Rajiv Kumar - Priority Technology Senior Officer
| PRTH Stock | USD 8.02 0.33 3.95% |
Executive
Rajiv Kumar is Senior Officer of Priority Technology Holdings
| Address | 2001 Westside Parkway, Alpharetta, GA, United States, 30004 |
| Phone | 404 952 2107 |
| Web | https://www.prth.com |
Latest Insider Transactions
Rajiv Kumar Latest Insider Activity
Tracking and analyzing the buying and selling activities of Rajiv Kumar against Priority Technology stock is an integral part of due diligence when investing in Priority Technology. Rajiv Kumar insider activity provides valuable insight into whether Priority Technology is net buyers or sellers over its current business cycle. Note, Priority Technology insiders must abide by specific rules, including filing SEC forms every time they buy or sell Priority Technology'sshares to prevent insider trading or benefiting illegally from material non-public information that their positions give them access to.
Rajiv Kumar over two months ago Disposition of 10000 shares by Rajiv Kumar of Priority Technology at 6.13 subject to Rule 16b-3 |
Priority Technology Management Efficiency
The company has return on total asset (ROA) of 0.0474 % which means that it generated a profit of $0.0474 on every $100 spent on assets. This is way below average. Similarly, it shows a return on stockholder's equity (ROE) of 0.5639 %, meaning that it created $0.5639 on every $100 dollars invested by stockholders. Priority Technology's management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well Priority Technology manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities. The Priority Technology's current Return On Capital Employed is estimated to increase to 0.11, while Return On Tangible Assets are forecasted to increase to (0). As of now, Priority Technology's Other Assets are increasing as compared to previous years. The Priority Technology's current Other Current Assets is estimated to increase to about 820.8 M, while Non Current Assets Total are projected to decrease to under 412.5 M.Similar Executives
| Showing other executives | EXECUTIVE Age | ||
| Alberto Gaffney | Evertec | 52 | |
| Lori Szwanek | CSG Systems International | 58 | |
| Thomas Raimondi | NetScout Systems | 66 | |
| Anthony Piazza | NetScout Systems | N/A | |
| Lara Mataac | OneSpan | N/A | |
| Sameer Hajarnis | OneSpan | N/A | |
| David Schaaf | CSG Systems International | 54 | |
| Joe Strathmann | Secureworks Corp | N/A | |
| Naomi Barnett | Repay Holdings Corp | 33 | |
| Guy CPA | Radware | 62 | |
| Alan Keschner | Lesaka Technologies | 64 | |
| Joseph PE | OneSpan | N/A | |
| Stacy Leidwinger | Secureworks Corp | N/A | |
| Gabi Malka | Radware | 48 | |
| Keith Kourie | Lesaka Technologies | N/A | |
| Kay Sharpton | Evertec | N/A | |
| Elizabeth Bauer | CSG Systems International | 60 | |
| Erik Skinner | Repay Holdings Corp | N/A | |
| Paul Barrett | NetScout Systems | N/A | |
| Kevin Toomey | Secureworks Corp | N/A | |
| Claudio Prado | Evertec | 60 | |
Management Performance
| Return On Equity | 0.56 | ||||
| Return On Asset | 0.0474 |
Priority Technology Leadership Team
Elected by the shareholders, the Priority Technology's board of directors comprises two types of representatives: Priority Technology inside directors who are chosen from within the company, and outside directors, selected externally and held independent of Priority. The board's role is to monitor Priority Technology's management team and ensure that shareholders' interests are well served. Priority Technology's inside directors are responsible for reviewing and approving budgets prepared by upper management to implement core corporate initiatives and projects. On the other hand, Priority Technology's outside directors are responsible for providing unbiased perspectives on the board's policies.
| Bradley Miller, Chief Counsel | ||
| Rajiv Kumar, Senior Officer | ||
| La Hagan, Assistant Resources | ||
| Thomas Priore, President Chairman | ||
| David Faupel, Chief Officer | ||
| Yi Sun, Chief Officer | ||
| Mayrov Eagan, Senior Resources | ||
| Anthony Bonventre, Executive Operations | ||
| Pamela Tefft, Senior Finance | ||
| Timothy OLeary, Chief Officer | ||
| Ranjana Ram, Chief Officer | ||
| Bradley JD, Chief Counsel | ||
| Ranjana CFA, Chief Officer | ||
| Tim OLeary, Chief Officer | ||
| Sean Kiewiet, Chief Officer |
Priority Stock Performance Indicators
The ability to make a profit is the ultimate goal of any investor. But to identify the right stock is not an easy task. Is Priority Technology a good investment? Although profit is still the single most important financial element of any organization, multiple performance indicators can help investors identify the equity that they will appreciate over time.
| Return On Equity | 0.56 | ||||
| Return On Asset | 0.0474 | ||||
| Profit Margin | 0.02 % | ||||
| Operating Margin | 0.17 % | ||||
| Current Valuation | 1.5 B | ||||
| Shares Outstanding | 77.17 M | ||||
| Shares Owned By Insiders | 75.50 % | ||||
| Shares Owned By Institutions | 12.83 % | ||||
| Number Of Shares Shorted | 110.8 K | ||||
| Price To Earning | 14.24 X |
Currently Active Assets on Macroaxis
When determining whether Priority Technology offers a strong return on investment in its stock, a comprehensive analysis is essential. The process typically begins with a thorough review of Priority Technology's financial statements, including income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements, to assess its financial health. Key financial ratios are used to gauge profitability, efficiency, and growth potential of Priority Technology Holdings Stock. Outlined below are crucial reports that will aid in making a well-informed decision on Priority Technology Holdings Stock:Check out Your Equity Center to better understand how to build diversified portfolios, which includes a position in Priority Technology Holdings. Also, note that the market value of any company could be closely tied with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in estimate. You can also try the Headlines Timeline module to stay connected to all market stories and filter out noise. Drill down to analyze hype elasticity.
Is Transaction & Payment Processing Services space expected to grow? Or is there an opportunity to expand the business' product line in the future? Factors like these will boost the valuation of Priority Technology. If investors know Priority will grow in the future, the company's valuation will be higher. The financial industry is built on trying to define current growth potential and future valuation accurately. All the valuation information about Priority Technology listed above have to be considered, but the key to understanding future value is determining which factors weigh more heavily than others.
Earnings Share (0.42) | Revenue Per Share 10.913 | Quarterly Revenue Growth 0.201 | Return On Assets 0.0474 | Return On Equity 0.5639 |
The market value of Priority Technology is measured differently than its book value, which is the value of Priority that is recorded on the company's balance sheet. Investors also form their own opinion of Priority Technology's value that differs from its market value or its book value, called intrinsic value, which is Priority Technology's true underlying value. Investors use various methods to calculate intrinsic value and buy a stock when its market value falls below its intrinsic value. Because Priority Technology's market value can be influenced by many factors that don't directly affect Priority Technology's underlying business (such as a pandemic or basic market pessimism), market value can vary widely from intrinsic value.
Please note, there is a significant difference between Priority Technology's value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if Priority Technology is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, Priority Technology's price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.