Scott Miller - Snap Independent Director
| SNAP Stock | USD 10.85 0.40 3.56% |
Director
Mr. Scott Dennis Miller is an Independent Director of the Company. Mr. Miller has served on our board of directors since October 2016. Mr. Miller is a founder and Chief Executive Officer of G100 Companies, which operates G100 Network and SSA Company. Before joining G100 Companies in March 2004, Mr. Miller was employed at Hyatt Hotels Corporationrationration, a global hospitality company, where he served as nonexecutive vice chairman from August 2003 to December 2004, president from January 1999 to August 2003, and executive vice president from September 1997 to July 2003. Mr. Miller currently serves on the board of directors of QTS Realty Trust, Inc. and served on the boards of Affinion Group, Inc. from 2011 to 2013, AXA Equitable Life Insurance Company from 2002 to 2012, Orbitz Worldwide, Inc. from 2003 to 2004, and NAVTEQ corporation from 2002 to 2006. He also serves on several private company boards since 2016.
| Age | 68 |
| Tenure | 9 years |
| Professional Marks | MBA |
| Address | 3000 31st Street, Santa Monica, CA, United States, 90405 |
| Phone | 310 399 3339 |
| Web | https://www.snap.com |
Scott Miller Latest Insider Activity
Tracking and analyzing the buying and selling activities of Scott Miller against Snap stock is an integral part of due diligence when investing in Snap. Scott Miller insider activity provides valuable insight into whether Snap is net buyers or sellers over its current business cycle. Note, Snap insiders must abide by specific rules, including filing SEC forms every time they buy or sell Snap'sshares to prevent insider trading or benefiting illegally from material non-public information that their positions give them access to.
Scott Miller over six months ago Disposition of 6705 shares by Scott Miller of Kirby at 84.9 subject to Rule 16b-3 |
Snap Management Efficiency
The company has return on total asset (ROA) of (0.0564) % which means that it has lost $0.0564 on every $100 spent on assets. This is way below average. Similarly, it shows a return on stockholder's equity (ROE) of (0.2869) %, meaning that it created substantial loss on money invested by shareholders. Snap's management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well Snap manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities. As of 02/16/2025, Return On Tangible Assets is likely to drop to -0.12. In addition to that, Return On Capital Employed is likely to drop to -0.12. As of 02/16/2025, Change To Liabilities is likely to grow to about 149.3 M, while Total Current Liabilities is likely to drop slightly above 743.5 M.Similar Executives
| Showing other executives | DIRECTOR Age | ||
| Heidi ONeill | Spotify Technology SA | 56 | |
| Barry McCarthy | Spotify Technology SA | 67 | |
| Byron Deeter | Twilio Inc | 45 | |
| Jeff Epstein | Twilio Inc | 63 | |
| Lawrence II | Alphabet Inc Class C | 52 | |
| Christopher Marshall | Spotify Technology SA | 52 | |
| Cristina Stenbeck | Spotify Technology SA | 43 | |
| Richard Dalzell | Twilio Inc | 63 | |
| Thomas Staggs | Spotify Technology SA | 60 | |
| Martin Lorentzon | Spotify Technology SA | 52 | |
| Jeremy Levine | 46 | ||
| Theodore Sarandos | Spotify Technology SA | 56 | |
| Deval Patrick | Twilio Inc | 63 | |
| Leslie Kilgore | 54 | ||
| Mona Sutphen | Spotify Technology SA | 54 | |
| Shishir Mehrotra | Spotify Technology SA | 41 | |
| Erika Rottenberg | Twilio Inc | 57 | |
| Padmasree Warrior | Spotify Technology SA | 60 | |
| Donna Dubinsky | Twilio Inc | 64 | |
| Evan Sharp | 41 | ||
| Jeffrey Jordan | 61 | ||
Management Performance
| Return On Equity | -0.29 | ||||
| Return On Asset | -0.0564 |
Snap Inc Leadership Team
Elected by the shareholders, the Snap's board of directors comprises two types of representatives: Snap inside directors who are chosen from within the company, and outside directors, selected externally and held independent of Snap. The board's role is to monitor Snap's management team and ensure that shareholders' interests are well served. Snap's inside directors are responsible for reviewing and approving budgets prepared by upper management to implement core corporate initiatives and projects. On the other hand, Snap's outside directors are responsible for providing unbiased perspectives on the board's policies.
