.66 | ARTW | Arts Way Manufacturing | PairCorr |
| 0.61 | KUBTY | Kubota Corp ADR | PairCorr |
| 0.52 | WNC | Wabash National | PairCorr |
| 0.49 | TWI | Titan International | PairCorr |
| 0.41 | SHYF | Shyft Group | PairCorr |
The ability to find closely correlated positions to AGCO could be a great tool in your tax-loss harvesting strategies, allowing investors a quick way to find a similar-enough asset to replace AGCO when you sell it. If you don't do this, your portfolio allocation will be skewed against your target asset allocation. So, investors can't just sell and buy back AGCO - that would be a violation of the tax code under the "wash sale" rule, and this is why you need to find a similar enough asset and use the proceeds from selling AGCO Corporation to buy it.
The correlation of AGCO is a statistical measure of how it moves in relation to other instruments. This measure is expressed in what is known as the correlation coefficient, which ranges between -1 and +1. A perfect positive correlation (i.e., a correlation coefficient of +1) implies that as AGCO moves, either up or down, the other security will move in the same direction. Alternatively, perfect negative correlation means that if AGCO moves in either direction, the perfectly negatively correlated security will move in the opposite direction. If the correlation is 0, the equities are not correlated; they are entirely random. A correlation greater than 0.8 is generally described as strong, whereas a correlation less than 0.5 is generally considered weak.
Correlation analysis and pair trading evaluation for AGCO can also be used as hedging techniques within a particular sector or industry or even over random equities to generate a better risk-adjusted return on your portfolios.Check out Trending Equities to better understand how to build diversified portfolios, which includes a position in AGCO Corporation. Also, note that the market value of any company could be closely tied with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in main economic indicators. You can also try the My Watchlist Analysis module to analyze my current watchlist and to refresh optimization strategy. Macroaxis watchlist is based on self-learning algorithm to remember stocks you like.
Is Agricultural & Farm Machinery space expected to grow? Or is there an opportunity to expand the business' product line in the future? Factors like these will boost the valuation of AGCO. If investors know AGCO will grow in the future, the company's valuation will be higher. The financial industry is built on trying to define current growth potential and future valuation accurately. All the valuation information about AGCO listed above have to be considered, but the key to understanding future value is determining which factors weigh more heavily than others.
Quarterly Earnings Growth (0.89) | Dividend Share 1.16 | Earnings Share 2.26 | Revenue Per Share 168.626 | Quarterly Revenue Growth (0.25) |
The market value of AGCO is measured differently than its book value, which is the value of AGCO that is recorded on the company's balance sheet. Investors also form their own opinion of AGCO's value that differs from its market value or its book value, called intrinsic value, which is AGCO's true underlying value. Investors use various methods to calculate intrinsic value and buy a stock when its market value falls below its intrinsic value. Because AGCO's market value can be influenced by many factors that don't directly affect AGCO's underlying business (such as a pandemic or basic market pessimism), market value can vary widely from intrinsic value.
Please note, there is a significant difference between AGCO's value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if AGCO is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, AGCO's price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.