Byron Deeter - Twilio Independent Director
| TWLO Stock | USD 102.07 3.63 3.69% |
Director
Mr. Byron B. Deeter is Independent Director of the Twilio Inc. Since 2005, Mr. Deeter has served as a member of our board of directors since November 2010. Since 2005, Mr. Deeter has served as a partner of Bessemer Venture Partners, a VC firm. From 2004 to 2005, Mr. Deeter served as a director at International Business Machines Corporationrationration, or IBM, a technology and consulting company. From 2000 to 2004, Mr. Deeter served in several roles at Trigo Technologies, Inc., a product information management company, which was acquired by IBM in 2004, including cofounder, President, Chief Executive Officer and Vice President of Business Development. From 1998 to 2000, Mr. Deeter served as an Associate at TA Associates, a private equity firm. From 1996 to 1998, Mr. Deeter served as an Analyst at McKinsey Company, a business consulting firm. Mr. Deeter previously served on the board of directors of Cornerstone OnDemand, Inc., a talent management software company and Instructure, Inc., an educational technology company since 2010.
| Age | 45 |
| Tenure | 14 years |
| Address | 101 Spear Street, San Francisco, CA, United States, 94105 |
| Phone | 415 390 2337 |
| Web | https://www.twilio.com |
Twilio Management Efficiency
As of the 21st of November 2024, Return On Tangible Assets is likely to drop to -0.18. In addition to that, Return On Capital Employed is likely to drop to -0.08. At this time, Twilio's Other Assets are very stable compared to the past year. As of the 21st of November 2024, Intangible Assets is likely to grow to about 411.2 M, while Return On Tangible Assets are likely to drop (0.18). Twilio's management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well Twilio manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities.Similar Executives
| Showing other executives | DIRECTOR Age | ||
| Scott Miller | Snap Inc | 68 | |
| Elizabeth Jenkins | Snap Inc | 43 | |
| Fredric Reynolds | 70 | ||
| Thomas Staggs | Spotify Technology SA | 60 | |
| Heidi ONeill | Spotify Technology SA | 56 | |
| Padmasree Warrior | Spotify Technology SA | 60 | |
| Lawrence II | Alphabet Inc Class C | 51 | |
| Robert Murphy | Snap Inc | 35 | |
| Andrea Wishom | 50 | ||
| Poppy Thorpe | Snap Inc | 36 | |
| Stanley Meresman | Snap Inc | 74 | |
| Christopher Marshall | Spotify Technology SA | 52 | |
| Mona Sutphen | Spotify Technology SA | 54 | |
| Lawrence II | Alphabet Inc Class A | 51 | |
| Leslie Kilgore | 54 | ||
| Michelle Wilson | 57 | ||
| Shishir Mehrotra | Spotify Technology SA | 41 | |
| Jeremy Levine | 46 | ||
| Alan Lafley | Snap Inc | 72 | |
| Martin Lorentzon | Spotify Technology SA | 52 | |
| Jeffrey Jordan | 61 | ||
Management Performance
| Return On Equity | -0.0508 | ||||
| Return On Asset | -0.0059 |
Twilio Inc Leadership Team
Elected by the shareholders, the Twilio's board of directors comprises two types of representatives: Twilio inside directors who are chosen from within the company, and outside directors, selected externally and held independent of Twilio. The board's role is to monitor Twilio's management team and ensure that shareholders' interests are well served. Twilio's inside directors are responsible for reviewing and approving budgets prepared by upper management to implement core corporate initiatives and projects. On the other hand, Twilio's outside directors are responsible for providing unbiased perspectives on the board's policies.
| Donna Dubinsky, Independent Director | ||
| Andrew Zilli, Vice Relations | ||
| Chris Koehler, Chief Officer | ||
| Erika Rottenberg, Independent Director | ||
| Inbal Shani, Twilio Officer | ||
| Mark Simms, Chief Officer | ||
| Erin Reilly, Chief Officer | ||
| Deval Patrick, Independent Director | ||
| Steve Pugh, Chief Security Officer | ||
| Chris Nasson, Manager Treasury | ||
| Jeffrey Immelt, Independent Director | ||
| Christy Lake, Chief Officer | ||
| Reeny Sondhi, Chief Officer | ||
| Karyn Smith, General Counsel, Corporate Secretary | ||
| Glenn Weinstein, Chief Customer Officer | ||
| Dana Wagner, Chief Officer | ||
| Eyal Manor, Chief Officer | ||
| Jeff Epstein, Lead independent Director | ||
| Jeff Lawson, Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer, Co-Founder | ||
| Dana JD, Chief Officer | ||
| Chee Chew, Chief Product Officer | ||
| Amy Holcroft, Chief Officer | ||
| John Wolthuis, Co-Founder, Board Observer | ||
| George Hu, Chief Operating Officer | ||
| Thomas Wyatt, President Segment | ||
| Aidan Viggiano, Chief Officer | ||
| Joyce Kim, Chief Officer | ||
| Elena Donio, Independent Director | ||
| Ivy Grant, SVP Operations | ||
| Byron Deeter, Independent Director | ||
| Khozema Shipchandler, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Operating Officer | ||
| Jeffrey Lawson, Chairman CoFounder | ||
| Richard Dalzell, Independent Director |
Twilio Stock Performance Indicators
The ability to make a profit is the ultimate goal of any investor. But to identify the right stock is not an easy task. Is Twilio a good investment? Although profit is still the single most important financial element of any organization, multiple performance indicators can help investors identify the equity that they will appreciate over time.
