Matthew Rose - Fluor Independent Director
| FLR Stock | USD 54.72 2.19 4.17% |
Director
Mr. Matthew K. Rose is Independent Director of Fluor Corporationration effective April 30, 2014. He is Executive Chairman, Burlington Northern Santa Fe, LLC, a subsidiary of Berkshire Hathaway Inc. and one of the largest freight rail systems in North America, since 2014 Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of BNSF from 2002 to 2014 joined BNSF in 1993 since 2014.
| Age | 61 |
| Tenure | 10 years |
| Address | 6700 Las Colinas Boulevard, Irving, TX, United States, 75039 |
| Phone | 469 398 7000 |
| Web | https://www.fluor.com |
Fluor Management Efficiency
The company has Return on Asset of 0.0204 % which means that on every $100 spent on assets, it made $0.0204 of profit. This is way below average. In the same way, it shows a return on shareholders' equity (ROE) of 0.082 %, implying that it generated $0.082 on every 100 dollars invested. Fluor's management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well Fluor manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities. At this time, Fluor's Return On Tangible Assets are relatively stable compared to the past year. As of 11/22/2024, Return On Assets is likely to grow to 0.04, while Return On Capital Employed is likely to drop 0.04. At this time, Fluor's Asset Turnover is relatively stable compared to the past year.Similar Executives
| Showing other executives | DIRECTOR Age | ||
| Molly Campbell | Granite Construction Incorporat | 60 | |
| David Darnell | Granite Construction Incorporat | 67 | |
| Steven Schwarzwaelder | EMCOR Group | 65 | |
| Worthing Jackman | Quanta Services | 56 | |
| Vincent Stewart | KBR Inc | 62 | |
| Jeffery Lyash | Granite Construction Incorporat | 58 | |
| Patrick Wood | Quanta Services | 57 | |
| Umberto Sala | KBR Inc | 72 | |
| David Laidley | EMCOR Group | 73 | |
| Doyle Beneby | Quanta Services | 61 | |
| Janet Wolfenbarger | Aecom Technology | 62 | |
| Ronald Johnson | EMCOR Group | 65 | |
| Vincent Foster | Quanta Services | 63 | |
| Bernard Fried | Quanta Services | 63 | |
| James Blackwell | KBR Inc | 61 | |
| Celeste Mastin | Granite Construction Incorporat | 51 | |
| Margaret Shannon | Quanta Services | 70 | |
| Wendy Masiello | KBR Inc | 62 | |
| Sean Eastman | Quanta Services | N/A | |
| Robin WalkerLee | EMCOR Group | 66 | |
| Carlos Sabater | KBR Inc | 62 | |
Management Performance
| Return On Equity | 0.082 | ||||
| Return On Asset | 0.0204 |
Fluor Leadership Team
Elected by the shareholders, the Fluor's board of directors comprises two types of representatives: Fluor inside directors who are chosen from within the company, and outside directors, selected externally and held independent of Fluor. The board's role is to monitor Fluor's management team and ensure that shareholders' interests are well served. Fluor's inside directors are responsible for reviewing and approving budgets prepared by upper management to implement core corporate initiatives and projects. On the other hand, Fluor's outside directors are responsible for providing unbiased perspectives on the board's policies.
