Ali Hedayat - Restaurant Brands Independent Director
| QSR Stock | USD 69.84 0.06 0.09% |
Director
Mr. Ali Hedayat is an Independent Director of the Company. Mr. Hedayat has served on our Board since July 2016. Mr. Hedayat is the founder and was Managing Director of Maryana Capital, a financial firm in Toronto, Canada, since March 2015. He previously cofounded Edoma Capital in London, a capital fund, where he worked from 2010 until December 2012, and was a partner at Indus Capital, a capital fund in London, from May 2013 until March 2015. Mr. Hedayat held progressively more senior roles at the Goldman Sachs Group from 1997 to 2010, including from 2005 to 2007 as Managing Director of the European Principal Strategies group and from 2007 to 2010 as Managing Director and Cohead of the Americas Principal Strategies group. Mr. Hedayat served on the board of U.S. Geothermal Inc., a leading renewable energy company, from February 2017 until its sale to Ormat Technologies Inc. in April 2018 and currently serves on the board of Crius Energy, an independent energy retailer in the United States. since 2016.
| Age | 45 |
| Tenure | 8 years |
| Address | 130 King Street West, Toronto, ON, Canada, M5X 1E1 |
| Phone | 905 339 6011 |
| Web | https://www.rbi.com |
Latest Insider Transactions
Restaurant Brands Management Efficiency
The company has Return on Asset of 0.0586 % which means that on every $100 spent on assets, it made $0.0586 of profit. This is way below average. In the same way, it shows a return on shareholders' equity (ROE) of 0.3731 %, implying that it generated $0.3731 on every 100 dollars invested. Restaurant Brands' management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well Restaurant Brands manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities. As of 11/22/2024, Return On Tangible Assets is likely to drop to 0.10. In addition to that, Return On Capital Employed is likely to drop to 0.07. At this time, Restaurant Brands' Other Assets are relatively stable compared to the past year. As of 11/22/2024, Non Currrent Assets Other is likely to grow to about 1.3 B, while Total Assets are likely to drop slightly above 13.8 B.Similar Executives
| Showing other executives | DIRECTOR Age | ||
| Christina Tan | Dorian LPG | 67 | |
| Kathy Warden | Merck Company | 49 | |
| Philisiwe Sibiya | Gold Fields Ltd | 43 | |
| Raymond Syufy | Cinemark Holdings | 57 | |
| Robin Hickenlooper | Chipotle Mexican Grill | 42 | |
| Peter Wendell | Merck Company | 70 | |
| Malcolm McAvity | Dorian LPG | 69 | |
| Nina Vaca | Cinemark Holdings | 49 | |
| Leslie Brun | Merck Company | 68 | |
| Steven Rosenberg | Cinemark Holdings | 62 | |
| Peter Bacchus | Gold Fields Ltd | 51 | |
| Mary Coe | Merck Company | 54 | |
| Ali Namvar | Chipotle Mexican Grill | 50 | |
| Pamela Craig | Merck Company | 64 | |
| Oivind Lorentzen | Dorian LPG | 70 | |
| Enrique Hernandez | Cinemark Holdings | 76 | |
| Neil Flanzraich | Chipotle Mexican Grill | 76 | |
| Scott Maw | Chipotle Mexican Grill | 54 | |
| Paul Rothman | Merck Company | 63 | |
| Carlos Sepulveda | Cinemark Holdings | 63 | |
| Albert Baldocchi | Chipotle Mexican Grill | 67 | |
Management Performance
| Return On Equity | 0.37 | ||||
| Return On Asset | 0.0586 |
Restaurant Brands Leadership Team
Elected by the shareholders, the Restaurant Brands' board of directors comprises two types of representatives: Restaurant Brands inside directors who are chosen from within the company, and outside directors, selected externally and held independent of Restaurant. The board's role is to monitor Restaurant Brands' management team and ensure that shareholders' interests are well served. Restaurant Brands' inside directors are responsible for reviewing and approving budgets prepared by upper management to implement core corporate initiatives and projects. On the other hand, Restaurant Brands' outside directors are responsible for providing unbiased perspectives on the board's policies.