| Return On Equity | -0.0508 | ||||
| Return On Asset | -0.0059 | ||||
| Profit Margin | (0.11) % | ||||
| Operating Margin | (0) % | ||||
| Current Valuation | 13.53 B | ||||
| Shares Outstanding | 153.38 M | ||||
| Shares Owned By Insiders | 5.62 % | ||||
| Shares Owned By Institutions | 80.90 % | ||||
| Number Of Shares Shorted | 2.91 M | ||||
| Price To Earning | (62.00) X |
Pair Trading with Twilio
One of the main advantages of trading using pair correlations is that every trade hedges away some risk. Because there are two separate transactions required, even if Twilio position performs unexpectedly, the other equity can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Twilio will appreciate offsetting losses from the drop in the long position's value.Moving together with Twilio Stock
Moving against Twilio Stock
| 0.91 | VHAI | VHAI | PairCorr |
| 0.71 | VRAR | Glimpse Group | PairCorr |
| 0.68 | MQ | Marqeta | PairCorr |
| 0.58 | FAAS | DigiAsia Corp Symbol Change | PairCorr |
| 0.47 | VRNS | Varonis Systems | PairCorr |
The ability to find closely correlated positions to Twilio could be a great tool in your tax-loss harvesting strategies, allowing investors a quick way to find a similar-enough asset to replace Twilio when you sell it. If you don't do this, your portfolio allocation will be skewed against your target asset allocation. So, investors can't just sell and buy back Twilio - that would be a violation of the tax code under the "wash sale" rule, and this is why you need to find a similar enough asset and use the proceeds from selling Twilio Inc to buy it.
The correlation of Twilio is a statistical measure of how it moves in relation to other instruments. This measure is expressed in what is known as the correlation coefficient, which ranges between -1 and +1. A perfect positive correlation (i.e., a correlation coefficient of +1) implies that as Twilio moves, either up or down, the other security will move in the same direction. Alternatively, perfect negative correlation means that if Twilio Inc moves in either direction, the perfectly negatively correlated security will move in the opposite direction. If the correlation is 0, the equities are not correlated; they are entirely random. A correlation greater than 0.8 is generally described as strong, whereas a correlation less than 0.5 is generally considered weak.
Correlation analysis and pair trading evaluation for Twilio can also be used as hedging techniques within a particular sector or industry or even over random equities to generate a better risk-adjusted return on your portfolios.Check out World Market Map to better understand how to build diversified portfolios, which includes a position in Twilio Inc. Also, note that the market value of any company could be closely tied with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in bureau of economic analysis. You can also try the USA ETFs module to find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) in USA.
Is Internet Services & Infrastructure space expected to grow? Or is there an opportunity to expand the business' product line in the future? Factors like these will boost the valuation of Twilio. If investors know Twilio will grow in the future, the company's valuation will be higher. The financial industry is built on trying to define current growth potential and future valuation accurately. All the valuation information about Twilio listed above have to be considered, but the key to understanding future value is determining which factors weigh more heavily than others.
Earnings Share (2.57) | Revenue Per Share 25.084 | Quarterly Revenue Growth 0.097 | Return On Assets (0.01) | Return On Equity (0.05) |
The market value of Twilio Inc is measured differently than its book value, which is the value of Twilio that is recorded on the company's balance sheet. Investors also form their own opinion of Twilio's value that differs from its market value or its book value, called intrinsic value, which is Twilio's true underlying value. Investors use various methods to calculate intrinsic value and buy a stock when its market value falls below its intrinsic value. Because Twilio's market value can be influenced by many factors that don't directly affect Twilio's underlying business (such as a pandemic or basic market pessimism), market value can vary widely from intrinsic value.
Please note, there is a significant difference between Twilio's value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if Twilio is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, Twilio's price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.