Restaurant Brands International Stock Current Valuation
| QSR Stock | USD 69.81 0.71 1.03% |
Valuation analysis of Restaurant Brands helps investors to measure Restaurant Brands' intrinsic value by examining its available valuation indicators, including the cash flow records, the balance sheet account changes and income statement patterns. As of 11/26/2024, Enterprise Value Over EBITDA is likely to grow to 18.12. Also, Enterprise Value Multiple is likely to grow to 18.12. Fundamental drivers impacting Restaurant Brands' valuation include:
Price Book 6.9123 | Enterprise Value 37.2 B | Enterprise Value Ebitda 15.0671 | Price Sales 3.9307 | Forward PE 13.2275 |
Undervalued
Today
Please note that Restaurant Brands' price fluctuation is very steady at this time. Calculation of the real value of Restaurant Brands is based on 3 months time horizon. Increasing Restaurant Brands' time horizon generally increases the accuracy of value calculation and significantly improves the predictive power of the methodology used.
The fair value of the Restaurant stock is determined by what a typical buyer is willing to pay for full or partial control of Restaurant Brands International. Since Restaurant Brands is currently traded on the exchange, buyers and sellers on that exchange determine the market value of Restaurant Stock. However, Restaurant Brands' intrinsic value may or may not be the same as its current market price, in which case there is an opportunity to profit from the mispricing, assuming the market price will eventually merge with its intrinsic value. | Historical | Market 69.81 | Real 74.73 | Target 79.68 | Hype 69.83 | Naive 71.02 |
The intrinsic value of Restaurant Brands' stock can be calculated using various methods such as discounted cash flow analysis, price-to-earnings ratio, or price-to-book ratio. That value may differ from its current market price, which is determined by supply and demand factors such as investor sentiment, market trends, news, and other external factors that may influence Restaurant Brands' stock price. It is important to note that the real value of any stock may change over time based on changes in the company's performance.
Estimating the potential upside or downside of Restaurant Brands International helps investors to forecast how Restaurant stock's addition to their portfolios will impact the overall performance. We also use other valuation drivers to help us estimate the true value of Restaurant Brands more accurately as focusing exclusively on Restaurant Brands' fundamentals will not take into account other important factors: Restaurant Brands International Company Current Valuation Analysis
Restaurant Brands' Enterprise Value is a firm valuation proxy that approximates the current market value of a company. It is typically used to determine the takeover or merger price of a firm. Unlike Market Cap, this measure takes into account the entire liquid asset, outstanding debt, and exotic equity instruments that the company has on its balance sheet. When a takeover occurs, the parent company will have to assume the target company's liabilities but will take possession of all cash and cash equivalents.
Current Restaurant Brands Current Valuation | 37.22 B |
Most of Restaurant Brands' fundamental indicators, such as Current Valuation, are part of a valuation analysis module that helps investors searching for stocks that are currently trading at higher or lower prices than their real value. If the real value is higher than the market price, Restaurant Brands International is considered to be undervalued, and we provide a buy recommendation. Otherwise, we render a sell signal.
Restaurant Current Valuation Driver Correlations
Understanding the fundamental principles of building solid financial models for Restaurant Brands is extremely important. It helps to project a fair market value of Restaurant Stock properly, considering its historical fundamentals such as Current Valuation. Since Restaurant Brands' main accounts across its financial reports are all linked and dependent on each other, it is essential to analyze all possible correlations between related accounts. However, instead of reviewing all of Restaurant Brands' historical financial statements, investors can examine the correlated drivers to determine its overall health. This can be effectively done using a conventional correlation matrix of Restaurant Brands' interrelated accounts and indicators.
Click cells to compare fundamentals
Enterprise Value can be a useful tool to compare companies with different capital structures. Long term liability and current cash or cash equivalents can have a huge impact on market valuation of a given company.
| Competition |
In accordance with the recently published financial statements, Restaurant Brands International has a Current Valuation of 37.22 B. This is 105.61% higher than that of the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure sector and 269.1% higher than that of the Consumer Discretionary industry. The current valuation for all United States stocks is 123.86% lower than that of the firm.
Restaurant Current Valuation Peer Comparison
Stock peer comparison is one of the most widely used and accepted methods of equity analyses. It analyses Restaurant Brands' direct or indirect competition against its Current Valuation to detect undervalued stocks with similar characteristics or determine the stocks which would be a good addition to a portfolio. Peer analysis of Restaurant Brands could also be used in its relative valuation, which is a method of valuing Restaurant Brands by comparing valuation metrics of similar companies.Restaurant Brands is currently under evaluation in current valuation category among its peers.
