Mark Roualet - General Dynamics Executive Vice President - Combat Systems
| GD Stock | USD 340.75 5.59 1.61% |
President
Mr. Mark C. Roualet is Executive Vice President Combat Systems of the Company. Executive Vice President, Combat Systems since March 2013 Vice President of the company and President of General Dynamics Land Systems, October 2008 March 2013 Senior Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of General Dynamics Land Systems, July 2007 October 2008. since 2013.
| Age | 65 |
| Tenure | 13 years |
| Professional Marks | MBA |
| Address | 11011 Sunset Hills Road, Reston, VA, United States, 20190 |
| Phone | 703 876 3000 |
| Web | https://www.gd.com |
General Dynamics Management Efficiency
The company has Return on Asset (ROA) of 0.0599 % which means that for every $100 of assets, it generated a profit of $0.0599. This is way below average. Likewise, it shows a return on total equity (ROE) of 0.1766 %, which means that it produced $0.1766 on every 100 dollars invested by current stockholders. General Dynamics' management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well General Dynamics manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities. At present, General Dynamics' Return On Assets are projected to increase slightly based on the last few years of reporting. The current year's Return On Equity is expected to grow to 0.22, whereas Return On Tangible Assets are forecasted to decline to 0.1. At present, General Dynamics' Non Current Assets Total are projected to increase significantly based on the last few years of reporting. The current year's Non Currrent Assets Other is expected to grow to about 3.2 B, whereas Return On Tangible Assets are forecasted to decline to 0.1.Similar Executives
| Showing other executives | PRESIDENT Age | ||
| Ivan Fong | 3M Company | 58 | |
| Kristen Ludgate | 3M Company | 57 | |
| Jason Bingham | Trane Technologies plc | N/A | |
| Kevin McHenry | Transdigm Group Incorporated | N/A | |
| John Mollard | Lockheed Martin | 66 | |
| Diana Perreiah | Howmet Aerospace | 59 | |
| Ann Addison | Northrop Grumman | 62 | |
| Michael Hardesty | Northrop Grumman | 54 | |
| Robert Malone | Parker Hannifin | 57 | |
| David Ruiz | United Parcel Service | N/A | |
| Michelle Turner | L3Harris Technologies | 50 | |
| Joseph Leonti | Parker Hannifin | 52 | |
| George Brooks | United Parcel Service | 63 | |
| Michael Vale | 3M Company | 58 | |
| Richard Ambrose | Lockheed Martin | 61 | |
| Charlene Thomas | United Parcel Service | 53 | |
| Brian Newman | United Parcel Service | 55 | |
| David Keffer | Northrop Grumman | 46 | |
| Kareem Rogers | Automatic Data Processing | 50 | |
| George Willis | United Parcel Service | 54 | |
| Vagner Finelli | Howmet Aerospace | N/A | |
Management Performance
| Return On Equity | 0.18 | ||||
| Return On Asset | 0.0599 |
General Dynamics Leadership Team
Elected by the shareholders, the General Dynamics' board of directors comprises two types of representatives: General Dynamics inside directors who are chosen from within the company, and outside directors, selected externally and held independent of General. The board's role is to monitor General Dynamics' management team and ensure that shareholders' interests are well served. General Dynamics' inside directors are responsible for reviewing and approving budgets prepared by upper management to implement core corporate initiatives and projects. On the other hand, General Dynamics' outside directors are responsible for providing unbiased perspectives on the board's policies.