| Eitan Pilipski, Senior Platform | ||
| Joanna Coles, Independent Director | ||
| Kenneth Mitchell, Chief Officer | ||
| Robert Murphy, Co-Founder, Chief Technology Officer, Director | ||
| Alan Lafley, Independent Director | ||
| Kimberlee Archer, Head Camera | ||
| Elizabeth Jenkins, Independent Director | ||
| Ankit Goyle, Head Marketing | ||
| Derek Andersen, Chief Financial Officer | ||
| David Ometer, Head Relations | ||
| Rebecca Morrow, Chief Accounting Officer, Controller | ||
| Evan Spiegel, Chief Executive Officer, Co-Founder, Director | ||
| Michael OSullivan, General Secretary | ||
| Jake Thomas, Head Emirates | ||
| Jeremi Gorman, Chief Business Officer | ||
| Kenny Mitchell, Chief Marketing Officer | ||
| Eric Young, Senior Engineering | ||
| Derek CFA, Chief Officer | ||
| Fidel Vargas, Independent Director | ||
| Poppy Thorpe, Independent Director | ||
| Julie Henderson, Chief Communications Officer | ||
| Scott Withycombe, Chief Officer | ||
| Kelly Coffey, Independent Director | ||
| Michael JD, General Secretary | ||
| Scott Miller, Independent Director | ||
| Stanley Meresman, Independent Director | ||
| Jerry Hunter, Senior Vice President - Engineering | ||
| Michael Lynton, Independent Chairman of the Board | ||
| Jared Grusd, Chief Strategy Officer |
Snap Stock Performance Indicators
The ability to make a profit is the ultimate goal of any investor. But to identify the right stock is not an easy task. Is Snap a good investment? Although profit is still the single most important financial element of any organization, multiple performance indicators can help investors identify the equity that they will appreciate over time.
| Return On Equity | -0.29 | ||||
| Return On Asset | -0.0564 | ||||
| Profit Margin | (0.13) % | ||||
| Operating Margin | (0.02) % | ||||
| Current Valuation | 19.27 B | ||||
| Shares Outstanding | 1.44 B | ||||
| Shares Owned By Insiders | 24.06 % | ||||
| Shares Owned By Institutions | 59.11 % | ||||
| Number Of Shares Shorted | 62.17 M | ||||
| Price To Earning | (5.04) X |
Pair Trading with Snap
One of the main advantages of trading using pair correlations is that every trade hedges away some risk. Because there are two separate transactions required, even if Snap position performs unexpectedly, the other equity can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Snap will appreciate offsetting losses from the drop in the long position's value.Moving against Snap Stock
The ability to find closely correlated positions to Snap could be a great tool in your tax-loss harvesting strategies, allowing investors a quick way to find a similar-enough asset to replace Snap when you sell it. If you don't do this, your portfolio allocation will be skewed against your target asset allocation. So, investors can't just sell and buy back Snap - that would be a violation of the tax code under the "wash sale" rule, and this is why you need to find a similar enough asset and use the proceeds from selling Snap Inc to buy it.
The correlation of Snap is a statistical measure of how it moves in relation to other instruments. This measure is expressed in what is known as the correlation coefficient, which ranges between -1 and +1. A perfect positive correlation (i.e., a correlation coefficient of +1) implies that as Snap moves, either up or down, the other security will move in the same direction. Alternatively, perfect negative correlation means that if Snap Inc moves in either direction, the perfectly negatively correlated security will move in the opposite direction. If the correlation is 0, the equities are not correlated; they are entirely random. A correlation greater than 0.8 is generally described as strong, whereas a correlation less than 0.5 is generally considered weak.
Correlation analysis and pair trading evaluation for Snap can also be used as hedging techniques within a particular sector or industry or even over random equities to generate a better risk-adjusted return on your portfolios.Additional Tools for Snap Stock Analysis
When running Snap's price analysis, check to measure Snap's market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Snap is operating at the current time. Most of Snap's value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Snap's future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Snap's price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Snap to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.