Restaurant Brands ESG Sustainability
Some studies have found that companies with high sustainability scores are getting higher valuations than competitors with lower social-engagement activities. While most ESG disclosures are voluntary and do not directly affect the long term financial condition, Restaurant Brands' sustainability indicators can be used to identify proper investment strategies using environmental, social, and governance scores that are crucial to Restaurant Brands' managers, analysts, and investors.Environmental | Governance | Social |
Restaurant Fundamentals
| Return On Equity | 0.37 | ||||
| Return On Asset | 0.0586 | ||||
| Profit Margin | 0.16 % | ||||
| Operating Margin | 0.27 % | ||||
| Current Valuation | 37.22 B | ||||
| Shares Outstanding | 323.71 M | ||||
| Shares Owned By Insiders | 1.23 % | ||||
| Shares Owned By Institutions | 88.27 % | ||||
| Number Of Shares Shorted | 5.38 M | ||||
| Price To Earning | 39.12 X | ||||
| Price To Book | 6.91 X | ||||
| Price To Sales | 3.93 X | ||||
| Revenue | 7.02 B | ||||
| Gross Profit | 2.6 B | ||||
| EBITDA | 2.45 B | ||||
| Net Income | 1.21 B | ||||
| Cash And Equivalents | 1.18 B | ||||
| Cash Per Share | 2.74 X | ||||
| Total Debt | 14.52 B | ||||
| Debt To Equity | 3.71 % | ||||
| Current Ratio | 0.89 X | ||||
| Book Value Per Share | 10.00 X | ||||
| Cash Flow From Operations | 1.32 B | ||||
| Short Ratio | 4.38 X | ||||
| Earnings Per Share | 3.99 X | ||||
| Price To Earnings To Growth | 1.79 X | ||||
| Target Price | 81.77 | ||||
| Number Of Employees | 9 K | ||||
| Beta | 0.96 | ||||
| Market Capitalization | 31.17 B | ||||
| Total Asset | 23.39 B | ||||
| Retained Earnings | 1.6 B | ||||
| Working Capital | 29 M | ||||
| Current Asset | 1.37 B | ||||
| Current Liabilities | 1.12 B | ||||
| Annual Yield | 0.03 % | ||||
| Five Year Return | 3.08 % | ||||
| Net Asset | 23.39 B | ||||
| Last Dividend Paid | 2.29 |
About Restaurant Brands Fundamental Analysis
The Macroaxis Fundamental Analysis modules help investors analyze Restaurant Brands International's financials across various querterly and yearly statements, indicators and fundamental ratios. We help investors to determine the real value of Restaurant Brands using virtually all public information available. We use both quantitative as well as qualitative analysis to arrive at the intrinsic value of Restaurant Brands International based on its fundamental data. In general, a quantitative approach, as applied to this company, focuses on analyzing financial statements comparatively, whereas a qaualitative method uses data that is important to a company's growth but cannot be measured and presented in a numerical way.
Please read more on our fundamental analysis page.
Pair Trading with Restaurant Brands
One of the main advantages of trading using pair correlations is that every trade hedges away some risk. Because there are two separate transactions required, even if Restaurant Brands position performs unexpectedly, the other equity can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Restaurant Brands will appreciate offsetting losses from the drop in the long position's value.Moving against Restaurant Stock
The ability to find closely correlated positions to Restaurant Brands could be a great tool in your tax-loss harvesting strategies, allowing investors a quick way to find a similar-enough asset to replace Restaurant Brands when you sell it. If you don't do this, your portfolio allocation will be skewed against your target asset allocation. So, investors can't just sell and buy back Restaurant Brands - that would be a violation of the tax code under the "wash sale" rule, and this is why you need to find a similar enough asset and use the proceeds from selling Restaurant Brands International to buy it.
The correlation of Restaurant Brands is a statistical measure of how it moves in relation to other instruments. This measure is expressed in what is known as the correlation coefficient, which ranges between -1 and +1. A perfect positive correlation (i.e., a correlation coefficient of +1) implies that as Restaurant Brands moves, either up or down, the other security will move in the same direction. Alternatively, perfect negative correlation means that if Restaurant Brands moves in either direction, the perfectly negatively correlated security will move in the opposite direction. If the correlation is 0, the equities are not correlated; they are entirely random. A correlation greater than 0.8 is generally described as strong, whereas a correlation less than 0.5 is generally considered weak.
Correlation analysis and pair trading evaluation for Restaurant Brands can also be used as hedging techniques within a particular sector or industry or even over random equities to generate a better risk-adjusted return on your portfolios.Additional Tools for Restaurant Stock Analysis
When running Restaurant Brands' price analysis, check to measure Restaurant Brands' market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Restaurant Brands is operating at the current time. Most of Restaurant Brands' value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Restaurant Brands' future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Restaurant Brands' price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Restaurant Brands to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.