Jonathan Doyle - Piper Sandler Insider
| PIPR Stock | USD 348.81 8.10 2.38% |
Insider
Jonathan Doyle is Vice Chairman of the Board and Head of Financial Services Group, Senior Managing Principal of Piper Sandler Companies since 2020.
| Age | 59 |
| Tenure | 4 years |
| Address | 800 Nicollet Mall, Minneapolis, MN, United States, 55402 |
| Phone | 612 303 6000 |
| Web | https://www.pipersandler.com |
Jonathan Doyle Latest Insider Activity
Tracking and analyzing the buying and selling activities of Jonathan Doyle against Piper Sandler stock is an integral part of due diligence when investing in Piper Sandler. Jonathan Doyle insider activity provides valuable insight into whether Piper Sandler is net buyers or sellers over its current business cycle. Note, Piper Sandler insiders must abide by specific rules, including filing SEC forms every time they buy or sell Piper Sandler'sshares to prevent insider trading or benefiting illegally from material non-public information that their positions give them access to.
Jonathan Doyle over two weeks ago Disposition of 1005 shares by Jonathan Doyle of Piper Sandler at 333.14 subject to Rule 16b-3 | ||
Jonathan Doyle over three months ago Disposition of 1100 shares by Jonathan Doyle of Piper Sandler at 238.65 subject to Rule 16b-3 |
Piper Sandler Management Efficiency
The company has return on total asset (ROA) of 0.0848 % which means that it generated a profit of $0.0848 on every $100 spent on assets. This is way below average. Similarly, it shows a return on stockholder's equity (ROE) of 0.1314 %, meaning that it created $0.1314 on every $100 dollars invested by stockholders. Piper Sandler's management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well Piper Sandler manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities. As of 11/25/2024, Return On Tangible Assets is likely to grow to 0.05. Also, Return On Capital Employed is likely to grow to 0.15. At this time, Piper Sandler's Non Current Assets Total are relatively stable compared to the past year. As of 11/25/2024, Return On Tangible Assets is likely to grow to 0.05, while Other Assets are likely to drop slightly above 552.3 M.Similar Executives
| Showing other executives | INSIDER Age | ||
| Michael Boone | Houlihan Lokey | N/A | |
| Arik Rashkes | Houlihan Lokey | N/A | |
| Juan Cozar | Evercore Partners | N/A | |
| Walid Khiari | Houlihan Lokey | N/A | |
| Bradford Raymond | Stifel Financial | 58 | |
| Gillian Zucker | Houlihan Lokey | 51 | |
| Paul Haigney | Lazard | N/A | |
| James Sutch | Houlihan Lokey | N/A | |
| Christian Lunny | Houlihan Lokey | N/A | |
| Jason Abt | Houlihan Lokey | N/A | |
| Melissa Mariaschin | Moelis Co | N/A | |
| Kristen Youngren | Evercore Partners | N/A | |
| Adam Schlesinger | PJT Partners | N/A | |
| Eric Johnson | Donnelley Financial Solutions | 56 | |
| Samuel CFA | Scully Royalty | 39 | |
| David Travin | PJT Partners | 48 | |
| Ferdinand Steinbauer | Scully Royalty | 67 | |
| Andreas Dombret | Houlihan Lokey | 60 | |
| Jonathan Guskind | Houlihan Lokey | N/A | |
| Sharon Pearson | PJT Partners | N/A | |
| Robert Steel | Perella Weinberg Partners | 73 | |
Management Performance
| Return On Equity | 0.13 | ||||
| Return On Asset | 0.0848 |
Piper Sandler Companies Leadership Team
Elected by the shareholders, the Piper Sandler's board of directors comprises two types of representatives: Piper Sandler inside directors who are chosen from within the company, and outside directors, selected externally and held independent of Piper. The board's role is to monitor Piper Sandler's management team and ensure that shareholders' interests are well served. Piper Sandler's inside directors are responsible for reviewing and approving budgets prepared by upper management to implement core corporate initiatives and projects. On the other hand, Piper Sandler's outside directors are responsible for providing unbiased perspectives on the board's policies.
