Correlation Between Catalyst Media and Litigation Capital

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Catalyst Media and Litigation Capital at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Catalyst Media and Litigation Capital into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Catalyst Media Group and Litigation Capital Management, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Catalyst Media and Litigation Capital and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Catalyst Media with a short position of Litigation Capital. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Catalyst Media and Litigation Capital.

Diversification Opportunities for Catalyst Media and Litigation Capital

0.86
  Correlation Coefficient

Very poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Catalyst and Litigation is 0.86. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Catalyst Media Group and Litigation Capital Management in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Litigation Capital and Catalyst Media is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Catalyst Media Group are associated (or correlated) with Litigation Capital. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Litigation Capital has no effect on the direction of Catalyst Media i.e., Catalyst Media and Litigation Capital go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Catalyst Media and Litigation Capital

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Catalyst Media is expected to generate 2.1 times less return on investment than Litigation Capital. In addition to that, Catalyst Media is 2.71 times more volatile than Litigation Capital Management. It trades about 0.04 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. Litigation Capital Management is currently generating about 0.23 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  11,075  in Litigation Capital Management on August 25, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  500.00  from holding Litigation Capital Management or generate 4.51% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthStrong
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Catalyst Media Group  vs.  Litigation Capital Management

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Catalyst Media Group 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

10 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Catalyst Media Group are ranked lower than 10 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of rather unsteady technical and fundamental indicators, Catalyst Media exhibited solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Litigation Capital 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

6 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Modest
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Litigation Capital Management are ranked lower than 6 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of rather unsteady technical and fundamental indicators, Litigation Capital exhibited solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Catalyst Media and Litigation Capital Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Catalyst Media and Litigation Capital

The main advantage of trading using opposite Catalyst Media and Litigation Capital positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Catalyst Media position performs unexpectedly, Litigation Capital can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Litigation Capital will offset losses from the drop in Litigation Capital's long position.
The idea behind Catalyst Media Group and Litigation Capital Management pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Bond Analysis module to evaluate and analyze corporate bonds as a potential investment for your portfolios..

Other Complementary Tools

Portfolio Suggestion
Get suggestions outside of your existing asset allocation including your own model portfolios
Volatility Analysis
Get historical volatility and risk analysis based on latest market data
Earnings Calls
Check upcoming earnings announcements updated hourly across public exchanges
Portfolio File Import
Quickly import all of your third-party portfolios from your local drive in csv format
Transaction History
View history of all your transactions and understand their impact on performance