Correlation Between Strategic Allocation and Green Century

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Strategic Allocation and Green Century at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Strategic Allocation and Green Century into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Strategic Allocation Servative and Green Century Equity, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Strategic Allocation and Green Century and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Strategic Allocation with a short position of Green Century. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Strategic Allocation and Green Century.

Diversification Opportunities for Strategic Allocation and Green Century

0.74
  Correlation Coefficient

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Strategic and Green is 0.74. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Strategic Allocation Servative and Green Century Equity in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Green Century Equity and Strategic Allocation is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Strategic Allocation Servative are associated (or correlated) with Green Century. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Green Century Equity has no effect on the direction of Strategic Allocation i.e., Strategic Allocation and Green Century go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Strategic Allocation and Green Century

Assuming the 90 days horizon Strategic Allocation is expected to generate 1.81 times less return on investment than Green Century. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Strategic Allocation Servative is 2.53 times less risky than Green Century. It trades about 0.15 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Green Century Equity is currently generating about 0.1 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  8,342  in Green Century Equity on September 1, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  1,075  from holding Green Century Equity or generate 12.89% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthSignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Strategic Allocation Servative  vs.  Green Century Equity

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Strategic Allocation 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

12 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Strategic Allocation Servative are ranked lower than 12 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong fundamental indicators, Strategic Allocation is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Green Century Equity 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

15 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Green Century Equity are ranked lower than 15 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly weak basic indicators, Green Century may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in December 2024.

Strategic Allocation and Green Century Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Strategic Allocation and Green Century

The main advantage of trading using opposite Strategic Allocation and Green Century positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Strategic Allocation position performs unexpectedly, Green Century can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Green Century will offset losses from the drop in Green Century's long position.
The idea behind Strategic Allocation Servative and Green Century Equity pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Commodity Directory module to find actively traded commodities issued by global exchanges.

Other Complementary Tools

Portfolio Suggestion
Get suggestions outside of your existing asset allocation including your own model portfolios
Fundamentals Comparison
Compare fundamentals across multiple equities to find investing opportunities
Content Syndication
Quickly integrate customizable finance content to your own investment portal
Money Flow Index
Determine momentum by analyzing Money Flow Index and other technical indicators
Global Markets Map
Get a quick overview of global market snapshot using zoomable world map. Drill down to check world indexes