| Sherry Smith, Independent Director | ||
| Robbin Mitchell, Director | ||
| Kate Clune, Chief Officer | ||
| Philip Soran, Lead Independent Director | ||
| Jonathan Heroux, Managing Group | ||
| Robert Rinek, Managing Group | ||
| Jonathan Doyle, Vice Chairman of the Board and Head of Financial Services Group, Senior Managing Principal | ||
| Jon Salveson, Vice Banking | ||
| Brian Sterling, Director | ||
| Chad Abraham, Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer, Director | ||
| Michael Dillahunt, Global Co-Head of Investment Banking and Capital Markets | ||
| Janica Lane, Co - Head of Consumer Investment Banking | ||
| Michael CFA, Chief Strategies | ||
| Victoria Holt, Independent Director | ||
| Dale Lehman, Managing Banking | ||
| John Geelan, General Counsel, Secretary | ||
| Todd Goffoy, Managing Government | ||
| Debbra Schoneman, President Director | ||
| James Baker, Global Co-Head of Investment Banking and Capital Markets | ||
| Scott Taylor, Independent Director | ||
| Dennis Mitchell, Managing Banking | ||
| Keith Morgan, MD Group | ||
| Timothy Carter, Chief Financial Officer | ||
| R LaRue, Vice Chairman of Investment Banking | ||
| Bradley Wirt, Managing Living | ||
| William Fitzgerald, Independent Director | ||
| Shawn Quant, MD Officer | ||
| William Henderson, Managing Banking | ||
| Addison Piper, Independent Director | ||
| Thomas Schreier, Independent Director | ||
| Christine Esckilsen, Chief MD | ||
| Thomas JD, Vice Group | ||
| Jace Kowalzyk, Managing Director - IT, Networking | ||
| Katherine Clune, Chief Officer |
Piper Stock Performance Indicators
The ability to make a profit is the ultimate goal of any investor. But to identify the right stock is not an easy task. Is Piper Sandler a good investment? Although profit is still the single most important financial element of any organization, multiple performance indicators can help investors identify the equity that they will appreciate over time.
| Return On Equity | 0.13 | ||||
| Return On Asset | 0.0848 | ||||
| Profit Margin | 0.11 % | ||||
| Operating Margin | 0.16 % | ||||
| Current Valuation | 4.98 B | ||||
| Shares Outstanding | 15.86 M | ||||
| Shares Owned By Insiders | 2.38 % | ||||
| Shares Owned By Institutions | 80.96 % | ||||
| Number Of Shares Shorted | 250.72 K | ||||
| Price To Earning | 11.74 X |
Pair Trading with Piper Sandler
One of the main advantages of trading using pair correlations is that every trade hedges away some risk. Because there are two separate transactions required, even if Piper Sandler position performs unexpectedly, the other equity can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Piper Sandler will appreciate offsetting losses from the drop in the long position's value.Moving together with Piper Stock
| 0.83 | V | Visa Class A | PairCorr |
| 0.85 | DHIL | Diamond Hill Investment | PairCorr |
| 0.89 | DIST | Distoken Acquisition | PairCorr |
| 0.72 | AB | AllianceBernstein | PairCorr |
| 0.74 | AC | Associated Capital | PairCorr |
Moving against Piper Stock
| 0.72 | XP | Xp Inc | PairCorr |
| 0.7 | WU | Western Union | PairCorr |
| 0.62 | PT | Pintec Technology | PairCorr |
| 0.39 | RM | Regional Management Corp | PairCorr |
The ability to find closely correlated positions to Piper Sandler could be a great tool in your tax-loss harvesting strategies, allowing investors a quick way to find a similar-enough asset to replace Piper Sandler when you sell it. If you don't do this, your portfolio allocation will be skewed against your target asset allocation. So, investors can't just sell and buy back Piper Sandler - that would be a violation of the tax code under the "wash sale" rule, and this is why you need to find a similar enough asset and use the proceeds from selling Piper Sandler Companies to buy it.
The correlation of Piper Sandler is a statistical measure of how it moves in relation to other instruments. This measure is expressed in what is known as the correlation coefficient, which ranges between -1 and +1. A perfect positive correlation (i.e., a correlation coefficient of +1) implies that as Piper Sandler moves, either up or down, the other security will move in the same direction. Alternatively, perfect negative correlation means that if Piper Sandler Companies moves in either direction, the perfectly negatively correlated security will move in the opposite direction. If the correlation is 0, the equities are not correlated; they are entirely random. A correlation greater than 0.8 is generally described as strong, whereas a correlation less than 0.5 is generally considered weak.
Correlation analysis and pair trading evaluation for Piper Sandler can also be used as hedging techniques within a particular sector or industry or even over random equities to generate a better risk-adjusted return on your portfolios.Additional Tools for Piper Stock Analysis
When running Piper Sandler's price analysis, check to measure Piper Sandler's market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Piper Sandler is operating at the current time. Most of Piper Sandler's value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Piper Sandler's future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Piper Sandler's price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Piper Sandler to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.