Correlation Between Harvest Fund and Peoples Insurance

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Harvest Fund and Peoples Insurance at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Harvest Fund and Peoples Insurance into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Harvest Fund Management and Peoples Insurance of, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Harvest Fund and Peoples Insurance and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Harvest Fund with a short position of Peoples Insurance. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Harvest Fund and Peoples Insurance.

Diversification Opportunities for Harvest Fund and Peoples Insurance

0.29
  Correlation Coefficient

Modest diversification

The 3 months correlation between Harvest and Peoples is 0.29. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Harvest Fund Management and Peoples Insurance of in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Peoples Insurance and Harvest Fund is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Harvest Fund Management are associated (or correlated) with Peoples Insurance. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Peoples Insurance has no effect on the direction of Harvest Fund i.e., Harvest Fund and Peoples Insurance go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Harvest Fund and Peoples Insurance

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Harvest Fund Management is expected to under-perform the Peoples Insurance. But the stock apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, Harvest Fund Management is 1.39 times less risky than Peoples Insurance. The stock trades about -0.04 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The Peoples Insurance of is currently generating about 0.06 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  515.00  in Peoples Insurance of on September 28, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  252.00  from holding Peoples Insurance of or generate 48.93% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy96.44%
ValuesDaily Returns

Harvest Fund Management  vs.  Peoples Insurance of

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Harvest Fund Management 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

8 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Harvest Fund Management are ranked lower than 8 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite somewhat strong basic indicators, Harvest Fund is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Peoples Insurance 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

2 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Weak
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Peoples Insurance of are ranked lower than 2 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite somewhat strong basic indicators, Peoples Insurance is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Harvest Fund and Peoples Insurance Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Harvest Fund and Peoples Insurance

The main advantage of trading using opposite Harvest Fund and Peoples Insurance positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Harvest Fund position performs unexpectedly, Peoples Insurance can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Peoples Insurance will offset losses from the drop in Peoples Insurance's long position.
The idea behind Harvest Fund Management and Peoples Insurance of pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Risk-Return Analysis module to view associations between returns expected from investment and the risk you assume.

Other Complementary Tools

Global Correlations
Find global opportunities by holding instruments from different markets
Portfolio Anywhere
Track or share privately all of your investments from the convenience of any device
Companies Directory
Evaluate performance of over 100,000 Stocks, Funds, and ETFs against different fundamentals
Content Syndication
Quickly integrate customizable finance content to your own investment portal
Price Ceiling Movement
Calculate and plot Price Ceiling Movement for different equity instruments