Correlation Between Lootom Telcovideo and Xingguang Agricultural

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Lootom Telcovideo and Xingguang Agricultural at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Lootom Telcovideo and Xingguang Agricultural into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Lootom Telcovideo Network and Xingguang Agricultural Mach, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Lootom Telcovideo and Xingguang Agricultural and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Lootom Telcovideo with a short position of Xingguang Agricultural. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Lootom Telcovideo and Xingguang Agricultural.

Diversification Opportunities for Lootom Telcovideo and Xingguang Agricultural

0.41
  Correlation Coefficient

Very weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between Lootom and Xingguang is 0.41. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Lootom Telcovideo Network and Xingguang Agricultural Mach in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Xingguang Agricultural and Lootom Telcovideo is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Lootom Telcovideo Network are associated (or correlated) with Xingguang Agricultural. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Xingguang Agricultural has no effect on the direction of Lootom Telcovideo i.e., Lootom Telcovideo and Xingguang Agricultural go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Lootom Telcovideo and Xingguang Agricultural

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Lootom Telcovideo Network is expected to generate 1.01 times more return on investment than Xingguang Agricultural. However, Lootom Telcovideo is 1.01 times more volatile than Xingguang Agricultural Mach. It trades about 0.13 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Xingguang Agricultural Mach is currently generating about -0.29 per unit of risk. If you would invest  809.00  in Lootom Telcovideo Network on October 22, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  62.00  from holding Lootom Telcovideo Network or generate 7.66% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthWeak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Lootom Telcovideo Network  vs.  Xingguang Agricultural Mach

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Lootom Telcovideo Network 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

5 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Modest
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Lootom Telcovideo Network are ranked lower than 5 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite somewhat weak basic indicators, Lootom Telcovideo sustained solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Xingguang Agricultural 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Xingguang Agricultural Mach has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite somewhat strong basic indicators, Xingguang Agricultural is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Lootom Telcovideo and Xingguang Agricultural Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Lootom Telcovideo and Xingguang Agricultural

The main advantage of trading using opposite Lootom Telcovideo and Xingguang Agricultural positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Lootom Telcovideo position performs unexpectedly, Xingguang Agricultural can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Xingguang Agricultural will offset losses from the drop in Xingguang Agricultural's long position.
The idea behind Lootom Telcovideo Network and Xingguang Agricultural Mach pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Theme Ratings module to determine theme ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis theme ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance.

Other Complementary Tools

AI Portfolio Architect
Use AI to generate optimal portfolios and find profitable investment opportunities
Portfolio Volatility
Check portfolio volatility and analyze historical return density to properly model market risk
Headlines Timeline
Stay connected to all market stories and filter out noise. Drill down to analyze hype elasticity
Portfolio Holdings
Check your current holdings and cash postion to detemine if your portfolio needs rebalancing
Odds Of Bankruptcy
Get analysis of equity chance of financial distress in the next 2 years