Correlation Between Chongqing Road and Thinkingdom Media

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Chongqing Road and Thinkingdom Media at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Chongqing Road and Thinkingdom Media into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Chongqing Road Bridge and Thinkingdom Media Group, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Chongqing Road and Thinkingdom Media and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Chongqing Road with a short position of Thinkingdom Media. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Chongqing Road and Thinkingdom Media.

Diversification Opportunities for Chongqing Road and Thinkingdom Media

0.81
  Correlation Coefficient

Very poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Chongqing and Thinkingdom is 0.81. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Chongqing Road Bridge and Thinkingdom Media Group in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Thinkingdom Media and Chongqing Road is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Chongqing Road Bridge are associated (or correlated) with Thinkingdom Media. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Thinkingdom Media has no effect on the direction of Chongqing Road i.e., Chongqing Road and Thinkingdom Media go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Chongqing Road and Thinkingdom Media

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Chongqing Road Bridge is expected to generate 1.31 times more return on investment than Thinkingdom Media. However, Chongqing Road is 1.31 times more volatile than Thinkingdom Media Group. It trades about 0.12 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Thinkingdom Media Group is currently generating about 0.13 per unit of risk. If you would invest  559.00  in Chongqing Road Bridge on September 3, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  109.00  from holding Chongqing Road Bridge or generate 19.5% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthStrong
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Chongqing Road Bridge  vs.  Thinkingdom Media Group

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Chongqing Road Bridge 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

20 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Solid
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Chongqing Road Bridge are ranked lower than 20 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite somewhat weak basic indicators, Chongqing Road sustained solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Thinkingdom Media 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

17 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Solid
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Thinkingdom Media Group are ranked lower than 17 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite somewhat weak basic indicators, Thinkingdom Media sustained solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Chongqing Road and Thinkingdom Media Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Chongqing Road and Thinkingdom Media

The main advantage of trading using opposite Chongqing Road and Thinkingdom Media positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Chongqing Road position performs unexpectedly, Thinkingdom Media can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Thinkingdom Media will offset losses from the drop in Thinkingdom Media's long position.
The idea behind Chongqing Road Bridge and Thinkingdom Media Group pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Instant Ratings module to determine any equity ratings based on digital recommendations. Macroaxis instant equity ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance.

Other Complementary Tools

Options Analysis
Analyze and evaluate options and option chains as a potential hedge for your portfolios
Volatility Analysis
Get historical volatility and risk analysis based on latest market data
Efficient Frontier
Plot and analyze your portfolio and positions against risk-return landscape of the market.
Portfolio Volatility
Check portfolio volatility and analyze historical return density to properly model market risk
Aroon Oscillator
Analyze current equity momentum using Aroon Oscillator and other momentum ratios