| Alexandre Behring, Executive Chairman, Chairman of Compensation Committee and Chairman of Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee | ||
| Matthew Dunnigan, Chief Financial Officer | ||
| Axel Schwan, President - Tim Hortons Americas | ||
| Thecla Sweeney, Independent Director | ||
| Daniel Schwartz, Executive Chairman of the Board, Co-Chairman | ||
| Joshua Kobza, Chief Operating Officer | ||
| Thomas Curtis, President Canada | ||
| Sami Siddiqui, President - Popeyes Americas | ||
| Jacqueline Friesner, Principal Accounting Officer, Controller | ||
| Christopher Finazzo, President - Burger King Americas | ||
| Fernando Machado, Chief Marketing Officer | ||
| Jeff Housman, Chief Officer | ||
| Golnar Khosrowshahi, Independent Director | ||
| Roberto Motta, Independent Director | ||
| Patrick Doyle, Executive Chairman | ||
| Marc Lemann, Independent Director | ||
| Carlos Sicupira, Independent Director | ||
| Jill Granat, General Counsel, Corporate Secretary | ||
| David Shear, President - International | ||
| Duncan Fulton, Chief Corporate Officer | ||
| Felipe Athayde, President - Popeyes Americas | ||
| Maximilien Stirum, Independent Director | ||
| Jason Melbourne, Independent Director | ||
| Paul Fribourg, Lead Independent Director | ||
| Stephen Lichtner, Director Relations | ||
| Neil Golden, Independent Director | ||
| Jose Cil, President of Burger King(R) Brand | ||
| Kendall Peck, Head Relations | ||
| Ali Hedayat, Independent Director | ||
| Chris Brigleb, Head IR | ||
| Joao CastroNeves, Independent Director | ||
| Giovanni Prato, Independent Director |
Restaurant Stock Performance Indicators
The ability to make a profit is the ultimate goal of any investor. But to identify the right stock is not an easy task. Is Restaurant Brands a good investment? Although profit is still the single most important financial element of any organization, multiple performance indicators can help investors identify the equity that they will appreciate over time.
| Return On Equity | 0.37 | ||||
| Return On Asset | 0.0586 | ||||
| Profit Margin | 0.16 % | ||||
| Operating Margin | 0.27 % | ||||
| Current Valuation | 37.41 B | ||||
| Shares Outstanding | 323.71 M | ||||
| Shares Owned By Insiders | 1.23 % | ||||
| Shares Owned By Institutions | 88.25 % | ||||
| Number Of Shares Shorted | 5.38 M | ||||
| Price To Earning | 39.12 X |
Pair Trading with Restaurant Brands
One of the main advantages of trading using pair correlations is that every trade hedges away some risk. Because there are two separate transactions required, even if Restaurant Brands position performs unexpectedly, the other equity can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Restaurant Brands will appreciate offsetting losses from the drop in the long position's value.Moving against Restaurant Stock
The ability to find closely correlated positions to Restaurant Brands could be a great tool in your tax-loss harvesting strategies, allowing investors a quick way to find a similar-enough asset to replace Restaurant Brands when you sell it. If you don't do this, your portfolio allocation will be skewed against your target asset allocation. So, investors can't just sell and buy back Restaurant Brands - that would be a violation of the tax code under the "wash sale" rule, and this is why you need to find a similar enough asset and use the proceeds from selling Restaurant Brands International to buy it.
The correlation of Restaurant Brands is a statistical measure of how it moves in relation to other instruments. This measure is expressed in what is known as the correlation coefficient, which ranges between -1 and +1. A perfect positive correlation (i.e., a correlation coefficient of +1) implies that as Restaurant Brands moves, either up or down, the other security will move in the same direction. Alternatively, perfect negative correlation means that if Restaurant Brands moves in either direction, the perfectly negatively correlated security will move in the opposite direction. If the correlation is 0, the equities are not correlated; they are entirely random. A correlation greater than 0.8 is generally described as strong, whereas a correlation less than 0.5 is generally considered weak.
Correlation analysis and pair trading evaluation for Restaurant Brands can also be used as hedging techniques within a particular sector or industry or even over random equities to generate a better risk-adjusted return on your portfolios.Additional Tools for Restaurant Stock Analysis
When running Restaurant Brands' price analysis, check to measure Restaurant Brands' market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Restaurant Brands is operating at the current time. Most of Restaurant Brands' value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Restaurant Brands' future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Restaurant Brands' price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Restaurant Brands to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.