| Rick Koumouris, Group President Mining & Metals, Infrastructure, Power, Life Sciences & Advanced Manufacturing | ||
| Thomas Leppert, Independent Director | ||
| James Breuer, Group President - Energy Solutions | ||
| Matthew Rose, Independent Director | ||
| Jason Landkamer, Director Relations | ||
| Peter Barker, Independent Director | ||
| Peter Fluor, Lead Independent Director | ||
| D Steuert, Chief Financial Officer, Executive Vice President, Interim Principal Accounting Officer | ||
| Stacy Dillow, Chief Human Resource Officer, Executive Vice President | ||
| Mark Fields, Group President Energy & Chemicals | ||
| David Constable, Chief Executive Officer, Director | ||
| Eric Helm, Chief VP | ||
| Armando Olivera, Independent Director | ||
| James Hackett, Independent Director | ||
| Alan Boeckmann, Executive Chairman of the Board | ||
| Mark Landry, Senior Vice President - Human Resources | ||
| Taco Haan, Group President Diversified Services | ||
| Alan Bennett, Lead Independent Director | ||
| Terry Towle, Group President Infrastructure & Power | ||
| Joe Brennan, Chief Financial Officer, Executive Vice President | ||
| Joseph Brennan, Chief Financial Officer, Executive Vice President | ||
| Rosemary Berkery, Independent Director | ||
| H Eberhart, Independent Director | ||
| Carlos Hernandez, Chief Legal Officer, Executive VP and Corporate Secretary | ||
| Christopher Panichi, Senior Finance | ||
| James Brittain, Group President Energy & Chemicals | ||
| Alvin Collins, Group President - Corporate Development and Sustainability | ||
| John Regan, Executive Vice President Chief Accounting Officer, Controller | ||
| Teri McClure, Independent Director | ||
| Garry Flowers, Executive Vice President, Construction, HSE & Risk | ||
| Matthew McSorley, Executive Vice President Project Support Services | ||
| Robert Taylor, Executive Officer | ||
| Thomas DAgostino, Group President - Mission Solutions | ||
| John Reynolds, Executive Vice President, Chief Legal Officer, Secretary | ||
| David BSc, Executive CEO | ||
| Anthony Morgan, Group Solutions |
Fluor Stock Performance Indicators
The ability to make a profit is the ultimate goal of any investor. But to identify the right stock is not an easy task. Is Fluor a good investment? Although profit is still the single most important financial element of any organization, multiple performance indicators can help investors identify the equity that they will appreciate over time.
| Return On Equity | 0.082 | ||||
| Return On Asset | 0.0204 | ||||
| Profit Margin | 0.02 % | ||||
| Operating Margin | 0.01 % | ||||
| Current Valuation | 7.12 B | ||||
| Shares Outstanding | 171.52 M | ||||
| Shares Owned By Insiders | 1.38 % | ||||
| Shares Owned By Institutions | 92.58 % | ||||
| Number Of Shares Shorted | 6.25 M | ||||
| Price To Earning | 60.86 X |
Pair Trading with Fluor
One of the main advantages of trading using pair correlations is that every trade hedges away some risk. Because there are two separate transactions required, even if Fluor position performs unexpectedly, the other equity can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Fluor will appreciate offsetting losses from the drop in the long position's value.Moving together with Fluor Stock
The ability to find closely correlated positions to Fluor could be a great tool in your tax-loss harvesting strategies, allowing investors a quick way to find a similar-enough asset to replace Fluor when you sell it. If you don't do this, your portfolio allocation will be skewed against your target asset allocation. So, investors can't just sell and buy back Fluor - that would be a violation of the tax code under the "wash sale" rule, and this is why you need to find a similar enough asset and use the proceeds from selling Fluor to buy it.
The correlation of Fluor is a statistical measure of how it moves in relation to other instruments. This measure is expressed in what is known as the correlation coefficient, which ranges between -1 and +1. A perfect positive correlation (i.e., a correlation coefficient of +1) implies that as Fluor moves, either up or down, the other security will move in the same direction. Alternatively, perfect negative correlation means that if Fluor moves in either direction, the perfectly negatively correlated security will move in the opposite direction. If the correlation is 0, the equities are not correlated; they are entirely random. A correlation greater than 0.8 is generally described as strong, whereas a correlation less than 0.5 is generally considered weak.
Correlation analysis and pair trading evaluation for Fluor can also be used as hedging techniques within a particular sector or industry or even over random equities to generate a better risk-adjusted return on your portfolios.Additional Tools for Fluor Stock Analysis
When running Fluor's price analysis, check to measure Fluor's market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Fluor is operating at the current time. Most of Fluor's value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Fluor's future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Fluor's price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Fluor to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.