Michael Cons - Premium Brands COO Partnership
| PBH Stock | CAD 79.25 1.09 1.36% |
Insider
Michael Cons is COO Partnership of Premium Brands Holdings
| Phone | 604 656 3100 |
| Web | https://www.premiumbrandsholdings.com |
Premium Brands Management Efficiency
The company has return on total asset (ROA) of 0.0356 % which means that it generated a profit of $0.0356 on every $100 spent on assets. This is way below average. Similarly, it shows a return on equity (ROE) of 0.0563 %, meaning that it generated $0.0563 on every $100 dollars invested by stockholders. Premium Brands' management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well Premium Brands manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities.Similar Executives
| Showing other executives | INSIDER Age | ||
| David CA | North West | N/A | |
| Cole Akerstream | North West | N/A | |
| Suzanne Hathaway | Maple Leaf Foods | N/A | |
| Patrick Stark | Stella Jones | N/A | |
| CA CMA | North West | N/A | |
| Timothy Hockey | Maple Leaf Foods | 55 | |
| Alison Coville | North West | N/A | |
| Stephanie Corrente | Stella Jones | N/A | |
| Thomas Meilleur | North West | N/A | |
| Douglas Muzyka | Stella Jones | 64 | |
| Jonathan Sawatzky | Maple Leaf Foods | N/A | |
| JONATHAN MCCAIN | Maple Leaf Foods | 34 | |
| KATHERINE LEMON | Maple Leaf Foods | 61 | |
| David Diestel | FirstService Corp | 54 | |
| Jeffrey Stout | North West | N/A | |
| Wayne Kusmierczyk | Stella Jones | N/A | |
| Casey Richards | Maple Leaf Foods | N/A | |
| Gunther Birkner | CCL Industries | 51 | |
| Alex Yeo | North West | N/A | |
| Jeff Brandt | Stella Jones | N/A | |
| Jay CM | FirstService Corp | 67 | |
Management Performance
| Return On Equity | 0.0563 | |||
| Return On Asset | 0.0356 |
Premium Brands Holdings Leadership Team
Elected by the shareholders, the Premium Brands' board of directors comprises two types of representatives: Premium Brands inside directors who are chosen from within the company, and outside directors, selected externally and held independent of Premium. The board's role is to monitor Premium Brands' management team and ensure that shareholders' interests are well served. Premium Brands' inside directors are responsible for reviewing and approving budgets prepared by upper management to implement core corporate initiatives and projects. On the other hand, Premium Brands' outside directors are responsible for providing unbiased perspectives on the board's policies.
| John Beliveau, Chief Operating Officer - PB Retail Group | ||
| Dennis Papakostas, Chief Executive Officer of Expresco Foods Inc. | ||
| Hugh McKinnon, Independent Director | ||
| Irv Teper, Chief Executive Officer of Concord Premium Meats Ltd | ||
| Stephen Sposari, President Group | ||
| Michael Cons, COO Partnership | ||
| Johnny Ciampi, Independent Director | ||
| AOE BCom, Gen Sec | ||
| Ronald Kleijn, President Group | ||
| Ronald Cons, CEO Partnership | ||
| George CA, CEO President | ||
| Kenneth Propp, Pres Group | ||
| Wilhelm Huber, CEO Foods | ||
| George Paleologou, President, Chief Executive Officer, Director | ||
| John Zaplatynsky, Independent Director | ||
| Thomas Hernquist, Chief Executive Officer of Oberto Snacks Inc. | ||
| Steve Sposari, Corporate Executive President - SK Food Group Inc | ||
| Kathleen KellerHobson, Independent Director | ||
| Bruce Hodge, Independent Chairman of the Board | ||
| Joseph Mannara, President Concord Premium Meats Ltd. | ||
| William CA, Chief Officer | ||
| Tom Hernquist, Corporate Executive | ||
| Sean Cheah, Independent Director | ||
| David Carriere, President - PB Foodservice Group | ||
| Douglas Goss, General Counsel, Corporate Secretary | ||
| Gordon Sigurdson, Chief Fairbanks | ||
| Will Kalutycz, Chief Financial Officer | ||
| Irving Teper, Chief Ltd | ||
| Kevin Kelly, Chief Foods | ||
| Joe Mannara, President Ltd | ||
| William Kalutycz, Chief Officer |
Premium Stock Performance Indicators
The ability to make a profit is the ultimate goal of any investor. But to identify the right stock is not an easy task. Is Premium Brands a good investment? Although profit is still the single most important financial element of any organization, multiple performance indicators can help investors identify the equity that they will appreciate over time.
| Return On Equity | 0.0563 | |||
| Return On Asset | 0.0356 | |||
| Profit Margin | 0.02 % | |||
| Operating Margin | 0.05 % | |||
| Current Valuation | 6.4 B | |||
| Shares Outstanding | 44.43 M | |||
| Shares Owned By Insiders | 2.12 % | |||
| Shares Owned By Institutions | 45.69 % | |||
| Number Of Shares Shorted | 430.35 K | |||
| Price To Earning | 47.86 X |
Pair Trading with Premium Brands
One of the main advantages of trading using pair correlations is that every trade hedges away some risk. Because there are two separate transactions required, even if Premium Brands position performs unexpectedly, the other equity can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Premium Brands will appreciate offsetting losses from the drop in the long position's value.Moving against Premium Stock
| 0.52 | GOOG | Alphabet CDR | PairCorr |
| 0.38 | AMZN | Amazon CDR | PairCorr |
| 0.38 | COST | Costco Wholesale Corp | PairCorr |
| 0.37 | UNH | UnitedHealth Group CDR | PairCorr |
The ability to find closely correlated positions to Premium Brands could be a great tool in your tax-loss harvesting strategies, allowing investors a quick way to find a similar-enough asset to replace Premium Brands when you sell it. If you don't do this, your portfolio allocation will be skewed against your target asset allocation. So, investors can't just sell and buy back Premium Brands - that would be a violation of the tax code under the "wash sale" rule, and this is why you need to find a similar enough asset and use the proceeds from selling Premium Brands Holdings to buy it.
The correlation of Premium Brands is a statistical measure of how it moves in relation to other instruments. This measure is expressed in what is known as the correlation coefficient, which ranges between -1 and +1. A perfect positive correlation (i.e., a correlation coefficient of +1) implies that as Premium Brands moves, either up or down, the other security will move in the same direction. Alternatively, perfect negative correlation means that if Premium Brands Holdings moves in either direction, the perfectly negatively correlated security will move in the opposite direction. If the correlation is 0, the equities are not correlated; they are entirely random. A correlation greater than 0.8 is generally described as strong, whereas a correlation less than 0.5 is generally considered weak.
Correlation analysis and pair trading evaluation for Premium Brands can also be used as hedging techniques within a particular sector or industry or even over random equities to generate a better risk-adjusted return on your portfolios.Other Information on Investing in Premium Stock
Premium Brands financial ratios help investors to determine whether Premium Stock is cheap or expensive when compared to a particular measure, such as profits or enterprise value. In other words, they help investors to determine the cost of investment in Premium with respect to the benefits of owning Premium Brands security.