Correlation Between Retail Estates and Litigation Capital

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Retail Estates and Litigation Capital at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Retail Estates and Litigation Capital into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Retail Estates NV and Litigation Capital Management, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Retail Estates and Litigation Capital and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Retail Estates with a short position of Litigation Capital. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Retail Estates and Litigation Capital.

Diversification Opportunities for Retail Estates and Litigation Capital

-0.32
  Correlation Coefficient

Very good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Retail and Litigation is -0.32. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Retail Estates NV and Litigation Capital Management in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Litigation Capital and Retail Estates is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Retail Estates NV are associated (or correlated) with Litigation Capital. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Litigation Capital has no effect on the direction of Retail Estates i.e., Retail Estates and Litigation Capital go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Retail Estates and Litigation Capital

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Retail Estates is expected to generate 1.98 times less return on investment than Litigation Capital. In addition to that, Retail Estates is 2.33 times more volatile than Litigation Capital Management. It trades about 0.03 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. Litigation Capital Management is currently generating about 0.13 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  10,073  in Litigation Capital Management on August 25, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  1,502  from holding Litigation Capital Management or generate 14.91% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Retail Estates NV  vs.  Litigation Capital Management

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Retail Estates NV 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

1 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Weak
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Retail Estates NV are ranked lower than 1 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively uncertain basic indicators, Retail Estates may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in December 2024.
Litigation Capital 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

6 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Modest
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Litigation Capital Management are ranked lower than 6 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of rather unsteady technical and fundamental indicators, Litigation Capital exhibited solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Retail Estates and Litigation Capital Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Retail Estates and Litigation Capital

The main advantage of trading using opposite Retail Estates and Litigation Capital positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Retail Estates position performs unexpectedly, Litigation Capital can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Litigation Capital will offset losses from the drop in Litigation Capital's long position.
The idea behind Retail Estates NV and Litigation Capital Management pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Insider Screener module to find insiders across different sectors to evaluate their impact on performance.

Other Complementary Tools

Portfolio Comparator
Compare the composition, asset allocations and performance of any two portfolios in your account
Volatility Analysis
Get historical volatility and risk analysis based on latest market data
Top Crypto Exchanges
Search and analyze digital assets across top global cryptocurrency exchanges
Portfolio Holdings
Check your current holdings and cash postion to detemine if your portfolio needs rebalancing
Equity Valuation
Check real value of public entities based on technical and fundamental data