| Andy Chen, VP Treasurer | ||
| C Nye, Independent Director | ||
| Mark Malcolm, Independent Director | ||
| Robert Smith, Executive Vice President - Marine Systems | ||
| Robert Steel, Independent Director | ||
| Rudy Leon, Independent Director | ||
| Mark Burns, Vice President, President of Gulfstream Aerospace Corporation | ||
| Catherine Reynolds, Independent Director | ||
| Cecil Haney, Independent Director | ||
| M Gilliland, Senior Vice President and President of General Dynamics Information Technology | ||
| Danny Deep, Vice President and President of General Dynamics Land Systems | ||
| Mark Roualet, Executive Vice President - Combat Systems | ||
| James Crown, Lead Independent Director | ||
| Shane Berg, Senior Administration | ||
| Kimberly Kuryea, Senior Vice President - Human Resources and Administration | ||
| Phebe Novakovic, Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer | ||
| Jason Aiken, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer | ||
| Peter Wall, Independent Director | ||
| Christopher Brady, Vice President and Presidentident of General Dynamics Mission Systems | ||
| Robert Helm, Senior Vice President - Planning and Development | ||
| Kevin Graney, Vice President of the Company and President of Electric Boat Corporation | ||
| Jason CPA, Executive Technologies | ||
| Thomas Kirchmaier, Communications Planning | ||
| Gregory Gallopoulos, Senior Vice President, General Counsel, Secretary | ||
| Rudy deleon, Independent Director | ||
| Gary Whited, Vice President and Presidentident - General Dynamics Land Systems | ||
| David Paddock, President Systems | ||
| Christopher Marzilli, Vice President; President of General Dynamics C4 Systems Inc. | ||
| John Stratton, Independent Director | ||
| Howard Rubel, Vice President - Corporation and Vice President of Investor Relations | ||
| Laura Schumacher, Independent Director | ||
| William Moss, Vice President Controller | ||
| Nicole Shelton, Vice Relations | ||
| William Osborn, Independent Director | ||
| Elizabeth Schmid, Senior Communications | ||
| James Mattis, Independent Director | ||
| Marguerite Gilliland, Senior Technology |
General Stock Performance Indicators
The ability to make a profit is the ultimate goal of any investor. But to identify the right stock is not an easy task. Is General Dynamics a good investment? Although profit is still the single most important financial element of any organization, multiple performance indicators can help investors identify the equity that they will appreciate over time.
| Return On Equity | 0.18 | ||||
| Return On Asset | 0.0599 | ||||
| Profit Margin | 0.08 % | ||||
| Operating Margin | 0.10 % | ||||
| Current Valuation | 101.1 B | ||||
| Shares Outstanding | 270.39 M | ||||
| Shares Owned By Insiders | 0.50 % | ||||
| Shares Owned By Institutions | 87.43 % | ||||
| Number Of Shares Shorted | 2.54 M | ||||
| Price To Earning | 20.89 X |
Also Currently Popular
Analyzing currently trending equities could be an opportunity to develop a better portfolio based on different market momentums that they can trigger. Utilizing the top trending stocks is also useful when creating a market-neutral strategy or pair trading technique involving a short or a long position in a currently trending equity.Check out Risk vs Return Analysis to better understand how to build diversified portfolios, which includes a position in General Dynamics. Also, note that the market value of any company could be closely tied with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in unemployment. For information on how to trade General Stock refer to our How to Trade General Stock guide.You can also try the Portfolio Volatility module to check portfolio volatility and analyze historical return density to properly model market risk.
Will Aerospace & Defense sector continue expanding? Could General diversify its offerings? Factors like these will boost the valuation of General Dynamics. Market participants price General higher when confident in its future expansion prospects. Accurate valuation requires analyzing both current fundamentals and future growth trajectories. Every General Dynamics data point contributes insight, yet successful analysis hinges on identifying the most consequential variables.
Quarterly Earnings Growth 0.004 | Dividend Share 6 | Earnings Share 15.2 | Revenue Per Share | Quarterly Revenue Growth 0.078 |
Understanding General Dynamics requires distinguishing between market price and book value, where the latter reflects General's accounting equity. The concept of intrinsic value - what General Dynamics' is actually worth based on fundamentals - guides informed investors toward better entry and exit points. Seasoned market participants apply comprehensive analytical frameworks to derive fundamental worth and identify mispriced opportunities. Market sentiment, economic cycles, and investor behavior can push General Dynamics' price substantially above or below its fundamental value.
Please note, there is a significant difference between General Dynamics' value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if General Dynamics is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. In contrast, General Dynamics' trading price reflects the actual exchange value where willing buyers and sellers reach mutual agreement.